Echo planar imaging-induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification

Fully Automated Valve Segmentation for Blood Flow Assessment From 4D Flow MRI Including Automated Cardiac Valve Tracking and Transvalvular Velocity Mapping

BACKGROUND

Automated 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification without time-consuming manual segmentation might improve workflow.

PURPOSE

Compare automated valve segmentation (AS) to manual (MS), and manually corrected automated segmentation (AMS), in corrected atrioventricular septum defect (c-AVSD) patients and healthy volunteers, for assessing net forward volume (NFV) and regurgitation fraction (RF).

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

27 c-AVSD patients (median, 23 years; interquartile range, 16-31 years) and 24 healthy volunteers (25 years; 12.5-36.5 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Whole-heart 4D flow MRI and cine steady-state free precession at 3T.

ASSESSMENT

After automatic valve tracking, valve annuli were segmented on time-resolved reformatted trans-valvular velocity images by AS, MS, and AMS. NFV was calculated for all valves, and RF for right and left atrioventricular valves (RAVV and LAVV). NFV variation (standard deviation divided by mean NFV) and NFV differences (NFV difference of a valve vs. mean NFV of other valves) expressed internal NFV consistency.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Comparisons between methods were assessed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and intra/interobserver variability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with multiple testing correction.

RESULTS

AMS mean analysis time was significantly shorter compared with MS (5.3 ± 1.6 minutes vs. 9.1 ± 2.5 minutes). MS NFV variation (6.0%) was significantly smaller compared with AMS (6.3%), and AS (8.2%). Median NFV difference of RAVV, LAVV, PV, and AoV between segmentation methods ranged from -0.7-1.0 mL, -0.5-2.8 mL, -1.1-3.6 mL, and - 3.1--2.1 mL, respectively. Median RAVV and LAVV RF, between 7.1%-7.5% and 3.8%-4.3%, respectively, were not significantly different between methods. Intraobserver/interobserver agreement for AMS and MS was strong-to-excellent for NFV and RF (ICC ≥0.88).

DATA CONCLUSION

MS demonstrates strongest internal consistency, followed closely by AMS, and AS. Automated segmentation, with or without manual correction, can be considered for 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Comparison of Echo-Planar Imaging and Compressed Sensing in the Estimation of Flow Metrics from Aortic 4D Flow MR Imaging: A Healthy Volunteer Study

PURPOSE

Prolonged scanning of time-resolved 3D phase-contrast MRI (4D flow MRI) limits its routine use in clinical practice. An echo-planar imaging (EPI)-based sequence and compressed sensing can reduce the scan duration. We aimed to determine the impact of EPI for 4D flow MRI on the scan duration, image quality, and quantitative flow metrics.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 15 healthy volunteers (all male, mean age 33 ± 5 years). Conventional sensitivity encoding (SENSE), EPI with SENSE (EPI), and compressed SENSE (CS) (reduction factors: 6 and 12, respectively) were scanned.Scan duration, qualitative indexes of image quality, and quantitative flow parameters of net flow volume, maximum flow velocity, wall shear stress (WSS), and energy loss (EL) in the ascending aorta were assessed. Two-dimensional phase-contrast cine MRI (2D-PC) was considered the gold standard of net flow volume and maximum flow velocity.

RESULTS

Compared to SENSE, EPI and CS12 shortened scan durations by 71% and 73% (EPI, 4 min 39 sec; CS6, 7 min 29 sec; CS12, 4 min 14 sec; and SENSE, 15 min 51 sec). Visual image quality was significantly better for EPI than for SENSE and CS (P < 0.001). The net flow volumes obtained with SENSE, EPI, and CS12 and those obtained with 2D-PC were correlated well (r = 0.950, 0.871, and 0.850, respectively). However, the maximum velocity obtained with EPI was significantly underestimated (P < 0.010). The average WSS was significantly higher with EPI than with SENSE, CS6, and CS12 (P < 0.001, P = 0.040, and P = 0.012, respectively). The EL was significantly lower with EPI than with CS6 and CS12 (P = 0.002 and P = 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EPI reduced the scan duration, improved visual image quality, and was associated with more accurate net flow volume than CS. However, the flow velocity, WSS, and EL values obtained with EPI and other sequences may not be directly comparable.

Age- and sex-specific reference values of biventricular flow components and kinetic energy by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Advances in four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) have allowed quantification of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) blood flow. We aimed to (1) investigate age and sex differences of 4D flow CMR-derived LV and RV relative flow components and kinetic energy (KE) parameters indexed to end-diastolic volume (KEiEDV) in healthy subjects; and (2) assess the effects of age and sex on these parameters.

