1
|
McCabe C, Abadi E, Zarei M, Segars WP, Samei E. The potential of photon-counting CT for the improved precision of lung nodule radiomics. Phys Med Biol 2025; 70:10.1088/1361-6560/adaad2. [PMID: 39813810 PMCID: PMC11866323 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/adaad2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
Objective.Lung nodule appearance may provide prognostic information, as the presence of spiculation increases the suspicion of a nodule being cancerous. Spiculations can be quantified using morphological radiomics features extracted from CT images. Radiomics features can be affected by the acquisition parameters and scanner technologies; thus, it is essential to identify imaging conditions that provide reliable measurements, particularly for emerging technologies like photon-counting CT (PCCT). This study aimed to systematically quantify the effect of imaging parameters on the radiomics measurements using a virtual imaging trial (VIT) platform, and further verify the findings with human clinical data.Approach.The VIT utilized nine virtual patients, each with three 6 mm nodules of varying spiculations. The virtual patients were run through a validated CT simulator (DukeSim) to acquire images at three dose levels (CTDIvol = 2.85, 5.69, and 11.38 mGy) with a clinical energy-integrating CT and a PCCT. The acquired projection images were reconstructed using multiple slice thicknesses, kernels, and matrix sizes. The reconstructed images were processed to extract morphological features using three segmentation methods. The features were clustered into three broad type categories. Features extracted from the acquired CT images were compared to their corresponding ground truth values, across all imaging conditions.Main results.Among all imaging conditions, slice thickness had the greatest effect on the radiomics measurements. When the thickest slices were used, the coefficient of variation increased by [1.19%-9.66%] in the energy integrating CT images, and [3.94%-24.43%] in the PCCT images. For both scanners, varying the kernel sharpness and dose affected the radiomics measurements insignificantly, while pixel size and segmentation method were observed to have stronger effects. Under varying imaging conditions, the trends and magnitude of radiomics features measurements were coherent with virtual trial results.Significance.The findings stress the importance of choosing optimal reconstruction settings for radiomics extraction to achieve precise feature quantifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy McCabe
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Mojtaba Zarei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - W Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wildman-Tobriner B, Felice N, Kalisz KR, Allen BC, Thomas SP, Kruse DE, Segars WP, Harrawood B, Bashir MR, Marin D, Morrison S, Erkanli A, Samei E, Abadi E, Wolfe S. Photon-Counting CT Effects on Sensitivity for Liver Lesion Detection: A Reader Study Using Virtual Imaging. Radiology 2025; 314:e241568. [PMID: 39807984 PMCID: PMC11783162 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Background Detection of hepatic metastases at CT is a daily task in radiology departments that influences medical and surgical treatment strategies for oncology patients. Purpose To compare simulated photon-counting CT (PCCT) with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT for the detection of small liver lesions. Materials and Methods In this reader study (July to December 2023), a virtual imaging framework was used with 50 anthropomorphic phantoms and 183 generated liver lesions (one to six lesions per phantom, 0.4-1.5 cm in diameter). Virtual CT platforms simulated PCCT and EID CT scanners. Phantoms were virtually scanned using routine (6 mGy) and low-dose (1.5 mGy) conditions and reconstructed with three kernels. A subset of 300 scans (150 PCCT vs EID CT pairs) were selected. Four radiologists independently reviewed all scans to mark liver lesions, assigned confidence scores for detection, and rated scan quality. Analysis was performed on a per-lesion basis to determine sensitivity for several variables and on a per-scan basis for scan quality. The McNemar test, two-sided paired t tests, and mixed-effects logistic regression models were fitted; P < .05 was considered indicative of statistically significant difference. Results Consensus reader sensitivity in detecting lesions was 82.1% (451 of 549) for PCCT versus 77.6% (426 of 549) for EID CT (P < .001), with a mean sensitivity gain of 4.3 percentage points ± 1.3 (P < .001 to P = .02 per reader). Readers had better subjective confidence for lesions at PCCT (mean score, 61.5 ± 22 vs 56.1 ± 24 [on a 101-point scale]; P < .001). Sensitivity was lower for lesions smaller than 1 cm, with more pronounced difference between PCCT and EID CT (74.0% [271 of 366] vs 67.2% [246 of 366]; P < .001). At the lower dose level, PCCT showed higher sensitivity than EID CT (68.9% [168 of 244] vs 61.1% [149 of 244]; P < .001) for subcentimeter lesions. In a multivariable model, PCCT was independently associated with increased odds of lesion detection (odds ratio, 1.55; P < .001). Image quality was slightly higher for PCCT (mean score, 55.3 vs 50.6 [on a 101-point scale]; P < .001). Conclusion Compared with EID CT, PCCT showed better sensitivity in the detection of small liver lesions. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Menu in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Nicholas Felice
