1
|
Koprivec D, Belanger C, Beaulieu L, Chatigny PY, Rosenfeld A, Cutajar D, Petasecca M, Howie A, Bucci J, Poder J. Impact of robust optimization on patient specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy source tracking. Brachytherapy 2025; 24:281-292. [PMID: 39690005 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 10/12/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of catheter shift errors and determine patient specific error thresholds (PSETs) for different high dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT) plans generated by different forms of inverse optimization. METHODS Three plans were generated for 50 HDRPBT patients and PSETs were determined for each of the 3 plans. Plan 1 was the original Oncentra Prostate (v4.2.2.4, Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) plan, the second plan used the graphical processor unit multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm, and plan 3 used gMCO but had a robustness parameter as an additional optimization criterion (gMCOr). gMCO and gMCOr plans were selected from a pool of 2000 pareto optimal plans. gMCO plan selection involved increasing prostate V100% and reducing rectum Dmax/urethra D01.cc progressively until only 1 plan remained. The gMCOr plan was the most robust plan (using robustness parameter) that met the clinical DVH criteria (V100% ≥ 95%, rectum Dmax ≤ 80%, urethra D0.1cc ≤ 118%). PSETs were determined using catheter shift software. RESULTS The initial dose volume histogram (DVH) characteristics showed all 50 patient plans met a prostate V100% > 95% and resulted in significant reduction in rectum Dmax and urethra D0.1cc for gMCO and gMCOr plans. No single plan showed benefits in PSETs for all shift directions compared to the other plans, however gMCO and gMCOr plans exhibit the best initial DVH characteristics assuming no errors occur. The robustness parameter showed no significant impact when considered in plan optimization. CONCLUSIONS PSETs were found to be equivalent regardless of optimization method. Indicating, no single optimization method can significantly increase the patient specific thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Koprivec
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Cedric Belanger
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada
| | - Philippe Y Chatigny
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec city, Québec, Canada
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dean Cutajar
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Howie
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joseph Bucci
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joel Poder
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia; School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Georgi PD, Jørgensen EB, Heidotting M, Tanderup K, Kertzscher G, Johansen JG. A simple calibration routine for small inorganic scintillation detectors for in vivo dosimetry during brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:514-522. [PMID: 38853063 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is rarely performed in brachytherapy (BT), allowing potential dose misadministration to go unnoticed. This study presents a clinical routine-calibration method of detectors for IVD in high (HDR) and pulsed dose rate (PDR) Ir-192 BT. PURPOSE To evaluate the dosimetric precision and feasibility of an in-clinic calibration routine of detectors for IVD in afterloading BT. METHODS Calibrations were performed in a PMMA phantom with two needles inserted 20 mm apart. The source was loaded in one of the needles at 15 dwells for 10 s. The detector was placed in the other needle, and its signal was recorded. The mean signal at each dwell position was fitted to the expected dose rate with the calibration factor and the detector's longitudinal position being free parameters. The method was tested with an inorganic scintillation detector using one Ir-192 FlexiSource HDR and two Ir-192 GammaMedPlus PDR sources and followed by validation measurements in water. RESULTS The standard measurement uncertainty (k = 1) of the calibration factor in absolute terms (Gy/s) was 3.2/3.4% for the HDR/PDR source. The uncertainty was dominated by source strength uncertainty, and the precision of the method was <1%. The mean ± 1SD of the difference in measured and expected dose rate during validation was 1.5 ± 4.7% (HDR) and 0.0 ± 4.1% (PDR) with a positional uncertainty in the setup of 0.33/0.23 mm (HDR/PDR) (k = 1). CONCLUSION A precise and feasible in-clinic calibration method for IVD and source strength consistency tests in BT was presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Georgi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Erik B Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jacob G Johansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Georgi P, Tedgren ÅC, Persson L, Johansen JG. Determination of intrinsic energy dependence of point-like inorganic scintillation detector in brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:5059-5069. [PMID: 38197459 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inorganic scintillation detectors (ISDs) are promising for in vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy (BT). ISDs have fast response, providing time resolved dose rate information, and high sensitivity, attributed to high atomic numbers. However, the conversion of the detector signal to absorbed dose-to-water is highly dependent on the energy spectrum of the incident radiation. This dependence is comprised of absorbed dose energy dependence, obtainable with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, and the absorbed dose-to-signal