1
|
Smith BR, Hyer DE. The LET enhancement of energy-specific collimation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2025; 26:e14477. [PMID: 39644507 PMCID: PMC11712952 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To computationally characterize the LET distribution during dynamic collimation in PBS and quantify its impact on the resultant dose distribution. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4 were used to model the production of low-energy proton scatter produced in the collimating components of a novel PBS collimator. Custom spectral tallies were created to quantify the energy, track- and dose-averaged LET resulting from individual beamlet and composite fields simulated from a model of the IBA dedicated nozzle system. The composite dose distributions were optimized to achieve a uniform physical dose coverage of a cubical and pyramidal target, and the resulting dose-average LET distributions were calculated for uncollimated and collimated PBS deliveries and used to generate RBE-weighted dose distributions. RESULTS For collimated beamlets, the scattered proton energy fluence is strongly dependent on collimator position relative to the central axis of the beamlet. When delivering a uniform profile, the distribution of dose-average LET was nearly identical within the target and increased between 1 and2 keV / μ m $2 \,{\rm keV}/\mathrm{\umu }\mathrm{m}$ within 10 mm surrounding the target. Dynamic collimation resulted in larger dose-average LET changes: increasing the dose-average LET between 1 and3 keV / μ m $3 \,{\rm keV}/\mathrm{\umu }\mathrm{m}$ within 10 mm of a pyramidal target while reducing the dose-average LET outside this margin by as much as10 keV / μ m $10 \,{\rm keV}/\mathrm{\umu }\mathrm{m}$ . Biological dose distributions are improved with energy-specific collimation in reducing the lateral penumbra. CONCLUSION The presence of energy-specific collimation in PBS can lead to dose-average LET changes relative to an uncollimated delivery. In some clinical situations, the placement and application of energy-specific collimation may require additional planning considerations based on its reduction to the lateral penumbra and increase in high-dose conformity. Future applications may embody these unique dosimetric characteristics to redirect high-LET portions of a collimated proton beamlet from healthy tissues while enhancing the dose-average LET distribution within target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake R. Smith
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Daniel E. Hyer
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kong W, Huiskes M, Habraken SJM, Astreinidou E, Rasch CRN, Heijmen BJM, Breedveld S. Reducing the lateral dose penumbra in IMPT by incorporating transmission pencil beams. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110388. [PMID: 38897315 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), Bragg peaks result in steep distal dose fall-offs, while the lateral IMPT dose fall-off is often less steep than in photon therapy. High-energy pristine transmission ('shoot through') pencil beams have no Bragg peak in the patient, but show a sharp lateral penumbra at the target level. We investigated whether combining Bragg peaks with Transmission pencil beams ('IMPT&TPB') could improve head-and-neck plans by exploiting the steep lateral dose fall-off of transmission pencil beams. APPROACH Our system for automated multi-criteria IMPT plan optimisation was extended for combined optimisation of BPs and TPBs. The system generates for each patient a Pareto-optimal plan using a generic 'wish-list' with prioritised planning objectives and hard constraints. For eight nasopharynx cancer patients (NPC) and eight oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients, the IMPT&TPB plan was compared to the competing conventional IMPT plan with only Bragg peaks, which was generated with the same optimiser, but without transmission pencil beams. MAIN RESULTS Clinical OAR and target constraints were met in all plans. By allowing transmission pencil beams in the optimisation, on average 14 of the 25 investigated OAR plan parameters significantly improved for NPC, and 9 of the 17 for OPC, while only one OPC parameter showed small but significant deterioration. Non-significant differences were found in the remaining parameters. In NPC, cochlea Dmean reduced by up to 17.5 Gy and optic nerve D2% by up to 11.1 Gy. CONCLUSION Compared to IMPT, IMPT&TPB resulted in comparable target coverage with overall superior OAR sparing, the latter originating from steeper dose fall-offs close to OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S J M Habraken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - E Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - B J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janson M, Glimelius L, Fredriksson A, Traneus E, Engwall E. Treatment planning of scanned proton beams in RayStation. Med Dosim 2023; 49:2-12. [PMID: 37996354 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
