1
|
Hashemi HS, Mohammed SK, Zeng Q, Azar RZ, Rohling RN, Salcudean SE. 3-D Ultrafast Shear Wave Absolute Vibro-Elastography Using a Matrix Array Transducer. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL 2023; 70:1039-1053. [PMID: 37235463 DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2023.3280450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Real-time ultrasound imaging plays an important role in ultrasound-guided interventions. The 3-D imaging provides more spatial information compared to conventional 2-D frames by considering the volumes of data. One of the main bottlenecks of 3-D imaging is the long data acquisition time, which reduces practicality and can introduce artifacts from unwanted patient or sonographer motion. This article introduces the first shear wave absolute vibro-elastography (S-WAVE) method with real-time volumetric acquisition using a matrix array transducer. In S-WAVE, an external vibration source generates mechanical vibrations inside the tissue. The tissue motion is then estimated and used in solving a wave equation inverse problem to provide the tissue elasticity. A matrix array transducer is used with a Verasonics ultrasound machine and a frame rate of 2000 volumes/s to acquire 100 radio frequency (RF) volumes in 0.05 s. Using plane wave (PW) and compounded diverging wave (CDW) imaging methods, we estimate axial, lateral, and elevational displacements over 3-D volumes. The curl of the displacements is used with local frequency estimation to estimate elasticity in the acquired volumes. Ultrafast acquisition extends substantially the possible S-WAVE excitation frequency range, now up to 800 Hz, enabling new tissue modeling and characterization. The method was validated on three homogeneous liver fibrosis phantoms and on four different inclusions within a heterogeneous phantom. The homogeneous phantom results show less than 8% (PW) and 5% (CDW) difference between the manufacturer values and the corresponding estimated values over a frequency range of 80-800 Hz. The estimated elasticity values for the heterogeneous phantom at 400-Hz excitation frequency show the average errors of 9% (PW) and 6% (CDW) compared to the provided average values by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Furthermore, both imaging methods were able to detect the inclusions within the elasticity volumes. An ex vivo study on a bovine liver sample shows less than 11% (PW) and 9% (CDW) difference between the estimated elasticity ranges by the proposed method and the elasticity ranges provided by MRE and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI).
Collapse
|
2
|
Herthum H, Hetzer S, Kreft B, Tzschätzsch H, Shahryari M, Meyer T, Görner S, Neubauer H, Guo J, Braun J, Sack I. Cerebral tomoelastography based on multifrequency MR elastography in two and three dimensions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:1056131. [PMID: 36532573 PMCID: PMC9755504 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1056131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) generates quantitative maps of the mechanical properties of biological soft tissues. However, published values obtained by brain MRE vary largely and lack detail resolution, due to either true biological effects or technical challenges. We here introduce cerebral tomoelastography in two and three dimensions for improved data consistency and detail resolution while considering aging, brain parenchymal fraction (BPF), systolic blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI). Methods: Multifrequency MRE with 2D- and 3D-tomoelastography postprocessing was applied to the brains of 31 volunteers (age range: 22-61 years) for analyzing the coefficient of variation (CV) and effects of biological factors. Eleven volunteers were rescanned after 1 day and 1 year to determine intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and identify possible long-term changes. Results: White matter shear wave speed (SWS) was slightly higher in 2D-MRE (1.28 ± 0.02 m/s) than 3D-MRE (1.22 ± 0.05 m/s, p < 0.0001), with less variation after 1 day in 2D (0.33 ± 0.32%) than in 3D (0.96 ± 0.66%, p = 0.004), which was also reflected in a slightly lower CV and higher ICC in 2D (1.84%, 0.97 [0.88-0.99]) than in 3D (3.89%, 0.95 [0.76-0.99]). Remarkably, 3D-MRE was sensitive to a decrease in white matter SWS within only 1 year, whereas no change in white matter volume was observed during this follow-up period. Across volunteers, stiffness correlated with age and BPF, but not with blood pressure and BMI. Conclusion: Cerebral tomoelastography provides high-resolution viscoelasticity maps with excellent consistency. Brain MRE in 2D shows less variation across volunteers in shorter scan times than 3D-MRE, while 3D-MRE appears to be more sensitive to subtle biological effects such as aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Herthum
- Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Hetzer
- Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kreft
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heiko Tzschätzsch
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mehrgan Shahryari
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tom Meyer
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Görner
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hennes Neubauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jing Guo
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jürgen Braun
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingolf Sack
- Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Gao Q, Chen N, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li C, He X, Jiao Y, Zhang Z. Clinical studies of magnetic resonance elastography from 1995 to 2021: Scientometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:5080-5100. [PMID: 36330182 PMCID: PMC9622435 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the knowledge framework around magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and to explore MRE research hotspots and emerging trends. METHODS The Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection was searched on 22 October 2021 for MRE-related studies published between 1995 and 2021. Excel 2016 and CiteSpace V (version 5.8.R3) were used to analyze the downloaded data. RESULTS In all, 1,236 articles published by 726 authors from 540 institutions in 40 countries were included in this study. The top 10 authors published 57.6% of all included articles. The 3 most productive countries were the USA (n=631), Germany (n=202), and France (n=134), and the 3 most productive institutions were the