Cardiac cine magnetic resonance fingerprinting for combined ejection fraction, T1 and T2 quantification

Deep image prior cine MR fingerprinting with B1 + spin history correction

PURPOSE

To develop a deep image prior (DIP) reconstruction for B1 + -corrected 2D cine MR fingerprinting (MRF).

METHODS

The proposed method combines low-rank (LR) modeling with a DIP to generate cardiac phase-resolved parameter maps without motion correction, employing self-supervised training to enforce consistency with undersampled spiral k-space data. Two implementations were tested: one approach (DIP) for cine T1 , T2 , and M0 mapping, and a second approach (DIP with effective B1 + estimation [DIP-B1]) that also generated an effective B1 + map to correct for errors due to RF transmit inhomogeneities, through-plane motion, and blood flow. Cine MRF data were acquired in 14 healthy subjects and four reconstructions were compared: LR, low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC), DIP, and DIP-B1. Results were compared to diastolic ECG-triggered MRF, MOLLI, and T2 -prep bSSFP. Additionally, bright-blood and dark-blood images calculated from cine MRF maps were used to quantify ventricular function and compared to reference cine measurements.

RESULTS

DIP and DIP-B1 outperformed other cine MRF reconstructions with improved noise suppression and delineation of high-resolution details. Within-segment variability in the myocardium (reported as the coefficient of variation for T1 /T2 ) was lowest for DIP-B1 (2.3/8.3%) followed by DIP (2.7/8.7%), LRMC (3.5/10.5%), and LR (15.3/39.6%). Spatial homogeneity improved with DIP-B1 having the lowest intersegment variability (2.6/4.1%). The mean bias in ejection fraction was -1.1% compared to reference cine scans.

CONCLUSION

A DIP reconstruction for 2D cine MRF enabled cardiac phase-resolved mapping of T1 , T2 , M0 , and the effective B1 + with improved noise suppression and precision compared to LR and LRMC.

Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as a vital medical imaging technique, renowned for its ability to offer high-resolution images of the human body with remarkable soft-tissue contrast. This enables healthcare professionals to gain valuable insights into various aspects of the human body, including morphology, structural integrity, and physiological processes. Quantitative imaging provides compositional measurements of the human body, but, currently, either it takes a long scan time or is limited to low spatial resolutions. Undersampled k-space data acquisitions have significantly helped to reduce MRI scan time, while compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) reconstructions have mitigated the associated undersampling artifacts. Alternatively, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides an efficient and versatile framework to acquire and quantify multiple tissue properties simultaneously from a single fast MRI scan. The MRF framework involves four key aspects: (1) pulse sequence design; (2) rapid (undersampled) data acquisition; (3) encoding of tissue properties in MR signal evolutions or fingerprints; and (4) simultaneous recovery of multiple quantitative spatial maps. This paper provides an extensive literature review of the MRF framework, addressing the trends associated with these four key aspects. There are specific challenges in MRF for all ranges of magnetic field strengths and all body parts, which can present opportunities for further investigation. We aim to review the best practices in each key aspect of MRF, as well as for different applications, such as cardiac, brain, and musculoskeletal imaging, among others. A comprehensive review of these applications will enable us to assess future trends and their implications for the translation of MRF into these biomedical imaging applications.

Fast deep learning reconstruction techniques for preclinical magnetic resonance fingerprinting

We propose a deep learning (DL) model and a hyperparameter optimization strategy to reconstruct T1 and T2 maps acquired with the magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) methodology. We applied two different MRF sequence routines to acquire images of ex vivo rat brain phantoms using a 7-T preclinical scanner. Subsequently, the DL model was trained using experimental data, completely excluding the use of any theoretical MRI signal simulator. The best combination of the DL parameters was implemented by an automatic hyperparameter optimization strategy, whose key aspect is to include all the parameters to the fit, allowing the simultaneous optimization of the neural network architecture, the structure of the DL model, and the supervised learning algorithm. By comparing the reconstruction performances of the DL technique with those achieved from the traditional dictionary-based method on an independent dataset, the DL approach was shown to reduce the mean percentage relative error by a factor of 3 for T1 and by a factor of 2 for T2 , and to improve the computational time by at least a factor of 37. Furthermore, the proposed DL method enables maintaining comparable reconstruction performance, even with a lower number of MRF images and a reduced k-space sampling percentage, with respect to the dictionary-based method. Our results suggest that the proposed DL methodology may offer an improvement in reconstruction accuracy, as well as speeding up MRF for preclinical, and in prospective clinical, investigations.

Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Overview, Technical Developments, and Applications

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an established imaging modality with proven utility in assessing cardiovascular diseases. The ability of CMR to characterize myocardial tissue using T1 - and T2 -weighted imaging, parametric mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement has allowed for the non-invasive identification of specific pathologies not previously possible with modalities like echocardiography. However, CMR examinations are lengthy and technically complex, requiring multiple pulse sequences and different anatomical planes to comprehensively assess myocardial structure, function, and tissue composition. To increase the overall impact of this modality, there is a need to simplify and shorten CMR exams to improve access and efficiency, while also providing reproducible quantitative measurements. Multiparametric MRI techniques that measure multiple tissue properties offer one potential solution to this problem. This review provides an in-depth look at one such multiparametric approach, cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). The article is structured as follows. First, a brief review of single-parametric and (non-Fingerprinting) multiparametric CMR mapping techniques is presented. Second, a general overview of cardiac MRF is provided covering pulse sequence implementation, dictionary generation, fast k-space sampling methods, and pattern recognition. Third, recent technical advances in cardiac MRF are covered spanning a variety of topics, including simultaneous multislice and 3D sampling, motion correction algorithms, cine MRF, synthetic multicontrast imaging, extensions to measure additional clinically important tissue properties (proton density fat fraction, T2 *, and T1ρ ), and deep learning methods for image reconstruction and parameter estimation. The last section will discuss potential clinical applications, concluding with a perspective on how multiparametric techniques like MRF may enable streamlined CMR protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Motion-compensated T1 mapping in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a technical review

T 1 mapping is becoming a staple magnetic resonance imaging method for diagnosing myocardial diseases such as ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and more. Clinically, most T 1 mapping sequences acquire a single slice at a single cardiac phase across a 10 to 15-heartbeat breath-hold, with one to three slices acquired in total. This leaves opportunities for improving patient comfort and information density by acquiring data across multiple cardiac phases in free-running acquisitions and across multiple respiratory phases in free-breathing acquisitions. Scanning in the presence of cardiac and respiratory motion requires more complex motion characterization and compensation. Most clinical mapping sequences use 2D single-slice acquisitions; however newer techniques allow for motion-compensated reconstructions in three dimensions and beyond. To further address confounding factors and improve measurement accuracy, T 1 maps can be acquired jointly with other quantitative parameters such as T 2 , T 2 ∗ , fat fraction, and more. These multiparametric acquisitions allow for constrained reconstruction approaches that isolate contributions to T 1 from other motion and relaxation mechanisms. In this review, we examine the state of the literature in motion-corrected and motion-resolved T 1 mapping, with potential future directions for further technical development and clinical translation.

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A Review of Clinical Applications

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an approach to quantitative magnetic resonance imaging that allows for efficient simultaneous measurements of multiple tissue properties, which are then used to create accurate and reproducible quantitative maps of these properties. As the technique has gained popularity, the extent of preclinical and clinical applications has vastly increased. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of currently investigated preclinical and clinical applications of MRF, as well as future directions. Topics covered include MRF in neuroimaging, neurovascular, prostate, liver, kidney, breast, abdominal quantitative imaging, cardiac, and musculoskeletal applications.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has developed as a technique for rapid, multi-parametric tissue property mapping that has potential to both improve cardiac MRI exam efficiency and expand the information captured. In this review, we describe the cMRF technique, summarize technical developments and in vivo reports, and highlight potential clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Technical developments in cMRF continue to progress rapidly, including motion compensated reconstruction, additional tissue property quantification, signal time course analysis, and synthetic LGE image generation. Such technical developments can enable simplified CMR protocols by combining multiple evaluations into a single protocol and reducing the number of breath-held scans. cMRF continues to be reported for use in a range of pathologies; however barriers to clinical implementation remain. Technical developments are described in this review, followed by a focus on potential clinical applications that they may support. Clinical translation of cMRF could shorten protocols, improve CMR accessibility, and provide additional information as compared to conventional cardiac parametric mapping methods. Current needs for clinical implementation are discussed, as well as how those needs may be met in order to bring cMRF from its current research setting to become a viable tool for patient care.

