Ultra-high dose rate pencil beam scanning proton dosimetry using ion chambers and a calorimeter in support of first in-human flash clinical trial

Commissioning and initial validation of Eclipse eMC algorithm for the electron FLASH research extension (FLEX) system for pre-clinical studies

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of commissioning the 16 MeV electron FLASH Extension (FLEX) in the commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for biomedical research with cell and mouse models, and in silico treatment planning studies.

METHODS

To commission the FLEX system with the electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm in the commercial TPS, radiochromic film was used to measure the vendor-recommended beam data. Once the beam model was generated for the eMC algorithm, supplemental measurements were collected for validation purposes and compared against the TPS-calculated results. Additionally, the newly commissioned 16 MeV FLASH beam was compared to the corresponding 16 MeV conventional electron beam.

RESULTS

The eMC algorithm effectively modeled the FLEX system. The eMC-calculated PDDs and profiles for the 16 MeV electron FLASH beam agreed with measured values within 1%, on average, for 6 × 6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2 applicators. Flatness and symmetry deviated by less than 1%, while FWHM and penumbra agreed within 1 mm for both eMC-calculated and measured profiles. Additionally, the small field (i.e., 2-cm diameter cutout) that was measured for validation purposes agreed with TPS-calculated results within 1%, on average, for both the PDD and profiles. The FLASH and conventional dose rate 16 MeV electron beam were in agreement in regard to energy, but the profiles for larger field sizes began to deviate (>10 × 10 cm2) due to the forward-peaked nature of the FLASH beam. For cell irradiation experiments, the measured and eMC-calculated in-plane and cross-plane absolute dose profiles agreed within 1%, on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLEX system was successfully commissioned in the commercial TPS using the eMC algorithm, which accurately modeled the forward-peaked nature of the FLASH beam. A commissioned TPS for FLASH will be useful for pre-clinical cell and animal studies, as well as in silico FLASH treatment planning studies for future clinical implementation.

FLASH radiotherapy: A new milestone in the field of cancer radiotherapy

Radiotherapy plays a pivotal role in the control and eradication of tumors, but it can also induce radiation injury to surrounding normal tissues while targeting tumor cells. In recent years, FLASH-Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has emerged as a cutting-edge research focus in the field of radiation therapy. By delivering high radiation doses to the treatment target in an ultra-short time, FLASH-RT produces the FLASH effect, which reduces the toxicity to normal tissues while achieving comparable tumor control efficacy to conventional radiotherapy. This review provides a brief overview of the development history of FLASH-RT and its impact on tumor control. Additionally, it focuses on introducing the protective effects and molecular mechanisms of this technology on various normal tissues, as well as exploring its synergistic effects when combined with other tumor therapies. Importantly, this review discusses the challenges faced in translating FLASH-RT into clinical practice and outlines its promising future applications.

Multi-institutional consensus on machine QA for isochronous cyclotron-based systems delivering ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) pencil beam scanning proton therapy in transmission mode

BACKGROUND

The first clinical trials to assess the feasibility of FLASH radiotherapy in humans have started (FAST-01, FAST-02) and more trials are foreseen. To increase comparability between trials it is important to assure treatment quality and therefore establish a standard for machine quality assurance (QA). Currently, the AAPM TG-224 report is considered as the standard on machine QA for proton therapy, however, it was not intended to be used for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton beams, which have gained interest due to the observation of the FLASH effect.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to find consensus on practical guidelines on machine QA for UHDR proton beams in transmission mode in terms of which QA is required, how they should be done, which detectors are suitable for UHDR machine QA, and what tolerance limits should be applied.

METHODS

A risk assessment to determine the gaps in the current standard for machine QA was performed by an international group of medical physicists. Based on that, practical guidelines on how to perform machine QA for UHDR proton beams were proposed.

