1
|
Li X, Young AJ, Shi Z, Byanyima J, Vesslee S, Reddy R, Pond T, Elliott M, Reddy R, Doot RK, van der Veen JW, Kranzler HR, Reddy Nanga RP, Dubroff JG, Wiers CE. Pharmacokinetic effects of a single-dose nutritional ketone ester supplement on brain glucose and ketone metabolism in alcohol use disorder. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2025:2023.09.25.23296090. [PMID: 37808798 PMCID: PMC10557835 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.25.23296090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Acute alcohol intake decreases brain glucose metabolism and increases brain uptake of acetate, a metabolite of alcohol. This shift in energy utilization persists beyond acute intoxication in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and may contribute to alcohol craving. We recently found that ketone therapies decrease alcohol withdrawal and alcohol craving in AUD. Here, we studied the effects of a single-dose ketone ester (KE) supplement on brain energy metabolism and alcohol craving. Five AUD and five healthy control (HC) participants underwent two 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scans, after consumption of 395 mg/kg KE or without (baseline), in randomized order. In the AUD group, KE reduced alcohol craving scores compared to baseline. KE decreased blood glucose levels and elevated blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) levels compared to baseline in both groups. Whole-brain voxel-wise maps of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc) decreased by 17% in both groups, with the largest KE-induced CMRglc reductions in the frontal, occipital, and cingulate cortices, hippocampus, amygdala, and insula. There were no group differences between AUD and HC in blood or FDG measures, and no correlations between reductions in craving with CMRglc. Cingulate BHB levels, as assessed with 1 H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in 5 participant with AUD, increased 3-fold with KE compared to baseleline. In sum, administration of a single dose of KE rapidly shifted brain energetics from glucose to ketone metabolism in HC and AUD. KE also reduced ratings of alcohol craving, demonstrating its potential clinical effectiveness for supporting brain health and alcohol craving in AUD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Oberman LM, Francis SM, Beynel L, Hynd M, Jaime M, Robins PL, Deng ZD, Stout J, van der Veen JW, Lisanby SH. Design and methodology for a proof of mechanism study of individualized neuronavigated continuous Theta burst stimulation for auditory processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1304528. [PMID: 38389984 PMCID: PMC10881663 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1304528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
It has been suggested that aberrant excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and dysfunctional structure and function of relevant brain networks may underlie the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the nomological network linking these constructs to quantifiable measures and mechanistically relating these constructs to behavioral symptoms of ASD is lacking. Herein we describe a within-subject, controlled, proof-of-mechanism study investigating the pathophysiology of auditory/language processing in adolescents with ASD. We utilize neurophysiological and neuroimaging techniques including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) metrics of language network structure and function. Additionally, we apply a single, individually targeted session of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) as an experimental probe of the impact of perturbation of the system on these neurophysiological and neuroimaging outcomes. MRS, fMRI, and MEG measures are evaluated at baseline and immediately prior to and following cTBS over the posterior superior temporal cortex (pSTC), a region involved in auditory and language processing deficits in ASD. Also, behavioral measures of ASD and language processing and DWI measures of auditory/language network structures are obtained at baseline to characterize the relationship between the neuroimaging and neurophysiological measures and baseline symptom presentation. We hypothesize that local gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate concentrations (measured with MRS), and structural and functional activity and network connectivity (measured with DWI and fMRI), will significantly predict MEG indices of auditory/language processing and behavioral deficits in ASD. Furthermore, a single session of cTBS over left pSTC is hypothesized to lead to significant, acute changes in local glutamate and GABA concentration, functional activity and network connectivity, and MEG indices of auditory/language processing. We have completed the pilot phase of the study (n=20 Healthy Volunteer adults) and have begun enrollment for the main phase with adolescents with ASD (n=86; age 14-17). If successful, this study will establish a nomological network linking local E/I balance measures to functional and structural connectivity within relevant brain networks, ultimately connecting them to ASD symptoms. Furthermore, this study will inform future therapeutic trials using cTBS to treat the symptoms of ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay M Oberman
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Sunday M Francis
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Lysianne Beynel
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Megan Hynd
- Clinical Affective Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Miguel Jaime
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Pei L Robins
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Zhi-De Deng
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jeff Stout
- Magnetoencephalography Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jan Willem van der Veen
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peek AL, Rebbeck TJ, Leaver AM, Foster SL, Refshauge KM, Puts NA, Oeltzschner G. A comprehensive guide to MEGA-PRESS for GABA measurement. Anal Biochem 2023; 669:115113. [PMID: 36958511 PMCID: PMC10805000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this guideline is to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations that allow those new to using MEGA-PRESS to produce high-quality data for the measurement of GABA levels using edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy with the MEGA-PRESS sequence at 3T. GABA is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter of the central nervous system and has been increasingly studied due to its relevance in many clinical disorders of the central nervous system. MEGA-PRESS is the most widely used method for quantification of GABA at 3T, but is technically challenging and operates at a low signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, the acquisition of high-quality MRS data relies on avoiding numerous pitfalls and observing important caveats. The guideline was developed by a working party that consisted of experts in MRS and experts in guideline development and implementation, together with key stakeholders. Strictly following a translational framework, we first identified evidence using a systematically conducted scoping literature review, then synthesized and graded the quality of evidence that formed recommendations. These recommendations were then sent to a panel of 21 world leaders in MRS for feedback and approval using a modified-Delphi process across two rounds. The final guideline consists of 23 recommendations across six domains essential for GABA MRS acquisition (Parameters, Practicalities, Data acquisition, Confounders, Quality/reporting, Post-processing). Overall, 78% of recommendations were formed from high-quality evidence, and 91% received agreement from over 80% of the expert panel. These 23 expert-reviewed recommendations and accompanying extended documentation form a readily useable guideline to allow those new to using MEGA-PRESS to design appropriate MEGA-PRESS study protocols and generate high-quality data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Peek
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2141, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, Queensland, Australia.
