Rapid measurement of the low contrast detectability of CT scanners

A novel method for developing contrast-detail curves from clinical patient images based on statistical low-contrast detectability

Purpose. To develop a method to extract statistical low-contrast detectability (LCD) and contrast-detail (C-D) curves from clinical patient images.Method. We used the region of air surrounding the patient as an alternative for a homogeneous region within a patient. A simple graphical user interface (GUI) was created to set the initial configuration for region of interest (ROI), ROI size, and minimum detectable contrast (MDC). The process was started by segmenting the air surrounding the patient with a threshold between -980 HU (Hounsfield units) and -1024 HU to get an air mask. The mask was trimmed using the patient center coordinates to avoid distortion from the patient table. It was used to automatically place square ROIs of a predetermined size. The mean pixel values in HU within each ROI were calculated, and the standard deviation (SD) from all the means was obtained. The MDC for a particular target size was generated by multiplying the SD by 3.29. A C-D curve was obtained by iterating this process for the other ROI sizes. This method was applied to the homogeneous area from the uniformity module of an ACR CT phantom to find the correlation between the parameters inside and outside the phantom, for 30 thoracic, 26 abdominal, and 23 head images.Results. The phantom images showed a significant linear correlation between the LCDs obtained from outside and inside the phantom, with R2values of 0.67 and 0.99 for variations in tube currents and tube voltages. This indicated that the air region outside the phantom can act as a surrogate for the homogenous region inside the phantom to obtain the LCD and C-D curves.Conclusion. The C-D curves obtained from outside the ACR CT phantom show a strong linear correlation with those from inside the phantom. The proposed method can also be used to extract the LCD from patient images by using the region of air outside as a surrogate for a region inside the patient.

3D printed phantom with 12 000 submillimeter lesions to improve efficiency in CT detectability assessment

BACKGROUND

The detectability performance of a CT scanner is difficult to precisely quantify when nonlinearities are present in reconstruction. An efficient detectability assessment method that is sensitive to small effects of dose and scanner settings is desirable. We previously proposed a method using a search challenge instrument: a phantom is embedded with hundreds of lesions at random locations, and a model observer is used to detect lesions. Preliminary tests in simulation and a prototype showed promising results.

PURPOSE

In this work, we fabricated a full-size search challenge phantom with design updates, including changes to lesion size, contrast, and number, and studied our implementation by comparing the lesion detectability from a nonprewhitening (NPW) model observer between different reconstructions at different exposure levels, and by estimating the instrument sensitivity to detect changes in dose.

METHODS

Designed to fit into QRM anthropomorphic phantoms, our search challenge phantom is a cylindrical insert 10 cm wide and 4 cm thick, embedded with 12 000 lesions (nominal width of 0.6 mm, height of 0.8 mm, and contrast of -350 HU), and was fabricated using PixelPrint, a 3D printing technique. The insert was scanned alone at a high dose to assess printing accuracy. To evaluate lesion detectability, the insert was placed in a QRM thorax phantom and scanned from 50 to 625 mAs with increments of 25 mAs, once per exposure level, and the average of all exposure levels was used as high-dose reference. Scans were reconstructed with three different settings: filtered-backprojection (FBP) with Br40 and Br59, and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) with strength level 5 and Br59 kernel. An NPW model observer was used to search for lesions, and detection performance of different settings were compared using area under the exponential transform of free response ROC curve (AUC). Using propagation of uncertainty, the sensitivity to changes in dose was estimated by the percent change in exposure due to one standard deviation of AUC, measured from 5 repeat scans at 100, 200, 300, and 400 mAs.

RESULTS

The printed insert lesions had an average position error of 0.20 mm compared to printing reference. As the exposure level increases from 50 mAs to 625 mAs, the lesion detectability AUCs increase from 0.38 to 0.92, 0.42 to 0.98, and 0.41 to 0.97 for FBP Br40, FBP Br59, and SAFIRE Br59, respectively, with a lower rate of increase at higher exposure level. FBP Br59 performed best with AUC 0.01 higher than SAFIRE Br59 on average and 0.07 higher than FBP Br40 (all P < 0.001). The standard deviation of AUC was less than 0.006, and the sensitivity to detect changes in mAs was within 2% for FBP Br59.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 3D-printed search challenge phantom with 12 000 submillimeter lesions, together with an NPW model observer, provide an efficient CT detectability assessment method that is sensitive to subtle effects in reconstruction and is sensitive to small changes in dose.

Complex Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and CT Radiation Dose

Concerns over need for CT radiation dose optimization and reduction led to improved scanner efficiency and introduction of several reconstruction techniques and image processing-based software. The latest technologies use artificial intelligence (AI) for CT dose optimization and image quality improvement. While CT dose optimization has and can benefit from AI, variations in scanner technologies, reconstruction methods, and scan protocols can lead to substantial variations in radiation doses and image quality across and within different scanners. These variations in turn can influence performance of AI algorithms being deployed for tasks such as detection, segmentation, characterization, and quantification. We review the complex relationship between AI and CT radiation dose.