Pseudo-spiral sampling and compressed sensing reconstruction provides flexibility of temporal resolution in accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI: A comparison with k-t principal component analysis

Muscle fiber strain rates in the lower leg during ankle dorsi-/plantarflexion exercise

Static quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides readouts of structural changes in diseased muscle, but current approaches lack the ability to fully explain the loss of contractile function. Muscle contractile function can be assessed using various techniques including phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI), where strain rates are quantified. However, current two-dimensional implementations are limited in capturing the complex motion of contracting muscle in the context of its three-dimensional (3D) fiber architecture. The MR acquisitions (chemical shift-encoded water-fat separation scan, spin echo-echoplanar imaging with diffusion weighting, and two time-resolved 3D PC-MRI) wereperformed at 3 T. PC-MRI acquisitions and performed with and without load at 7.5% of the maximum voluntary dorsiflexion contraction force. Acquisitions (3 T, chemical shift-encoded water-fat separation scan, spin echo-echo planar imaging with diffusion weighting, and two time-resolved 3D PC-MRI) were performed with and without load at 7.5% of the maximum voluntary dorsiflexion contraction force. Strain rates and diffusion tensors were calculated and combined to obtain strain rates along and perpendicular to the muscle fibers in seven lower leg muscles during the dynamic dorsi-/plantarflexion movement cycle. To evaluate strain rates along the proximodistal muscle axis, muscles were divided into five equal segments. t-tests were used to test if cyclic strain rate patterns (amplitude > 0) were present along and perpendicular to the muscle fibers. The effects of proximal-distal location and load were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVAs. Cyclic temporal strain rate patterns along and perpendicular to the fiber were found in all muscles involved in dorsi-/plantarflexion movement (p < 0.0017). Strain rates along and perpendicular to the fiber were heterogeneously distributed over the length of most muscles (p < 0.003). Additional loading reduced strain rates of the extensor digitorum longus and gastrocnemius lateralis muscle (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the lower leg muscles involved in cyclic dorsi-/plantarflexion exercise showed cyclic fiber strain rate patterns with amplitudes that varied between muscles and between the proximodistal segments within the majority of muscles.

Single Breath-Hold MR Elastography for Fast Biomechanical Probing of Pancreatic Stiffness

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stromal disposition is thought to influence chemotherapy efficacy and increase tissue stiffness, which could be quantified noninvasively via MR elastography (MRE). Current methods cause position-based errors in pancreas location over time, hampering accuracy. It would be beneficial to have a single breath-hold acquisition.

PURPOSE

To develop and test a single breath-hold three-dimensional MRE technique utilizing prospective undersampling and a compressed sensing reconstruction (CS-MRE).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 30 healthy volunteers (HV) (31 ± 9 years; 33% male) and five patients with PDAC (69 ± 5 years; 80% male).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T, GRE Ristretto MRE.

ASSESSMENT

First, optimization of multi breath-hold MRE was done in 10 HV using four combinations of vibration frequency, number of measured wave-phase offsets, and TE and looking at MRE quality measures in the pancreas head. Second, viscoelastic parameters delineated in the pancreas head or tumor of CS-MRE were compared against (I) 2D and (II) 3D four breath-hold acquisitions in HV (N = 20) and PDAC patients. Intrasession repeatability was assessed for CS-MRE in a subgroup of healthy volunteers (N = 15).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Tests include repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation (CoVs). A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Optimization of the four breath-hold acquisitions resulted in 40 Hz vibration frequency, five wave-phases, and echo time (TE) = 6.9 msec as the preferred method (4BH-MRE). CS-MRE quantitative results did not differ from 4BH-MRE. Shear wave speed (SWS) and phase angle differed significantly between HV and PDAC patients using 4BH-MRE or CS-MRE. The limits of agreement for SWS were [-0.09, 0.10] m/second and the within-subject CoV was 4.8% for CS-MRE.

