History of bariatric surgery and COVID-19 outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from the CORONADO study

Bariatric surgery and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity and its associated complications have a negative impact on human health. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) ameliorates a series of clinical manifestations associated with obesity. However, the overall efficacy of MBS on COVID-19 outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article is to analyze the relationship between MBS and COVID-19 outcomes.

SETTING

A meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to retrieve the related articles from inception to December 2022. All original articles reporting MBS-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Outcomes including hospital admission, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation utilization, hemodialysis during admission, and hospital stay were selected. Meta-analysis with fixed or random-effect models was used and reported in terms of odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 10 clinical trials involving the investigation of 150,848 patients undergoing MBS interventions were included. Patients who underwent MBS had a lower risk of hospital admission (OR: .47, 95% CI: .34-.66, I2 = 0%), mortality (OR: .43, 95% CI: .28-.65, I2 = 63.6%), ICU admission (OR: .41, 95% CI: .21-.77, I2 = 0%), and mechanical ventilation (OR: .51, 95% CI: .35-.75, I2 = 56.2%) than those who did not undergo surgery, but MBS did not affect hemodialysis risk or COVID-19 infection rate. In addition, the length of hospital stay for patients with COVID-19 after MBS was significantly reduced (WMD: -1.81, 95% CI: -3.11-.52, I2 = 82.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that MBS is shown to improve COVID-19 outcomes, including hospital admission, mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay. Patients with obesity who have undergone MBS infected with COVID-19 will have better clinical outcomes than those without MBS.

The Association of Weight Reduction and Other Variables after Bariatric Surgery with the Likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although obesity has been confirmed as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity, the role of post-bariatric surgery (BS) variables and the infection is unclear. We, therefore, aimed to study comprehensively the relationship between the extent of weight reduction after surgery and other demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables with the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional study was performed, utilizing advanced tracking methodologies on the computerized database of a nation-wide health maintenance organization (HMO). The study population included all HMO members aged ≥18 years that had been tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period and underwent BS at least one year before their testing.

RESULTS

Of the total 3038 individuals who underwent BS, 2697 (88.78%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 341 (11.22%) were negative. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the body mass index and the amount of weight reduction after the BS were not related to the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Post-operative low socioeconomic status (SES) and vitamin D3 deficiency were associated with significant and independent increased rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.03, p < 0.001; and OR 1.55, 95% CI, 1.18-2.02, p < 0.001; respectively). Post-operative physical activity > 3 times/week was associated with a significant and independent reduced rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.35-0.73, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Post-BS vitamin D3 deficiency, SES, and physical activity, but not the amount of weight reduction, were significantly associated with the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare workers should be aware of these associations after BS and intervene accordingly.

Prior metabolic surgery reduced COVID-19 severity: Systematic analysis from year one of the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for COVID-19 severity. Recent studies suggest that prior metabolic surgery (MS) modifies the risk of COVID-19 severity.

Methods

COVID-19 outcomes were compared between patients with MS (n = 287) and a matched cohort of unoperated patients (n = 861). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hospitalization. A systematic literature review and pooled analysis was conducted to provide overall evidence of the influence of prior metabolic surgery on COVID-19 outcomes.

Results

COVID-19 patients with MS had less hospitalization (9.8% versus 14.3%, p = 0.049). Age 70+, higher BMI, and low weight regain after MS were associated with more hospitalization after COVID-19. A systematic review of 7 studies confirmed that MS reduced the risk of post-COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.71, 95%CI = [0.61-0.83], p < 0.0001) and death (OR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.30-0.65], p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

MS favorably modifies the risks of severe COVID-19 infection. Older age and higher BMI are major risk factors for severity of COVID-19 infection.

Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in COVID-19 Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Obesity is linked with poor prognostic outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In patients with BMI>35 kg/m2, increased rates of hospital and subsequently ICU admissions have been noted. Bariatric surgery resulting in sustained weight loss is hypothesized to decrease the morbid outcomes associated with COVID. In this review, we planned to update the evidence on the topic presented by Aminian et al.