conversion efficiency or intrinsic energy dependence requiring measurements. Studies have indicated negligible intrinsic energy dependence of ZnSe:O-based ISDs in Ir-192 BT. A full characterization has not been performed earlier. PURPOSE This study characterizes the intrinsic energy dependence of ZnSe:O-based ISDs for kV X-ray radiation qualities, with energies relevant for BT. METHODS Three point-like ISDs made from fiber-coupled cuboid ZnSe:O-based scintillators were calibrated at the Swedish National Metrology Laboratory for ionizing radiation. The calibration was done in terms of air kerma free-in-air,K air ${K}_{{\mathrm{air}}}$ , in 13 X-ray radiation qualities, Q $Q$ , from 25 to 300 kVp (CCRI 25-250 kV and ISO 4037 N-series), and in terms of absorbed dose to water,D w ${D}_{\mathrm{w}}$ , in a Co-60 beam,Q 0 ${Q}_0$ . The mean absorbed dose to the ISDs, relative toK air ${K}_{{\mathrm{air}}}$ andD w ${D}_{\mathrm{w}}$ , were obtained with the MC code TOPAS (Geant4) using X-ray spectra obtained with SpekPy software and laboratory filtration data and a generic Co-60 source. The intrinsic energy dependence was determined as a function of effective photon energy,E e f f ${E}_{eff}$ , (relative to Co-60). The angular dependence of the ISD signal was measured in a 25 kVp (0.20 mm Al HVL) and 135 kVp beam (0.48 mm Cu HVL), by rotating the ISDs 180° around the fiber's longitudinal axis (perpendicular to the beam). A full 360° was not performed due to setup limitations. The impact of detector design was quantified with MC simulation. RESULTS Above 30 keVE e f f ${E}_{eff}$ the intrinsic energy dependence varied with less than 5 ± 4% from unity for all detectors (with the uncertainty expressed as the mean of all expanded measurement uncertainties for individualE e f f ${E}_{eff}$ above 30 keV, k = 2). Below 30 keV, it decreased with up to 17% and inter-detector variations of 13% were observed, likely due to differences in detector geometry not captured by the simulations using nominal geometry. In the 25 kVp radiation quality, the ISD signal varied with 24% over a ∼45° rotation. For 135 kVp, the corresponding variation was below 3%. Assuming a 0.05 mm thicker layer of reflective paint around the sensitive volume changed the absorbed dose with 6.3% at the lowestE e f f ${E}_{eff}$ , and with less than 2% at higher energies. CONCLUSION The study suggests that the ISDs have an intrinsic energy dependence relative to Co-60 lower than 5 ± 4% in radiation qualities withE e f f ${E}_{eff}\ $ > 30 keV. Therefore, they could in principle be calibrated in a Co-60 beam quality and transferred to such radiation qualities with correction factors determined only by the absorbed dose energy dependence obtained from MC simulations. This encourages exploration of the ISDs' applications in intensity modulated BT with Yb-169 or other novel intermediate energy isotopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Georgi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Department of Medicine, Health, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda Persson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- National Regulation Department, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacob Graversen Johansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tho D, Bélanger C, Jørgensen EB, Tanguay J, Rosales HML, Beddar S, Johansen JG, Kertzscher G, Lavallée MC, Beaulieu L. Establishing a fingerprinting method for fast catheter identification in HDR brachytherapy in vivo dosimetry. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:165-172. [PMID: 38281894 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To use quantities measurable during in vivo dosimetry to build unique channel identifiers, that enable detection of brachytherapy errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plan of 360 patients with prostate cancer who underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy (range, 16-25 catheters; mean, 17) were used. A single point virtual dosimeter was placed at multiple positions within the treatment geometry, and the source-dosimeter distance and dwell time were determined for each dwell position in each catheter. These values were compared across all catheters, dwell position by dwell position, simulating a treatment delivery. A catheter was considered uniquely identified if, for a given dwell position, no other catheters had the same measured values. The minimum number of dwell positions needed to identify a specific catheter and the optimal dosimeter location uniquely were determined. The radial (r) and vertical (z) dimensions of the source-dosimeter distance were also examined for their utility in discriminating catheters. RESULTS Using a virtual dosimeter with no uncertainties, all catheters were identified in 359 of the 360 cases with 9 dwell position measurements. When only the dwell time were measured, all catheters were uniquely identified after 1 dwell position. With a 2-mm spatial accuracy (r,z), all catheters were identified in 94% of the plans. Simultaneous measurement of source-dosimeter distance and dwell time ensured full catheter identification in all plans ranging from 2 to 6 dwell positions. The number of dwell positions needed to uniquely identify all catheters was lower when the distance from the implant center was higher. CONCLUSIONS The most efficient fingerprinting approach involved combining source-dosimeter distance (i.e., source tracking) and dwell time. The further the dosimeter is placed from the center of the implant the better it can uniquely identify catheters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daline Tho
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada.