DATA CONCLUSION

CS-MRE might allow a single breath-hold MRE acquisition with comparable SWS and phase angle as 4BH-MRE, and it may still enable to differentiate between HV and PDAC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.

Reproducibility of 3D thoracic aortic displacement from 3D cine balanced SSFP at 3 T without contrast enhancement

PURPOSE

Aortic motion has direct impact on the mechanical stresses acting on the aorta. In aortic disease, increased stiffness of the aorta may lead to decreased aortic motion over time, which could be a predictor for aortic dissection or rupture. This study investigates the reproducibility of obtaining 3D displacement and diameter maps quantified using accelerated 3D cine MRI at 3 T.

METHODS

A noncontrast-enhanced, free-breathing 3D cine sequence based on balanced SSFP and pseudo-spiral undersampling with high spatial isotropic resolution was developed (spatial/temporal resolution [1.6 mm]3 /67 ms). The thoracic aorta of 14 healthy volunteers was prospectively scanned three times at 3 T: twice on the same day and a third time 2 weeks later. Aortic displacement was calculated using iterative closest point nonrigid registration of manual segmentations of the 3D aorta at end-systole and mid-diastole. Interexamination and interobserver regional analysis of mean displacement for five regions of interest was performed using Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, a complementary voxel-by-voxel analysis was done, allowing a more local inspection of the method.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in mean and maximum displacement for any of the regions of interest for the interexamination and interobserver analysis. The maximum displacement measured in the lower half of the ascending aorta was 11.0 ± 3.4 mm (range: 3.0-17.5 mm) for the first scan. The smallest detectable change in mean displacement in the lower half of the ascending aorta was 3 mm.

CONCLUSION

Detailed 3D cine balanced SSFP at 3 T allows for reproducible quantification of systolic-diastolic mean aortic displacement within acceptable limits.

Four-Dimensional Flow MRI-Derived Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Reproducibility and Associations With Diameter, Intraluminal Thrombus Volume, and Vorticity

BACKGROUND

Maximum diameter measurements are used to assess the rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs); however, these are not precise enough to predict all ruptures. Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI-derived parameters provide additional information by visualizing hemodynamics in AAAs but merit further investigation before they are clinically applicable.

PURPOSE

To assess the reproducibility of 4D flow MRI-derived hemodynamics, to investigate possible correlations with lumen and maximum diameter, and to explore potential relationships with vorticity and aneurysm growth.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective single-arm study.

POPULATION

A total of 22 (71.5 ± 6.1 years, 20 male) asymptomatic AAA patients with a maximum diameter of at least 30 mm.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T/Free-breathing 4D flow MRI phase-contrast acquisition with retrospective ECG-gating.

ASSESSMENT

Patients underwent two consecutive 4D flow MRI scans 1-week apart. Aortic volumes were segmented from time-averaged phase contrast magnetic resonance angiographies. Reproducibility was assessed by voxelwise analysis after registration. Mean flow velocity, mean wall shear stress (WSS), mean lumen diameter, and qualitative vorticity scores were assessed. In addition, Dixon MRI and retrospective surveillance data were used to study maximum diameter (including thrombus), intraluminal thrombus volume (ILT), and growth rate.

STATISTICAL TESTS

For reproducibility assessment, Bland-Altman analyses, Pearson correlation, Spearman's correlation, and orthogonal regression were conducted. Potential correlations between hemodynamics and vorticity scores were assessed using linear regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Test-retest median Pearson correlation coefficients for flow velocity and WSS were 0.85 (IQR = 0.08) m/sec and 0.82 (IQR = 0.10) Pa, respectively. Mean WSS significantly correlated with mean flow velocity (R = 0.75) and inversely correlated with mean lumen diameter (R = -0.73). No significant associations were found between 4D flow MRI-derived hemodynamic parameters and maximum diameter (flow velocity: P = 0.98, WSS: P = 0.22).