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin R. Kalisz
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Brian C. Allen
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah P. Thomas
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Danielle E. Kruse
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - William Paul Segars
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Brian Harrawood
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Mustafa R. Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniele Marin
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Samantha Morrison
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Ehsan Samei
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| | - Shannyn Wolfe
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, 2301
Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27701 (B.W.T., K.R.K., B.C.A., S.P.T., D.E.K.,
B.H., M.R.B., D.M., E.S., E.A.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
(N.F., S.M., A.E.) and Department of Medical Physics (W.P.S., E.S., E.A.), Duke
University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abadi E, Barufaldi B, Lago M, Badal A, Mello-Thoms C, Bottenus N, Wangerin KA, Goldburgh M, Tarbox L, Beaucage-Gauvreau E, Frangi AF, Maidment A, Kinahan PE, Bosmans H, Samei E. Toward widespread use of virtual trials in medical imaging innovation and regulatory science. Med Phys 2024; 51:9394-9404. [PMID: 39369717 PMCID: PMC11659034 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The rapid advancement in the field of medical imaging presents a challenge in keeping up to date with the necessary objective evaluations and optimizations for safe and effective use in clinical settings. These evaluations are traditionally done using clinical imaging trials, which while effective, pose several limitations including high costs, ethical considerations for repetitive experiments, time constraints, and lack of ground truth. To tackle these issues, virtual trials (aka in silico trials) have emerged as a promising alternative, using computational models of human subjects and imaging devices, and observer models/analysis to carry out experiments. To facilitate the widespread use of virtual trials within the medical imaging research community, a major need is to establish a common consensus framework that all can use. Based on the ongoing efforts of an AAPM Task Group (TG387), this article provides a comprehensive overview of the requirements for establishing virtual imaging trial frameworks, paving the way toward their widespread use within the medical imaging research community. These requirements include credibility, reproducibility, and accessibility. Credibility assessment involves verification, validation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis, ensuring the accuracy and realism of computational models. A proper credibility assessment requires a clear context of use and the questions that the study is intended to objectively answer. For reproducibility and accessibility, this article highlights the need for detailed documentation, user-friendly software packages, and standard input/output formats. Challenges in data and software sharing, including proprietary data and inconsistent file formats, are discussed. Recommended solutions to enhance accessibility include containerized environments and data-sharing hubs, along with following standards such as CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium). By addressing challenges associated with credibility, reproducibility, and accessibility, virtual imaging trials can be positioned as a powerful and inclusive resource, advancing medical imaging innovation and regulatory science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology and Electrical & Computer Engineering, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bruno Barufaldi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miguel Lago
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability, OSEL, CDRH, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Andreu Badal
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability, OSEL, CDRH, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Nick Bottenus
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Kristen A. Wangerin
- Research and Development, Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE HealthCare, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Lawrence Tarbox
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau
- Institute of Physics-based Modeling for in silico Health (iSi Health), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alejandro F. Frangi
- Christabel Pankhurst Institute, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, UK
| | - Andrew Maidment
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul E. Kinahan
- Departments of Radiology, Bioengineering, and Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hilde Bosmans