Free-running 3D whole-heart T1 and T2 mapping and cine MRI using low-rank reconstruction with non-rigid cardiac motion correction

PURPOSE

To introduce non-rigid cardiac motion correction into a novel free-running framework for the simultaneous acquisition of 3D whole-heart myocardial <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images, enabling a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \sim $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 3-min scan.

METHODS

Data were acquired using a free-running 3D golden-angle radial readout interleaved with inversion recovery and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> -preparation pulses. After correction for translational respiratory motion, non-rigid cardiac-motion-corrected reconstruction with dictionary-based low-rank compression and patch-based regularization enabled 3D whole-heart <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> mapping at any given cardiac phase as well as whole-heart cardiac cine imaging. The framework was validated and compared with established methods in 11 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

Good quality 3D <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images were reconstructed for all subjects. Septal <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> values using the proposed approach ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1200</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 1200\pm 50 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms) were higher than those from a 2D MOLLI sequence ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1063</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 1063\pm 33 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms), which is known to underestimate <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> , while <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> values from the proposed approach ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>51</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 51\pm 4 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms) were in good agreement with those from a 2D GraSE sequence ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mn>51</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ 51\pm 2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> ms).

CONCLUSION

The proposed technique provides 3D <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_1 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ {T}_2 $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> maps and cine images with isotropic spatial resolution in a single <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \sim $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> 3.3-min scan.

Optimisation of data acquisition towards continuous cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting applications

PURPOSE

Assess and optimise acquisition parameters for continuous cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF).

METHODS

Different acquisition schemes (flip angle amplitude, lobe size, T2-preparation pulses) for cardiac MRF were assessed in simulations and phantom and demonstrated in one healthy volunteer. Three different experimental designs were evaluated using central composite and fractional factorial designs. Relative errors for T1 and T2 were calculated for a wide range of realistic T1 and T2 value combinations. The effect of different designs on the accuracy of T1 and T2 was assessed using response surface modelling and Cohen's f calculations.

RESULTS

Larger flip angle amplitudes lead to an improvement of T2 accuracy and precision for simulations and phantom experiments. Similar effects could also be shown qualitatively in in-vivo scans. Accuracy and precision of T1 were robust to different design parameters with improved values for faster flip angle variation. Cohen's f showed that T2-preparation pulses influence the accuracy of T2. The number of pulses used is the most important parameter. Without T2-preparation pulses, RMSE were 3.0 ± 8.09 % for T1 and 16.24 ± 14.47 % for T2. Using those pulses reduced the RMSE to 2.3 ± 8.4 % for T1 and 14.11 ± 13.46 % for T2. Nonetheless, even if the improvement is significant, RMSE are still too high for reliable quantification.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previous study using triggered MRF sequences using < 30° flip angles, large flip angle amplitudes led to better results for continuous cardiac MRF sequences. T2-preparation pulse can improve the accuracy of T2 estimation but lead to longer scan times.

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development

Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques (SMART) are gaining attention for their potential to overcome some of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging's (CMR) clinical limitations. The major advantages of SMART lie within their ability to simultaneously capture multiple "features" such as cardiac motion, respiratory motion, T1/T2 relaxation. This review aims to summarize the overarching theory of SMART, describing key concepts that many of these techniques share to produce co-registered, high quality CMR images in less time and with less requirements for specialized personnel. Further, this review provides an overview of the recent developments in the field of SMART by describing how they work, the parameters they can acquire, their status of clinical testing and validation, and by providing examples for how their use can improve the current state of clinical CMR workflows. Many of the SMART are in early phases of development and testing, thus larger scale, controlled trials are needed to evaluate their use in clinical setting and with different cardiac pathologies.