DATA CONCLUSION

A 4D flow MRI is robust for assessing the hemodynamics within AAAs. No correlations were found between hemodynamic parameters and maximum diameter, ILT volume and growth rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The CALIPR framework for highly accelerated myelin water imaging with improved precision and sensitivity

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are powerful tools for the study of human tissue, but, in practice, their utility has been limited by lengthy acquisition times. Here, we introduce the Constrained, Adaptive, Low-dimensional, Intrinsically Precise Reconstruction (CALIPR) framework in the context of myelin water imaging (MWI); a quantitative MRI technique generally regarded as the most rigorous approach for noninvasive, in vivo measurement of myelin content. The CALIPR framework exploits data redundancy to recover high-quality images from a small fraction of an imaging dataset, which allowed MWI to be acquired with a previously unattainable sequence (fully sampled acquisition 2 hours:57 min:20 s) in 7 min:26 s (4.2% of the dataset, acceleration factor 23.9). CALIPR quantitative metrics had excellent precision (myelin water fraction mean coefficient of variation 3.2% for the brain and 3.0% for the spinal cord) and markedly increased sensitivity to demyelinating disease pathology compared to a current, widely used technique. The CALIPR framework facilitates drastically improved MWI and could be similarly transformative for other quantitative MRI applications.

Comparison of 2D and 4D Flow MRI in Neonates Without General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Neonates with critical congenital heart disease require early intervention. Four-dimensional (4D) flow may facilitate surgical planning and improve outcome, but accuracy and precision in neonates are unknown.

PURPOSE

To 1) validate two-dimensional (2D) and 4D flow MRI in a phantom and investigate the effect of spatial and temporal resolution; 2) investigate accuracy and precision of 4D flow and internal consistency of 2D and 4D flow in neonates; and 3) compare scan time of 4D flow to multiple 2D flows.

STUDY TYPE

Phantom and prospective patients.

POPULATION

A total of 17 neonates with surgically corrected aortic coarctation (age 18 days [IQR 11-20]) and a three-dimensional printed neonatal aorta phantom.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T, 2D flow and 4D flow.

ASSESSMENT

In the phantom, 2D and 4D flow volumes (ascending and descending aorta, and aortic arch vessels) with different resolutions were compared to high-resolution reference 2D flow. In neonates, 4D flow was compared to 2D flow volumes at each vessel. Internal consistency was computed as the flow volume in the ascending aorta minus the sum of flow volumes in the aortic arch vessels and descending aorta, divided by ascending aortic flow.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Bland-Altman plots, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

In the phantom, 2D flow differed by 0.01 ± 0.02 liter/min with 1.5 mm spatial resolution and -0.01 ± 0.02 liter/min with 0.8 mm resolution; 4D flow differed by -0.05 ± 0.02 liter/min with 2.4 mm spatial and 42 msec temporal resolution, -0.01 ± 0.02 liter/min with 1.5 mm, 42 msec resolution and -0.01 ± 0.02 liter/min with 1.5 mm, 21 msec resolution. In patients, 4D flow and 2D flow differed by -0.06 ± 0.08 liter/min. Internal consistency in patients was -11% ± 17% for 2D flow and 5% ± 13% for 4D flow. Scan time was 17.1 minutes [IQR 15.5-18.5] for 2D flow and 6.2 minutes [IQR 5.3-6.9] for 4D flow, P < 0.0001.

DATA CONCLUSION

Neonatal 4D flow MRI is time efficient and can be acquired with good internal consistency without contrast agents or general anesthesia, thus potentially expanding 4D flow use to the youngest and smallest patients.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

bnormal aortic hemodynamics are associated with risk factors for aortic complications in patients with marfan syndrome

Background

It is difficult to assess the risk for aortic dissection beyond the aortic root in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). To aid risk assessment in these patients, we investigated aortic flow and wall shear stress (WSS) by 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with MFS and compared the results with healthy volunteers. We hypothesized that MFS patients with a high-risk profile for aortic dissection would show abnormal hemodynamics in aortic regions associated with aortic dissection.