| | - Cédric Bélanger
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada
| | - Erik B Jørgensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jérémie Tanguay
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada
| | - Haydee M L Rosales
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jacob G Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Marie-Claude Lavallée
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Centre Intégré De Cancérologie, CHU De Québec, Université Laval, Centre De Recherche Chu De Québec, Québec, Canada; Département De Physique, De Génie Physique Et D'optique, Centre De Recherche Sur Le Cancer, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koprivec D, Belanger C, Beaulieu L, Chatigny PY, Rosenfeld A, Cutajar D, Petasecca M, Howie A, Bucci J, Poder J. Development of patient and catheter specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:2144-2154. [PMID: 38308854 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In-vivo source tracking has been an active topic of research in the field of high-dose rate brachytherapy in recent years to verify accuracy in treatment delivery. Although detection systems for source tracking are being developed, the allowable threshold of treatment error is still unknown and is likely patient-specific due to anatomy and planning variation. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine patient and catheter-specific shift error thresholds for in-vivo source tracking during high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT). METHODS A module was developed in the previously described graphical processor unit multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm. The module generates systematic catheter shift errors retrospectively into HDRPBT treatment plans, performed on 50 patients. The catheter shift model iterates through the number of catheters shifted in the plan (from 1 to all catheters), the direction of shift (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, cranial, and caudal), and the magnitude of catheter shift (1-6 mm). For each combination of these parameters, 200 error plans were generated, randomly selecting the catheters in the plan to shift. After shifts were applied, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were re-calculated. Catheter shift thresholds were then derived based on plans where DVH parameters were clinically unacceptable (prostate V100 < 95%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectum Dmax > 80%). Catheter thresholds were also Pearson correlated to catheter robustness values. RESULTS Patient-specific thresholds varied between 1 to 6 mm for all organs, in all shift directions. Overall, patient-specific thresholds typically decrease with an increasing number of catheters shifted. Anterior and inferior directions were less sensitive than other directions. Pearson's correlation test showed a strong correlation between catheter robustness and catheter thresholds for the rectum and urethra, with correlation values of -0.81 and -0.74, respectively (p < 0.01), but no correlation was found for the prostate. CONCLUSIONS It was possible to determine thresholds for each patient, with thresholds showing dependence on shift direction, and number of catheters shifted. Not every catheter combination is explorable, however, this study shows the feasibility to determine patient-specific thresholds for clinical application. The correlation of patient-specific thresholds with the equivalent robustness value indicated the need for robustness consideration during plan optimization and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Koprivec
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Cedric Belanger
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Philippe Y Chatigny
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer de l'Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada
- Département de radio-oncologie et Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Dean Cutajar
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Andrew Howie
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joseph Bucci
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joel Poder
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caccia M, Giaz A, Galoppo M, Santoro R, Martyn M, Bianchi C, Novario R, Woulfe P, O’Keeffe S. Characterisation of a Silicon Photomultiplier Based Oncological Brachytherapy Fibre Dosimeter. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:910. [PMID: 38339627 PMCID: PMC10856931 DOI: 10.3390/s24030910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Source localisation and real-time dose verification are at the forefront of medical research in brachytherapy, an oncological radiotherapy procedure based on radioactive sources implanted in the patient body. The ORIGIN project aims to respond to this medical community's need by targeting the development of a multi-point dose mapping system based on fibre sensors integrating a small volume of scintillating material into the tip and interfaced with silicon photomultipliers operated in counting mode. In this paper, a novel method for the selection of the optimal silicon photomultipliers to be used is presented, as well as a laboratory characterisation based on dosimetric figures of merit. More specifically, a technique exploiting the optical cross-talk to maintain the detector linearity in high-rate conditions is demonstrated. Lastly, it is shown that the ORIGIN system complies with the TG43-U1 protocol in high and low dose rate pre-clinical trials with actual brachytherapy sources, an essential requirement for assessing the proposed system as a dosimeter and comparing the performance of the system prototype against the ORIGIN project specifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Caccia
