The low-LET radiation contribution to the tumor dose in diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy

DNA damage response in a 2D-culture model by diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (Alpha-DaRT)

Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (Alpha-DaRT) is a unique method, in which interstitial sources carrying 224Ra release a chain of short-lived daughter atoms from their surface. Although DNA damage response (DDR) is crucial to inducing cell death after irradiation, how the DDR occurs during Alpha-DaRT treatment has not yet been explored. In this study, we temporo-spatially characterized DDR such as kinetics of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and cell cycle, in two-dimensional (2D) culture conditions qualitatively mimicking Alpha-DaRT treatments, by employing HeLa cells expressing the Fucci cell cycle-visualizing system. The distribution of the alpha-particle pits detected by a plastic nuclear track detector, CR-39, strongly correlated with γH2AX staining, a marker of DSBs, around the 224Ra source, but the area of G2 arrested cells was more widely spread 24 h from the start of the exposure. Thereafter, close time-lapse observation revealed varying cell cycle kinetics, depending on the distance from the source. A medium containing daughter nuclides prepared from 224Ra sources allowed us to estimate the radiation dose after 24 h of exposure, and determine surviving fractions. The present experimental model revealed for the first time temporo-spatial information of DDR occurring around the source in its early stages.

First measurements of radon-220 diffusion in mice tumors, towards treatment planning in diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy ("Alpha-DaRT") is a new method for treating solid tumors with alpha particles, relying on the release of the short-lived alpha-emitting daughter atoms of radium-224 from interstitial sources inserted into the tumor. Alpha-DaRT tumor dosimetry is governed by the spread of radium's progeny around the source, as described by an approximate framework called the "diffusion-leakage model". The most important model parameters are the diffusion lengths of radon-220 and lead-212, and their estimation is therefore essential for treatment planning.

PURPOSE

Previous works have provided initial estimates for the dominant diffusion length, by measuring the activity spread inside mice-borne tumors several days after the insertion of an Alpha-DaRT source. The measurements, taken when lead-212 was in secular equilibrium with radium-224, were interpreted as representing the lead-212 diffusion length. The aim of this work is to provide first experimental estimates for the diffusion length of radon-220, using a new methodology.

METHODS

The diffusion length of radon-220 was estimated from autoradiography measurements of histological sections taken from 24 mice-borne subcutaneous tumors of five different types. Unlike previous studies, the source dwell time inside the tumor was limited to 30 min, to prevent the buildup of lead-212. To investigate the contribution of potential non-diffusive processes, experiments were done in two sets: fourteen in vivo tumors, where during the treatment the tumors were still carried by the mice with active blood supply, and 10 ex-vivo tumors, where the tumors were excised before source insertion and kept in a medium at37 ∘ C $37^\circ {\text{C}}$ with the source inside.

RESULTS

The measured diffusion lengths of radon-220, extracted by fitting the recorded activity pattern up to 1.5 mm from the source, lie in the range0.25 - 0.6 mm ${0.25-0.6}\nobreakspace {\text{mm}}$ , with no significant difference between the average values measured in in-vivo and ex-vivo tumors:L R n i n - v i v o = 0.40 ± 0.08 mm $L_{Rn}^{in-vivo}=0.40{\pm }0.08\nobreakspace {\text{mm}}$ versusL R n e x - v i v o = 0.39 ± 0.07 mm $L_{Rn}^{ex-vivo}=0.39{\pm }0.07\nobreakspace {\text{mm}}$ . However, in-vivo tumors display an enhanced spread of activity 2-3 mm away from the source. This effect is not explained by the current model and is much less pronounced in ex-vivo tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The average measured radon-220 diffusion lengths in both in-vivo and ex-vivo tumors are consistent with published data on the diffusion length of radon in water and lie close to the upper limit of the previously estimated range of0.2 - 0.4 mm $0.2-0.4\nobreakspace {\text{mm}}$ . The observation that close to the source there is no apparent difference between in-vivo and ex-vivo tumors, and the good agreement with the theoretical model in this region suggest that the spread of radon-220 is predominantly diffusive in this region. The departure from the model prediction in in-vivo tumors at large radial distances may hint at potential vascular contribution, which will be the subject of future works.