| | - T J Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2141, Australia; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, Queensland, Australia.
| | - A M Leaver
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.
| | - S L Foster
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2141, Australia; Department of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia.
| | - K M Refshauge
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.
| | - N A Puts
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, Kings College London, UK.
| | - G Oeltzschner
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong S, An L, Shen J. Monte Carlo study of metabolite correlations originating from spectral overlap. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE (SAN DIEGO, CALIF. : 1997) 2022; 341:107257. [PMID: 35752065 PMCID: PMC9339476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations and a mathematical model of spectral fitting were used to study the correlations between metabolites with overlapping resonances. The dependence of the polarity and the magnitude of cross-correlation coefficients between overlapping metabolites on the spectral patterns of MRS signals was investigated. The results demonstrate the importance of quantifying metabolite correlations originating from spectral overlap as they may confound determination of correlations of biological origin. The findings also indicate that it is possible to minimize unwanted metabolite correlations by altering spectral patterns in the presence of significant spectral overlap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungtak Hong
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Li An
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Jun Shen
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zöllner HJ, Tapper S, Hui SCN, Barker PB, Edden RAE, Oeltzschner G. Comparison of linear combination modeling strategies for edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4618. [PMID: 34558129 PMCID: PMC8935346 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
J-difference-edited spectroscopy is a valuable approach for the in vivo detection of γ-aminobutyric-acid (GABA) with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). A recent expert consensus article recommends linear combination modeling (LCM) of edited MRS but does not give specific details regarding implementation. This study explores different modeling strategies to adapt LCM for GABA-edited MRS. Sixty-one medial parietal lobe GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS spectra from a recent 3-T multisite study were modeled using 102 different strategies combining six different approaches to account for co-edited macromolecules (MMs), three modeling ranges, three baseline knot spacings, and the use of basis sets with or without homocarnosine. The resulting GABA and GABA+ estimates (quantified relative to total creatine), the residuals at different ranges, standard deviations and coefficients of variation (CVs), and Akaike information criteria, were used to evaluate the models' performance. Significantly different GABA+ and GABA estimates were found when a well-parameterized MM3co basis function was included in the model. The mean GABA estimates were significantly lower when modeling MM3co , while the CVs were similar. A sparser spline knot spacing led to lower variation in the GABA and GABA+ estimates, and a narrower modeling range-only including the signals of interest-did not substantially improve or degrade modeling performance. Additionally, the results suggest that LCM can separate GABA and the underlying co-edited MM3co . Incorporating homocarnosine into the modeling did not significantly improve variance in GABA+ estimates. In conclusion, GABA-edited MRS is most appropriately quantified by LCM with a well-parameterized co-edited MM3co basis function with a constraint to the nonoverlapped MM0.93 , in combination with a sparse spline knot spacing (0.55 ppm) and a modeling range of 0.5-4 ppm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge J. Zöllner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sofie Tapper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Steve C. N. Hui
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter B. Barker
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard A. E. Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Georg Oeltzschner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finkelman T, Furman-Haran E, Paz R, Tal A. Quantifying the excitatory-inhibitory balance: A comparison of SemiLASER and MEGA-SemiLASER for simultaneously measuring GABA and glutamate at 7T. Neuroimage 2021; 247:118810. [PMID: 34906716 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The importance of the excitatory-inhibitory (E/I) balance in a wide range of cognitive and behavioral processes has prompted a commensurate interest in methods for reliably quantifying it. Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-MRS) remains the only method capable of safely and non-invasively measuring the concentrations of the brain's major excitatory (glutamate) and inhibitory (γ-aminobutyric-acid, GABA) neurotransmitters in-vivo. MRS relies on spectral Mescher-Garwood (MEGA) editing techniques at 3T to distinguish GABA from its overlapping resonances. However, with the increased spectral resolution at ultrahigh field strengths of 7T and above, non-edited spectroscopic techniques become potential viable alternatives to MEGA based approaches, and also address some of their shortcomings, such as signal loss, sensitivity to transmitter inhomogeneities and temporal resolution. We present a comprehensive comparison of both edited and non-edited strategies at 7T for simultaneously quantifying glutamate and GABA from the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), and evaluate their reproducibility and relative bias. The combined root-mean-square test-retest reproducibility of Glu and GABA (CVE/I) was as low as 13.3% for unedited MRS at TE=80 ms using SemiLASER localization, while edited MRS at TE=80 ms yielded CVE/I=20% and 21% for asymmetric and symmetric MEGA editing, respectively. An unedited SemiLASER acquisition using a shorter echo time of TE=42 ms yielded CVE/I as low as 24.9%. Our results show that non-edited sequences at an echo time of 80 ms provide better reproducibility than either edited sequences at the same TE, or non-edited sequences at a shorter TE of 42 ms. This is supported by numerical simulations and is driven in part by a pseudo-singlet appearance of the GABA multiplets at TE=80 ms, and the excellent spectral resolution at 7T. Our results uphold a transition to non-edited MRS for monitoring the E/I balance at ultrahigh fields, and stress the importance of using a properly-optimized echo time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Finkelman
- Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzel St., Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Edna Furman-Haran
- Life Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Rony Paz
- Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Assaf Tal
- Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzel St., Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hui SCN, Mikkelsen M, Zöllner HJ, Ahluwalia V, Alcauter S, Baltusis L, Barany DA, Barlow LR, Becker R, Berman JI, Berrington A, Bhattacharyya PK, Blicher JU, Bogner W, Brown MS, Calhoun VD, Castillo R, Cecil KM, Choi YB, Chu WCW, Clarke WT, Craven AR, Cuypers K, Dacko M, de la Fuente-Sandoval C, Desmond P, Domagalik A, Dumont J, Duncan NW, Dydak U, Dyke K, Edmondson DA, Ende G, Ersland L, Evans CJ, Fermin ASR, Ferretti A, Fillmer A, Gong T, Greenhouse I, Grist JT, Gu M, Harris AD, Hat K, Heba S, Heckova E, Hegarty JP, Heise KF, Honda S, Jacobson A, Jansen JFA, Jenkins CW, Johnston SJ, Juchem C, Kangarlu A, Kerr AB, Landheer K, Lange T, Lee P, Levendovszky SR, Limperopoulos C, Liu F, Lloyd W, Lythgoe DJ, Machizawa MG, MacMillan EL, Maddock RJ, Manzhurtsev AV, Martinez-Gudino ML, Miller JJ, Mirzakhanian H, Moreno-Ortega M, Mullins PG, Nakajima S, Near J, Noeske R, Nordhøy W, Oeltzschner G, Osorio-Duran R, Otaduy MCG, Pasaye EH, Peeters R, Peltier SJ, Pilatus U, Polomac N, Porges EC, Pradhan S, Prisciandaro JJ, Puts NA, Rae CD, Reyes-Madrigal F, Roberts TPL, Robertson CE, Rosenberg JT, Rotaru DG, O'Gorman Tuura RL, Saleh MG, Sandberg K, Sangill R, Schembri K, et alHui SCN, Mikkelsen M, Zöllner HJ, Ahluwalia V, Alcauter S, Baltusis L, Barany DA, Barlow LR, Becker R, Berman JI, Berrington A, Bhattacharyya PK, Blicher JU, Bogner W, Brown MS, Calhoun VD, Castillo R, Cecil KM, Choi YB, Chu WCW, Clarke WT, Craven AR, Cuypers K, Dacko M, de la Fuente-Sandoval C, Desmond P, Domagalik A, Dumont J, Duncan NW, Dydak U, Dyke K, Edmondson DA, Ende G, Ersland L, Evans CJ, Fermin ASR, Ferretti A, Fillmer A, Gong T, Greenhouse I, Grist JT, Gu M, Harris AD, Hat K, Heba S, Heckova E, Hegarty JP, Heise KF, Honda S, Jacobson A, Jansen JFA, Jenkins CW, Johnston SJ, Juchem C, Kangarlu A, Kerr AB, Landheer K, Lange T, Lee P, Levendovszky SR, Limperopoulos C, Liu F, Lloyd W, Lythgoe DJ, Machizawa MG, MacMillan EL, Maddock RJ, Manzhurtsev AV, Martinez-Gudino ML, Miller JJ, Mirzakhanian H, Moreno-Ortega M, Mullins PG, Nakajima S, Near J, Noeske R, Nordhøy W, Oeltzschner G, Osorio-Duran R, Otaduy MCG, Pasaye EH, Peeters R, Peltier SJ, Pilatus U, Polomac N, Porges EC, Pradhan S, Prisciandaro JJ, Puts NA, Rae CD, Reyes-Madrigal F, Roberts TPL, Robertson CE, Rosenberg JT, Rotaru DG, O'Gorman Tuura RL, Saleh MG, Sandberg K, Sangill R, Schembri K, Schrantee A, Semenova NA, Singel D, Sitnikov R, Smith J, Song Y, Stark C, Stoffers D, Swinnen SP, Tain R, Tanase C, Tapper S, Tegenthoff M, Thiel T, Thioux M, Truong P, van Dijk P, Vella N, Vidyasagar R, Vovk A, Wang G, Westlye LT, Wilbur TK, Willoughby WR, Wilson M, Wittsack HJ, Woods AJ, Wu YC, Xu J, Lopez MY, Yeung DKW, Zhao Q, Zhou X, Zupan G, Edden RAE. Frequency drift in MR spectroscopy at 3T. Neuroimage 2021; 241:118430. [PMID: 34314848 PMCID: PMC8456751 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118430] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Heating of gradient coils and passive shim components is a common cause of instability in the B0 field, especially when gradient intensive sequences are used. The aim of the study was to set a benchmark for typical drift encountered during MR spectroscopy (MRS) to assess the need for real-time field-frequency locking on MRI scanners by comparing field drift data from a large number of sites. METHOD A standardized protocol was developed for 80 participating sites using 99 3T MR scanners from 3 major vendors. Phantom water signals were acquired before and after an EPI sequence. The protocol consisted of: minimal preparatory imaging; a short pre-fMRI PRESS; a ten-minute fMRI acquisition; and a long post-fMRI PRESS acquisition. Both pre- and post-fMRI PRESS were non-water suppressed. Real-time frequency stabilization/adjustment was switched off when appropriate. Sixty scanners repeated the protocol for a second dataset. In addition, a three-hour post-fMRI MRS acquisition was performed at one site to observe change of gradient temperature and drift rate. Spectral analysis was performed using MATLAB. Frequency drift in pre-fMRI PRESS data were compared with the first 5:20 minutes and the full 30:00 minutes of data after fMRI. Median (interquartile range) drifts were measured and showed in violin plot. Paired t-tests were performed to compare frequency drift pre- and post-fMRI. A simulated in vivo spectrum was generated using FID-A to visualize the effect of the observed frequency drifts. The simulated spectrum was convolved with the frequency trace for the most extreme cases. Impacts of frequency drifts on NAA and GABA were also simulated as a function of linear drift. Data from the repeated protocol were compared with the corresponding first dataset using Pearson's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS Of the data collected from 99 scanners, 4 were excluded due to various reasons. Thus, data from 95 scanners were ultimately analyzed. For the first 5:20 min (64 transients), median (interquartile range) drift was 0.44 (1.29) Hz before fMRI and 0.83 (1.29) Hz after. This increased to 3.15 (4.02) Hz for the full 30 min (360 transients) run. Average drift rates were 0.29 Hz/min before fMRI and 0.43 Hz/min after. Paired t-tests indicated that drift increased after fMRI, as expected (p < 0.05). Simulated spectra convolved with the frequency drift showed that the intensity of the NAA singlet was reduced by up to 26%, 44 % and 18% for GE, Philips and Siemens scanners after fMRI, respectively. ICCs indicated good agreement between datasets acquired on separate days. The single site long acquisition showed drift rate was reduced to 0.03 Hz/min approximately three hours after fMRI. DISCUSSION This study analyzed frequency drift data from 95 3T MRI scanners. Median levels of drift were relatively low (5-min average under 1 Hz), but the most extreme cases suffered from higher levels of drift. The extent of drift varied across scanners which both linear and nonlinear drifts were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve C N Hui
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark Mikkelsen