Cardiac phase-resolved late gadolinium enhancement imaging

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the clinical reference for assessment of myocardial scar and focal fibrosis. However, current LGE techniques are confined to imaging of a single cardiac phase, which hampers assessment of scar motility and does not allow cross-comparison between multiple phases. In this work, we investigate a three step approach to obtain cardiac phase-resolved LGE images: (1) Acquisition of cardiac phase-resolved imaging data with varying T₁ weighting. (2) Generation of semi-quantitative T1* maps for each cardiac phase. (3) Synthetization of LGE contrast to obtain functional LGE images. The proposed method is evaluated in phantom imaging, six healthy subjects at 3T and 20 patients at 1.5T. Phantom imaging at 3T demonstrates consistent contrast throughout the cardiac cycle with a coefficient of variation of 2.55 ± 0.42%. In-vivo results show reliable LGE contrast with thorough suppression of the myocardial tissue is healthy subjects. The contrast between blood and myocardium showed moderate variation throughout the cardiac cycle in healthy subjects (coefficient of variation 18.2 ± 3.51%). Images were acquired at 40–60 ms and 80 ms temporal resolution, at 3T and 1.5, respectively. Functional LGE images acquired in patients with myocardial scar visualized scar tissue throughout the cardiac cycle, albeit at noticeably lower imaging resolution and noise resilience than the reference technique. The proposed technique bears the promise of integrating the advantages of phase-resolved CMR with LGE imaging, but further improvements in the acquisition quality are warranted for clinical use.

Evaluation of combined late gadolinium-enhancement and functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using spiral real-time acquisition

The purpose of the current study was to implement and validate joint real-time acquisition of functional and late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images during free breathing. Inversion recovery cardiac real-time images with a temporal resolution of 50 ms were acquired using a spiral trajectory (IR-CRISPI) with a pre-emphasis based on the gradient system transfer function during free breathing. Functional and LGE cardiac MR images were reconstructed using a low-rank plus sparse model. Late gadolinium-enhancement appearance, image quality, and functional parameters of IR-CRISPI were compared with clinical standard balanced steady-state free precession breath-hold techniques in 10 patients. The acquisition of IR-CRISPI in free breathing of the entire left ventricle took 97 s on average. Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon tests showed a higher artifact level for the breath-hold technique (p = 0.003), especially for arrhythmic patients or patients with dyspnea, but an increased noise level for IR-CRISPI of the LGE images (p = 0.01). The estimated transmural extent of the enhancement differed by not more than 25% and did not show a significant bias between the techniques (p = 0.50). The ascertained functional parameters were similar for the breath-hold technique and IR-CRISPI, that is, with a minor, nonsignificant (p = 0.16) mean difference of the ejection fraction of 2.3% and a 95% confidence interval from -4.8% to 9.4%. IR-CRISPI enables joint functional and LGE imaging in free breathing with good image quality but distinctly shorter scan times in comparison with breath-hold techniques.

A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Reconstruction for Shortening the Breathhold and Acquisition Window in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting

