1
|
Koehler M, Goetz SM. A Closed Formalism for Anatomy-Independent Projection and Optimization of Magnetic Stimulation Coils on Arbitrarily Shaped Surfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2024; 71:1745-1755. [PMID: 38206785 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2024.3350693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular method for the noninvasive stimulation of neurons in the brain. It has become a standard instrument in experimental brain research and has been approved for a range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. These applications require appropriately shaped coils. Various applications have been established or approved for specific coil designs with their corresponding spatial electric field distributions. However, the specific coil implementation may no longer be appropriate from the perspective of available material and manufacturing opportunities or considering the latest understanding of how to achieve induced electric fields in the head most efficiently. Furthermore, in some cases, field measurements of coils with unknown winding or a user-defined field are available and require an actual implementation. Similar applications exist for magnetic resonance imaging coils. OBJECTIVE This work aims at introducing a complete formalism free from heuristics, iterative optimization, and ad-hoc or manual steps to form practical stimulation coils with individual turns to either equivalently match an existing coil or produce a given field. The target coil can reside on practically any sufficiently large or closed surface adjacent to or around the head. METHODS The method derives an equivalent field through vector projection exploiting the well-known Huygens' and Love's equivalence principle. In contrast to other coil design or optimization approaches recently presented, the procedure is an explicit forward Hilbert-space vector projection or basis change. For demonstration, we map a commercial figure-of-eight coil as one of the most widely used devices and a more intricate coil recently approved clinically for addiction treatment (H4) onto a bent surface close to the head for highest efficiency and lowest field energy. RESULTS The resulting projections are within ≤4% of the target field and reduce the necessary pulse energy by more than 40%.
Collapse
|
2
|
Davids M, Vendramini L, Klein V, Ferris N, Guerin B, Wald LL. Experimental validation of a PNS-optimized whole-body gradient coil. Magn Reson Med 2024. [PMID: 38767407 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) limits the usability of state-of-the-art whole-body and head-only MRI gradient coils. We used detailed electromagnetic and neurodynamic modeling to set an explicit PNS constraint during the design of a whole-body gradient coil and constructed it to compare the predicted and experimentally measured PNS thresholds to those of a matched design without PNS constraints. METHODS We designed, constructed, and tested two actively shielded whole-body Y-axis gradient coil winding patterns: YG1 is a conventional symmetric design without PNS-optimization, whereas YG2's design used an additional constraint on the allowable PNS threshold in the head-imaging landmark, yielding an asymmetric winding pattern. We measured PNS thresholds in 18 healthy subjects at five landmark positions (head, cardiac, abdominal, pelvic, and knee). RESULTS The PNS-optimized design YG2 achieved 46% higher average experimental thresholds for a head-imaging landmark than YG1 while incurring a 15% inductance penalty. For cardiac, pelvic, and knee imaging landmarks, the PNS thresholds increased between +22% and +35%. For abdominal imaging, PNS thresholds did not change significantly between YG1 and YG2 (-3.6%). The agreement between predicted and experimental PNS thresholds was within 11.4% normalized root mean square error for both coils and all landmarks. The PNS model also produced plausible predictions of the stimulation sites when compared to the sites of perception reported by the subjects. CONCLUSION The PNS-optimization improved the PNS thresholds for the target scan landmark as well as most other studied landmarks, potentially yielding a significant improvement in image encoding performance that can be safely used in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Davids
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Livia Vendramini
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Valerie Klein
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natalie Ferris
- Harvard Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bastien Guerin
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Babaloo R, Atalar E. Minimizing electric fields and increasing peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds using a body gradient array coil. Magn Reson Med 2024. [PMID: 38624032 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the performance of gradient array coils in minimizing switched-gradient-induced electric fields (E-fields) and improving peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) thresholds while generating gradient fields with adjustable linearity across customizable regions of linearity (ROLs). METHODS A body gradient array coil is used to reduce the induced E-fields on the surface of a body model by modulating applied currents. This is achieved by performing an optimization problem with the peak E-field as the objective function and current amplitudes as unknown variables. Coil dimensions and winding patterns are fixed throughout the optimization, whereas other engineering metrics remain adjustable. Various scenarios are explored by manipulating adjustable parameters. RESULTS The array design consistently yields lower E-fields and higher PNS thresholds across all scenarios compared with a conventional coil. When the gradient array coil generates target gradient fields within a 44-cm-diameter spherical ROL, the maximum E-field is reduced by 10%, 18%, and 61% for the X, Y, and Z gradients, respectively. Transitioning to a smaller ROL (24 cm) and relaxing the gradient linearity error results in further E-field reductions. In oblique gradients, the array coil demonstrates the most substantial reduction of 40% in the Z-Y direction. Among the investigated scenarios, the most significant increase of 4.3-fold is observed in the PNS thresholds. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that gradient array coils offer a promising pathway toward achieving high-performance gradient coils regarding gradient strength, slew rate, and PNS thresholds, especially in scenarios in which linear magnetic fields are required within specific target regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Babaloo
- National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ergin Atalar