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Helge J Zöllner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vishwadeep Ahluwalia
- GSU/GT Center for Advanced Brain Imaging, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sarael Alcauter
- Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Queretaro, Mexico
| | - Laima Baltusis
- Center for Cognitive and Neurobiological Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Deborah A Barany
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, and Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, Athens, GA USA
| | - Laura R Barlow
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Becker
- Center for Innovative Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Research, Department Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jeffrey I Berman
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Adam Berrington
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Jakob Udby Blicher
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wolfgang Bogner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, High-Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark S Brown
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vince D Calhoun
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Ryan Castillo
- NeuRA Imaging, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Australia
| | - Kim M Cecil
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Yeo Bi Choi
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| | - Winnie C W Chu
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - William T Clarke
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexander R Craven
- Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Koen Cuypers
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Dacko
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychiatry & Neuropsychiatry Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Patricia Desmond
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne/ Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aleksandra Domagalik
- Brain Imaging Core Facility, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Julien Dumont
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, US 41 - UMS 2014 - PLBS, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Niall W Duncan
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ulrike Dydak
- School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA
| | - Katherine Dyke
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David A Edmondson
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Gabriele Ende
- Center for Innovative Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Research, Department Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lars Ersland
- Department of Clinical Engineering, University of Bergen, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Alan S R Fermin
- Center for Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Antonio Ferretti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ariane Fillmer
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig und Berlin, Germany
| | - Tao Gong
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ian Greenhouse
- Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR USA
| | - James T Grist
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, Oxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance / Department of Radiology, The Churchill Hospital, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Meng Gu
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ashley D Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Katarzyna Hat
- Consciousness Lab, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
| | - Stefanie Heba
- Department of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eva Heckova
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, High-Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John P Hegarty
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Shiori Honda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aaron Jacobson
- Department of Radiology / Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Jacobus F A Jansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stephen J Johnston
- Psychology Department / Clinical Imaging Facility, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Christoph Juchem
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
| | - Alayar Kangarlu
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - Adam B Kerr
- Center for Cognitive and Neurobiological Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Karl Landheer
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
| | - Thomas Lange
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Phil Lee
- Department of Radiology / Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS USA
| | | | - Catherine Limperopoulos
- Developing Brain Institute, Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC USA
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - William Lloyd
- Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David J Lythgoe
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maro G Machizawa
- Center for Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Erin L MacMillan
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Philips Canada, Markham, ON, Canada
| | - Richard J Maddock
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Imaging Research Center, Davis, CA USA
| | - Andrei V Manzhurtsev
- Department of Radiology, Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma, Moscow, Russia; Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - María L Martinez-Gudino
- Departamento de Imágenes Cerebrales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jack J Miller
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; The MR Research Centre & The PET Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK
| | - Heline Mirzakhanian
- Department of Radiology / Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Marta Moreno-Ortega
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY USA
| | - Paul G Mullins
- Bangor Imaging Unit, Department of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK
| | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jamie Near
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Wibeke Nordhøy
- NORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction and Department of Diagnostic Physics, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital / Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Georg Oeltzschner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raul Osorio-Duran