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy; (A.G.); (M.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Agnese Giaz
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy; (A.G.); (M.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Marco Galoppo
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy; (A.G.); (M.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Romualdo Santoro
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy; (A.G.); (M.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Micheal Martyn
- Radiotherapy Department, Galway Clinic, Doughiska Road, H91 HHT0 Galway, Ireland;
| | - Carla Bianchi
- Ospedale di Circolo di Varese, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Viale Borri, 57, 21100 Varese, Italy; (C.B.); (R.N.); (P.W.)
| | - Raffaele Novario
- Ospedale di Circolo di Varese, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Viale Borri, 57, 21100 Varese, Italy; (C.B.); (R.N.); (P.W.)
| | - Peter Woulfe
- Ospedale di Circolo di Varese, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Viale Borri, 57, 21100 Varese, Italy; (C.B.); (R.N.); (P.W.)
| | - Sinead O’Keeffe
- Optical Fibre Sensors Research Centre, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gonod M, Suarez MA, Avila CC, Karakhanyan V, Eustache C, Laskri S, Crouzilles J, Vinchant JF, Aubignac L, Grosjean T. Six-probe scintillator dosimeter for treatment verification in HDR-brachytherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:7192-7202. [PMID: 37738612 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is gaining interest for treatment delivery verification in HDR-brachytherapy. Time resolved methods, including source tracking, have the ability both to detect treatment errors in real time and to minimize experimental uncertainties. Multiprobe IVD architectures holds promise for simultaneous dose determinations at the targeted tumor and surrounding healthy tissues while enhancing measurement accuracy. However, most of the multiprobe dosimeters developed so far either suffer from compactness issues or rely on complex data post-treatment. PURPOSE We introduce a novel concept of a compact multiprobe scintillator detector and demonstrate its applicability in HDR-brachytherapy. Our fabricated seven-fiber probing system is sufficiently narrow to be inserted in a brachytherapy needle or in a catheter. METHODS Our multiprobe detection system results from the parallel implementation of six miniaturized inorganic Gd2 O2 S:Tb scintillator detectors at the end of a bundle of seven fibers, one fiber is kept bare to assess the stem effect. The resulting system, which is narrower than 320 microns, is tested with a MicroSelectron 9.14 Ci Ir-192 HDR afterloader, in a water phantom. The detection signals from all six probes are simultaneously read with a sCMOS camera (at a rate of 0.06 s). The camera is coupled to a chromatic filter to cancel Cerenkov signal induced within the fibers upon exposure. By implementing an aperiodic array of six scintillating cells along the bundle axis, we first determine the range of inter-probe spacings leading to optimal source tracking accuracy (first tracking method). Then, three different source tracking algorithms involving all the scintillating probes are tested and compared. In each of these four methods, dwell positions are assessed from dose measurements and compared to the treatment plan. Dwell time is also determined and compared to the treatment plan. RESULTS The optimum inter-probe spacing for an accurate source tracking ranges from 15 to 35 mm. The optimum detection algorithm consists of adding the readout signals from all detector probes. In that case, the error to the planned dwell positions is of 0.01 ± 0.14 mm and 0.02 ± 0.29 mm at spacings between the source and detector axes of 5.5 and 40 mm, respectively. Using this approach, the average deviations to the expected dwell time are of- 0.006 ± 0.009 $-0.006\,\pm \,0.009$ s and- 0.008 ± 0.058 $-0.008\, \pm 0.058$ s, at spacings between source and probe axes of 5.5 and 20 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our six-probe Gd2 O2 S:Tb dosimeter coupled to a sCMOS camera can perform time-resolved treatment verification in HDR brachytherapy. This detection system of high spatial and temporal resolutions (0.25 mm and 0.06 s, respectively) provides a precise information on the treatment delivery via a dwell time and position verification of unmatched accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gonod
- Medical Physics Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL), Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Vage Karakhanyan