The aim of this study is to shorten the breathhold and diastolic acquisition window in cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous T1, T2, and proton spin density (M0) mapping to improve scan efficiency and reduce motion artifacts. To this end, a novel reconstruction was developed that combines low-rank subspace modeling with a deep image prior, termed DIP-MRF. A system of neural networks is used to generate spatial basis images and quantitative tissue property maps, with training performed using only the undersampled k-space measurements from the current scan. This approach avoids difficulties with obtaining in vivo MRF training data, as training is performed de novo for each acquisition. Calculation of the forward model during training is accelerated by using GRAPPA operator gridding to shift spiral k-space data to Cartesian grid points, and by using a neural network to rapidly generate fingerprints in place of a Bloch equation simulation. DIP-MRF was evaluated in simulations and at 1.5 T in a standardized phantom, 18 healthy subjects, and 10 patients with suspected cardiomyopathy. In addition to conventional mapping, two cardiac MRF sequences were acquired, one with a 15-heartbeat(HB) breathhold and 254 ms acquisition window, and one with a 5HB breathhold and 150 ms acquisition window. In simulations, DIP-MRF yielded decreased nRMSE compared to dictionary matching and a sparse and locally low rank (SLLR-MRF) reconstruction. Strong correlation (R2 &gt; 0.999) with T1 and T2 reference values was observed in the phantom using the 5HB/150 ms scan with DIP-MRF. DIP-MRF provided better suppression of noise and aliasing artifacts in vivo, especially for the 5HB/150 ms scan, and lower intersubject and intrasubject variability compared to dictionary matching and SLLR-MRF. Furthermore, it yielded a better agreement between myocardial T1 and T2 from 15HB/254 ms and 5HB/150 ms MRF scans, with a bias of −9 ms for T1 and 2 ms for T2. In summary, this study introduces an extension of the deep image prior framework for cardiac MRF tissue property mapping, which does not require pre-training with in vivo scans, and has the potential to reduce motion artifacts by enabling a shortened breathhold and acquisition window.

Point-of-care magnetic resonance technology to measure liver fat: Phantom and first-in-human pilot study

PURPOSE

To assess feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care (POC) NMR-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in phantoms and in a human pilot study in a POC setting.

METHODS

POC NMR (LiverScope, Livivos, San Diego CA) PDFF measurements were obtained of certified phantoms with known PDFF values (0%-40%). In an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective human study, a convenience sample of participants from an obesity clinic was enrolled (November 2020 to June 2021). The inclusion criteria required body mass index (BMI) = 27-40 kg/m² and willingness to undergo POC NMR and MRI-PDFF measurements. Liver PDFF was measured by POC NMR and, within 35 days after, by a confounder corrected CSE MRI PDFF acquisition and reconstruction method. The adverse events were documented and linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

POC NMR-PDFF measurements agreed with known phantom PDFF values (R²  = 0.99). Fourteen participants were enrolled in the pilot human study. MRI-PDFF could not be obtained in 4 participants (claustrophobia reaction, n = 3, exceeded size of MR scanner bore, n = 1). POC NMR was unevaluable in 2 participants (insufficient signal penetration depth, n = 1, failure to comply with instructions, n = 1). Technical success was 11 of 13 (85%) for POC NMR PDFF. In 7 participants (4 female; 31-74 years old; median BMI 35 kg/m² ), MRI-PDFF (range, 2.8%-18.1%), and POC NMR-PDFF (range, 3%-25.2%), agreed with R²  = 0.94. POC NMR had no adverse events.

CONCLUSION

POC NMR measures PDFF accurately in phantoms and, in a first-in-human pilot study, is feasible and accurate in adults with obesity. Further testing to determine precision and accuracy across larger and more diverse cohorts is needed.

Rapid MR relaxometry using deep learning: An overview of current techniques and emerging trends

Quantitative mapping of MR tissue parameters such as the spin-lattice relaxation time (T₁ ), the spin-spin relaxation time (T₂ ), and the spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame (T_1ρ ), referred to as MR relaxometry in general, has demonstrated improved assessment in a wide range of clinical applications. Compared with conventional contrast-weighted (eg T₁ -, T₂ -, or T_1ρ -weighted) MRI, MR relaxometry provides increased sensitivity to pathologies and delivers important information that can be more specific to tissue composition and microenvironment. The rise of deep learning in the past several years has been revolutionizing many aspects of MRI research, including image reconstruction, image analysis, and disease diagnosis and prognosis. Although deep learning has also shown great potential for MR relaxometry and quantitative MRI in general, this research direction has been much less explored to date. The goal of this paper is to discuss the applications of deep learning for rapid MR relaxometry and to review emerging deep-learning-based techniques that can be applied to improve MR relaxometry in terms of imaging speed, image quality, and quantification robustness. The paper is comprised of an introduction and four more sections. Section 2 describes a summary of the imaging models of quantitative MR relaxometry. In Section 3, we review existing "classical" methods for accelerating MR relaxometry, including state-of-the-art spatiotemporal acceleration techniques, model-based reconstruction methods, and efficient parameter generation approaches. Section 4 then presents how deep learning can be used to improve MR relaxometry and how it is linked to conventional techniques. The final section concludes the review by discussing the promise and existing challenges of deep learning for rapid MR relaxometry and potential solutions to address these challenges.