RESULTS

The risk assessment clearly identified the need for additional guidance on temporal dosimetry, addressing dose rate (constancy), dose spillage, and scanning speed. In addition, several minor changes from AAPM TG-224 were identified; define required dose rate levels, the use of clinically relevant dose levels, and the use of adapted beam settings to minimize activation of detector and phantom materials or to avoid saturation effects of specific detectors. The final report was created based on discussions and consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was reached on what QA is required for UHDR scanning proton beams in transmission mode for isochronous cyclotron-based systems and how they should be performed. However, the group discussions also showed that there is a lack of high temporal resolution detectors and sufficient QA data to set appropriate limits for some of the proposed QA procedures.

Impact of Multiple Beams on the FLASH Effect in Soft Tissue and Skin in Mice

PURPOSE

FLASH proton pencil beam scanning (p-PBS) showed a reduction in mouse skin toxicity and fibrosis when delivered as a single, uninterrupted, high-dose fraction. Clinical p-PBS treatment usually requires multiple beams to achieve good conformality, and these beams are separated by minutes to allow patient and equipment repositioning. We evaluate the impact of multibeam versus single-beam proton radiation on the FLASH sparing effect on skin toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The right hind leg of 10-week-old female C57Bl/6j mice was irradiated using a Varian ProBeam proton beam scanning gantry system at conventional (1 Gy/s) or FLASH (100 Gy/s) average field dose rate. We scored the skin toxicity after different doses for 7 weeks. The treatment was delivered as 1, 2, or 3 equal beams with an interruption of 2 minutes. For each beam delivery, the equipment remained in the same position so that there was a full overlap of beams administered.

RESULTS

Single-beam delivery confirmed a benefit for p-PBS FLASH in this model at 30, 35, and 40 Gy. At 30 and 35 Gy, a single beam interruption of 2 minutes (2 × 15 Gy or 2 × 17.5 Gy) reduced the FLASH sparing effect, which remained significant (P < .001). However, 2 interruptions (3 × 10 Gy or 3 × 11.6 Gy) abrogated the normal tissue sparing effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the FLASH sparing effect in areas of beam overlap can be compromised by interruptions in delivery time. Time gap between overlapping beams and spatial arrangement of the delivered beams are important parameters for FLASH studies. The effect of multibeam needs to be studied on different organs of interest.

Ultra-high dose-rate proton FLASH improves tumor control

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proton radiotherapy (PRT) offers potential benefits over other radiation modalities, including photon and electron radiotherapy. Increasing the rate at which proton radiation is delivered may provide a therapeutic advantage. Here, we compared the efficacy of conventional proton therapy (CONVpr) to ultrahigh dose-rate proton therapy, FLASHpr, in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice bearing orthotopic lung tumors received thoracic radiation therapy using CONVpr (<0.05 Gy/s) and FLASHpr (>60 Gy/s) dose rates.

RESULTS

Compared to CONVpr, FLASHpr was more effective in reducing tumor burden and decreasing tumor cell proliferation. Furthermore, FLASHpr was more efficient in increasing the infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocytes inside the tumor while simultaneously reducing the percentage of immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs) among T-lymphocytes. Also, compared to CONVpr, FLASHpr was more effective in decreasing pro-tumorigenic M2-like macrophages in lung tumors, while increasing infiltration of anti-tumor M1-like macrophages. Finally, FLASHpr treatment reduced expression of checkpoint inhibitors in lung tumors, indicating reduced immune tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that FLASH dose-rate proton delivery modulates the immune system to improve tumor control and might thus be a promising new alternative to conventional dose rates for NSCLC treatment.

A portable primary-standard level graphite calorimeter for absolute dosimetry in clinical pencil beam scanning proton beams