- FEMTO-ST Institute, CNRS, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Clément Eustache
- FEMTO-ST Institute, CNRS, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Samir Laskri
- SEDI-ATI Fibres Optiques, Évry-Courcouronnes, France
| | | | | | - Léone Aubignac
- Medical Physics Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL), Dijon, France
| | - Thierry Grosjean
- FEMTO-ST Institute, CNRS, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Optimization of the energy window setting in Ir-192 source imaging for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using a YAP(Ce) gamma camera. Phys Med 2022; 103:66-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
9
|
Koprivec D, Rosenfeld A, Cutajar D, Petasecca M, Howie A, Bucci J, Poder J. Feasibility of online adaptive HDR prostate brachytherapy: A novel treatment concept. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:943-955. [PMID: 36068155 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of online adaptive transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT) through retrospective simulation of source positioning and catheter swap errors on patient treatment plans. METHOD Source positioning errors (catheter shifts in 1 mm increments in the cranial/caudal, anterior/posterior, and medial/lateral directions up to ±6 mm) and catheter swap errors (between the most and least heavily weighted) were introduced retrospectively into DICOM treatment plans of 20 patients that previously received TRUS HDRPBT. Dose volume histogram (DVH) indices were monitored as errors were introduced sequentially into individual catheters, simulating potential errors throughout treatment. Whenever DVH indices were outside institution thresholds: prostate V100% <95%, urethra D0.1cc >118% and rectum Dmax >80%, the plan was adapted using remaining catheters (i.e., simulating previous catheters as previously delivered). The final DVH indices were recorded. RESULTS Prostate coverage (V100% >95%) could be maintained for source position errors up to 6 mm through online plan adaptation. The source position error at which the urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax was able to return to clinically acceptable levels using online adaptation varied between 6 mm to 1 mm, depending on the direction of the source position error and patient anatomy. After introduction of catheter swap errors to patient plans, prostate V100% was recoverable using online adaptation to near original plan characteristics. Urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax showed less recoverability. CONCLUSION Online adaptive HDRPBT maintains the prostate V100% to clinically acceptable values for majority of directional shifts. However, the current online adaptive method may not correct for source position errors near organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Koprivec
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Dean Cutajar
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Howie
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Bucci
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Joel Poder
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaveckyte V, Jørgensen EB, Kertzscher G, Johansen JG, Tedgren ÅC. Monte Carlo characterization of high atomic number inorganic scintillators for in vivo dosimetry in 192 Ir brachytherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:4715-4730. [PMID: 35443079 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increased interest in vivo dosimetry for 192 Ir brachytherapy (BT) treatments using high atomic number (Z) inorganic scintillators. Their high light output enables construction of small detectors with negligible stem effect and simple readout electronics. Experimental determination of absorbed-dose energy dependence of detectors relative to water is prevalent, but it can be prone to high detector positioning uncertainties and does not allow for decoupling of absorbed-dose energy dependence from other factors affecting detector response. PURPOSE To investigate which measurement conditions and detector properties could affect their absorbed-dose energy dependence in BT in vivo dosimetry. METHODS We used a general-purpose MC code penelope for the characterization of high-Z inorganic scintillators with the focus on ZnSe (Z¯=32). Two other promising media CsI (Z¯=54) and Al2 O3 (Z¯=11) were included for comparison in selected scenarios. We determined absorbed-dose energy dependence of crystals relative to water under different scatter conditions (calibration phantom 12 × 12 × 30 cm3 , characterization phantoms 20 × 20 × 20 cm3 , 30 × 30 × 30 cm3 , 40 × 40 × 40 cm3 , and patient-like elliptic phantom 40 × 30 × 25 cm3 ). To mimic irradiation conditions during prostate treatments, we evaluated whether the presence of pelvic bones and calcifications affect ZnSe response. ZnSe detector design influence was also investigated. RESULTS In contrast to low-Z organic and medium-Z inorganic scintillators, ZnSe and CsI media have substantially greater absorbed-dose energy dependence relative to water. The response was phantom-size dependent and changed by 