The use of scanned proton beams in external beam radiation therapy has seen a rapid development over the past decade. This technique places new demands on treatment planning, as compared to conventional photon-based radiation therapy. In this article, several proton specific functions as implemented in the treatment planning system RayStation are presented. We will cover algorithms for energy layer and spot selection, basic optimization including the handling of spot weight limits, optimization of the linear energy transfer (LET) distribution, robust optimization including the special case of 4D optimization, proton arc planning, and automatic planning using deep learning. We will further present the Monte Carlo (MC) proton dose engine in RayStation to some detail, from the material interpretation of the CT data, through the beam model parameterization, to the actual MC transport mechanism. Useful tools for plan evaluation, including robustness evaluation, and the versatile scripting interface are also described. The overall aim of the paper is to give an overview of some of the key proton planning functions in RayStation, with example usages, and at the same time provide the details about the underlying algorithms that previously have not been fully publicly available.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson NP, Culberson WS, Hyer DE, Geoghegan TJ, Patwardhan KA, Smith BR, Flynn RT, Gutiérrez AN, Boland T, Hill PM. Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 9:10.1088/2057-1976/ad02ff. [PMID: 37832529 PMCID: PMC11128250 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad02ff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To integrate a Dynamic Collimation System (DCS) into a pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system and validate its dosimetric impact.Approach.Uncollimated and collimated treatment fields were developed for clinically relevant targets using an in-house treatment plan optimizer and an experimentally validated Monte Carlo model of the DCS and IBA dedicated nozzle (DN) system. The dose reduction induced by the DCS was quantified by calculating the mean dose in 10- and 30-mm two-dimensional rinds surrounding the target. A select number of plans were then used to experimentally validate the mechanical integration of the DCS and beam scanning controller system through measurements with the MatriXX-PT ionization chamber array and EBT3 film. Absolute doses were verified at the central axis at various depths using the IBA MatriXX-PT and PPC05 ionization chamber.Main results.Simulations demonstrated a maximum mean dose reduction of 12% for the 10 mm rind region and 45% for the 30 mm rind region when utilizing the DCS. Excellent agreement was observed between Monte Carlo simulations, EBT3 film, and MatriXX-PT measurements, with gamma pass rates exceeding 94.9% for all tested plans at the 3%/2 mm criterion. Absolute central axis doses showed an average verification difference of 1.4% between Monte Carlo and MatriXX-PT/PPC05 measurements.Significance.We have successfully dosimetrically validated the delivery of dynamically collimated proton therapy for clinically relevant delivery patterns and dose distributions with the DCS. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to assess dose reductions and treatment planning considerations associated with the DCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Theodore J Geoghegan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Kaustubh A Patwardhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Alonso N Gutiérrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 331765, United States of America
| | | | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nelson NP, Culberson WS, Hyer DE, Geoghegan TJ, Patwardhan KA, Smith BR, Flynn RT, Yu J, Gutiérrez AN, Hill PM. Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:055003. [PMID: 36706460 PMCID: PMC9940016 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb6cd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy target dose conformity can be improved with energy layer-specific collimation. One such collimator is the dynamic collimation system (DCS), which consists of four nickel trimmer blades that intercept the scanning beam as it approaches the lateral extent of the target. While the dosimetric benefits of the DCS have been demonstrated through computational treatment planning studies, there has yet to be experimental verification of these benefits for composite multi-energy layer fields. The objective of this work is to dosimetrically characterize and experimentally validate the delivery of dynamically collimated proton therapy with the DCS equipped to a clinical PBS system.Approach. Optimized single field, uniform dose treatment plans for 3 × 3 × 3 cm3target volumes were generated using Monte Carlo dose calculations with depths ranging from 5 to 15 cm, trimmer-to-surface distances ranging from 5 to 18.15 cm, with and without a 4 cm thick polyethylene range shifter. Treatment plans were then delivered to a water phantom using a prototype DCS and an IBA dedicated nozzle system and measured with a Zebra multilayer ionization chamber, a MatriXX PT ionization chamber array, and Gafchromic™ EBT3 film.Main results. For measurements made within the SOBPs, average 2D gamma pass rates exceeded 98.5% for the MatriXX PT and 96.5% for film at the 2%/2 mm criterion across all measured uncollimated and collimated plans, respectively. For verification of the penumbra width reduction with collimation, film agreed with Monte Carlo with differences within 0.3 mm on average compared to 0.9 mm for the MatriXX PT.Significance. We have experimentally verified the delivery of DCS-collimated fields using a clinical PBS system and commonly available dosimeters and have also identified potential weaknesses for dosimeters subject to steep dose gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America,Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Theodore J Geoghegan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Kaustubh A Patwardhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Alonso N Gutiérrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Behrends C, Bäumer C, Verbeek NG, Wulff J, Timmermann B. Optimization of proton pencil beam positioning in collimated fields. Med Phys 2023; 50:2540-2551. [PMID: 36609847 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of static or dynamic collimator systems to the pencil beam scanning delivery technique increases the number of options for lateral field shaping. The collimator shape needs to be optimized together with the intensity modulation of spots. PURPOSE To minimize the proton field's lateral penumbra by