Gender difference in clinical conditions among hospitalized adults with myotonic dystrophy

CNS involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1: does sex play a role?

Introduction

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a hereditary neuromuscular disorder affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Although sex differences have been explored in other neuromuscular disorders, research on this topic in DM1 remains limited. The present study aims to analyze sex differences (both the patient's and disease-transmitting parent's sex) with a focus on CNS outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective data from 146 non-congenital DM1 patients were analyzed, including clinical, molecular, neuropsychological, and neuroradiological data. Sex and inheritance pattern differences were analyzed using t-tests, and ANOVA analyses were conducted to address the interactions.

Results

Overall, no significant sex differences were observed except in certain cognitive domains. However, individuals with maternal inheritance showed larger CTG expansion size, lower estimated IQs, and poorer performance on visual memory, executive functions, and language domains than those with paternal inheritance. Notably, IQ performance was independently influenced by inheritance pattern and CTG expansion.

Discussion

This study is the first to delve into sex differences in DM1 with a focus on CNS outcomes. While the results revealed the absence of a sex-specific clinic-molecular profile, more substantial CNS differences were observed between patients with maternal and paternal inheritance patterns. The hypothetical existence of genomic imprinting and its potential mechanism are discussed. These findings hold potential implications for aiding clinical management by improving genetic counseling and predicting disease severity and prognosis.

Sex differences in neuromuscular disorders

The prevalence, onset, pathophysiology, and clinical course of many neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) may significantly differ between males and females. Some NMDs are more frequently observed in females, and characterized to show a higher grade of severity during or after the pregnancy. Meanwhile, others tend to have an earlier onset in males and exhibit a more variable progression. Prevalently, sex differences in NMDs have a familiar character given from genetic inheritance. However, they may also influence clinical presentation and disease severity of acquired NMD forms, and are represented by both hormonal and genetic factors. Consequently, to shed light on the distinctive role of biological factors in the different clinical phenotypes, we summarize in this review the sex related differences and their distinctive biological roles emerging from the current literature in both acquired and inherited NMDs.

Gender effect on cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cardiac involvement is observed in about 80% of subjects with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and is mainly characterized by cardiac conduction and/or rhythm abnormalities (CCRAs), possibly leading to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Our objective was to investigate whether the gender difference may influence the cardiac involvement and SCD in DM1.

METHODS

We analyzed prevalence and incidence of cardiological abnormalities in males versus females in 151 consecutive DM1 patients over a 35-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients, 35 males (62.5%) and 20 females (42.5%), developed some type of CCRA during the follow-up period (mean 7.82 ± 6.21 years). CCRA overall, and specifically cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCAs), were significantly more frequent in males than in females (p = 0.043 and p = 0.031, respectively). CCRAs progressed in 16 males (45.7%) and six females (30%). Twenty-four patients, 14 males (25.0%) and 10 females (21.3%), died during the follow-up. Nine of them, six males (10.7%) and three females (6.4%), had SCD. After correction for Muscular Impairment Rating Scale progression, cytosine thymine-guanine expansion, and follow-up duration, a higher prevalence of CCAs was independently associated with male gender (p = 0.039), but independent association with gender was not detected for CCRAs overall, cardiac rhythm abnormalities, and SCD prevalence, even if prevalence was higher in males than females.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of occurrence of CCAs in DM1 is significantly higher in males than females regardless of genetic background and disease severity and progression. Moreover, the data also suggest a similar impact for male gender for CCRAs overall, CCAs, and SCD even if not statistically significant.