Expedited upskilling of intermediate care nurses to provide critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Support, Education and Learning Needs of Experienced Nurses Who Are Transitioning to Work in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review

AIM

To ascertain the current evidence about the support, education and learning needs of experienced registered nurses who are transitioning their work to intensive care nursing as a new context.

DESIGN

A scoping review was conducted using established frameworks from JBI, Arksey and O'Malley.

METHODS

A search was conducted in CINHAL and MEDLINE (April 2023). Two researchers independently screened the records, extracted and cross-checked the data. The results were consolidated narratively in answer to the review questions. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used to guide reporting.

RESULTS

Eight articles (seven research, one evaluation) were included. The data were widely heterogenous. Evidence pays more attention to education experiences and needs during transition than to mechanisms used informally to engender socialisation of experienced registered nurses into the intensive care team. Key education strategies include orientation, skill and knowledge development, self-directed learning, preceptorship and mentorship, situated clinical nurse education and expertise sharing from the wider intensive care team. Four papers related to the COVID-19 pandemic reported education related to patient surges; three papers described team or buddy nursing as an educational strategy. Several articles reported that learning needs and experiences evolve as transition occurs, and intensive care is a specialised learning environment where required skills and knowledge are domain specific. Reality shock can be encountered, education needs can be influenced by prior experience and social connection with and support from the team can make a difference.

CONCLUSION

This review has identified the current state of evidence regarding the support education and learning needs of experienced registered nurses who are transitioning to work in intensive care. The evidence is limited and very heterogeneous. Findings highlight several areas of evidence paucity and some basis for further research. Given the importance of this group to the intensive care workforce, it will be imperative to invest in future research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Attending to the specific learning and support needs of experienced registered nurses who are making transitions to work in intensive care may impact their experiences of transition shock and quality of learning and may make some differences to recruitment and retention of staff.

IMPACT

By consolidating the evidence, this scoping review highlights important support, education and learning needs of experienced nurses who are transitioning to intensive care. Insight arising from the review will assist experienced nurses, and those working in education and management, as they seek to engage with and support registered nurses who are making transitions to this context of work. There are genuine gaps in research evidence which will require the investment of nursing researchers internationally.

REPORTING METHOD

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in perioperative care: protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence

INTRODUCTION

An ageing population and a workforce crisis have triggered an ambitious UK strategy for sustained delivery of healthcare. In perioperative care (the management of patients from contemplation of surgery until full recovery), it is recognised that interventions are needed to place the workforce on a more sustainable footing through cross-functionality and skill-shifting, namely with advanced practice roles. However, despite some reports and reviews in the literature, it is unclear how skills development efforts may potentially support workforce transformation for an effective and resilient perioperative care workforce. Thus, drawing causal inferences for policy-making that is both evidence based and rooted in theory is challenging. A scoping review, reported within this protocol, confirmed that 'poly-skilling' and 'advanced practice roles' are critical to this workforce transformation, but the mechanisms through which interventions in this area may work are not understood. A synthesis of evidence is, therefore, proposed in this protocol, to understand what works for whom and under what circumstances, in relation to poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in workforce transformation for sustained healthcare delivery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol sets out the plan to undertake a realist synthesis of the related literature, with theory elicitation (step 1), search for empirical evidence (step 2), selection and appraisal of evidence (step 3) and programme theory refinement (step 4). Exploratory reviews of the literature and key informants' inputs will produce initial hypotheses as to what it is about interventions in poly-skilling and advanced practice roles that work and why. Data from the literature will then be collected based on relevance, rigour and richness. The iterative analysis and synthesis of these data will produce causal links between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. The results will inform a realist evaluation, to be undertaken as part of doctoral research, to better understand the mechanisms that support workforce transformation through poly-skilling and advanced practice roles.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As a review of previously published literature, the evidence synthesis proposed in this protocol does not require formal ethical approval. Recommended ethical considerations regarding the involvement of key informants, who are not study participants but a consultative group, are presented in this protocol. A formal ethics approval will be sought ahead of the later empirical stage of the research. The results of the realist synthesis proposed in this protocol will be fed back to the local National Health Service organisation and Integrated Care Board and disseminated to the research community via presentations at conferences and a peer-reviewed journal article.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024512164.

Upskill training and preparedness of non-critical-care registered nurses deployed to intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The increase in intensive care unit (ICU) capacity compelled by the COVID-19 pandemic required the rapid deployment of non-critical-care registered nurses to the ICU setting. The upskill training needed to prepare these registered nurses for deployment was rapidly assembled due to the limited timeframe associated with the escalating pandemic. Scoping the literature to identify the content, structure, and effectiveness of the upskill education provided is necessary to identify lessons learnt during the COVID-19 pandemic response so that they may guide workforce preparation for future surge planning.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review was to map the literature to identify the available information regarding upskill training and preparedness of non-critical-care registered nurses deployed to the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology. A protocol outlined the review questions and used the participants, concept, and context framework to define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A search of healthcare databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, and Scopus was supplemented with a grey literature search via Google.

RESULTS

Screening and review found 32 manuscripts that met the inclusion criterion for examination. Analysis revealed variation in duration of programs, theoretical versus practical content, face-to-face or online mode of delivery, and duration of preparation time at the bedside in the ICU setting. Data on contributors to preparedness for deployment were sparse but included training, support, peer education, buddy time, and clarity around responsibilities and communication.

DISCUSSION

Evaluation of upskill education was mostly limited to post-training surveys. Few studies explored the preparedness of deployed registered nurses as an outcome of their upskill training or described measures of effectiveness of ICU deployment.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence describing preparedness of non-critical-care registered nurses on deployment to the ICU. Further research is needed to identify what elements of upskill education led to preparedness and effective deployment to the ICU setting.

Lung Protective Ventilation Adherence and Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated in an Intermediate Care Unit Repurposed to ICU Level of Care

OBJECTIVE

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.

SETTING

Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.

PATIENTS

Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.

Expedited upskilling of intermediate care nurses to provide critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

Describe the strategy, efficacy and preferred mechanisms of training used to rapidly upskill intermediate care nursing staff to provide critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

METHODS

The strategy used from March through December 2020 to upskill nurses in an intermediate care unit to administer critical care upon rapid conversion of the intermediate care unit to an intensive care unit for coronavirus disease 2019 is described. Training and education included paired staffing models, interdisciplinary education, skills days and self-directed learning. Nurses engaged in this upskilling process were surveyed to evaluate their confidence in new critical care competencies and educational preferences.

RESULTS

Of 38 intermediate care nurses, 35 completed training and began independent intensive care practice. Nursing confidence in critical care competencies increased steadily. Nurses demonstrated the greatest preference for peer education models, particularly those incorporating the hospital's pre-existing medical intensive care nurses.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS

No patient or public contributions were made to this manuscript.