Technical Note: Self-shielding evaluation and radiation leakage measurement of a jawless ring gantry linac with a beam stopper

Development of shielding evaluation and management program for O-ring type linear accelerators

The shielding parameters can vary depending on the geometrical structure of the linear accelerators (LINAC), treatment techniques, and beam energies. Recently, the introduction of O-ring type linear accelerators is increasing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the shielding parameters of new type of linac using a dedicated program developed by us named ORSE (O-ring type Radiation therapy equipment Shielding Evaluation). The shielding evaluation was conducted for a total of four treatment rooms including Elekta Unity, Varian Halcyon, and Accuray Tomotherapy. The developed program possesses the capability to calculate transmitted dose, maximum treatable patient capacity, and shielding wall thickness based on patient data. The doses were measured for five days using glass dosimeters to compare with the results of program. The IMRT factors and use factors obtained from patient data showed differences of up to 65.0% and 33.8%, respectively, compared to safety management report. The shielding evaluation conducted in each treatment room showed that the transmitted dose at every location was below 1% of the dose limit. The results of program and measurements showed a maximum difference of 0.003 mSv/week in transmitted dose. The ORSE program allows for the shielding evaluation results to the clinical environment of each institution based on patient data.

Characterization of Cherenkov imaging parameters and positional constraints on an O-ring linear accelerator

Objective. With the introduction of Cherenkov imaging technology on the Halcyon O-ring linear accelerator platform, we seek to demonstrate the imaging feasibility and optimize camera placement.Approach. Imaging parameters were probed by acquiring triggering data Cherenkov image frames for simplistic beams on the Halcyon and comparing the analyzed metrics with those from the TrueBeam platform. Camera position was analyzed by performing 3D rendering of patient treatment plans for various sites and iterating over camera positions to assess treatment area visibility.Main results. Commercial Cherenkov imaging systems are compatible with the pulse timing of the Halcyon, and this platform design favorably impacts signal to noise in Cherenkov image frames. Additionally, ideal camera placement is treatment site dependent and is always within a biconical zone of visibility centered on the isocenter. Visibility data is provided for four treatment sites, with suggestions for camera placement based on room dimensions. Median visibility values were highest for right breast plans, with values of 80.33% and 68.49% for the front and rear views respectively. Head and neck plans presented with the lowest values at 26.44% and 38.18% respectively.Significance. This work presents the first formal camera positional analysis for Cherenkov imaging on any platform and serves as a template for performing similar work for other irradiation platforms. Additionally, this study confirms the Cherenkov imaging parameters do not need to be changed for optimal imaging on the Halcyon. Lastly, the presented methodology provides a framework which could be further expanded to other optical imaging systems which rely on line of sight visibility to the patient.

Optimization of Radiation Shielding Considerations for Designing Halcyon Vault

Purpose

To determine the radiation shielding considerations for optimization of Halcyon vault shielding requirements.

Materials and Methods

The primary and leakage workloads were estimated using actual clinical treatment planning and treatment delivery data acquired from three busy operational clinical Halcyon facilities. The effective use factor was determined based on a newer approach proposed in this paper using the percentage of patients treated with different treatment techniques. The transmission factor of the primary beam block, maximum head leakage, and patient scatter fractions around the Halcyon machine were experimentally determined. The first tenth-value layer (TVL1) and equilibrium tenth-value layer (TVLe) for 6 MV - flattening-filter-free (FFF) primary X-ray beam for ordinary concrete were measured.

Results

The primary and leakage workloads are estimated as 1 × 105 cGy/wk and 3.1 × 105 cGy/wk at 1 m respectively. The effective use factor is found as 0.114. The primary beam-block transmission factor is determined as 1.7 × 10-4 at 1 m distance from isocenter along the central beam axis. The maximum head leakage is noted as 6.23 × 10-4. The patient scatter fractions are reported for various planar angles around the Halcyon machine at a radial distance of 1 m in a horizontal plane passing through isocenter. The TVL1 and TVLe of 6 MV-FFF X-ray beam energy for ordinary concrete are found to be 33 and 29 cm, respectively.

Conclusion

Using experimentally determined shielding considerations, the optimized vault shielding requirements for the Halcyon facility are calculated and a typical layout drawing is proposed.

Characterisation of in-room leakage and scattered radiation for the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator

Unintended sources of secondary radiation resulting from photon beams in linear accelerators are patient scatter, collimator scatter, scatter from surfaces within the bunker, and head leakage. This work characterises the in-room leakage and scattered radiation for the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator. Scattered and leakage radiation for static gantry angles 0°, 45°, and 90° and largest field size 28 × 28 cm² were measured with an ionisation chamber survey meter at a radial distance of 1.5 m from the isocentre. The scatter within the treatment room was characterised with isocontour maps from measurements of 360° arc deliveries with the largest field size 28 × 28 cm² at various heights and distances from the isocentre. The transmission through the primary beam stopper was measured with a Farmer ionisation chamber. For static gantry angles, instantaneous dose rate readings were typically around 70 mSv/hr at 1.5 m from the isocentre with lower dose rates at room angles adjacent to the gantry. The head leakage was measured as less than 0.03% of the useful beam. In a full 360° arc, the radiation dose around the Halcyon was coldest in lateral areas, with hotter areas behind and in front of the gantry. The primary beam stopper transmission was measured as 0.019%, reducing the requirement of primary barriers in the shielding design by a factor of 1/500. The results presented in this study can be used to determine the out-of-field dose to patients and to inform bunker shielding designs for Halcyon linear accelerators.