Methods

MFS patients (n = 55) and healthy subjects (n = 25), matched for age and sex, prospectively underwent 4D flow MRI. 4D flow maps were constructed to detect elevated (defined as higher than the three-dimensional 95 % confidence interval) and deviant directed (defined as vector angle differences higher than 120°) WSS in MFS patients as compared to the controls. Univariate and multivariate associations with risk factors for aortic dissection in MFS patients were assessed.

Results

The maximum incidence for elevated WSS was 20 % (CI 9 %-31 %) and found in the ascending aorta. The maximum for deviant directed WSS was 39 % (CI 26 %-52 %) and found in the inner descending aorta. Significantly more male patients had deviant directed WSS in the inner proximal descending aorta (63 % vs 24 %, p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis showed that deviant directed WSS was associated with male sex (p = 0.019), and a haplo-insufficient FBN1 mutation type (p = 0.040). In 60 % of MFS patients with a previous aortic root replacement surgery, abnormal hemodynamics were found in the ascending aorta. No significant differences between hemodynamics were found in the descending aorta between operated and non-operated patients.

Conclusion

Deviant directed WSS in the proximal descending aorta is associated with known risk factors for aortic dissection in MFS patients, namely male sex and a haploinsufficient FBN1 mutation type.

Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection Using Compressed Sensing Accelerated 4D Flow MRI

BACKGROUND

4D Flow MRI is a quantitative imaging technique to evaluate blood flow patterns; however, it is unclear how compressed sensing (CS) acceleration would impact aortic hemodynamic quantification in type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

PURPOSE

To investigate CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI performance compared to GRAPP-accelerated 4D Flow MRI (GRAPPA) to evaluate aortic hemodynamics in TBAD.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Twelve TBAD patients, two volunteers.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T, 3D time-resolved cine phase-contrast gradient echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

GRAPPA (acceleration factor [R] = 2) and two CS-accelerated (R = 7.7 [CS7.7] and 10.2 [CS10.2]) 4D Flow MRI scans were acquired twice for interscan reproducibility assessment. Voxelwise kinetic energy (KE), peak velocity (PV), forward flow (FF), reverse flow (RF), and stasis were calculated. Plane-based mid-lumen flows were quantified. Imaging times were recorded.

TESTS

Repeated measures analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

The KE and FF in true lumen (TL) and PV in false lumen (FL) did not show difference among three acquisition types (P = 0.818, 0.065, 0.284 respectively). The PV and stasis in TL were higher, KE, FF, and RF in FL were lower, and stasis was higher in GRAPPA compared to CS7.7 and CS10.2. The RF was lower in GRAPPA compared to CS10.2. The correlation coefficients were strong in TL (r = [0.781-0.986]), and low to strong in FL (r = [0.347-0.948]). The ICC levels demonstrated moderate to excellent interscan reproducibility (0.732-0.989). The FF and net flow in mid-descending aorta TL were significantly different between CS7.7 and CS10.2.