- Departamento de Imágenes Cerebrales, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Maria C G Otaduy
- LIM44, Instituto e Departamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Erick H Pasaye
- Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Queretaro, Mexico
| | - Ronald Peeters
- Department of Imaging & Pathology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Scott J Peltier
- Functional MRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Ulrich Pilatus
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nenad Polomac
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eric C Porges
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions. Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Subechhya Pradhan
- Developing Brain Institute, Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC USA
| | - James Joseph Prisciandaro
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA
| | - Nicolaas A Puts
- Department of Forensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline D Rae
- NeuRA Imaging, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Australia
| | - Francisco Reyes-Madrigal
- Laboratory of Experimental Psychiatry & Neuropsychiatry Department, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Timothy P L Roberts
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Caroline E Robertson
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| | - Jens T Rosenberg
- McKnight Brain Institute, AMRIS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Diana-Georgiana Rotaru
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth L O'Gorman Tuura
- Center for MR Research, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Muhammad G Saleh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Kristian Sandberg
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ryan Sangill
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Anouk Schrantee
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Natalia A Semenova
- Department of Radiology, Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma, Moscow, Russia; Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Debra Singel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rouslan Sitnikov
- Clinical Neuroscience, MRI Centre, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jolinda Smith
- Lewis Center for Neuroimaging, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR USA
| | - Yulu Song
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Craig Stark
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Facility for Imaging and Brain Research (FIBRE) & Campus Center for Neuroimaging (CCNI), School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Diederick Stoffers
- Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rongwen Tain
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Facility for Imaging and Brain Research (FIBRE) & Campus Center for Neuroimaging (CCNI), School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Costin Tanase
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Imaging Research Center, Davis, CA USA
| | - Sofie Tapper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martin Tegenthoff
- Department of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Thomas Thiel
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc Thioux
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Truong
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pim van Dijk
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nolan Vella
- Medical Physics, Mater Dei Hospital, Imsida, Malta
| | - Rishma Vidyasagar
- Melbourne Dementia Research Centre, Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrej Vovk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Guangbin Wang
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Lars T Westlye
- NORMENT, Division of Mental Health and Addiction and Department of Diagnostic Physics, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital / Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Timothy K Wilbur
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - William R Willoughby
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Martin Wilson
- Centre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hans-Jörg Wittsack
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Adam J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions. Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Yen-Chien Wu
- Department of Radiology, TMU-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Junqian Xu
- Department of Radiology and Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | | | - David K W Yeung
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Qun Zhao
- Bioimaging Research Center, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA
| | - Xiaopeng Zhou
- School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA
| | - Gasper Zupan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Richard A E Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Near J, Harris AD, Juchem C, Kreis R, Marjańska M, Öz G, Slotboom J, Wilson M, Gasparovic C. Preprocessing, analysis and quantification in single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4257. [PMID: 32084297 PMCID: PMC7442593 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Once an MRS dataset has been acquired, several important steps must be taken to obtain the desired metabolite concentration measures. First, the data must be preprocessed to prepare them for analysis. Next, the intensity of the metabolite signal(s) of interest must be estimated. Finally, the measured metabolite signal intensities must be converted into scaled concentration units employing a quantitative reference signal to allow meaningful interpretation. In this paper, we review these three main steps in the post-acquisition workflow of a single-voxel MRS experiment (preprocessing, analysis and quantification) and provide recommendations for best practices at each step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Near
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ashley D. Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada
| | - Christoph Juchem
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York NY, USA
| | - Roland Kreis
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Research, University Bern, Switzerland
| | - Małgorzata Marjańska
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA
| | - Gülin Öz
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA
| | - Johannes Slotboom
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), Neuroradiology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin Wilson
