Reliability of radiomics features due to image reconstruction using a standardized T2 -weighted pulse sequence for MR-guided radiotherapy: An anthropomorphic phantom study

A first look into radiomics application in testicular imaging: A systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the state of the art of radiomics in testicular imaging by assessing the quality of radiomic workflow using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). A systematic literature search was performed to find potentially relevant articles on the applications of radiomics in testicular imaging, and 6 final articles were extracted. The mean RQS was 11,33 ± 3,88 resulting in a percentage of 31,48% ± 10,78%. Regarding QUADAS-2 criteria, no relevant biases were found in the included papers in the patient selection, index test, reference standard criteria and flow-and-timing domain. In conclusion, despite the publication of promising studies, radiomic research on testicular imaging is in its very beginning and still hindered by methodological limitations, and the potential applications of radiomics for this field are still largely unexplored.

Radiomics in clinical trials: perspectives on standardization

The term biomarker is used to describe a biological measure of the disease behavior. The existing imaging biomarkers are associated with the known tissue biological characteristics and follow a well-established roadmap to be implemented in routine clinical practice. Recently, a new quantitative imaging analysis approach named radiomics has emerged. It refers to the extraction of a large number of advanced imaging features with high-throughput computing. Extensive research has demonstrated its value in predicting disease behavior, progression, and response to therapeutic options. However, there are numerous challenges to establishing it as a clinically viable solution, including lack of reproducibility and transparency. The data-driven nature also does not offer insights into the underpinning biology of the observed relationships. As such, additional effort is needed to establish it as a qualified biomarker to inform clinical decisions. Here we review the technical difficulties encountered in the clinical applications of radiomics and current effort in addressing some of these challenges in clinical trial designs. By addressing these challenges, the true potential of radiomics can be unleashed.

The Role of Radiomics in Salivary Gland Imaging: A Systematic Review and Radiomics Quality Assessment

Background: Radiomics of salivary gland imaging can support clinical decisions in different clinical scenarios, such as tumors, radiation-induced xerostomia and sialadenitis. This review aims to evaluate the methodological quality of radiomics studies on salivary gland imaging. Material and Methods: A systematic search was performed, and the methodological quality was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Subgroup analyses according to the first author's professional role (medical or not medical), journal type (radiological journal or other) and the year of publication (2021 or before) were performed. The correlation of RQS with the number of patients was calculated. Results: Twenty-three articles were included (mean RQS 11.34 ± 3.68). Most studies well-documented the imaging protocol (87%), while neither prospective validations nor cost-effectiveness analyses were performed. None of the included studies provided open-source data. A statistically significant difference in RQS according to the year of publication was found (p = 0.009), with papers published in 2021 having slightly higher RQSs than older ones. No differences according to journal type or the first author's professional role were demonstrated. A moderate relationship between the overall RQS and the number of patients was found. Conclusions: Radiomics application in salivary gland imaging is increasing. Although its current clinical applicability can be affected by the somewhat inadequate quality of the papers, a significant improvement in radiomics methodologies has been demonstrated in the last year.

The stability of oncologic MRI radiomic features and the potential role of deep learning: a review

The use of MRI radiomic models for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response prediction of tumors has been increasingly reported in literature. However, its widespread adoption in clinics is hampered by issues related to features stability. In the MRI radiomic workflow, the main factors that affect radiomic features computation can be found in the image acquisition and reconstruction phase, in the image pre-processing steps, and in the segmentation of the region of interest on which radiomic indices are extracted. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), having shown their potentiality in the medical image processing and analysis field, can be seen as an attractive strategy to partially overcome the issues related to radiomic stability and mitigate their impact. In fact, DNN approaches can be prospectively integrated in the MRI radiomic workflow to improve image quality, obtain accurate and reproducible segmentations and generate standardized images. In this review, DNN methods that can be included in the image processing steps of the radiomic workflow are described and discussed, in the light of a detailed analysis of the literature in the context of MRI radiomic reliability.