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Radiation Physics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology and Electrical & Computer Engineering, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Felice N, Wildman-Tobriner B, Segars WP, Bashir MR, Marin D, Samei E, Abadi E. Photon-counting computed tomography versus energy-integrating computed tomography for detection of small liver lesions: comparison using a virtual framework imaging. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2024; 11:053502. [PMID: 39430123 PMCID: PMC11486217 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.11.5.053502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has the potential to provide superior image quality to energy-integrating CT (EICT). We objectively compare PCCT to EICT for liver lesion detection. Approach Fifty anthropomorphic, computational phantoms with inserted liver lesions were generated. Contrast-enhanced scans of each phantom were simulated at the portal venous phase. The acquisitions were done using DukeSim, a validated CT simulation platform. Scans were simulated at two dose levels (CTDI vol 1.5 to 6.0 mGy) modeling PCCT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and EICT (SOMATOM Flash, Siemens). Images were reconstructed with varying levels of kernel sharpness (soft, medium, sharp). To provide a quantitative estimate of image quality, the modulation transfer function (MTF), frequency at 50% of the MTF (f 50 ), noise magnitude, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR, per lesion), and detectability index (d ' , per lesion) were measured. Results Across all studied conditions, the best detection performance, measured byd ' , was for PCCT images with the highest dose level and softest kernel. With soft kernel reconstruction, PCCT demonstrated improved lesion CNR andd ' compared with EICT, with a mean increase in CNR of 35.0% ( p < 0.001 ) and 21% ( p < 0.001 ) and a mean increase ind ' of 41.0% ( p < 0.001 ) and 23.3% ( p = 0.007 ) for the 1.5 and 6.0 mGy acquisitions, respectively. The improvements were greatest for larger phantoms, low-contrast lesions, and low-dose scans. Conclusions PCCT demonstrated objective improvement in liver lesion detection and image quality metrics compared with EICT. These advances may lead to earlier and more accurate liver lesion detection, thus improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Felice
- Duke University, Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | | | - William Paul Segars
- Duke University, Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Mustafa R. Bashir
- Duke University, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Duke University, Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Department of Physics, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Duke University, Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sotoudeh-Paima S, Segars WP, Ghosh D, Luo S, Samei E, Abadi E. A systematic assessment and optimization of photon-counting CT for lung density quantifications. Med Phys 2024; 51:2893-2904. [PMID: 38368605 PMCID: PMC11055522 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has recently emerged into clinical use; however, its optimum imaging protocols and added benefits remains unknown in terms of providing more accurate lung density quantification compared to energy-integrating computed tomography (EICT) scanners. PURPOSE To systematically assess the performance of a clinical PCCT scanner for lung density quantifications and compare it against EICT. METHODS This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective analysis of subjects scanned (August-December 2021) using a clinical PCCT system. The influence of altering reconstruction parameters was studied (reconstruction kernel, pixel size, slice thickness). A virtual CT dataset of anthropomorphic virtual subjects was acquired to demonstrate the correspondence of findings to clinical dataset, and to perform systematic imaging experiments, not possible using human subjects. The virtual subjects were imaged using a validated, scanner-specific CT simulator of a PCCT and two EICT (defined as EICT A and B) scanners. The images were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) of lung and emphysema density against their corresponding ground truth. RESULTS Clinical and virtual PCCT datasets showed similar trends, with sharper kernels and smaller voxel sizes increasing percentage of low-attenuation areas below -950 HU (LAA-950) by up to 15.7 ± 6.9% and 11.8 ± 5.5%, respectively. Under the conditions studied, higher doses, thinner slices, smaller pixel sizes, iterative reconstructions, and quantitative kernels with medium sharpness resulted in lower lung MAE values. While using these settings for PCCT, changes in the dose level (13 to 1.3 mGy), slice thickness (0.4 to 1.5 mm), pixel size (0.49 to 0.98 mm), reconstruction technique (70 keV-VMI to wFBP), and kernel (Qr48 to Qr60) increased lung MAE by 15.3 ± 2.0, 1.4 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.3, 4.2 ± 0.8, and 9.1 ± 1.6 HU, respectively. At the optimum settings identified per scanner, PCCT images exhibited lower lung and emphysema MAE than those of EICT scanners (by 2.6 ± 1.0 and 9.6 ± 3.4 HU, compared to EICT A, and by 4.8 ± 0.8 and 7.4 ± 2.3 HU, compared to EICT B). The accuracy of lung density measurements was correlated with subjects' mean lung density (p < 0.05), measured by PCCT at optimum setting under the conditions studied. CONCLUSION Photon-counting CT demonstrated superior performance in density quantifications, with its influences of imaging parameters in line with energy-integrating CT scanners. The technology offers improvement in lung quantifications, thus demonstrating potential toward more objective assessment of respiratory conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saman Sotoudeh-Paima