investigating the fundamental relations between spot and collimating aperture edge position. METHODS Analytical approaches describing the effect of spot position on the resulting spot profile are presented. The theoretical description is then compared with Monte Carlo simulations in TOPAS and in the RayStation treatment planning system, as well as with radiochromic film measurements at a clinical proton therapy facility. In the model, one single spot profile is analyzed for various spot positions in air. Further, irradiation setups in water with different energies, the combination with a range shifter, and two-dimensional proton fields were investigated in silico. RESULTS The further the single spot is placed beyond the collimating aperture edge ('overscanning'), the sharper the relative lateral dose fall-off and thus the lateral penumbra. Overscanning up to 5 mm $5\,\text{mm}$ reduced the lateral penumbra by about 20% on average after a propagation of 13 cm $13\,\text{cm}$ in air. This benefit from overscanning is first predicted by the analytical proofs and later verified by simulations and measurements. Corresponding analyses in water confirm the benefit in lateral penumbra with spot position optimization as observed theoretically and in air. The combination of spot overscanning with fluence modulation facilitated an additional improvement. CONCLUSIONS The lateral penumbra of single spots in collimated scanned proton fields can be improved by the method of spot overscanning. This suggests a better sparing of proximal organs at risk in smaller water depths at higher energies, especially in the plateau of the depth dose distribution. All in all, spot overscanning in collimated scanned proton fields offers particular potential in combination with techniques such as fluence modulation or dynamic collimation for optimizing the lateral penumbra to spare normal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Behrends
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nico Gerd Verbeek
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Holmes J, Shen J, Patel SH, Wong WW, Foote RL, Bues M, Liu W. Collimating individual beamlets in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, a dosimetric investigation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1031340. [PMID: 36439436 PMCID: PMC9692234 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1031340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to investigate collimating individual proton beamlets from a dosimetric perspective and to introduce a new device concept, the spot scanning aperture (SSA). The SSA consists of a thin aperture with a small cylindrical opening attached to a robotics system, which allows the aperture to follow and align with individual beamlets during spot delivery. Additionally, a range shifter is incorporated (source-side) for treating shallow depths. Since the SSA trims beamlets spot by spot, the patient-facing portion of the device only needs to be large enough to trim a single proton beamlet. The SSA has been modelled in an open-source Monte-Carlo-based dose engine (MCsquare) to characterize its dosimetric properties in water at depths between 0 and 10 cm while varying the following parameters: the aperture material, thickness, distance to the water phantom, distance between the aperture and attached range shifter, and the aperture opening radius. Overall, the SSA greatly reduced spot sizes for all the aperture opening radii that were tested (1 - 4 mm), especially in comparison with the extended range shifter (ranger shifter placed at 30 cm from patient); greater than 50% when placed less than 10 cm away from the patient at depths in water less than 50 mm. The peak to entrance dose ratio and linear energy transfer was found to depend on the thickness of the aperture and therefore the aperture material. Neutron production rates were also investigated and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Loap P, De Marzi L, Almeida CE, Barcellini A, Bradley J, de Santis MC, Dendale R, Jimenez R, Orlandi E, Kirova Y. Hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103574. [PMID: 34958916 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment, and recent technical advances have been made to improve the therapeutic window by limiting the risk of radiation-induced toxicity or by increasing tumor control. Hadrontherapy is a form a radiotherapy relying on particle beams; compared with photon beams, particle beams have specific physical, radiobiological and immunological properties, which can be valuable in diverse clinical situations. To date, available hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer irradiation include proton therapy, carbon ion radiation therapy, fast neutron therapy and boron neutron capture therapy. This review analyzes the current rationale and level of evidence for each hadrontherapy technique for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
| | | | - Carlos Eduardo Almeida
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Julie Bradley
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | | | - Remi Dendale
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ester Orlandi
- National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dosimetric study of the interplay effect using three-dimensional motion phantom in proton pencil beam scanning treatment of moving thoracic tumours. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
The dosimetric and clinical advantages offered by implementation of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving thoracic tumours is hindered by interplay effect. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of large proton beam spot size along with adaptive aperture (AA) and various motion mitigation techniques on the interplay effect for a range of motion amplitudes in a three-dimensional (3D) respiratory motion phantom.
