Development and validation of CT-based radiomics nomogram for the classification of benign parotid gland tumors

Nomogram combining dual-energy computed tomography features and radiomics for differentiating parotid warthin tumor from pleomorphic adenoma: a retrospective study

Introduction

Accurate differentiation between pleomorphic adenomas (PA) and Warthin tumors (WT) in the parotid gland is challenging owing to overlapping imaging features. This study aimed to evaluate a nomogram combining dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) quantitative parameters and radiomics to enhance diagnostic precision.

Methods

This retrospective study included 120 patients with pathologically confirmed PA or WT, randomly divided into training and test sets (7:3). DECT features, including tumor CT values from 70 keV virtual monochromatic images (VMIs), iodine concentration (IC), and normalized IC (NIC), were analyzed. Independent predictors were identified via logistic regression. Radiomic features were extracted from segmented regions of interest and filtered using the K-best and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Radiomic models based on 70 keV VMIs and material decomposition images were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). The best-performing radiomics model was combined with independent DECT predictors to construct a model and nomogram. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

IC (venous phase), NIC (arterial phase), and NIC (venous phase) were independent DECT predictors. The DECT feature model achieved AUCs of 0.842 and 0.853 in the training and test sets, respectively, outperforming the traditional radiomics model (AUCs 0.836 and 0.834, respectively). The DECT radiomics model using arterial phase water-based images with LR showed improved performance (AUCs 0.883 and 0.925). The combined model demonstrated the highest discrimination power, with AUCs of 0.910 and 0.947. The combined model outperformed the DECT features and conventional radiomics models, with AUCs of 0.910 and 0.947, respectively (P<0.05). While the difference in AUC between the combined model and the DECT radiomics model was not statistically significant (P>0.05), it showed higher specificity, accuracy, and precision. DCA found that the nomogram gave the greatest net therapeutic effect across a broad range of threshold probabilities.

Discussion

The nomogram combining DECT features and radiomics offers a promising non-invasive tool for differentiating PA and WT in clinical practice.

The value of T1- and FST2-Weighted-based radiomics nomogram in differentiating pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor

PURPOSE

To establish a radiomics nomogram based on MRI radiomics features combined with clinical characteristics for distinguishing pleomorphic adenoma (PA) from warthin tumor (WT).

METHODS

294 patients with PA (n = 159) and WT (n = 135) confirmed by histopathology were included in this study between July 2017 and June 2023. Clinical factors including clinical data and MRI features were analyzed to establish clinical model. 10 MRI radiomics features were extracted and selected from T1WI and FS-T2WI, used to establish radiomics model and calculate radiomics scores (Rad-scores). Clinical factors and Rad-scores were combined to serve as crucial parameters for combined model. Through Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA), the discriminative values of the three models were qualified and compared, the best-performing combined model was visualized in the form of a radiomics nomogram.

RESULTS

The combined model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance for PA and WT in the training set (AUC=0.998) and testing set (AUC=0.993) and performed better compared with the clinical model and radiomics model in the training set (AUC=0.996, 0.952) and testing model (AUC=0.954, 0.849). The DCA showed that the combined model provided more overall clinical usefulness in distinguishing parotid PA from WT than another two models.

CONCLUSION

An analytical radiomics nomogram based on MRI radiomics features, incorporating clinical factors, can effectively distinguish between PA and WT.

Multi-feature Fusion Network on Gray Scale Ultrasonography: Effective Differentiation of Adenolymphoma and Pleomorphic Adenoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

to develop a deep learning radiomics graph network (DLRN) that integrates deep learning features extracted from gray scale ultrasonography, radiomics features and clinical features, for distinguishing parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA) from adenolymphoma (AL) MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 287 patients (162 in training cohort, 70 in internal validation cohort and 55 in external validation cohort) from two centers with histologically confirmed PA or AL were enrolled. Deep transfer learning features and radiomics features extracted from gray scale ultrasound images were input to machine learning classifiers including logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), KNN, RandomForest (RF), ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and MLP to construct deep transfer learning radiomics (DTL) models and Rad models respectively. Deep learning radiomics (DLR) models were constructed by integrating the two features and DLR signatures were generated. Clinical features were further combined with the signatures to develop a DLRN model. The performance of these models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

In the internal validation cohort and external validation cohort, comparing to Clinic (AUC=0.767 and 0.777), Rad (AUC=0.841 and 0.748), DTL (AUC=0.740 and 0.825) and DLR (AUC=0.863 and 0.859), the DLRN model showed greatest discriminatory ability (AUC=0.908 and 0.908) showed optimal discriminatory ability.

CONCLUSION

The DLRN model built based on gray scale ultrasonography significantly improved the diagnostic performance for benign salivary gland tumors. It can provide clinicians with a non-invasive and accurate diagnostic approach, which holds important clinical significance and value. Ensemble of multiple models helped alleviate overfitting on the small dataset compared to using Resnet50 alone.

Performance of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors: a systematic review

Purpose

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic precision of radiomics in the differential diagnosis of parotid tumors, considering the increasing utilization of radiomics in tumor diagnosis. Although some researchers have attempted to apply radiomics in this context, there is ongoing debate regarding its accuracy.

Methods

Databases of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to May 29, 2024 were systematically searched. The quality of included primary studies was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) checklist. The meta-analysis was performed utilizing a bivariate mixed-effects model.

