1
|
Victor CR, van den Heuvel E, Pentecost C, Quinn C, Charlwood C, Clare L. Understanding dementia in minority ethnic communities: The perspectives of key stakeholders interviewed as part of the IDEAL programme. DEMENTIA 2024:14713012241272817. [PMID: 39152913 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241272817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Future populations of older adults in the UK, those aged 65+, will demonstrate increased diversity in terms of their ethnic identity resultant from the ageing of the post-war migrants from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the Caribbean. As a consequence, there will be an increase in the numbers of older adults from these communities living with age-related chronic diseases such as dementia. In response to these demographic changes, we need to develop a research, policy and practice agenda that is inclusive and provides evidence for the development of culturally diverse and effective models of service delivery. This requires engagement with three key stakeholder groups: (a) people with dementia; (b) their carers; and (c) the wider community. As part of the IDEAL research programme on living well with dementia, we undertook semi-structured interviews with twelve community leaders, defined as known and trusted individuals active in their respective communities, and six community members (two people living with dementia and four carers). We explored their understandings, experiences, and views of about dementia. Our analysis identified two overarching themes. The migrant lifecourse highlighted issues of not belonging, discrimination and racism. This framed our second theme, the cultural context of dementia, which addressed dementia knowledge and attitudes, service provision and service access, and how being part of a minority ethnic community made a difference to these experiences. Our study highlights how lifecourse experiences of negative hostile social and policy environments and services can be profound and long-lasting and provide a prism through which accessing dementia care is experienced. Our findings argue for the inclusion of diverse views and lifecourse experiences within the context of developing a dementia strategy for research, policy and practice that is appropriate for a multicultural and heterogenous society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R Victor
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor van den Heuvel
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Claire Pentecost
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Catherine Quinn
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Catherine Charlwood
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South-West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
| | - Linda Clare
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South-West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clare L, Gamble LD, Martyr A, Henderson C, Knapp M, Matthews FE. Living Alone With Mild-to-Moderate Dementia Over a Two-Year Period: Longitudinal Findings From the IDEAL Cohort. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2024:S1064-7481(24)00352-X. [PMID: 38897833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the experiences of people with dementia living alone or with others and how these may change over two years. DESIGN We analysed longitudinal data from three assessment waves, one year apart, in the British IDEAL cohort. SETTING Participants with mild-to-moderate dementia were recruited through National Health Service providers, where possible with a family caregiver, and interviewed at home. PARTICIPANTS The current analyses include 281 people with dementia living alone and 1,244 living with others at baseline; follow-up data were available for 200 and 965 respectively at time 2 and 144 and 696 respectively at time 3. For those living alone, 140 nonresident caregivers contributed at baseline, 102 at time 2 and 81 at time 3. For those living with others, 1,127 family caregivers contributed at baseline, 876 at time 2 and 670 at time 3. MEASUREMENTS Assessments covered: cognitive and functional ability; self-reported perceptions of health, mood, social engagement, quality of life, satisfaction with life and well-being; use of in-home and community care; and transitions into residential care. RESULTS People living alone tended to have better cognitive and functional ability and were more frequent users of in-home care. However, they experienced poorer physical, social, and psychological health and reduced quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being. These differences persisted over time and rates of transition into residential care were higher. CONCLUSIONS To facilitate continuing in place for people with dementia living alone, a dual focus on supporting functional ability and addressing psychosocial needs is essential in the context of an enabling policy framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Clare
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, (L.C, A.M), Exeter, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South-West Peninsula, (L.C), Exeter, UK.