Materials and Methods:
Point doses using ionisation chamber (IC) and planner dose distributions with radiochromic film were compared against the corresponding treatment planning system (TPS) information. A 3D respiratory motion phantom was scanned either for static or 4D computed tomographic (CT) technique for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitudes in SI direction. For free breathing (FB) treatment, a tumour was contoured on maximum intensity projection scan and an average scan was used for treatment planning. Each FB treatment was delivered with one, three and five volumetric repaintings (VRs). Three phases (CT40–60%) were extracted from the 4D-CT scans of each motion amplitude for the respiratory-gated treatment and were used for the treatment planning and delivery. All treatment plans were made using AA and robustly optimised with 5-mm set-up and 3·5% density uncertainty. A total of 26 treatment plans were delivered to IC and film using static, dynamic and respiratory-gated treatments combinations. A percent dose difference between IC and TPS for the point dose and gamma indices for film–TPS planner dose comparison was used.
Results:
The dose profile of film and TPS for the static phantom matched well, and percent dose difference between IC and TPS was 0·4%. The percent dose difference for all the gated treatments were below 3·0% except 14-mm motion amplitude-gated treatment. The gamma passing rate was more than 95% for film–TPS comparison for all gated treatment for the investigated gamma acceptance criteria. For FB treatments, the percent dose difference for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitude was 1·4%, −2·7% and −4·1%, respectively. As the number of VR increased, the percent difference between measured and calculated values decreased. The gamma passing rate met the required tolerance for different acceptance criteria except for the 14-mm motion amplitude FB treatment.
Conclusion:
The PBS technique for the FB thoracic treatments up to 10-mm motion amplitude can be implemented with an acceptable accuracy using large proton beam spot size, AA and robust optimisation. The impact of the interplay effect can be reduced with VR and respiratory-gated treatment and extend the treatable tumour motion amplitude.
Collapse
|
10
|
Taasti VT, Hattu D, Vaassen F, Canters R, Velders M, Mannens J, van Loon J, Rinaldi I, Unipan M, van Elmpt W. Treatment planning and 4D robust evaluation strategy for proton therapy of lung tumors with large motion amplitude. Med Phys 2021; 48:4425-4437. [PMID: 34214201 PMCID: PMC8456954 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for lung tumors with a large tumor movement is challenging due to loss of robustness in the target coverage. Often an upper cut‐off at 5‐mm tumor movement is used for proton patient selection. In this study, we propose (1) a robust and easily implementable treatment planning strategy for lung tumors with a movement larger than 5 mm, and (2) a four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) robust evaluation strategy for evaluating the dose distribution on the breathing phases. Materials and methods We created a treatment planning strategy based on the internal target volume (ITV) concept (aim 1). The ITV was created as a union of the clinical target volumes (CTVs) on the eight 4DCT phases. The ITV expanded by 2 mm was the target during robust optimization on the average CT (avgCT). The clinical plan acceptability was judged based on a robust evaluation, computing the voxel‐wise min and max (VWmin/max) doses over 28 error scenarios (range and setup errors) on the avgCT. The plans were created in RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) using a Monte Carlo dose engine, commissioned for our Mevion S250i Hyperscan system (Mevion Medical Systems, Littleton, MA, USA). We developed a new 4D robust evaluation approach (4DRobAvg; aim 2). The 28 scenario doses were computed on each individual 4DCT phase. For each scenario, the dose distributions on the individual phases were deformed to the reference phase and combined to a weighted sum, resulting in 28 weighted sum scenario dose distributions. From these 28 scenario doses, VWmin/max doses were computed. This new 4D robust evaluation was compared to two simpler 4D evaluation strategies: re‐computing the nominal plan on each individual 4DCT phase (4DNom) and computing the robust VWmin/max doses on each individual phase (4DRobInd). The treatment planning and dose evaluation strategies were evaluated for 16 lung cancer patients with tumor movement of 4–26 mm. Results The ratio of the ITV and CTV volumes increased linearly with the tumor amplitude, with an average ratio of 1.4. Despite large ITV volumes, a clinically acceptable plan fulfilling all target and organ at risk (OAR) constraints was feasible for all patients. The 4DNom and 4DRobInd evaluation strategies were found to under‐ or overestimate the dosimetric effect of the tumor movement, respectively. 4DRobInd showed target underdosage for five patients, not observed in the robust evaluation on the avgCT or in 4DRobAvg. The accuracy of dose deformation used in 4DRobAvg was quantified and found acceptable, with differences for the dose‐volume parameters below 1 Gy in most cases. Conclusion The proposed ITV‐based planning strategy on the avgCT was found to be a clinically feasible approach with adequate tumor coverage and no OAR overdosage even for large tumor movement. The new proposed 4D robust evaluation, 4DRobAvg, was shown to give an easily interpretable understanding of the effect of respiratory motion dose distribution, and to give an accurate estimate of the dose delivered in the different breathing phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Trier Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Djoya Hattu
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Femke Vaassen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Richard Canters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marije Velders
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jolein Mannens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Judith van Loon
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mirko Unipan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|