Improved accuracy and precision with three-parameter simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping using multiparametric SASHA

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a three-parameter model for improved precision multiparametric SAturation-recovery single-SHot Acquisition (mSASHA) cardiac T₁ and T₂ mapping with high accuracy in a single breath-hold.

METHODS

The mSASHA acquisition consists of nine images of variable saturation recovery and T₂ preparation in 11 heartbeats with T₁ and T₂ values calculated using a three-parameter model. It was validated in simulations and phantoms at 3 T with comparison to a four-parameter joint T₁ -T₂ technique. The mSASHA acquisition was compared with MOLLI, SASHA, and T₂ -prepared balanced SSFP in 10 volunteers.

RESULTS

The mSASHA technique had high accuracy in phantoms compared to spin echo, with -0.2 ± 0.3% T₁ error and -2.4 ± 1.3% T₂ error. The mSASHA coefficient of variation in phantoms for T₁ was similar to MOLLI (0.7 ± 0.2% for both) and T₂ -prepared balanced SSFP for T₂ (1.3 ± 0.7% vs 1.4 ± 0.3%, adjusted p > .05 for both). In simulations, three-parameter mSASHA had higher precision than four-parameter joint T₁ -T₂ for both T₁ and T₂ (46% and 11% reductions in T₁ and T₂ interquartile range for native myocardium). In vivo myocardial mSASHA T₁ was similar to SASHA (1523 ± 18 ms vs 1520 ± 18 ms) with similar coefficient of variation to both MOLLI and SASHA (3.3 ± 0.6% vs 3.1 ± 0.6% and 3.3 ± 0.5% respectively, adjusted p > .05 for all). Myocardial mSASHA T₂ was 37.1 ± 1.1 ms with similar precision to T₂ -prepared balanced SSFP (6.7 ± 1.7% vs 6.0 ± 1.6%, adjusted p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Three-parameter mSASHA provides high-accuracy cardiac T₁ and T₂ quantification in a single breath-hold with similar precision to MOLLI and T₂ -prepared balanced SSFP. Further study is required to both establish normative values and demonstrate clinical utility in patient populations.

Myocardial T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction quantification via low-rank motion-corrected cardiac MR fingerprinting

Purpose

Develop a novel 2D cardiac MR fingerprinting (MRF) approach to enable simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction (FF) myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath‐hold scan.

Methods

Simultaneous, co‐registered, multi‐parametric mapping of T1, T2, and FF has been recently achieved with cardiac MRF. Here, we further incorporate T2* quantification within this approach, enabling simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and FF myocardial tissue characterization in a single breath‐hold scan. T2* quantification is achieved with an eight‐echo readout that requires a long cardiac acquisition window. A novel low‐rank motion‐corrected (LRMC) reconstruction is exploited to correct for cardiac motion within the long acquisition window. The proposed T1/T2/T2*/FF cardiac MRF was evaluated in phantom and in 10 healthy subjects in comparison to conventional mapping techniques.

Results

The proposed approach achieved high quality parametric mapping of T1, T2, T2*, and FF with corresponding normalized RMS error (RMSE) T1 = 5.9%, T2 = 9.6% (T2 values <100 ms), T2* = 3.3% (T2* values <100 ms), and FF = 0.8% observed in phantom scans. In vivo, the proposed approach produced higher left‐ventricular myocardial T1 values than MOLLI (1148 vs 1056 ms), lower T2 values than T2‐GraSE (42.8 vs 50.6 ms), lower T2* values than eight‐echo gradient echo (GRE) (35.0 vs 39.4 ms), and higher FF values than six‐echo GRE (0.8 vs 0.3 %) reference techniques. The proposed approach achieved considerable reduction in motion artifacts compared to cardiac MRF without motion correction, improved spatial uniformity, and statistically higher apparent precision relative to conventional mapping for all parameters.