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - W. Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Dhrubajyoti Ghosh
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Sheng Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kavuri A, Ho FC, Ghojogh-Nejad M, Sotoudeh-Paima S, Samei E, Segars WP, Abadi E. Quantitative accuracy of lung function measurement using parametric response mapping: A virtual imaging study. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2024; 12927:129270B. [PMID: 38765483 PMCID: PMC11100024 DOI: 10.1117/12.3006833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Parametric response mapping (PRM) is a voxel-based quantitative CT imaging biomarker that measures the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by analyzing both inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. Although PRM-derived measurements have been shown to predict disease severity and phenotyping, their quantitative accuracy is impacted by the variability of scanner settings and patient conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability of PRM-based measurements due to the changes in the scanner types and configurations. We developed 10 human chest models with emphysema and air-trapping at end-inspiration and end-expiration states. These models were virtually imaged using a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) to create CT images at different acquisition settings for energy-integrating and photon-counting CT systems. The CT images were used to estimate PRM maps. The quantified measurements were compared with ground truth values to evaluate the deviations in the measurements. Results showed that PRM measurements varied with scanner type and configurations. The emphysema volume was overestimated by 3 ± 9.5 % (mean ± standard deviation) of the lung volume, and the functional small airway disease (fSAD) volume was underestimated by 7.5±19 % of the lung volume. PRM measurements were more accurate and precise when the acquired settings were photon-counting CT, higher dose, smoother kernel, and larger pixel size. This study demonstrates the development and utility of virtual imaging tools for systematic assessment of a quantitative biomarker accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Kavuri
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - Fong Chi Ho
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - Mobina Ghojogh-Nejad
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - Saman Sotoudeh-Paima
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - W Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sharma S, Pal D, Abadi E, Segars P, Hsieh J, Samei E. Deep silicon photon-counting CT: A first simulation-based study for assessing perceptual benefits across diverse anatomies. Eur J Radiol 2024; 171:111279. [PMID: 38194843 PMCID: PMC10922475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess perceptual benefits provided by the improved spatial resolution and noise performance of deep silicon photon-counting CT (Si-PCCT) over conventional energy-integrating CT (ECT) using polychromatic images for various clinical tasks and anatomical regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Anthropomorphic, computational models were developed for lungs, liver, inner ear, and head-and-neck (H&N) anatomies. These regions included specific abnormalities such as lesions in the lungs and liver, and calcified plaques in the carotid arteries. The anatomical models were imaged using a scanner-specific CT simulation platform (DukeSim) modeling a Si-PCCT prototype and a conventional ECT system at matched dose levels. The simulated polychromatic projections were reconstructed with matched in-plane resolutions using manufacturer-specific software. The reconstructed pairs of images were scored by radiologists to gauge the task-specific perceptual benefits provided by Si-PCCT compared to ECT based on visualization of anatomical and image quality features. The scores were standardized as z-scores for minimizing inter-observer variability and compared between the systems for evidence of statistically significant improvement (one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test with a significance level of 0.05) in perceptual performance for Si-PCCT. RESULTS Si-PCCT offered favorable image quality and improved visualization capabilities, leading to mean improvements in task-specific perceptual performance over ECT for most tasks. The improvements for Si-PCCT were statistically significant for the visualization of lung lesion (0.08 ± 0.89 vs. 0.90 ± 0.48), liver lesion (-0.64 ± 0.37 vs. 0.95 ± 0.55), and soft tissue structures (-0.47 ± 0.90 vs. 0.33 ± 1.24) and cochlea (-0.47 ± 0.80 vs. 0.38 ± 0.62) in inner ear. CONCLUSIONS Si-PCCT exhibited mean improvements in task-specific perceptual performance over ECT for most clinical tasks considered in this study, with statistically significant improvement for 6/20 tasks. The perceptual performance of Si-PCCT is expected to improve further with availability of spectral information and reconstruction kernels optimized for high resolution provided by smaller pixel size of Si-PCCT. The outcomes of this study indicate the positive potential of Si-PCCT for benefiting routine clinical practice through improved image quality and visualization capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shobhit Sharma