Radiomics for Identification and Prediction in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Review of Studies

Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPCa) is associated with a poor patient prognosis. mPCa spreads throughout the body, often to bones, with spatial and temporal variations that make the clinical management of the disease difficult. The evolution of the disease leads to spatial heterogeneity that is extremely difficult to characterise with solid biopsies. Imaging provides the opportunity to quantify disease spread. Advanced image analytics methods, including radiomics, offer the opportunity to characterise heterogeneity beyond what can be achieved with simple assessment. Radiomics analysis has the potential to yield useful quantitative imaging biomarkers that can improve the early detection of mPCa, predict disease progression, assess response, and potentially inform the choice of treatment procedures. Traditional radiomics analysis involves modelling with hand-crafted features designed using significant domain knowledge. On the other hand, artificial intelligence techniques such as deep learning can facilitate end-to-end automated feature extraction and model generation with minimal human intervention. Radiomics models have the potential to become vital pieces in the oncology workflow, however, the current limitations of the field, such as limited reproducibility, are impeding their translation into clinical practice. This review provides an overview of the radiomics methodology, detailing critical aspects affecting the reproducibility of features, and providing examples of how artificial intelligence techniques can be incorporated into the workflow. The current landscape of publications utilising radiomics methods in the assessment and treatment of mPCa are surveyed and reviewed. Associated studies have incorporated information from multiple imaging modalities, including bone scintigraphy, CT, PET with varying tracers, multiparametric MRI together with clinical covariates, spanning the prediction of progression through to overall survival in varying cohorts. The methodological quality of each study is quantified using the radiomics quality score. Multiple deficits were identified, with the lack of prospective design and external validation highlighted as major impediments to clinical translation. These results inform some recommendations for future directions of the field.

Reliability of MRI radiomics features in MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Repeatability, reproducibility, and within-subject agreement

PURPOSE

The MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) images on the integrated MRI and linear accelerator (MR-LINAC) might facilitate radiomics analysis for longitudinal treatment response assessment. However, the reliability of MRgRT radiomics features is largely unknown. This study aims to investigate MRgRT radiomics feature reliability acquired using a standardized 3D-T2W-TSE sequence in terms of repeatability, reproducibility, and within-subject feature agreement on a 1.5T MR-simulator and a 1.5T MR-LINAC for prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive PC patients who underwent one MRI-simulator scan and two MR-LINAC scans before dose delivery were retrospectively included. The three MRI datasets were rigidly co-registered. 1023 first-order and texture radiomics features were extracted with different intensity bin widths for each scan in the manually segmented clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) by an experienced radiation oncologist. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate feature repeatability between MR-LINAC scans and reproducibility between MRI-simulator and MR-LINAC scans. The within-subject feature value agreements were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The impact of inter-observer segmentation on the radiomics feature reliability was also examined based on the second manual segmentation of CTV and PTV by an MRI researcher.

RESULTS

Based on the segmentation by the radiation oncologist and the default bin width of 25, 9.6%, 24.1%, 49.6%, and 16.8% of the total 1023 features exhibited excellent (ICC > 0.9), good (0.9 > ICC > 0.75), moderate (0.75 > ICC > 0.5), and poor (ICC < 0.5) repeatability in the CTV, and 9.2%, 26.8%, 50.5%, and 13.5% in the PTV, respectively. For reproducibility, the corresponding feature percentages were 8.9%, 19.7%, 41.9%, and 29.6% in the CTV, and 8.4%, 17.8%, 47.9%, and 26% in the PTV. Feature reliability was not notably influenced by intensity bin width for discretization. BA analysis revealed wide 95% limit-of-agreements and substantial biases of feature values between CTV and PTV and between any two MRI scans. The features even with excellent ICC were still subjected to considerable inter-scan feature variations in each individual subject. The analysis on the second segmentation by the MRI researcher showed insignificantly different feature repeatability and reproducibility in terms of ICC values.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small proportion of features exhibited excellent/good repeatability and reproducibility, highlighting the importance of reliable MRgRT feature selection. The within-subject feature values were subjected to considerable inter-scan variations, imposing a challenge on the determination of the smallest detectable change in future MRgRT delta-radiomics studies.