CONCLUSION

CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI has potential for clinical utilization with shorter scan times in TBAD. Our results suggest similar hemodynamic trends between acceleration types, but CS-acceleration impacts KE, FF, RF, and stasis more in FL.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Coronary Flow Assessment Using Accelerated 4D Flow MRI With Respiratory Motion Correction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can potentially be used for non-invasive screening of patients with stable angina pectoris to identify probable obstructive coronary artery disease. MRI-based coronary blood flow quantification has to date only been performed in a 2D fashion, limiting its clinical applicability. In this study, we propose a framework for coronary blood flow quantification using accelerated 4D flow MRI with respiratory motion correction and compressed sensing image reconstruction. We investigate its feasibility and repeatability in healthy subjects at rest. Fourteen healthy subjects received 8 times-accelerated 4D flow MRI covering the left coronary artery (LCA) with an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.0 mm³. Respiratory motion correction was performed based on 1) lung-liver navigator signal, 2) real-time monitoring of foot-head motion of the liver and LCA by a separate acquisition, and 3) rigid image registration to correct for anterior-posterior motion. Time-averaged diastolic LCA flow was determined, as well as time-averaged diastolic maximal velocity (V_MAX) and diastolic peak velocity (V_PEAK). 2D flow MRI scans of the LCA were acquired for reference. Scan-rescan repeatability and agreement between 4D flow MRI and 2D flow MRI were assessed in terms of concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and coefficient of variation (CV). The protocol resulted in good visibility of the LCA in 11 out of 14 subjects (six female, five male, aged 28 ± 4 years). The other 3 subjects were excluded from analysis. Time-averaged diastolic LCA flow measured by 4D flow MRI was 1.30 ± 0.39 ml/s and demonstrated good scan-rescan repeatability (CCC/CV = 0.79/20.4%). Time-averaged diastolic V_MAX (17.2 ± 3.0 cm/s) and diastolic V_PEAK (24.4 ± 6.5 cm/s) demonstrated moderate repeatability (CCC/CV = 0.52/19.0% and 0.68/23.0%, respectively). 4D flow- and 2D flow-based diastolic LCA flow agreed well (CCC/CV = 0.75/20.1%). Agreement between 4D flow MRI and 2D flow MRI was moderate for both diastolic V_MAX and V_PEAK (CCC/CV = 0.68/20.3% and 0.53/27.0%, respectively). In conclusion, the proposed framework of accelerated 4D flow MRI equipped with respiratory motion correction and compressed sensing image reconstruction enables repeatable diastolic LCA flow quantification that agrees well with 2D flow MRI.

Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI for Evaluation of Normal and Regurgitant Valvular Flow: A Quantitative Comparison Between Pseudo-Spiral Sampling and EPI Readout

Background

Pseudo‐spiral Cartesian sampling with compressed sensing reconstruction has facilitated highly accelerated 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in various cardiovascular structures. However, unlike echo planar imaging (EPI)‐accelerated 4D flow MRI, it has not been validated in whole‐heart applications.

Hypothesis

Pseudo‐spiral 4D flow MRI (PROUD [PROspective Undersampling in multiple Dimensions]) is comparable to EPI in robustness of valvular flow measurements and remains comparable as the undersampling factor is increased and scan time reduced.

Study Type

Prospective.

Population

Twelve healthy subjects and eight patients with valvular regurgitation.

Field Strength/Sequence

3.0 T; PROUD and EPI 4D flow sequences, 2D flow and balanced steady‐state free precession sequences.

Assessment

Valvular blood flow was quantified using valve tracking. PROUD‐ and EPI‐based measurements of aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) flow volumes and left and right ventricular stroke volumes were tested for agreement with 2D MRI‐based measurements. PROUD reconstructions with undersampling factors (R) of 9, 14, 28, and 56 were tested for intervalve consistency (per valve, compared to the other valves) and preservation of peak velocities and E/A ratios.

Statistical Tests

We used repeated measures ANOVA, Bland‐Altman, Wilcoxon signed rank, and intraclass correlation coefficients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

PROUD and EPI intervalve consistencies were not significantly different both in healthy subjects (valve‐averaged mean difference [limits of agreement width]: 3.2 ± 0.8 [8.7 ± 1.1] mL/beat for PROUD, 5.5 ± 2.9 [13.7 ± 2.3] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.07) and in patients with valvular regurgitation (2.3 ± 1.2 [15.3 ± 5.9] mL/beat for PROUD, 0.6 ± 0.6 [19.3 ± 2.9] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.47). Agreement between EPI and PROUD was higher than between 4D flow (EPI or PROUD) and 2D MRI for forward flow, stroke volumes, and regurgitant volumes. Up to R = 28 in healthy subjects and R = 14 in patients with valvular regurgitation, PROUD intervalve consistency remained comparable to that of EPI. Peak velocities and E/A ratios were preserved up to R = 9.