Mayo Clinic (n=240), Charité (n=131), and the University of Illinois (n=56). The USA and the Mayo Clinic had the highest betweenness centrality among countries and institutions, respectively, and played an important role in the field of MRE. In this study, the 24,347 distinct references were clustered into 48 categories via reasonable clustering using specific keywords, forming the knowledge framework. Among the 294 co-occurring keywords, "hepatic fibrosis", "stiffness", "skeletal muscle", "acoustic strain wave", "in vivo", and "non-invasive assessment" were research hotspots. "Diagnostic performance", "diagnostic accuracy", "hepatic steatosis", "chronic hepatitis B", "radiation force impulse", "children", and "echo" were frontier topics. CONCLUSIONS Scientometric and visualized analysis of MRE can provide information regarding the knowledge framework, research hotspots, frontier areas, and emerging trends in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youwei Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Na Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanfang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Juan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan He
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Jiao
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zongming Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The effects of geometry on stiffness measurements in high-field magnetic resonance elastography: A study on rodent cardiac phantoms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022; 133:105302. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
5
|
Troelstra MA, Runge JH, Burnhope E, Polcaro A, Guenthner C, Schneider T, Razavi R, Ismail TF, Martorell J, Sinkus R. Shear wave cardiovascular MR elastography using intrinsic cardiac motion for transducer-free non-invasive evaluation of myocardial shear wave velocity. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1403. [PMID: 33446701 PMCID: PMC7809276 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79231-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Changes in myocardial stiffness may represent a valuable biomarker for early tissue injury or adverse remodeling. In this study, we developed and validated a novel transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) approach for quantifying myocardial biomechanics using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves. Using motion-sensitized two-dimensional pencil beams, septal shear waves were imaged at high temporal resolution. Shear wave speed was measured using time-of-flight of waves travelling between two pencil beams and corrected for geometrical biases. After validation in phantoms, results from twelve healthy volunteers and five cardiac patients (two left ventricular hypertrophy, two myocardial infarcts, and one without confirmed pathology) were obtained. Torsional shear wave speed in the phantom was 3.0 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with reference speeds of 2.8 ± 0.1 m/s. Geometrically-biased flexural shear wave speed was 1.9 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with simulation values of 2.0 m/s. Corrected septal shear wave speeds were significantly higher in patients than healthy volunteers [14.1 (11.0-15.8) m/s versus 3.6 (2.7-4.3) m/s, p = 0.001]. The interobserver 95%-limits-of-agreement in healthy volunteers were ± 1.3 m/s and interstudy 95%-limits-of-agreement - 0.7 to 1.2 m/s. In conclusion, myocardial shear wave speed can be measured using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves, with cardiac patients showing significantly higher shear wave speeds than healthy volunteers. This non-invasive measure may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Amber Troelstra
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen Henk Runge
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Burnhope
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Polcaro
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Sciences, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian Guenthner
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Torben Schneider
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Philips, Guildford, UK
| | - Reza Razavi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tevfik F Ismail
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jordi Martorell
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Sciences, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ralph Sinkus
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Inserm U1148, LVTS, University Paris Diderot, University Paris 13, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manduca A, Bayly PJ, Ehman RL, Kolipaka A, Royston TJ, Sack I, Sinkus R, Van Beers BE. MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology. Magn Reson Med 2020; 85:2377-2390. [PMID: 33296103 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase contrast-based MRI technique that can measure displacement due to propagating mechanical waves, from which material properties such as shear modulus can be calculated. Magnetic resonance elastography can be thought of as quantitative, noninvasive palpation. It is increasing in clinical importance, has become widespread in the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis, and additional clinical applications are being explored. However, publications have reported MRE results using many different parameters, acquisition techniques, processing methods, and varied nomenclature. The diversity of terminology can lead to confusion (particularly among clinicians) about the meaning of and interpretation of MRE results. This paper was written by the MRE Guidelines Committee, a group formalized at the first meeting of the ISMRM MRE Study Group, to clarify and move toward standardization of MRE nomenclature. The purpose of this paper is to (1) explain MRE terminology and concepts to those not familiar with them, (2) define "good practices" for practitioners of MRE, and (3) identify opportunities to standardize terminology, to avoid confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Manduca
- Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Philip J Bayly
- Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Richard L Ehman
- Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arunark Kolipaka
- Department of Radiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas J Royston
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ingolf Sack
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Sinkus
- Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|