- National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu A, Tarasek M, Hua Y, Fiveland E, Maier SE, Mazaheri Y, Fung M, Westin CF, Yeo DT, Szczepankiewicz F, Tempany C, Akin O, Foo TK. Human prostate MRI at ultrahigh-performance gradient: A feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:640-648. [PMID: 37753628 PMCID: PMC10841413 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the technical feasibility and the value of ultrahigh-performance gradient in imaging the prostate in a 3T MRI system. METHODS In this local institutional review board-approved study, prostate MRI was performed on 4 healthy men. Each subject was scanned in a prototype 3T MRI system with a 42-cm inner-diameter gradient coil that achieves a maximum gradient amplitude of 200 mT/m and slew rate of 500 T/m/s. PI-RADS V2.1-compliant axial T2 -weighted anatomical imaging and single-shot echo planar DWI at standard gradient of 70 mT/m and 150 T/m/s were obtained, followed by DWI at maximum performance (i.e., 200 mT/m and 500 T/m/s). In comparison to state-of-the-art clinical whole-body MRI systems, the high slew rate improved echo spacing from 1020 to 596 μs and, together with a high gradient amplitude for diffusion encoding, TE was reduced from 55 to 36 ms. RESULTS In all 4 subjects (waist circumference = 81-91 cm, age = 45-65 years), no peripheral nerve stimulation sensation was reported during DWI. Reduced image distortion in the posterior peripheral zone prostate gland and higher signal intensity, such as in the surrounding muscle of high-gradient DWI, were noted. CONCLUSION Human prostate MRI at simultaneously high gradient amplitude of 200 mT/m and slew rate of 500 T/m/s is feasible, demonstrating that improved gradient performance can address image distortion and T2 decay-induced SNR issues for in vivo prostate imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ante Zhu
- GE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States
| | | | - Yihe Hua
- GE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States
| | | | - Stephan E. Maier
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Yousef Mazaheri
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Clare Tempany
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Oguz Akin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davids M, Dietz P, Ruyters G, Roesler M, Klein V, Guérin B, Feinberg DA, Wald LL. Peripheral nerve stimulation informed design of a high-performance asymmetric head gradient coil. Magn Reson Med 2023; 90:784-801. [PMID: 37052387 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) limits the image encoding performance of both body gradient coils and the latest generation of head gradients. We analyze a variety of head gradient design aspects using a detailed PNS model to guide the design process of a new high-performance asymmetric head gradient to raise PNS thresholds and maximize the usable image-encoding performance. METHODS A novel three-layer coil design underwent PNS optimization involving PNS predictions of a series of candidate designs. The PNS-informed design process sought to maximize the usable parameter space of a coil with <10% nonlinearity in a 22 cm region of linearity, a relatively large inner diameter (44 cm), maximum gradient amplitude of 200 mT/m, and a high slew rate of 900 T/m/s. PNS modeling allowed identification and iterative adjustment of coil features with beneficial impact on PNS such as the number of winding layers, shoulder accommodation strategy, and level of asymmetry. PNS predictions for the final design were compared to measured thresholds in a constructed prototype. RESULTS The final head gradient achieved up to 2-fold higher PNS thresholds than the initial design without PNS optimization and compared to existing head gradients with similar design characteristics. The inclusion of a third intermediate winding layer provided the additional degrees of freedom necessary to improve PNS thresholds without significant sacrifices to the other design metrics. CONCLUSION Augmenting the design phase of a new high-performance head gradient coil by PNS modeling dramatically improved the usable image-encoding performance by raising PNS thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Davids
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Valerie Klein
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bastien Guérin
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Feinberg
- Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, California, USA
- Brain Imaging Center and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fan Q, Eichner C, Afzali M, Mueller L, Tax CMW, Davids M, Mahmutovic M, Keil B, Bilgic B, Setsompop K, Lee HH, Tian Q, Maffei C, Ramos-Llordén G, Nummenmaa A, Witzel T, Yendiki A, Song YQ, Huang CC, Lin CP, Weiskopf N, Anwander A, Jones DK, Rosen BR, Wald LL, Huang SY. Mapping the Human Connectome using Diffusion MRI at 300 mT/m Gradient Strength: Methodological Advances and Scientific Impact. Neuroimage 2022; 254:118958. [PMID: 35217204 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Tremendous efforts have been made in the last decade to advance cutting-edge MRI technology in pursuit of mapping structural connectivity in the living human brain with unprecedented sensitivity and speed. The first Connectom 3T MRI scanner equipped with a 300 mT/m whole-body gradient system was installed at the Massachusetts General Hospital in 2011 and was specifically constructed as part of the Human Connectome Project. Since that time, numerous technological advances have been made to enable the broader use of the Connectom high gradient system for diffusion tractography and tissue microstructure studies and leverage its unique advantages and sensitivity to resolving macroscopic and microscopic structural information in neural tissue for clinical and neuroscientific studies. The goal of this review article is to summarize the technical developments that have emerged in the last decade to support and promote large-scale and scientific studies of the human brain using the Connectom scanner. We provide a brief historical perspective on the development of Connectom gradient technology and the efforts that led to the installation of three other Connectom 3T MRI scanners worldwide - one in the United Kingdom in Cardiff, Wales, another in Continental Europe in Leipzig, Germany, and the latest in Asia in Shanghai, China. We summarize the key developments in gradient hardware and image acquisition technology that have formed the backbone of Connectom-related research efforts, including the rich array of high-sensitivity receiver coils, pulse sequences, image artifact correction strategies and data preprocessing methods needed to optimize the quality of high-gradient strength dMRI data for subsequent analyses. Finally, we review the scientific impact of the Connectom MRI scanner, including advances in diffusion tractography, tissue microstructural imaging, ex vivo validation, and clinical investigations that have been enabled by Connectom technology. We conclude with brief insights into the unique value of strong gradients for dMRI and where the field is headed in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuyun Fan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cornelius Eichner