Conclusion

The proposed cardiac MRF approach enables simultaneous, co‐registered mapping of T1, T2, T2*, and FF in a single breath‐hold for comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization, achieving higher apparent precision than conventional methods.

Free-breathing 3D cardiac T1 mapping with transmit B1 correction at 3T

PURPOSE

To develop a cardiac T₁ mapping method for free-breathing 3D T₁ mapping of the whole heart at 3 T with transmit B₁ ( B 1 + ) correction.

METHODS

A free-breathing, electrocardiogram-gated inversion-recovery sequence with spoiled gradient-echo readout was developed and optimized for cardiac T₁ mapping at 3 T. High-frame-rate dynamic images were reconstructed from sparse (k,t)-space data acquired along a stack-of-stars trajectory using a subspace-based method for accelerated imaging. Joint T₁ and flip-angle estimation was performed in T₁ mapping to improve its robustness to B 1 + inhomogeneity. Subject-specific timing of data acquisition was used in the estimation to account for natural heart-rate variations during the imaging experiment.

RESULTS

Simulations showed that accuracy and precision of T₁ mapping can be improved with joint T₁ and flip-angle estimation and optimized electrocardiogram-gated spoiled gradient echo-based inversion-recovery acquisition scheme. The phantom study showed good agreement between the T₁ maps from the proposed method and the reference method. Three-dimensional cardiac T₁ maps (40 slices) were obtained at a 1.9-mm in-plane and 4.5-mm through-plane spatial resolution from healthy subjects (n = 6) with an average imaging time of 14.2 ± 1.6 minutes (heartbeat rate: 64.2 ± 7.1 bpm), showing myocardial T₁ values comparable to those obtained from modified Look-Locker inversion recovery. The proposed method generated B 1 + maps with spatially smooth variation showing 21%-32% and 11%-15% variations across the septal-lateral and inferior-anterior regions of the myocardium in the left ventricle.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method allows free-breathing 3D T₁ mapping of the whole heart with transmit B₁ correction in a practical imaging time.

Technical overview of magnetic resonance fingerprinting and its applications in radiation therapy

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an emerging imaging technique for rapid and simultaneous quantification of multiple tissue properties. The technique has been developed for quantitative imaging of different organs. The obtained quantitative measures have the potential to improve multiple steps of a typical radiotherapy workflow and potentially further improve integration of magnetic resonance imaging guided clinical decision making. In this review paper, we first provide a technical overview of the MRF method from data acquisition to postprocessing, along with recent development in advanced reconstruction methods. We further discuss critical aspects that could influence its usage in radiation therapy, such as accuracy and precision, repeatability and reproducibility, geometric distortion, and motion robustness. Finally, future directions for MRF application in radiation therapy are discussed.

Generalized low-rank nonrigid motion-corrected reconstruction for MR fingerprinting

PURPOSE

Develop a novel low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC) reconstruction for nonrigid motion-corrected MR fingerprinting (MRF).

METHODS

Generalized motion-corrected (MC) reconstructions have been developed for steady-state imaging. Here we extend this framework to enable nonrigid MC for transient imaging applications with varying contrast, such as MRF. This is achieved by integrating low-rank dictionary-based compression into the generalized MC model to reconstruct MC singular images, reducing motion artifacts in the resulting parametric maps. The proposed LRMC reconstruction was applied for cardiac motion correction in 2D myocardial MRF (T₁ and T₂ ) with extended cardiac acquisition window (~450 ms) and for respiratory MC in free-breathing 3D myocardial and 3D liver MRF. Experiments were performed in phantom and 22 healthy subjects. The proposed approach was compared with reference spin echo (phantom) and with 2D electrocardiogram-triggered/breath-hold MOLLI and T₂ gradient-and-spin echo conventional maps (in vivo 2D and 3D myocardial MRF).

