Alkalinized lidocaine solution as a first-line local anesthesia protocol for intradetrusor injection of onabotulinum toxin A: Results from a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

A Systematic Review of Loco-Sedative Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the characteristics and outcomes of conscious sedation and local anesthesia for various urologic procedures. Urologic care has much to gain from the routine integration of ambulatory surgery via loco-sedative anesthetic techniques for both surgeon and patient.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Scopus databases following PRISMA criteria from June to August 2021. Articles were included if they were English, prospective, randomized, or nonrandomized controlled trials that used local anesthetic or conscious sedation for urologic interventions in adult patients. Additionally, included studies provided primary data on the use loco-sedative anesthesia and the efficacy and complications. All studies included were further reviewed to assess the biases and conflicts of interests.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies with 6897 patients were included in the review. Mean patient age was 46.4years. The most common anesthetic and analgesic relief was the use of local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. The majority used lidocaine as an injection, whereas the second most common route of administration was a topical cream. However, there was significant heterogeneity in the type of local or conscious sedation method and whether a combination was used. 44.4% of the studies used the visual analog scale as their primary endpoint. All the studies reported an 83%-100% successful procedure rate without note of significant sedation-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Given the high efficacy rates, loco-sedative anesthesia is a promising technique for urologic interventions and should be further investigated to determine whether it may become be the standard of care.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for onabotulinum toxin A injections: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To our knowledge, there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal prophylactic antibiotic regimen for intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin type A (BTX) injections. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the optimal prophylactic antibiotic regimen to decrease urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients undergoing BTX for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science was conducted from inception through 30 June 2022. All randomized controlled trials and prospective trials with > 20 subjects undergoing BTX injections for OAB in adults that described prophylactic antibiotic regimens were included. Meta-analysis performed to assess UTI rates in patients with idiopathic OAB using the inverse variance method for pooling.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies (9 randomized controlled trials, 18 prospective) were included, representing 2,100 patients (69% women) with 19 studies of idiopathic OAB patients only, 6 of neurogenic only, and 2 including both. No studies directly compared antibiotic regimens for the prevention of UTI. Included studies favor the use of antibiotics in patients with idiopathic OAB and favor continuing antibiotics for 2-3 days after the procedure for prevention of UTI. Given the heterogeneity of the data, direct comparisons of antibiotic type or duration could not be performed. Meta-analysis found a 10% UTI rate at 4 weeks and 15% at 12 weeks post-injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are insufficient data to support the use of a specific antibiotic regimen, available studies favor the use of prophylactic antibiotics for 2-3 days in idiopathic OAB patients undergoing BTX injection. Future trials are needed to determine the optimal regimens to prevent UTI in patients undergoing BTX for OAB.

Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Older Adults: Intravesical Options

This article provides an overview of the diagnosis and the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older adults complicated by the neurodegenerative changes in the micturition reflex and further confounded by age-related decline in hepatic and renal clearance raising the propensity of adverse drug reactions. The first-line drug treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms, orally administered antimuscarinics, fails to reach the equilibrium dissociation constant of muscarinic receptors even at their maximum plasma concentration and tends to evoke a half-maximal response at a muscarinic receptor occupancy of just 0.206% in the bladder with a minimal difference from exocrine glands, which raises the adverse drug reaction risk. On the contrary, intravesical antimuscarinics are instilled at concentrations 1000-fold higher than the oral maximum plasma concentration and the equilibrium dissociation constant erects a downhill concentration gradient that drives passive diffusion and achieves a mucosal concentration around ten-fold lower than the instilled concentration for a long-lasting occupation of muscarinic receptors in mucosa and sensory nerves. A high local concentration of antimuscarinics in the bladder triggers alternative mechanisms of action and is supposed to engage retrograde transport to nerve cell bodies for neuroplastic changes that underlie a long-lasting therapeutic effect, while an intrinsically lower systemic uptake of the intravesical route lowers the muscarinic receptor occupancy of exocrine glands to lower the adverse drug reaction relative to the oral route. Thus, the traditional pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral treatment are upended by intravesical antimuscarinics to generate a dramatic improvement (~ 76%) noted in a meta-analysis of studies enrolling children with neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms on the primary endpoint of maximum cystometric bladder capacity as well as the secondary endpoints of filling compliance and uninhibited detrusor contractions. The therapeutic success of intravesical multidose oxybutynin solution or oxybutynin entrapped in the polymer for sustained release in the pediatric population bodes well for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms at the other extreme of the age spectrum. Though generally used to predict oral drug absorption, Lipinski's rule of five can also explain the ten-fold lower systemic uptake from the bladder of positively charged trospium over oxybutynin, a tertiary amine. Chemodenervation by an intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA is merited for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder discontinuing oral treatment because of a lack of efficacy. However, age-related peripheral neurodegeneration potentiates the adverse drug reaction risk of urinary retention that motivates the quest of liquid instillation, delivering larger fraction of onabotulinumtoxinA to the mucosa as opposed to muscle by an intradetrusor injection can also probe the neurogenic and myogenic predominance of idiopathic overactive bladder. Overall, the treatment paradigm of lower urinary tract symptoms in older adults should be tailored to individual's overall health status and the risk tolerance for adverse drug reactions.