METHODS

We performed 4D flow analysis in 163 healthy participants (42% female; mean age 43 ± 13 years) of a prospective registry study (NCT03217240) who were free of cardiovascular diseases. Relative flow components (direct flow, retained inflow, delayed ejection flow, residual volume) and multiple phasic KEiEDV (global, peak systolic, average systolic, average diastolic, peak E-wave, peak A-wave) for both LV and RV were analysed.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women had lower median LV and RV residual volume, and LV peak and average systolic KEiEDV, and higher median values of RV direct flow, RV global KEiEDV, RV average diastolic KEiEDV, and RV peak E-wave KEiEDV. ANOVA analysis found there were no differences in flow components, peak and average systolic, average diastolic and global KEiEDV for both LV and RV across age groups. Peak A-wave KEiEDV increased significantly (r = 0.458 for LV and 0.341 for RV), whereas peak E-wave KEiEDV (r = - 0.355 for LV and - 0.318 for RV), and KEiEDV E/A ratio (r = - 0.475 for LV and - 0.504 for RV) decreased significantly, with age.

CONCLUSION

These data using state-of-the-art 4D flow CMR show that biventricular flow components and kinetic energy parameters vary significantly by age and sex. Age and sex trends should be considered in the interpretation of quantitative measures of biventricular flow. Clinical trial registration  https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . Unique identifier: NCT03217240.

4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update

Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 '4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement'. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.

Evaluation of left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy in patients with hypertension by four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the intra-cavity left ventricular (LV) blood flow kinetic energy (KE) parameters using four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with hypertension (HTN).

METHODS

Forty-two HTN patients and twenty age-/gender-matched healthy controls who underwent CMR including cines, pre-/post-T1 mapping, and whole-heart 4D flow imaging were retrospectively evaluated. HTN patients were further divided into two subgroups: with preserved ejection fraction (HTN-pEF) and with reduced ejection fraction (HTN-rEF). KE parameters were indexed to LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) to obtain averaged LV, minimal, systolic, diastolic, peak E-wave, peak A-wave, E-wave, and A-wave KEi_EDV, as well as the proportion of in-plane LV KE (%), the time difference (TD). These parameters were compared between the HTN group and healthy controls, also between two subgroups. The correlation of LV blood flow KE parameters with LV function and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) were analyzed in the HTN group using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Peak E-wave KEi_EDV in the HTN group was significantly lower (p = 0.01), while in-plane KE and TD were significantly higher (all p < 0.01) than those in healthy controls. Compared to the HTN-pEF subgroup, the proportion of in-plane KE and TD was significantly increased in the HTN-rEF subgroup (all p < 0.01). Only the proportion of in-plane KE demonstrated an independent correlation with ECV (β* = 0.59, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The decreased peak E-wave KEi_EDV and the increased proportion of in-plane KE, TD reflected the alterations of LV blood flow in HTN patients, and the proportion of in-plane KE was independently associated with ECV.

KEY POINTS

• 4D flow CMR demonstrated that the peak E-wave KEi_EDV was decreased, while the in-plane KE and time difference (TD) were increased in hypertensive (HTN) patients. • The proportion of in-plane KE and TD was further increased in HTN patients with reduced ejection fraction than in HTN patients with preserved ejection fraction, and the proportion of in-plane KE was independently associated with extracellular volume fraction in HTN patients. • 4D flow CMR intra-cavity blood flow KE parameters might reveal the LV hemodynamic status in preclinical HTN patients.

Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Accurate evaluation of valvular pathology is crucial in the timing of surgical intervention. Whilst transthoracic echocardiography is widely available and routinely used in the assessment of valvular heart disease, it is bound by several limitations. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can overcome many of the challenges encountered by echocardiography, it also has a number of limitations.

MAIN TEXT

4D Flow CMR is a novel technique, which allows time-resolved, 3-dimensional imaging. It enables visualisation and direct quantification of flow and peak velocities of all valves simultaneously in one simple acquisition, without any geometric assumptions. It also has the unique ability to measure advanced haemodynamic parameters such as turbulent kinetic energy, viscous energy loss rate and wall shear stress, which may add further diagnostic and prognostic information. Although 4D Flow CMR acquisition can take 5-10 min, emerging acceleration techniques can significantly reduce scan times, making 4D Flow CMR applicable in contemporary clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

4D Flow CMR is an emerging CMR technique, which has the potential to become the new reference-standard method for the evaluation of valvular lesions. In this review, we describe the clinical applications, advantages and disadvantages of 4D Flow CMR in the assessment of valvular heart disease.

Why 4D Flow MRI? Real Advantages

This special issue of Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences features the most recent reviews on 4D Flow MRI. These reviews deal with the current status of the emerging technique of 4D Flow MRI facilitated in various areas that are difficult to obtain with conventional flowmetry. MR signals inherently contain flow velocity information. In previous decades, in vivo blood flow measurement was traditionally performed by 2D methods, such as Doppler ultrasonography and 2D phase-contrast MRI, which have long been regarded as mature techniques in hemodynamic flowmetry. Although 2D velocimetries have many advantages over 4D Flow MRI in terms of cost and accessibility, and provide excellent temporal and in-plane spatial resolutions, they also have some disadvantages. The emerging technology of 4D Flow MRI can overcome the shortcomings of conventional 2D imaging. In recent years, hemodynamic analysis has witnessed significant progress that is primarily attributable to advances in 4D Flow MRI.