Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners

Development of a proton CT imaging system using scintillator-based range detection

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of proton therapy and preclinical proton irradiation experiments is susceptible to proton range uncertainties, which partly stem from the inaccurate conversion between CT numbers and relative stopping power (RSP). Proton computed tomography (PCT) can reduce these uncertainties by directly acquiring RSP maps.

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop a novel PCT imaging system based on scintillator-based proton range detection for accurate RSP reconstruction.

METHODS

The proposed PCT system consists of a pencil-beam brass collimator with a 1 mm aperture, an object stage capable of translation and 360° rotation, a plastic scintillator for dose-to-light conversion, and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera for light distribution acquisition. A calibration procedure based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was implemented to convert the obtained light ranges into water equivalent ranges. The water equivalent path lengths (WEPLs) of the imaged object were determined by calculating the differences in proton ranges obtained with and without the object in the beam path. To validate the WEPL calculation, measurements of WEPLs for eight tissue-equivalent inserts were conducted. PCT imaging was performed on a custom-designed phantom and a mouse, utilizing both 60 and 360 projections. The filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was employed to reconstruct the RSP from WEPLs. Image quality was assessed based on the reconstructed RSP maps and compared to reference and simulation-based reconstructions.

RESULTS

The differences between the calibrated and reference ranges of 110-150 MeV proton beams were within 0.18 mm. The WEPLs of eight tissue-equivalent inserts were measured with accuracies better than 1%. Phantom experiments exhibited good agreement with reference and simulation-based reconstructions, demonstrating average RSP errors of 1.26%, 1.38%, and 0.38% for images reconstructed with 60 projections, 60 projections after penalized weighted least-squares algorithm denoising, and 360 projections, respectively. Mouse experiments provided clear observations of mouse contours and major tissue types. MC simulation estimated an imaging dose of 3.44 cGy for decent RSP reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed PCT imaging system enables RSP map acquisition with high accuracy and has the potential to improve dose calculation accuracy in proton therapy and preclinical proton irradiation experiments.

A direct comparison of multi-energy x-ray and proton CT for imaging and relative stopping power estimation of plastic andex-vivophantoms

Objective.Proton therapy administers a highly conformal dose to the tumour region, necessitating accurate prediction of the patient's 3D map of proton relative stopping power (RSP) compared to water. This remains challenging due to inaccuracies inherent in single-energy computed tomography (SECT) calibration. Recent advancements in spectral x-ray CT (xCT) and proton CT (pCT) have shown improved RSP estimation compared to traditional SECT methods. This study aims to provide the first comparison of the imaging and RSP estimation performance among dual-energy CT (DECT) and photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanners, and a pCT system prototype.Approach.Two phantoms were scanned with the three systems for their performance characterisation: a plastic phantom, filled with water and containing four plastic inserts and a wood insert, and a heterogeneous biological phantom, containing a formalin-stabilised bovine specimen. RSP maps were generated by converting CT numbers to RSP using a calibration based on low- and high-energy xCT images, while pCT utilised a distance-driven filtered back projection algorithm for RSP reconstruction. Spatial resolution, noise, and RSP accuracy were compared across the resulting images.Main results.All three systems exhibited similar spatial resolution of around 0.54 lp/mm for the plastic phantom. The PCCT images were less noisy than the DECT images at the same dose level. The lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of RSP,(0.28±0.07)%, was obtained with the pCT system, compared to MAPE values of(0.51±0.08)%and(0.80±0.08)%for the DECT- and PCCT-based methods, respectively. For the biological phantom, the xCT-based methods resulted in higher RSP values in most of the voxels compared to pCT.Significance.The pCT system yielded the most accurate estimation of RSP values for the plastic materials, and was thus used to benchmark the xCT calibration performance on the biological phantom. This study underlined the potential benefits and constraints of utilising such a novelex-vivophantom for inter-centre surveys in future.

Meeting the detector challenges for pre-clinical proton and ion computed tomography

Six decades after its conception, proton computed tomography (pCT) and proton radiography have yet to be used in medical clinics. However, good progress has been made on relevant detector technologies in the past two decades, and a few prototype pCT systems now exist that approach the performance needed for a clinical device. The tracking and energy-measurement technologies in common use are described, as are the few pCT scanners that are in routine operation at this time. Most of these devices still look like detector R&D efforts as opposed to medical devices, are difficult to use, are at least a factor of five slower than desired for clinical use, and are too small to image many parts of the human body. Recommendations are made for what to consider when engineering a pre-clinical pCT scanner that is designed to meet clinical needs in terms of performance, cost, and ease of use.

Integrated-mode proton radiography with 2D lateral projections

Integrated-mode proton radiography leading to water equivalent thickness (WET) maps is an avenue of interest for motion management, patient positioning, andin vivorange verification. Radiographs can be obtained using a pencil beam scanning setup with a large 3D monolithic scintillator coupled with optical cameras. Established reconstruction methods either (1) involve a camera at the distal end of the scintillator, or (2) use a lateral view camera as a range telescope. Both approaches lead to limited image quality. The purpose of this work is to propose a third, novel reconstruction framework that exploits the 2D information provided by two lateral view cameras, to improve image quality achievable using lateral views. The three methods are first compared in a simulated Geant4 Monte Carlo framework using an extended cardiac torso (XCAT) phantom and a slanted edge. The proposed method with 2D lateral views is also compared with the range telescope approach using experimental data acquired with a plastic volumetric scintillator. Scanned phantoms include a Las Vegas (contrast), 9 tissue-substitute inserts (WET accuracy), and a paediatric head phantom. Resolution increases from 0.24 (distal) to 0.33 lp mm-1(proposed method) on the simulated slanted edge phantom, and the mean absolute error on WET maps of the XCAT phantom is reduced from 3.4 to 2.7 mm with the same methods. Experimental data from the proposed 2D lateral views indicate a 36% increase in contrast relative to the range telescope method. High WET accuracy is obtained, with a mean absolute error of 0.4 mm over 9 inserts. Results are presented for various pencil beam spacing ranging from 2 to 6 mm. This work illustrates that high quality proton radiographs can be obtained with clinical beam settings and the proposed reconstruction framework with 2D lateral views, with potential applications in adaptive proton therapy.

A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts

Background and purpose

Many 4D particle therapy research concepts have been recently translated into clinics, however, remaining substantial differences depend on the indication and institute-related aspects. This work aims to summarise current state-of-the-art 4D particle therapy technology and outline a roadmap for future research and developments.

Material and methods

This review focused on the clinical implementation of 4D approaches for imaging, treatment planning, delivery and evaluation based on the 2021 and 2022 4D Treatment Workshops for Particle Therapy as well as a review of the most recent surveys, guidelines and scientific papers dedicated to this topic.

Results

Available technological capabilities for motion surveillance and compensation determined the course of each 4D particle treatment. 4D motion management, delivery techniques and strategies including imaging were diverse and depended on many factors. These included aspects of motion amplitude, tumour location, as well as accelerator technology driving the necessity of centre-specific dosimetric validation. Novel methodologies for X-ray based image processing and MRI for real-time tumour tracking and motion management were shown to have a large potential for online and offline adaptation schemes compensating for potential anatomical changes over the treatment course. The latest research developments were dominated by particle imaging, artificial intelligence methods and FLASH adding another level of complexity but also opportunities in the context of 4D treatments.

Conclusion

This review showed that the rapid technological advances in radiation oncology together with the available intrafractional motion management and adaptive strategies paved the way towards clinical implementation.