Conclusion

PROUD is comparable to EPI in terms of intervalve consistency and may be used with higher undersampling factors to shorten scan times further.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy Stage

2

Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Blood Flow in the Heart and Great Vessels: A Systematic Review

Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows multidirectional quantification of blood flow in the heart and great vessels. Comparability of the technique to the current reference standards of flow assessment-two-dimensional (2D) flow MRI and Doppler echocardiography-varies in the literature. Image acquisition parameters likely impact upon the accuracy and reproducibility of 4D flow MRI. We therefore sought to review the current literature on 4D flow MRI in the heart and great vessels, in comparison to 2D flow MRI, Doppler echocardiography, and invasive catheterization. Using a predefined search strategy and inclusion and exclusion criteria, the databases EMBASE and Medline were searched in January 2021 for peer-reviewed research articles comparing cardiac 4D flow MRI to 2D flow MRI, Doppler echocardiography and/or invasive catheterization. The data from all relevant articles were assimilated and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and chi χ² test. Forty-four manuscripts met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The review showed agreement of 4D flow MRI to the reference standard methods of flow assessment, particular in the measurement of peak velocity and stroke volume in 55% of manuscripts. The use of valve tracking significantly improves agreement between 4D flow MRI and the reference modalities (79% matching with the use of valve tracking vs. 50% without, P = 0.04). This review highlights that the impact of acquisition parameters on 4D flow MRI accuracy is multifactorial. It is therefore important that each center conducts its own quality assurance prior to using 4D flow MRI for clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Retrospective Camera-Based Respiratory Gating in Clinical Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI

Background

Respiratory gating is generally recommended in 4D flow MRI of the heart to avoid blurring and motion artifacts. Recently, a novel automated contact‐less camera‐based respiratory motion sensor has been introduced.

Purpose

To compare camera‐based respiratory gating (CAM) with liver‐lung‐navigator‐based gating (NAV) and no gating (NO) for whole‐heart 4D flow MRI.

Study Type

Retrospective.

Subjects

Thirty two patients with a spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

Field Strength/Sequence

A 3T, 3D‐cine spoiled‐gradient‐echo‐T1‐weighted‐sequence with flow‐encoding in three spatial directions.

Assessment

Respiratory phases were derived and compared against each other by cross‐correlation. Three radiologists/cardiologist scored images reconstructed with camera‐based, navigator‐based, and no respiratory gating with a 4‐point Likert scale (qualitative analysis). Quantitative image quality analysis, in form of signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and liver‐lung‐edge (LLE) for sharpness and quantitative flow analysis of the valves were performed semi‐automatically.

Statistical Tests

One‐way repeated measured analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Wilks's lambda testing and follow‐up pairwise comparisons. Significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Krippendorff's‐alpha‐test for inter‐rater reliability.

Results

The respiratory signal analysis revealed that CAM and NAV phases were highly correlated (C = 0.93 ± 0.09, P < 0.01). Image scoring showed poor inter‐rater reliability and no significant differences were observed (P ≥ 0.16). The image quality comparison showed that NAV and CAM were superior to NO with higher SNR (P = 0.02) and smaller LLE (P < 0.01). The quantitative flow analysis showed significant differences between the three respiratory‐gated reconstructions in the tricuspid and pulmonary valves (P ≤ 0.05), but not in the mitral and aortic valves (P > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that reconstructions without respiratory gating were different in flow measurements to either CAM or NAV or both, but no differences were found between CAM and NAV reconstructions.