11 % between limited- and full-scatter conditions for ZnSe, but not for Al2 O3 . For a given phantom size, a part of the absorbed-dose energy dependence of ZnSe is caused not due to in-phantom scatter but due to source anisotropy. Thus, the absorbed-dose energy dependence of high-Z scintillators is a function of not only the radial distance but also the polar angle. Pelvic bones did not affect ZnSe response, whereas large and intermediate size calcifications reduced it by 9 % and 5 %, respectively, when placed midway between the source and the detector. CONCLUSIONS Unlike currently prevalent low- and medium-Z scintillators, high-Z crystals are sensitive to characterization and in vivo measurement conditions. However, good agreement between MC data for ZnSe in the present study and experimental data for ZnSe:O by Jørgensen et al (2021) suggest that detector signal is proportional to the average absorbed dose to the detector cavity. This enables an easy correction for non-TG43-like scenarios (e.g., patient sizes and calcifications) through MC simulations. Information that should be provided to the clinic by the detector vendors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaiva Kaveckyte
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 85, Sweden
| | - Erik B Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Gustavo Kertzscher
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Jacob G Johansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 85, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jørgensen EB, Buus S, Bentzen L, Hokland SB, Rylander S, Kertzscher G, Beddar S, Tanderup K, Johansen JG. 3D dose reconstruction based on in vivo dosimetry for determining the dosimetric impact of geometric variations in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:62-68. [PMID: 35033604 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In vivo dosimetry (IVD) can be used for source tracking (ST), i.e., estimating source positions, during brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to exploit IVD-based ST to perform 3D dose reconstruction for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and to evaluate the robustness of the treatments against observed geometric variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-three fractions of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy were analysed. The treatment planning was based on MRI. Time-resolved IVD was performed using a fibre-coupled scintillator. ST was retrospectively performed using the IVD measurements. The ST identified 2D positional shifts of each treatment catheter and thereby inferred updated source positions. For each fraction, the dose was recalculated based on the source-tracked catheter positions and compared with the original plan dose using differences in dose volume histogram indices. RESULTS Of 352 treatment catheters, 344 had shifts of less than 5 mm. Shifts between 5 and 10 mm were observed for 3 catheters, and shifts greater than 10 mm for 2 catheters. The ST failed for 3 catheters. The maximum relative difference in clinical target volume (prostate + 3 mm isotropic margin) D90% was 5%. In one fraction, the bladder D2cm3 dose increased by 18% (1.4Gy) due to a single source position being inside the bladder rather than nearby as planned. The max increase in urethra dose was 1.5Gy (15%). CONCLUSION IVD-based 3D dose reconstruction for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy is feasible. The dosimetric impact of the observed catheter shifts was limited. Dose reconstruction can therefore aid in determining the dosimetric impact of geometric variations and errors in brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik B Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Simon Buus
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lise Bentzen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Susanne Rylander
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob G Johansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hanlon MD, Smith RL, Franich RD. MaxiCalc: A tool for online dosimetric evaluation of source-tracking based treatment verification in HDR brachytherapy. Phys Med 2022; 94:58-64. [PMID: 34998133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Source tracking is becoming a more widely used approach in HDR brachytherapy treatment verification. While it provides a sensitive method to detect deviations from the treatment plan during delivery, it does not show the clinical significance of any detected changes. By incorporating a tool that calculates volumetric doses and DVH indices from measurements, source tracking systems can be expanded to assess dosimetric significance of any deviations from the plan. METHODS The source tracking dose calculation tool, MaxiCalc, was developed in MATLAB. Validation was performed by comparing doses and DVH indices calculated in MaxiCalc to those calculated by the clinical TPS, for several test plans and 10 clinical plans. Clinical implementation was demonstrated by calculating volumetric doses from a clinical source tracking event. RESULTS MaxiCalc showed excellent agreement with the clinical TPS for point and volumetric doses (mean difference < 0.01% and 0.1% respectively). MaxiCalc calculates dosimetrically equivalent plans to the TPS with agreement < 0.3% for all DVH indices except PTV V200%. Small differences seen for the clinical source tracking event were consistent with the known tracking uncertainties enabling them to be quantified for clinical decision making. Calculations are fast, enabling real-time use. CONCLUSIONS MaxiCalc is an independent tool that calculates doses and DVH indices from dwells measured with any clinical HDR brachytherapy source tracking system. This extends the capabilities of source tracking systems from determining discrepancies in positions or times during delivery to assessing the dosimetric impact of any detected deviations, allowing for more comprehensive treatment verification and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian D Hanlon
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Ryan L Smith
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rick D Franich
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jørgensen EB, Johansen JG, Overgaard J, Piché-Meunier D, Tho D, Rosales HML, Tanderup K, Beaulieu L, Kertzscher G, Beddar S. A high-Z inorganic scintillator-based detector for time-resolved in vivo dosimetry during brachytherapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:7382-7398. [PMID: 34586641 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High-dose rate (HDR) and pulsed-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy would benefit from an independent treatment verification system to monitor treatment delivery and to detect errors in real time. This paper characterizes and provides an uncertainty budget for a detector based on a fiber-coupled high-Z inorganic scintillator capable of performing time-resolved in vivo dosimetry during HDR and PDR brachytherapy. METHOD The detector was composed of a detector probe and an optical reader. The detector probe consisted of either a 0.5 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3 (HDR) or a 1.0 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3 (PDR) cuboid ZnSe:O crystal glued onto an optical-fiber cable. The outer diameter of the detector probes was 1 mm, and fit inside standard brachytherapy catheters. The signal from the detector probe was read out at 20 Hz by a photodiode and a data acquisition device inside the optical reader. In order to construct an uncertainty budget for the detector, six characteristics were determined: (1) temperature dependence of the detector probe, (2) energy dependence as a function of the probe-to-source position in 2D (determined with 2 mm resolution using a robotic arm), (3) the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), (4) short-term stability over 8 h, and (5) long-term stability of three optical readers and four probes used for in vivo monitoring in HDR and PDR treatments over 21 months (196 treatments and 189 detector calibrations, and (6) dose-rate dependence. RESULTS The total uncertainty of the detector at a 20 mm probe-to-source distance was < 5.1% and < 5.8% for the HDR and PDR versions, respectively. Regarding the above characteristics, (1) the sensitivity of the detector decreased by an average of 1.4%/°C for detector probe temperatures varying from 22 to 37°C; (2) the energy dependence of the detector was nonlinear and depended on both probe-to-source distance and the angle between the probe and the brachytherapy source; (3) the median SNRs were 187 and 34 at a 20 mm probe-to-source distance for the HDR and PDR versions, respectively (corresponding median source activities of 4.8 and 0.56 Ci, respectively); (4) the detector response varied by 0.6% in 11 identical irradiations over 8 h; (5) the sensitivity of the four detector probes decreased systematically by 0-1.2%/100 Gy of dose delivered to the probes, and random fluctuations of 4.8% in the sensitivity were observed for the three probes used in PDR and 1.9% for the probe used in HDR; and (6) the detector response was linear with dose rate. CONCLUSION ZnSe:O detectors can be used effectively for in vivo dosimetry and with high accuracy for HDR and PDR brachytherapy applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik B Jørgensen
- Health Graduate School, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob G Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Dominique Piché-Meunier
- Département de physique-de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.,Département de radio-oncologie et Axe Oncologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daline Tho
- Département de physique-de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.,Département de radio-oncologie et Axe Oncologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Haydee M L Rosales
- Département de physique-de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.,Département de radio-oncologie et Axe Oncologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Département de physique-de génie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada.,Département de radio-oncologie et Axe Oncologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gustavo Kertzscher
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|