- Centre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choi IY, Andronesi OC, Barker P, Bogner W, Edden RAE, Kaiser LG, Lee P, Marjańska M, Terpstra M, de Graaf RA. Spectral editing in 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4411. [PMID: 32946145 PMCID: PMC8557623 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Spectral editing in in vivo 1 H-MRS provides an effective means to measure low-concentration metabolite signals that cannot be reliably measured by conventional MRS techniques due to signal overlap, for example, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutathione and D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Spectral editing strategies utilize known J-coupling relationships within the metabolite of interest to discriminate their resonances from overlying signals. This consensus recommendation paper provides a brief overview of commonly used homonuclear editing techniques and considerations for data acquisition, processing and quantification. Also, we have listed the experts' recommendations for minimum requirements to achieve adequate spectral editing and reliable quantification. These include selecting the right editing sequence, dealing with frequency drift, handling unwanted coedited resonances, spectral fitting of edited spectra, setting up multicenter clinical trials and recommending sequence parameters to be reported in publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In-Young Choi
- Department of Neurology, Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Barker
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, F. M. Kirby Center for Functional MRI, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wolfgang Bogner
- High-field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard A E Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, F. M. Kirby Center for Functional MRI, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lana G Kaiser
- Henry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center, University of California, Berkeley, California
| | - Phil Lee
- Department of Radiology, Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Małgorzata Marjańska
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Melissa Terpstra
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Robin A de Graaf
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mikkelsen M, Tapper S, Near J, Mostofsky SH, Puts NAJ, Edden RAE. Correcting frequency and phase offsets in MRS data using robust spectral registration. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2020; 33:e4368. [PMID: 32656879 PMCID: PMC9652614 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
An algorithm for retrospective correction of frequency and phase offsets in MRS data is presented. The algorithm, termed robust spectral registration (rSR), contains a set of subroutines designed to robustly align individual transients in a given dataset even in cases of significant frequency and phase offsets or unstable lipid contamination and residual water signals. Data acquired by complex multiplexed editing approaches with distinct subspectral profiles are also accurately aligned. Automated removal of unstable lipid contamination and residual water signals is applied first, when needed. Frequency and phase offsets are corrected in the time domain by aligning each transient to a weighted average reference in a statistically optimal order using nonlinear least-squares optimization. The alignment of subspectra in edited datasets is performed using an approach that specifically targets subtraction artifacts in the frequency domain. Weighted averaging is then used for signal averaging to down-weight poorer-quality transients. Algorithm performance was assessed on one simulated and 67 in vivo pediatric GABA-/GSH-edited HERMES datasets and compared with the performance of a multistep correction method previously developed for aligning HERMES data. The performance of the novel approach was quantitatively assessed by comparing the estimated frequency/phase offsets against the known values for the simulated dataset or by examining the presence of subtraction artifacts in the in vivo data. Spectral quality was improved following robust alignment, especially in cases of significant spectral distortion. rSR reduced more subtraction artifacts than the multistep method in 64% of the GABA difference spectra and 75% of the GSH difference spectra. rSR overcomes the major challenges of frequency and phase correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Mikkelsen
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sofie Tapper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jamie Near
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stewart H. Mostofsky
- Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicolaas A. J. Puts
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard A. E. Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oeltzschner G, Saleh MG, Rimbault D, Mikkelsen M, Chan KL, Puts NAJ, Edden RAE. Advanced Hadamard-encoded editing of seven low-concentration brain metabolites: Principles of HERCULES. Neuroimage 2019; 185:181-190. [PMID: 30296560 PMCID: PMC6289748 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the framework of a novel Hadamard-encoded spectral editing approach for simultaneously detecting multiple low-concentration brain metabolites in vivo at 3T. METHODS HERCULES (Hadamard Editing Resolves Chemicals Using Linear-combination Estimation of Spectra) is a four-step Hadamard-encoded editing scheme. 20-ms editing pulses are applied at: (A) 4.58 and 1.9 ppm; (B) 4.18 and 1.9 ppm; (C) 4.58 ppm; and (D) 4.18 ppm. Edited signals from γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutathione (GSH), ascorbate (Asc), N-acetylaspartate (NAA), N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG), aspartate (Asp), lactate (Lac), and likely 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) are separated with reduced signal overlap into distinct Hadamard combinations: (A+B+C+D); (A+B-C-D); and (A-B+C-D). HERCULES uses a novel multiplexed linear-combination modeling approach, fitting all three Hadamard combinations at the same time, maximizing the amount of information used for model parameter estimation, in order to quantify the levels of these compounds. Fitting also allows estimation of the levels of total choline (tCho), myo-inositol (Ins), glutamate (Glu), and glutamine (Gln). Quantitative HERCULES results were compared between two grey- and white-matter-rich brain regions (11 min acquisition time each) in 10 healthy volunteers. Coefficients of variation (CV) of quantified measurements from the HERCULES fitting approach were compared against those from a single-spectrum