Data Conclusion

Camera‐based respiratory gating performed as well as conventional liver‐lung‐navigator‐based respiratory gating. Quantitative image quality analysis showed that both techniques were equivalent and superior to no‐gating‐reconstructions. Quantitative flow analysis revealed local flow differences (tricuspid/pulmonary valves) in images of no‐gating‐reconstructions, but no differences were found between images reconstructed with camera‐based and navigator‐based respiratory gating.

Level of Evidence

3

Technical Efficacy

Stage 2

Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI using compressed sensing: Performance at different acceleration factors in patients with aortic disease

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the feasibility and performance of a highly accelerated compressed sensing (CS) 4D flow MRI framework at three different acceleration factors (R) for the quantification of aortic flow dynamics and wall shear stress (WSS) in patients with aortic disease.

METHODS

Twenty patients with aortic disease (58 ± 15 y old; 19 M) underwent four 4D flow scans: one conventional (GRAPPA, R = 2) and three CS 4D flows with R = 5.7, 7.7, and 10.2. All scans were acquired with otherwise equivalent imaging parameters on a 1.5T scanner. Peak-systolic velocity (V_max ), peak flow (Q_max ), and net flow (Q_net ) were quantified at the ascending aorta (AAo), arch, and descending aorta (DAo). WSS was calculated at six regions within the AAo and arch.

RESULTS

Mean scan times for the conventional and CS 4D flows with R = 5.7, 7.7, and 10.2 were 9:58 ± 2:58 min, 3:40 ± 1:19 min, 2:50 ± 0:56 min, and 2:05 ± 0:42 min, respectively. V_max , Q_max , and Q_net were significantly underestimated by all CS protocols (underestimation ≤ -7%, -9%, and -10% by CS, R = 5.7, 7.7, and 10.2, respectively). WSS measurements showed the highest underestimation by all CS protocols (underestimation ≤ -9%, -12%, and -14% by CS, R = 5.7, 7.7, and 10.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Highly accelerated aortic CS 4D flow at R = 5.7, 7.7, and 10.2 showed moderate agreement with the conventional 4D flow, despite systematically underestimating various hemodynamic parameters. The shortened scan time may enable the clinical translation of CS 4D flow, although potential hemodynamic underestimation should be considered when interpreting the results.

High Spatiotemporal Resolution 4D Flow MRI of Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T in 10 Minutes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with intracranial aneurysms may benefit from 4D flow MR imaging because the derived wall shear stress is considered a useful marker for risk assessment and growth of aneurysms. However, long scan times limit the clinical implementation of 4D flow MR imaging. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether highly accelerated, high resolution, 4D flow MR imaging at 7T provides reliable quantitative blood flow values in intracranial arteries and aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used pseudospiral Cartesian undersampling with compressed sensing reconstruction to achieve high spatiotemporal resolution (0.5 mm isotropic, ∼30 ms) in a scan time of 10 minutes. We analyzed the repeatability of accelerated 4D flow scans and compared flow rates, stroke volume, and the pulsatility index with 2D flow and conventional 4D flow MR imaging in a flow phantom and 15 healthy subjects. Additionally, accelerated 4D flow MR imaging with high spatiotemporal resolution was acquired in 5 patients with aneurysms to derive wall shear stress.

RESULTS

Flow-rate bias compared with 2D flow was lower for accelerated than for conventional 4D flow MR imaging (0.31 ± 0.13, P = .22, versus 0.79 ± 0.17 mL/s, P < .01). Pulsatility index bias gave similar results. Stroke volume bias showed no difference for accelerated as well as for conventional 4D flow compared to 2D flow MR imaging. Repeatability for accelerated 4D flow was similar to that of 2D flow MR imaging. Increased temporal resolution for wall shear stress measurements in 5 intracranial aneurysms did not show a consistent effect for the wall shear stress but did show an effect for the oscillatory shear index.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly accelerated high spatiotemporal resolution 4D flow MR imaging at 7T in intracranial arteries and aneurysms provides repeatable and accurate quantitative flow values. Flow rate accuracy is significantly increased compared with conventional 4D flow scans.