Diagnostic value of the near-nerve needle sensory nerve conduction in sensory inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Sensory Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: Neglected Immunotherapy-Responsive Sensory Neuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report an improvement with immunotherapy in 34 (85%)/40 patients who required an immunotherapy among 56 patients with sensory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Sensory CIDP was diagnosed when two inclusion criteria are met: 1) acquired, chronic progressive or relapsing symmetrical or asymmetrical sensory polyneuropathy that had progressed for >2 months; and 2) definite electrophysiological and/or biopsy evidence of demyelinating neuropathy.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with sensory CIDP were identified. Evidence of demyelination was obtained from by the routine motor nerve conduction study (NCS) in 39 (70%) patients, from a nerve biopsy in 10, and from a near-nerve needle sensory NCS in 7 patients. The most prominent laboratory abnormality was a high protein level in the cerebrospinal fluid in 21 (49%) of 43 tested patients. Immunotherapy was required in 41 (79%) of the 52 followed-up patients. An improvement with immunotherapy was observed in 36 (88%)/41 patients. In three patients, motor weakness developed in 5-8 years' follow-up period and so, their diagnosis was changed to CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory CIDP is responded to an immunotherapy in 88% of the treated patients. Sensory CIDP was diagnosed by the routine motor NCS in 70% of patients and by a sural nerve biopsy in 18% of patients. Thus, sensory CIDP should be recognized as a treatable CIDP variant among the different types of "idiopathic sensory neuropathy."

Chronic inflammatory axonal polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVES

Chronic inflammatory axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) is defined on the basis of the clinical, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy findings and therapeutic responses of 'immunotherapy responding chronic axonal polyneuropathy (IR-CAP)'.

METHODS

The diagnosis of IR-CAP was made when all of three of the following mandatory criterion were met: (1) acquired, chronic progressive or relapsing symmetrical or asymmetrical polyneuropathy with duration of progression >2 months; (2) electrophysiological evidence of axonal neuropathy in at least two nerves without any evidence of 'strict criteria of demyelination'; and (3) definite responsiveness to immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with IR-CAP showed similar clinical features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) except 'motor neuropathy subtype'. High spinal fluid protein was found in 27/32 (78%) cases. 'Inflammatory axonal neuropathy' was proven in 14 (45%) of 31 sural nerve biopsies.

DISCUSSIONS

IR-CAP could well be 'axonal CIDP' in view of clinical similarity, but not proven as yet. Thus, IR-CAP is best described as CIAP, a distinct entity that deserves its recognition in view of responsiveness to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of CIAP can be made by additional documentation of 'inflammation' by high spinal fluid protein or nerve biopsy in addition to the first two diagnostic criteria of IR-CAP.