Results

A total of 39 primary studies were incorporated. The machine learning model relying on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.86], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.27-0.99] in the validation set. The machine learning model based on MRI radiomics for diagnosis malignant tumors of the parotid gland, exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83[95% CI: 0.76, 0.88], SROC of 0.89 [95% CI: 0.17-1.00] in the validation set. The models also demonstrated high predictive accuracy for benign lesions.

Conclusion

There is great potential for radiomics-based models to improve the accuracy of diagnosing benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland. To further enhance this potential, future studies should consider implementing standardized radiomics-based features, adopting more robust feature selection methods, and utilizing advanced model development tools. These measures can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023434931.

Radiomic nomogram for discriminating parotid pleomorphic adenoma from parotid adenolymphoma based on grayscale ultrasonography

Objectives

To differentiate parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA) from adenolymphoma (AL) using radiomics of grayscale ultrasonography in combination with clinical features.

Methods

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic characteristics of 162 cases from December 2019 to March 2023. The study population consisted of a training cohort of 113 patients and a validation cohort of 49 patients. Grayscale ultrasonography was processed using ITP-Snap software and Python to delineate regions of interest (ROIs) and extract radiomic features. Univariate analysis, Spearman's correlation, greedy recursive elimination strategy, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) correlation were employed to select relevant radiographic features. Subsequently, eight machine learning methods (LR, SVM, KNN, RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and MLP) were employed to build a quantitative radiomic model using the selected features. A radiomic nomogram was developed through the utilization of multivariate logistic regression analysis, integrating both clinical and radiomic data. The accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results

To differentiate PA from AL, the radiomic model using SVM showed optimal discriminatory ability (accuracy = 0.929 and 0.857, sensitivity = 0.946 and 0.800, specificity = 0.921 and 0.897, positive predictive value = 0.854 and 0.842, and negative predictive value = 0.972 and 0.867 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively). A nomogram incorporating rad-Signature and clinical features achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.983 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.965-1) and 0.910 (95% CI: 0.830-0.990) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram and radiomic model outperformed the clinical-factor model in terms of clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

A nomogram based on grayscale ultrasonic radiomics and clinical features served as a non-invasive tool capable of differentiating PA and AL.

Deep Network-Based Comprehensive Parotid Gland Tumor Detection

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Salivary gland tumors constitute 2%-6% of all head and neck tumors and are most common in the parotid gland. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most sensitive imaging modality for diagnosis. Tumor type, localization, and relationship with surrounding structures are important factors for treatment. Therefore, parotid gland tumor segmentation is important. Specialists widely use manual segmentation in diagnosis and treatment. However, considering the development of artificial intelligence-based models today, it is seen that artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation models can be used instead of manual segmentation, which is a time-consuming technique. Therefore, we segmented parotid gland tumor (PGT) using deep learning-based architectures in the paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dataset used in the study includes 102 T1-w, 102 contrast-enhanced T1-w (T1C-w), and 102 T2-w MR images. After cropping the raw and manually segmented images by experts, we obtained the masks of these images. After standardizing the image sizes, we split these images into approximately 80% training set and 20% test set. Hereabouts, we trained six models for these images using ResNet18 and Xception-based DeepLab v3+. We prepared a user-friendly Graphical User Interface application that includes each of these models.

RESULTS

From the results, the accuracy and weighted Intersection over Union values of the ResNet18-based DeepLab v3+ architecture trained for T1C-w, which is the most successful model in the study, are equal to 0.96153 and 0.92601, respectively. Regarding the results and the literature, it can be seen that the proposed system is competitive in terms of both using MR images and training the models independently for T1-w, T1C-w, and T2-w. Expressing that PGT is usually segmented manually in the literature, we predict that our study can contribute significantly to the literature.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we prepared and presented a software application that can be easily used by users for automatic PGT segmentation. In addition to predicting the reduction of costs and workload through the study, we developed models with meaningful performance metrics according to the literature.

Differentiation between cerebral alveolar echinococcosis and brain metastases with radiomics combined machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Cerebral alveolar echinococcosis (CAE) and brain metastases (BM) share similar in locations and imaging appearance. However, they require distinct treatment approaches, with CAE typically treated with chemotherapy and surgery, while BM is managed with radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the primary malignancy. Accurate diagnosis is crucial due to the divergent treatment strategies.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics and machine learning techniques based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate between CAE and BM.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI images of 130 patients (30 CAE and 100 BM) from Xinjiang Medical University First Affiliated Hospital and The First People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture, between January 2014 and December 2022. The dataset was divided into training (91 cases) and testing (39 cases) sets. Three dimensional tumors were segmented by radiologists from contrast-enhanced T1WI images on open resources software 3D Slicer. Features were extracted on Pyradiomics, further feature reduction was carried out using univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Finally, we built five machine learning models, support vector machine, logistic regression, linear discrimination analysis, k-nearest neighbors classifier, and Gaussian naïve bias and evaluated their performance via several metrics including sensitivity (recall), specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The area under curve (AUC) of support vector classifier (SVC), linear discrimination analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and gaussian naïve bias (NB) algorithms in training (testing) sets are 0.99 (0.94), 1.00 (0.87), 0.98 (0.92), 0.97 (0.97), and 0.98 (0.93), respectively. Nested cross-validation demonstrated the robustness and generalizability of the models. Additionally, the calibration plot and decision curve analysis demonstrated the practical usefulness of these models in clinical practice, with lower bias toward different subgroups during decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiomics and machine learning approach based on contrast enhanced T1WI images could well distinguish CAE and BM. This approach holds promise in assisting doctors with accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.