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Neuropsychology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maryam Afzali
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK; Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Lars Mueller
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Chantal M W Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK; Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mathias Davids
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mirsad Mahmutovic
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection (IMPS), TH-Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences (THM), Giessen, Germany
| | - Boris Keil
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection (IMPS), TH-Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences (THM), Giessen, Germany
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Kawin Setsompop
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hong-Hsi Lee
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Qiyuan Tian
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gabriel Ramos-Llordén
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aapo Nummenmaa
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Anastasia Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yi-Qiao Song
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Chu-Chung Huang
- Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE & STCSM), Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ching-Po Lin
- Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.; Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alfred Anwander
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Department of Neuropsychology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Derek K Jones
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Susie Y Huang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang SY, Witzel T, Keil B, Scholz A, Davids M, Dietz P, Rummert E, Ramb R, Kirsch JE, Yendiki A, Fan Q, Tian Q, Ramos-Llordén G, Lee HH, Nummenmaa A, Bilgic B, Setsompop K, Wang F, Avram AV, Komlosh M, Benjamini D, Magdoom KN, Pathak S, Schneider W, Novikov DS, Fieremans E, Tounekti S, Mekkaoui C, Augustinack J, Berger D, Shapson-Coe A, Lichtman J, Basser PJ, Wald LL, Rosen BR. Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome. Neuroimage 2021; 243:118530. [PMID: 34464739 PMCID: PMC8863543 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The first phase of the Human Connectome Project pioneered advances in MRI technology for mapping the macroscopic structural connections of the living human brain through the engineering of a whole-body human MRI scanner equipped with maximum gradient strength of 300 mT/m, the highest ever achieved for human imaging. While this instrument has made important contributions to the understanding of macroscale connectional topology, it has also demonstrated the potential of dedicated high-gradient performance scanners to provide unparalleled in vivo assessment of neural tissue microstructure. Building on the initial groundwork laid by the original Connectome scanner, we have now embarked on an international, multi-site effort to build the next-generation human 3T Connectome scanner (Connectome 2.0) optimized for the study of neural tissue microstructure and connectional anatomy across multiple length scales. In order to maximize the resolution of this in vivo microscope for studies of the living human brain, we will push the diffusion resolution limit to unprecedented levels by (1) nearly doubling the current maximum gradient strength from 300 mT/m to 500 mT/m and tripling the maximum slew rate from 200 T/m/s to 600 T/m/s through the design of a one-of-a-kind head gradient coil optimized to minimize peripheral nerve stimulation; (2) developing high-sensitivity multi-channel radiofrequency receive coils for in vivo and ex vivo human brain imaging; (3) incorporating dynamic field monitoring to minimize image distortions and artifacts; (4) developing new pulse sequences to integrate the strongest diffusion encoding and highest spatial resolution ever achieved in the living human brain; and (5) calibrating the measurements obtained from this next-generation instrument through systematic validation of diffusion microstructural metrics in high-fidelity phantoms and ex vivo brain tissue at progressively finer scales with accompanying diffusion simulations in histology-based micro-geometries. We envision creating the ultimate diffusion MRI instrument capable of capturing the complex multi-scale organization of the living human brain - from the microscopic scale needed to probe cellular geometry, heterogeneity and plasticity, to the mesoscopic scale for quantifying the distinctions in cortical structure and connectivity that define cyto- and myeloarchitectonic boundaries, to improvements in estimates of macroscopic connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Y Huang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Boris Keil
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection (IMPS), TH-Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences (THM), Giessen, Germany
| | - Alina Scholz
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection (IMPS), TH-Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences (THM), Giessen, Germany
| | - Mathias Davids
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - John E Kirsch
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anastasia Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Qiuyun Fan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Qiyuan Tian
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gabriel Ramos-Llordén
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hong-Hsi Lee
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aapo Nummenmaa
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kawin Setsompop
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Fuyixue Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexandru V Avram
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michal Komlosh
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dan Benjamini
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sudhir Pathak
- Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Walter Schneider
- Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dmitry S Novikov
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Els Fieremans
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Slimane Tounekti
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Choukri Mekkaoui
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean Augustinack
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Berger
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Shapson-Coe
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jeff Lichtman
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Basser
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lawrence L Wald
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|