| | - Laura D Gamble
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, (L.D.G, F.E.M) Newcastle, UK
| | - Anthony Martyr
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, (L.C, A.M), Exeter, UK
| | - Catherine Henderson
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, (C.H, M.K), London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, (C.H, M.K), London, UK
| | - Fiona E Matthews
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, (L.D.G, F.E.M) Newcastle, UK; Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research, Hull York Medical School, (F.E.M), University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biggs K, Dix C, Shiely F, Treweek S, Shepherd V, Lane A, Green H, Isaacs T, Willis A, Cooper C. Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2024; 4:12. [PMID: 39297143 PMCID: PMC11408910 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
Background Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000-2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting 'lessons learnt' from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways.The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Biggs
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Caroline Dix
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Frances Shiely
- HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, County Cork, T12 WE28, Ireland
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Victoria Shepherd
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Athene Lane
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 1NU, UK
| | - Heidi Green
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK
- COUCH Health, Manchester, M1 3HF, UK
| | - Talia Isaacs
- Institute of Education (IOE), Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, England, WC1H 0NS, UK
| | - Andrew Willis
- HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, County Cork, T12 WE28, Ireland
| | - Cindy Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirt J, Beer T, Cavalli S, Cereghetti S, Pusterla ERG, Zeller A. Recruiting Persons With Dementia: A Systematic Review of Facilitators, Barriers, and Strategies. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2024; 39:15333175241276443. [PMID: 39137907 PMCID: PMC11322929 DOI: 10.1177/15333175241276443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Study recruitment of persons with dementia is challenging. We aimed to assess facilitators, barriers, and strategies to identify and approach persons with dementia for recruitment to dementia care studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and other sources (ORRCA [Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls]; pertinent evidence syntheses; citation searching) and narratively summarised the results (PROSPERO CRD42022342600). Facilitators and barriers consisted of "characteristics of participants, researchers, clinical contact persons", "study characteristics", and "communication with participants". The highest number of participants were recruited by study information in electronic and print formats, as well as by networking and collaboration. Advertisements proved to be the most expensive way of recruitment. There is limited evidence on the impact of recruitment strategies to identify persons with dementia for recruitment to dementia care studies. Our analysis of facilitators and barriers may inform research teams in designing strategies to identify persons with dementia for recruitment purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Hirt
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
- Pragmatic Evidence Lab, Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Beer
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Cavalli
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Cereghetti
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Elia R. G. Pusterla
- Centre of Competence on Ageing, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Adelheid Zeller
- Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bryant J, Freund M, Ries N, Garvey G, McGhie A, Zucca A, Hoberg H, Passey M, Sanson-Fisher R. Volume, scope, and consideration of ethical issues in Indigenous cognitive impairment and dementia research: A systematic scoping review of studies published between 2000-2021. DEMENTIA 2022; 21:2647-2676. [PMID: 36054372 DOI: 10.1177/14713012221119594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High quality research involving Indigenous people with cognitive impairment and dementia is critical for informing evidence-based policy and practice. We examined the volume, scope and ethical considerations of research related to dementia with Indigenous populations globally from January 2000-December 2021. METHODS Studies were included if they were published in English from 2000 to 2021 and provided original data that focused on cognitive impairment or dementia in any Indigenous population. RESULTS The search yielded 13,009 papers of which, 76 met inclusion criteria. The overall number of papers increased over time. Studies were mostly conducted in Australia with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (n = 30; 39%). Twenty-six papers directly involved Indigenous participants with cognitive impairment or dementia. Of these studies, ethics approval was commonly required from two or more committees (n = 23, 88.5%). Ethical and legal governance frameworks were rarely discussed. DISCUSSION There is a clear need for further robust studies examining cognitive impairment and dementia with Indigenous populations. Future research should consider the ethical aspects of involving Indigenous participants with cognitive impairment in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health & Wellbeing Research Program, 454568Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan Freund
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health & Wellbeing Research Program, 454568Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Nola Ries
- Faculty of Law, 1994University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gail Garvey
- Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Charles Darwin University, 10095Menzies School of Health Research, Causarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Alexandra McGhie
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health & Wellbeing Research Program, 454568Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Zucca
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health & Wellbeing Research Program, 454568Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Hana Hoberg
- Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Charles Darwin University, 10095Menzies School of Health Research, Causarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Megan Passey
- University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, 5982University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health & Wellbeing Research Program, 454568Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