RESULTS

Phantom results were in general agreement with reference spin-echo measurements, presenting relative errors of approximately 5.4% and 5.5% for T₁ and short T₂ (<100 ms), respectively. The proposed LRMC MRF reduced residual blurring artifacts with respect to no MC for cardiac or respiratory motion in all cases (2D and 3D myocardial, 3D abdominal). In 2D myocardial MRF, left-ventricle T₁ values were 1150 ± 41 ms for LRMC MRF and 1010 ± 56 ms for MOLLI; T₂ values were 43.8 ± 2.3 ms for LRMC MRF and 49.5 ± 4.5 ms for T₂ gradient and spin echo. Corresponding measurements for 3D myocardial MRF were 1085 ± 30 ms and 1062 ± 29 ms for T₁ , and 43.5 ± 1.9 ms and 51.7 ± 1.7 ms for T₂ . For 3D liver, LRMC MRF measured liver T₁ at 565 ± 44 ms and liver T₂ at 35.4 ± 2.4 ms.

CONCLUSION

The proposed LRMC reconstruction enabled generalized (nonrigid) MC for 2D and 3D MRF, both for cardiac and respiratory motion. The proposed approach reduced motion artifacts in the MRF maps with respect to no motion compensation and achieved good agreement with reference measurements.

Investigation of the effect of acquisition schemes on time-resolved magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Purpose.This study aims to investigate the feasibility of different acquisition methods for time-resolved magnetic resonance fingerprinting (TR-MRF) in computer simulation.Methods.An extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom is used to generate abdominal T1, T2, and proton density maps for MRF simulation. The simulated MRF technique consists of an IR-FISP MRF sequence with spiral trajectory acquisition. MRF maps were simulated with different numbers of repetitions from 1 to 15. Three different methods were used to generate TR-MRF maps: (1) continuous acquisition without delay between MRF repetitions; (2) continuous acquisition with 5 s delay between MRF repetitions; (3) triggered acquisition with variable delay between MRF repetitions to allow the next acquisition to start at different respiration phase. After the generation of TR-MRF maps, the image quality indexes including the absolute T1 and T2 values, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio, error in the amplitude of diaphragm motion and tumor volume error were used to evaluate the reconstructed parameter maps. Three volunteers were recruited to test the feasibility of the selected acquisition method.Results.Dynamic MR parametric maps using three different acquisition methods were estimated. The overall and liver T1 value error, liver SNR in T1 and T2 maps, and tumor SNR from T1 maps from triggered method is statistically significantly better than the other two methods (p-value < 0.05). The other image quality indexes have no significant difference between the triggered method and the other two continuous acquisition methods. All image quality indexes exhibit no significant difference between the acquisition methods with 0 s and 5 s delay. The triggered method was successfully performed in three healthy volunteers.Conclusion.TR-MRF technique was investigated using three different acquisition methods in computer simulation where the triggered method showed better performance than the other two methods. The triggered method has been tested successfully in healthy volunteers.

Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Trends in technical development and potential clinical applications

Quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged in recent years as an approach for evaluating a range of cardiovascular conditions, with T1 and T2 mapping at the forefront of these developments. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) provides a rapid and robust framework for simultaneous quantification of myocardial T1 and T2 in addition to other tissue properties. Since the advent of cMRF, a number of technical developments and clinical validation studies have been reported. This review provides an overview of cMRF, recent technical developments, healthy subject and patient studies, anticipated technical improvements, and potential clinical applications. Recent technical developments include slice profile and pulse efficiency corrections, improvements in image reconstruction, simultaneous multislice imaging, 3D whole-ventricle imaging, motion-resolved imaging, fat-water separation, and machine learning for rapid dictionary generation. Future technical developments in cMRF, such as B0 and B1 field mapping, acceleration of acquisition and reconstruction, imaging of patients with implanted devices, and quantification of additional tissue properties are also described. Potential clinical applications include characterization of infiltrative, inflammatory, and ischemic cardiomyopathies, tissue characterization in the left atrium and right ventricle, post-cardiac transplantation assessment, reduction of contrast material, pre-procedural planning for electrophysiology interventions, and imaging of patients with implanted devices.