[Onabotulium toxin A detrusor injection: The "real world" of users, the "real world" of patients - Update BOTUROLOGY 2022]

BACKGROUND

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) has been approved in Germany since 2013 for the second-line treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder in the form of a detrusor injection (OnabotA DI) after failure of anticholinergic therapy. Until 2018, however, its application lagged far behind the demand due to billing hurdles. Since the beginning of 2018, there has been an EBM (German Uniform Evaluation Standard) approval number in Germany for the transurethral application of Botox in urology.

QUESTION

The aim of a survey performed in 2019 among course participants of regular injection workshops (WS-P) in our institution was to evaluate whether billability has changed user behaviour in Germany in line with the demand. A similar survey was carried out in 2021 to show the developments over the past two years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2019, 88 consecutive participants in a user workshop that had been held regularly since 2013 were asked about their OnabotA DI practice anonymously via questionnaire. The survey was repeated in 2021 in an anonymous online survey of 55 course participants in order to evaluate changes in user behaviour over the past two years.

RESULTS

Evaluation 2019: Response rate 35/88 of the questionnaires (39.8%); a large majority (82%) of the WS-P attended the workshop AFTER the establishment of the EBM code. Only 54.5% of the WS-P performed two or more (12% more than 10) OnabotA DIs per quarter after the workshop. Most users (85%) always or predominantly performed the procedure on an outpatient basis, 63% always or predominantly under local anesthesia. The majority (84%) administered no or only a perioperative antibiotic treatment, 13% for one week. 89% stated that at least 70% of their patients had no or only mild symptoms under the LA. In the 2021 evaluation, the users tended to perform the procedure more often on an outpatient basis and in LA, and more often without any antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our user survey indicate that the implementation of the OnabotA DI has gained significant impetus since the EBM approval in Germany in January 2018. In most cases, the procedure can be performed easily on an outpatient basis under local anesthesia.

Interventions to improve tolerability of local anesthetic intradetrusor Botulinum toxin injections: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Intradetrusor BotulinumtoxinA (BTA) injections are recommended for patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to lifestyle changes and medical intervention. It is preferable to perform injections using a flexible cystoscope under local anesthetic (LA) rather than under spinal or general anesthetic owing to the associated anesthetic risks, increased costs, and need for repeated inpatient admission. Injections under LA can be difficult to tolerate for some patients. This review aims to assess interventions that may improve the tolerability of intradetrusor BTA injections under LA.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using Ovid of Embase + Embase classic and MEDLINE® ALL in November 2021. Articles were included if they reported objectively measured pain scores during LA intradetrusor BTA injections for refractory OAB. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools. Meta-analysis was not performed owing to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in this review with a total of 429 participants. The review identified alkalinized lidocaine, electromotive drug administration (EMDA), opiate suppositories, lidocaine bladder instillations, number of injections, and dose of BTA as interventions aimed at improving tolerability.

CONCLUSION

EMDA of intravesical alkalinized lidocaine, intravesical, alkalinized lidocaine without EMDA, and a reduction in the number of injection site were all associated with improvements in patient tolerability during LA BTA injections. Further research should address which subgroups of patients find the procedure most painful and would benefit most from these interventions.

Oral phenazopyridine vs intravesical lidocaine for bladder onabotulinumtoxinA analgesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the management of idiopathic overactive bladder has been well-established. The injections are typically performed in the office setting using local analgesia, most commonly a 20 to 30-minute intravesical instillation of lidocaine. There are limited data evaluating alternative bladder analgesics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain scores with preprocedure oral phenazopyridine vs intravesical lidocaine in women undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonpregnant adult females with idiopathic overactive bladder, scheduled for office injection of 100 units of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA were randomized to either 200 mg of oral phenazopyridine taken 1 to 2 hours preprocedure or a 20-minute preprocedure intravesical instillation of 50 mL of 2% lidocaine. We excluded participants with neurogenic bladders, and those who had received intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the previous 12 months. The primary outcome was pain measured by a 100-mm visual analog scale. Demographic characteristics and overall satisfaction with the procedure were also recorded. Providers answered questions about cystoscopic visualization, ease of procedure, and perception of participant comfort. Prespecified noninferiority margin was set to equal the anticipated minimum clinically important difference of 14 mm. A planned sample of 100 participants, 50 in each treatment arm, provided 80% power to detect noninferiority at a significance level of.05. We performed a modified intention-to-treat analysis and compared variables with the t test or the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 111 participants were enrolled, and complete data were obtained for 100 participants; 47 participants were randomized to phenazopyridine and 53 to lidocaine. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. There were 19.6% and 20.8% of participants in the phenazopyridine and lidocaine groups, respectively, who previously underwent intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The mean postprocedure pain was 2.7 mm lower in the phenazopyridine group than in the lidocaine group (95% confidence interval, -11.3 to 10.7), demonstrating noninferiority. More than 90% of participants in both groups stated that the pain was tolerable. Slightly more participants reported being "very satisfied" in the lidocaine group, although this was not statistically significant (50.0% vs 40.4%; P=.34). Providers reported clear visualization in 89.4% of participants in the phenazopyridine group and in 100% of participants in the lidocaine group (P=.02). Provider perception of participant comfort and overall ease of procedure were not different between groups. Length of time in the exam room was significantly shorter in the phenazopyridine than in the lidocaine group (44.4 vs 57.5 minutes; P=.0003).

CONCLUSION

In women receiving intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder, oral phenazopyridine was noninferior to intravesical lidocaine for procedural pain control. Phenazopyridine is well-tolerated by participants, allows for the procedure to be performed with similar ease, and is associated with shorter appointment times.