fitting approach, and against estimates from short-TE PRESS data. RESULTS HERCULES successfully segregates overlapping resonances into separate Hadamard combinations, allowing for the estimation of levels of seven coupled metabolites that would usually require a single 11-min editing experiment each. Metabolite levels and CVs agree well with published values. CVs of quantified measurements from the multiplexed HERCULES fitting approach outperform single-spectrum fitting and short-TE PRESS for most of the edited metabolites, performing only slightly to moderately worse than the fitting method that gives the lowest CVs for tCho, NAA, NAAG, and Asp. CONCLUSION HERCULES is a new experimental approach with the potential for simultaneous editing and multiplexed fitting of up to seven coupled low-concentration and six high-concentration metabolites within a single 11-min acquisition at 3T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Oeltzschner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Muhammad G Saleh
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Daniel Rimbault
- Medical Imaging Research Unit, Division of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark Mikkelsen
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kimberly L Chan
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Bioengineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Nicolaas A J Puts
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Richard A E Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moser P, Hingerl L, Strasser B, Považan M, Hangel G, Andronesi OC, van der Kouwe A, Gruber S, Trattnig S, Bogner W. Whole-slice mapping of GABA and GABA + at 7T via adiabatic MEGA-editing, real-time instability correction, and concentric circle readout. Neuroimage 2019; 184:475-489. [PMID: 30243974 PMCID: PMC7212034 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
An adiabatic MEscher-GArwood (MEGA)-editing scheme, using asymmetric hyperbolic secant editing pulses, was developed and implemented in a B1+-insensitive, 1D-semiLASER (Localization by Adiabatic SElective Refocusing) MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) sequence for the non-invasive mapping of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) over a whole brain slice. Our approach exploits the advantages of edited-MRSI at 7T while tackling challenges that arise with ultra-high-field-scans. Spatial-spectral encoding, using density-weighted, concentric circle echo planar trajectory readout, enabled substantial MRSI acceleration and an improved point-spread-function, thereby reducing extracranial lipid signals. Subject motion and scanner instabilities were corrected in real-time using volumetric navigators optimized for 7T, in combination with selective reacquisition of corrupted data to ensure robust subtraction-based MEGA-editing. Simulations and phantom measurements of the adiabatic MEGA-editing scheme demonstrated stable editing efficiency even in the presence of ±0.15 ppm editing frequency offsets and B1+ variations of up to ±30% (as typically encountered in vivo at 7T), in contrast to conventional Gaussian editing pulses. Volunteer measurements were performed with and without global inversion recovery (IR) to study regional GABA levels and their underlying, co-edited, macromolecular (MM) signals at 2.99 ppm. High-quality in vivo spectra allowed mapping of pure GABA and MM-contaminated GABA+ (GABA + MM) along with Glx (Glu + Gln), with high-resolution (eff. voxel size: 1.4 cm3) and whole-slice coverage in 24 min scan time. Metabolic ratio maps of GABA/tNAA, GABA+/tNAA, and Glx/tNAA were correlated linearly with the gray matter fraction of each voxel. A 2.15-fold increase in gray matter to white matter contrast was observed for GABA when enabling IR, which we attribute to the higher abundance of macromolecules at 2.99 ppm in the white matter than in the gray matter. In conclusion, adiabatic MEGA-editing with 1D-semiLASER selection is as a promising approach for edited-MRSI at 7T. Our sequence capitalizes on the benefits of ultra-high-field MRSI while successfully mitigating the challenges related to B0/B1+ inhomogeneities, prolonged scan times, and motion/scanner instability artifacts. Robust and accurate 2D mapping has been shown for the neurotransmitters GABA and Glx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moser
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular MRI, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Lukas Hingerl
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Bernhard Strasser
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Michal Považan
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Andre van der Kouwe
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Stephan Gruber
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Siegfried Trattnig
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Wolfgang Bogner
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Effects of carrier frequency mismatch on frequency-selective spectral editing. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2018; 32:237-246. [PMID: 30467687 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-018-0717-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the effects of carrier frequency mismatch on spectral editing and its correction by frequency matching of basis functions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Full density matrix computations and Monte-Carlo simulations based on magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data collected from five healthy volunteers at 7 T were used to analyze the effects of carrier frequency mismatch on spectral editing. Relative errors in metabolite quantification were calculated with and without frequency matching of basis functions. The algorithm for numerical computation of basis functions was also improved for higher computational efficiency. RESULTS We found significant errors without frequency matching of basis functions when carrier frequency mismatch was generally considered negligible. By matching basis functions with the history of frequency deviation, the mean errors in glutamate, glutamine, γ-aminobutyric acid, and glutathione concentrations were reduced from 3.90%, 1.85%, 11.53%, and 3.43% to 0.18%, 0.34%, 0.40%, and 0.51%, respectively. CONCLUSION Matching basis functions to frequency deviation history was necessary even when frequency deviations during frequency-selective spectral editing were fairly small. Basis set frequency matching significantly improved accuracy in the quantification of glutamate, glutamine, γ-aminobutyric acid, and glutathione concentrations.
