1
|
Gilanyi YL, Shah B, Cashin AG, Gibbs MT, Bellamy J, Day R, McAuley JH, Jones MD. Barriers and enablers to exercise adherence in people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00578. [PMID: 38635470 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Exercise is a first-line treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP), reducing pain and disability in the short term. However, exercise benefits decrease over time, with a lack of long-term exercise adherence a potential reason for this. This study aimed to synthesize the perceptions and beliefs of individuals with CLBP and identify their barriers and enablers to exercise adherence. We searched CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases from inception to February 28, 2023, for qualitative studies that explored the factors influencing exercise adherence for people with CLBP. A hybrid approach combining thematic synthesis with the Theoretical Domains Framework was used to analyze data. We assessed methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the level of confidence of the themes generated using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Studies. Twenty-three papers (n = 21 studies) were included (n = 677 participants). Four main themes affected exercise adherence: (1) exercise, pain, and the body, (2) psychological factors, (3) social factors, and (4) external factors. These themes contained 16 subthemes that were predominantly both barriers and enablers to exercise adherence. The individual's experiences of barriers and enablers were most appropriately represented across a spectrum, where influencing factors could be a barrier or enabler to exercise adherence, and these could be specific to pre-exercise, during-exercise, and post-exercise situations. These findings may be used to improve exercise adherence and ultimately treatment outcomes in people with CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick L Gilanyi
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brishna Shah
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mitchell T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jessica Bellamy
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Day
- St Vincent's Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Natoli A, Jones MD, Long V, Mouatt B, Walker ED, Gibbs MT. How do people with chronic low back pain perceive specific and general exercise? A mixed methods survey. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38379359 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exercise prescriptions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) often utilize reductionistic, trunk-focused exercise aimed at addressing proposed pain mechanisms. It is unknown if the use of these trunk-focused exercises imply beliefs to people with CLBP about the rationale for their use (e.g., etiology), even without concurrent biomedical narratives. This study aimed to explore people's perceptions of specific and general exercise without an accompanying narrative when experiencing CLBP. METHODS An anonymous online survey was distributed. Mixed methods were utilized for analysis. Six-point Likert scales categorized people's beliefs about individual exercises. Open-ended questions were used to gather further beliefs which were then coded into themes. RESULTS People with CLBP perceived specific exercise as more beneficial than general exercise. Eight themes and five subthemes were defined. A high volume of positive beliefs were centered around strengthening the low back and abdominal musculature, emphasizing the importance of correct technique. Negative beliefs were held against spinal flexion and external load. Both positive and negative beliefs were underpinned by spinal/pelvic stability being important as well as certain exercises being achievable or not. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that people with CLBP consider specific exercises to be more beneficial than general exercises for CLBP. Specific exercises irrespective of an accompanying narrative can imply meaning about the intent of an exercise. Understanding this requires practitioners to be mindful when prescribing and communicating exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Natoli
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - V Long
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Mouatt
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - E D Walker
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tracy BA, Soncrant J, Rhon DI, Young JL. Trials Investigating Exercise for Low Back Pain Lack Pragmatic Application: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:157-165. [PMID: 38042245 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the orientation of trials analyzing exercise for low back pain (LBP) on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for trials published between January 1, 2010, and August 13, 2022. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials investigating exercise for adults with LBP. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently used the Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum (RITES) tool to determine the efficacy-effectiveness orientation. The same 2 reviewers assessed the risk of bias for all studies using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias 2.0 tool. DATA SYNTHESIS The search identified 2975 records. Full-text review was conducted on 674 studies, and 159 studies were included. The proportion of trials with a strong or rather strong efficacy orientation (RITES rating=1 or 2), balanced emphasis (RITES rating=3), or strong or rather strong effectiveness (RITES rating=4 or 5) orientation on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum within each RITES domain were reported. A greater proportion of trials had an efficacy orientation when compared with effectiveness or a balanced emphasis within 4 domains: participant characteristics: efficacy 43.9%, 41.9% effectiveness, balanced 14.5%; trial setting: 69.0% efficacy, effectiveness 15.8% balanced 15.2%; flexibility of interventions: 74.2% efficacy, effectiveness 8.8%, balanced 17.0%; clinical relevance of experimental and comparison interventions: 50.3% efficacy, 33.3% effectiveness 33.3%, balanced 16.4%. A high risk of bias was found in 42.1% (n=67) of trials. CONCLUSION Trials investigating the effect of exercise for LBP have a greater orientation toward efficacy across multiple trial design domains. Researchers should consider pragmatic designs in future trials to improve generalizability. Clinicians should consider the efficacy-effectiveness orientation when translating evidence into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad A Tracy
- Bellin College, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, WI.
| | - Jason Soncrant
- Bellin College, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, WI; South College, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Knoxville, TN
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Bellin College, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, WI; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jodi L Young
- Bellin College, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, WI
| |
Collapse
|