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Physics, Duke University, Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Debashish Pal
- GE Healthcare, 3000 N Grandview Blvd, Waukesha, WI 53188, USA
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
| | - Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Jiang Hsieh
- GE Healthcare, 3000 N Grandview Blvd, Waukesha, WI 53188, USA
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Physics, Duke University, Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCabe C, Sauer TJ, Zarei M, Segars WP, Samei E, Abadi E. A systematic assessment of photon-counting CT for bone mineral density and microarchitecture quantifications. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2023; 12463:1246303. [PMID: 37125263 PMCID: PMC10142096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is an emerging imaging technology with potential improvements in quantification and rendition of micro-structures due to its smaller detector sizes. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a new PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) in quantifying clinically relevant bone imaging biomarkers for characterization of common bone diseases. We evaluated the ability of PCCT in quantifying microarchitecture in bones compared to conventional energy-integrating CT. The quantifications were done through virtual imaging trials, using a 50 percentile BMI male virtual patient, with a detailed model of trabecular bone with varied bone densities in the lumbar spine. The virtual patient was imaged using a validated CT simulator (DukeSim) at CTDIvol of 20 and 40 mGy for three scan modes: ultra-high-resolution PCCT (UHR-PCCT), high-resolution PCCT (HR-PCCT), and a conventional energy-integrating CT (EICT) (FORCE, Siemens). Further, each scan mode was reconstructed with varying parameters to evaluate their effect on quantification. Bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular volume to total bone volume (BV/TV), and radiomics texture features were calculated in each vertebra. The most accurate BMD measurements relative to the ground truth were UHR-PCCT images (error: 3.3% ± 1.5%), compared to HR-PCCT (error: 5.3% ± 2.0%) and EICT (error: 7.1% ± 2.0%). UHR-PCCT images outperformed EICT and HR-PCCT. In BV/TV quantifications, UHR-PCCT (errors of 29.7% ± 11.8%) outperformed HR-PCCT (error: 80.6% ± 31.4%) and EICT (error: 67.3% ± 64.3). UHR-PCCT and HR-PCCT texture features were sensitive to anatomical changes using the sharpest kernel. Conversely, the texture radiomics showed no clear trend to reflect the progression of the disease in EICT. This study demonstrated the potential utility of PCCT technology in improved performance of bone quantifications leading to more accurate characterization of bone diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy McCabe
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Thomas J Sauer
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Mojtaba Zarei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - W Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ho FC, Sotoudeh-Paima S, Segars WP, Samei E, Abadi E. Development and Application of a Virtual Imaging Trial framework for Airway Quantifications via CT. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2023; 12463:124631B. [PMID: 37125262 PMCID: PMC10142146 DOI: 10.1117/12.2654263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the top three causes of death worldwide, characterized by emphysema and bronchitis. Airway measurements reflect the severity of bronchitis and other airway-related diseases. Airway structures can be objectively evaluated with quantitative computed tomography (CT). The accuracy of such quantifications is limited by the spatial resolution and image noise characteristics of the imaging system and can be potentially improved with the emerging photon-counting CT (PCCT) technology. This study evaluated the quantitative performance of PCCT against energy-integrating CT (EICT) systems for airway measurements, and further identified optimum CT imaging parameters for such quantifications. The study was performed using a novel virtual imaging framework by developing the first library of virtual patients with bronchitis. These virtual patients were developed based on CT images of confirmed COPD patients with varied bronchitis severity. The human models were virtually imaged at 6.3 and 12.6 mGy dose levels using a scanner-specific simulator (DukeSim), synthesizing clinical PCCT and EICT scanners (NAEOTOM Alpha, FLASH, Siemens). The projections were reconstructed with two algorithms and kernels at different matrix sizes and slice thicknesses. The CT images were used to quantify clinically relevant airway measurements ("Pi10" and "WA%") and compared against their ground truth values. Compared to EICT, PCCT provided more accurate Pi10 and WA% measurements by 63.1% and 68.2%, respectively. For both technologies, sharper kernels and larger matrix sizes led to more reliable bronchitis quantifications. This study highlights the potential advantages of PCCT against EICT in characterizing bronchitis utilizing a virtual imaging platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fong Chi Ho
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Saman Sotoudeh-Paima
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - W Paul Segars
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| | - Ehsan Abadi
- Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University
| |
Collapse
|