Objective. To report the use of a portable primary standard level graphite calorimeter for direct dose determination in clinical pencil beam scanning proton beams, which forms part of the recommendations of the proposed Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) Code of Practice (CoP) for proton therapy dosimetry.Approach. The primary standard proton calorimeter (PSPC) was developed at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and measurements were performed at four clinical proton therapy facilities that use pencil beam scanning for beam delivery. Correction factors for the presence of impurities and vacuum gaps were calculated and applied, as well as dose conversion factors to obtain dose to water. Measurements were performed in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3homogeneous dose volumes, centred at 10.0, 15.0 and 25.0 g·cm-2depth in water. The absorbed dose to water determined with the calorimeter was compared to the dose obtained using PTW Roos-type ionisation chambers calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in60Co applying the recommendations in the IAEA TRS-398 CoP.Main results.The relative dose difference between the two protocols varied between 0.4% and 2.1% depending on the facility. The reported overall uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water using the calorimeter is 0.9% (k= 1), which corresponds to a significant reduction of uncertainty in comparison with the TRS-398 CoP (currently with an uncertainty equal or larger than 2.0% (k= 1) for proton beams).Significance. The establishment of a purpose-built primary standard and associated CoP will considerably reduce the uncertainty of the absorbed dose to water determination and ensure improved accuracy and consistency in the dose delivered to patients treated with proton therapy and bring proton reference dosimetry uncertainty in line with megavoltage photon radiotherapy.

Characterization of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescence detectors in low-LET proton beams at ultra-high dose rates

Objective.This work aims at characterizing LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) for dosimetry of a 250 MeV proton beam delivered at ultra-high dose rates (UHDR). Possible dose rate effects in LiF:Mg,Ti, as well as its usability for dosimetry of narrow proton beams are investigated.Approach.LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100^TMMicrocubes, 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm) was packaged in matrices of 5 × 5 detectors. The center of each matrix was irradiated with single-spot low-LET (energy >244 MeV) proton beam in the (1-4500) Gy s^-1average dose rates range. A beam reconstruction procedure was applied to the detectors irradiated at the highest dose rate (Gaussian beam sigma <2 mm) to correct for volumetric averaging effects. Reference dosimetry was carried out with a diamond detector and radiochromic films. The delivered number of protons was measured by a Faraday cup, which was employed to normalize the detector responses.Main results.The lateral beam spread obtained from the beam reconstruction agreed with the one derived from the radiochromic film measurements. No dose rates effects were observed in LiF:Mg,Ti for the investigated dose rates within 3% (k= 1). On average, the dose response of the TLDs agreed with the reference detectors within their uncertainties. The largest deviation (-5%) was measured at 4500 Gy s^-1.Significance.The dose rate independence of LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs makes them suitable for dosimetry of UHDR proton beams. Additionally, the combination of a matrix of TLDs and the beam reconstruction can be applied to determine the beam profile of narrow proton beams.

A prototype low-cost secondary standard calorimeter for reference dosimetry with ultra-high pulse dose rates

OBJECTIVES

Ultra-high pulse dose rate modalities present significant dosimetry challenges for ionisation chambers due to significant ion recombination. Conversely, calorimeters are ideally suited to measure high dose, short duration dose deliveries and this work describes a simple calorimeter as an alternative dosemeter for use in the clinic.

METHODS

Calorimeters were constructed featuring a disc-shaped core and single sensing thermistor encased in a 3D-printed body shaped like a Roos ionisation chamber. The thermistor forms one arm of a DC Wheatstone bridge, connected to a standard DMM. The bridge-out-of-balance voltage was calibrated in terms of temperature. A graphite-core calorimeter was calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water (J/kg) in Co-60 and conventional 6, 10 and 15 MV X-rays. Similarly, an aluminium-core calorimeter was calibrated in a conventional 20 MeV electron beam and tested in a research high dose per pulse 6 MeV electron beam.

RESULTS

Calorimeters were successfully calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in conventional radiotherapy beams at approximately 5 Gy/min with an estimated uncertainty of ±2-2.5% (k = 2), and performed similarly in a 6 MeV electron beam delivering approximately 180 Gy/s.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple, low-cost calorimeter traceably calibrated to existing primary standards of absorbed dose could be used as a secondary standard for dosimetry for ultra-high pulse dose rates in the clinic.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Secondary standard calorimeters for routine measurements are not available commercially; this work presents the basis of a simple, low-cost solution for reference dosimetry for ultra-high pulse dose rate beams.