West E, Nair P, Aker N, Sampson EL, Moore K, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Walters K, Kupeli N, Davies N. Rapid development of a COVID-19 care planning decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia. Health Expect 2022; 25:1954-1966. [PMID: 35716078 PMCID: PMC9327830 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 has disproportionately affected people living with dementia and their carers. Its effects on health and social care systems necessitated a rapid-response approach to care planning and decision-making in this population, with reflexivity and responsiveness to changing individual and system needs at its core. Considering this, a decision-aid to help families of persons with dementia was developed. OBJECTIVES To coproduce with people living with dementia, and the people who care for them, a decision-aid for family carers of people living with dementia, to support decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were undertaken in 2020 with: (1) staff from two English national end-of-life and supportive care organizations; and (2) people living with dementia and family carers. Simultaneously, a rapid review of current evidence on making decisions with older people at the end of life was undertaken. Evidence from these inputs was combined to shape the decision-aid through a series of workshops with key stakeholders, including our patient and public involvement group, which consisted of a person living with dementia and family carers; a group of clinical and academic experts and a group of policy and charity leads. RESULTS The rapid review of existing evidence highlighted the need to consider both process and outcome elements of decision-making and their effects on people living with dementia and their families. The qualitative interviews discussed a wide range of topics, including trust, agency and confusion in making decisions in the context of COVID-19. The decision-aid primarily focussed on care moves, legal matters, carer wellbeing and help-seeking. CONCLUSIONS Combining different sources and forms of evidence was a robust and systematic process that proved efficient and valuable in creating a novel decision-aid for family carers within the context of COVID-19. The output from this process is an evidence-based practical decision-aid coproduced with people living with dementia, family carers, clinical and academic experts and leading national dementia and palliative care organizations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION We worked with people living with dementia and family carers and other key stakeholders throughout this study, from study development and design to inclusion in stakeholder workshops and dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily West
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Pushpa Nair
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free CampusUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Narin Aker
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free CampusUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth L. Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal London HospitalEast London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Kirsten Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- National Ageing Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care WorkforceKing's College London, StrandLondonUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaborative (ARC) South LondonKing's College London, StrandLondonUK
| | - Greta Rait
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free CampusUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Kate Walters
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free CampusUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nathan Davies
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Royal Free CampusUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Woodland L, Blignault I, O'Callaghan C, Harris-Roxas B. A framework for preferred practices in conducting culturally competent health research in a multicultural society. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:24. [PMID: 33602261 PMCID: PMC7893969 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00657-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improving the health and well-being of the whole population requires that health inequities be addressed. In an era of unprecedented international migration, meeting the health care needs of growing multicultural or multiethnic societies presents major challenges for health care systems and for health researchers. Considerable literature exists on the methodological and ethical difficulties of conducting research in a cross-cultural context; however, there is a need for a framework to guide health research in multicultural societies. Methods The framework was informed by “research on research” that we have undertaken in community and primary health care settings in Sydney, Australia. Case studies are presented as illustrative examples. Results We present a framework for preferred practices in conducting health research that is culturally informed, high-quality, safe, and actionable. Conclusions The framework is not intended to be universal, however many of its aspects will have relevance for health research generally. Application of the framework for preferred practices could potentially make health research more culturally competent, thus enabling enhanced policies, programmes and practices to better meet population health needs. The framework needs to be further tested and refined in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Woodland
- Priority Populations, Population and Community Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, 301 Forbes St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. .,South Eastern Sydney Research Collaboration Hub, Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of NSW, Level 3, AGSM Building, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Ilse Blignault
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Building 3, David Pilgrim Avenue, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia
| | - Cathy O'Callaghan
- South Eastern Sydney Research Collaboration Hub, Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of NSW, Level 3, AGSM Building, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ben Harris-Roxas
- Priority Populations, Population and Community Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, 301 Forbes St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.,Population and Community Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, 301 Forbes St, Darlinghurst NSW 2010, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waheed W, Mirza N, Waheed MW, Blakemore A, Kenning C, Masood Y, Matthews F, Bower P. Recruitment and methodological issues in conducting dementia research in British ethnic minorities: A qualitative systematic review. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2020; 29:e1806. [PMID: 31808215 PMCID: PMC7051842 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identifying existing recruitment and methodological issues within dementia research conducted in UK studies that included ethnic minorities. METHODS We searched for and included any publication detailing dementia research in the UK that included any ethnic minority. The search results and all titles and abstracts were screened according to the inclusion criteria followed by screening of the full texts. We extracted data regarding the recruitment and methodological issues faced by the researchers. This data was combined and listed, and related issues were grouped into overarching themes and subthemes. RESULTS Of 52 publications suitable for analysis, 33 provided data collated into six themes: attitudes and beliefs about dementia in ethnic minority communities, recruitment process, data collection issues, practical issues, researcher characteristics, and lack of published research and normative data. These themes allowed us to identify three areas responsible for addressing these recruitment and methodological issues: community and patient education, health services, and researchers' training. CONCLUSIONS This is the first review identifying recruitment and methodological issues within UK dementia research that included ethnic minorities. We now have a compilation of reported existing issues and a framework of areas responsible for addressing them and devising solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waquas Waheed
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nadine Mirza
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Amy Blakemore
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Cassandra Kenning
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Yumna Masood
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Matthews
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|