Collapse
|
14
|
An L, Araneta MF, Johnson C, Shen J. Simultaneous measurement of glutamate, glutamine, GABA, and glutathione by spectral editing without subtraction. Magn Reson Med 2018; 80:1776-1786. [PMID: 29575059 PMCID: PMC6107387 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To simultaneously measure glutamate, glutamine, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutathione using spectral editing without subtraction at 7T. METHODS A novel spectral editing approach was proposed to simultaneously measure glutamate, glutamine, GABA, and glutathione using a TE of 56 ms at 7T. By numerical optimization of sequence timing in the presence of an editing pulse, the 4 metabolites all form relatively intense pseudo singlets with maximized peak amplitudes and minimized peak linewidths in 1 of the 3 interleaved spectra. For measuring glutamate, glutamine, and glutathione, the editing pulse targets the H3 protons of these metabolites near 2.12 parts per million. Both GABA H2 and H4 resonances are fully utilized in spectral fitting. RESULTS Concentration levels (/[total creatine]) of glutamate, glutamine, GABA, and glutathione from an 8 mL voxel in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex of 5 healthy volunteers were found to be 1.26 ± 0.13, 0.33 ± 0.06, 0.13 ± 0.03, and 0.27 ± 0.03, respectively, with within-subject coefficient of variation at 3.2%, 8.2%, 7.1%, and 10.2%, respectively. The total scan time was less than 4.5 min. CONCLUSIONS The proposed new technique does not require data subtraction. The 3 major metabolites of the glutamatergic and GABAergic systems and the oxidative stress marker glutathione were all measured in 1 short scan with high precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li An
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Christopher Johnson
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jun Shen
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maddock RJ, Caton MD, Ragland JD. Estimating glutamate and Glx from GABA-optimized MEGA-PRESS: Off-resonance but not difference spectra values correspond to PRESS values. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2018; 279:22-30. [PMID: 30081290 PMCID: PMC6105414 DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of glutamate and GABA are important in neuropsychiatric research. Some study designs require simultaneous measurement of both metabolites. GABA measurement requires specialized pulse sequences, the most common approach being J-difference spectral editing with MEGA-PRESS. This method enables two different strategies for concurrently measuring glutamate - from either off-resonance or difference spectra. However, it is uncertain how either strategy compares to conventional glutamate measurements. Here we compared these approaches in 49 subjects (28 healthy volunteers and 21 first-episode psychosis patients), in whom both PRESS (TE 80) and MEGA-PRESS (TE 68) spectra were obtained from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Glutamate and glx estimates from MEGA-PRESS difference and off-resonance spectra were compared to glutamate and glx estimates from PRESS spectra using correlational analyses. In healthy volunteers, correlations between PRESS and MEGA-PRESS off-resonance values were r ≥ 0.88 and were significantly higher than correlations between PRESS and MEGA-PRESS difference spectrum values (r ≤ 0.36). Patients showed a similar pattern. Lower correlations with difference spectrum values may reflect a disproportionate impact of field instabilities on co-edited glutamate signals. The results suggest that MEGA-PRESS off-resonance spectra can substitute for separately-acquired PRESS spectra in studies requiring simultaneous glutamate and GABA measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Maddock
- Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4701 X, Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| | - Michael D Caton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| | - J Daniel Ragland
- Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4701 X, Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mikkelsen M, Saleh MG, Near J, Chan KL, Gong T, Harris AD, Oeltzschner G, Puts NAJ, Cecil KM, Wilkinson ID, Edden RAE. Frequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione. Magn Reson Med 2018; 80:21-28. [PMID: 29215137 PMCID: PMC5876096 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Detection of endogenous metabolites using multiplexed editing substantially improves the efficiency of edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiplexed editing (i.e., performing more than one edited experiment in a single acquisition) requires a tailored, robust approach for correction of frequency and phase offsets. Here, a novel method for frequency and phase correction (FPC) based on spectral registration is presented and compared against previously presented approaches. METHODS One simulated dataset and 40 γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited HERMES datasets acquired in vivo at three imaging centers were used to test four FPC approaches: no correction; spectral registration; spectral registration with post hoc choline-creatine alignment; and multistep FPC. The performance of each routine for the simulated dataset was assessed by comparing the estimated frequency/phase offsets against the known values, whereas the performance for the in vivo data was assessed quantitatively by calculation of an alignment quality metric based on choline subtraction artifacts. RESULTS The multistep FPC approach returned corrections that were closest to the true values for the simulated dataset. Alignment quality scores were on average worst for no correction, and best for multistep FPC in both the γ-aminobutyric acid- and glutathione-edited spectra in the in vivo data. CONCLUSIONS Multistep FPC results in improved correction of frequency/phase errors in multiplexed γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments. The optimal FPC strategy is experiment-specific, and may even be dataset-specific. Magn Reson Med 80:21-28, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Mikkelsen
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Muhammad G. Saleh
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jamie Near
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kimberly L. Chan
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tao Gong
- Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ashley D. Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Georg Oeltzschner
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicolaas A. J. Puts
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kim M. Cecil
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Richard A. E. Edden
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|