Methods

An extensive literature search was conducted of the electronic databases. Screening of the articles based on the eligibility criteria was followed by relevant data extraction. Other than the articles used in the previous meta-analysis, relevant databases were searched to filter for any new articles. Initially, two independent reviewers screened Pubmed and Cochrane database followed by a thorough search of additional databases such as Google scholar and Medrxiv. The articles were first screened using title and abstract, followed by a full text read. Duplicates, meta-analysis, letter to the editors, and commentaries were excluded. No language restrictions were placed.

Results

A total of nine articles with a population of 1,130,341 were entered into the RevMan. Patients with bariatric surgery were significantly associated with decreased hospitalizations (OR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.45, 0.61]), less likely to be admitted to the ICU (OR: 0.44, 95% CI [0.29,0.67]), and reported reduced overall mortality (OR: 0.42, 95% CI [0.25, 0.70]).

Conclusion

Surgically induced weight loss is more beneficial in reducing the morbidity and mortality burden of COVID-19. More studies are needed to stratify the effect of demographics and metabolic profiles on disease progression.

COVID-19 and Diabetes Outcomes: Rationale for and Updates from the CORONADO Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In France, in order to describe the phenotypic characteristics of patients with diabetes hospitalized for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and to identify the prognostic factors in this specific population, the CORONADO (CORONAvirus and Diabetes Outcomes) study was launched. This review will summarize the key findings from the CORONADO study and put them in perspectives with others studies published on the subject.

RECENT FINDINGS

For almost 2 years, the new SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoronaVirus-2), which causes COVID-19, has spread all around the world leading to a pandemic. From the first epidemiological reports, diabetes mellitus has rapidly emerged as a major risk factor associated with severe forms of COVID-19 but few data were available about diabetes characteristics in hospitalized people with COVID-19. Between March 10 and April 10, 2020, 2951 patients were included in 68 centers throughout the national territory, including overseas territories. In the CORONADO study, the primary outcome was a composite endpoint combining invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and/or death within day 7 (D7). Secondary outcomes included death, IMV, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital discharge, all considered within D7 and day 28 (D28). The primary outcome occurred in 29.0% participants within D7 following hospital admission. Within D28, the end of the follow-up period, the mortality rate was 20.6%, while 50.2% of patients were discharged. In multivariable analysis, advanced age, microvascular complications, treatment with insulin or statin prior to admission, dyspnea on admission, as well as biological markers reflecting the severity of the infection (high levels of transaminases, leukocytes and CRP, and low platelet levels) were associated with an increased risk of death. Several exploratory analyses were performed to clarify the influence of some parameters such as weight status, sex, type of diabetes, and some routine drugs, including metformin or statins.

Impact of prior bariatric surgery on risk and severity of COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The association of prior bariatric surgery (BS) with infection rate and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to address this issue.

METHODS

We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to May, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of mortality, while secondary outcomes included risk of hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), and infection rate.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 151,475 patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed lower risks of mortality [odd ratio (OR)= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.65, p < 0.001, I² = 67%; nine studies; 151,113 patients, certainty of evidence (COE):moderate], hospital admission (OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.85, p = 0.007, I² =74.6%; seven studies; 17,810 patients; COE:low), ICU admission (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.001, I² =0%; six studies; 17,496 patients, COE:moderate), mechanical ventilation (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p < 0.001, I² =57.1%; seven studies; 137,992 patients, COE:moderate) in patients with prior BS (BS group) than those with obesity without surgical treatment (non-BS group). There was no difference in risk of AKI (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.41-1.32, p = 0.304, I² =83.6%; four studies; 129,562 patients, COE: very low) and infection rate (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.89-1.22, p = 0.572, I² =0%; four studies; 12,633 patients, COE:low) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis from matched cohort studies demonstrated associations of prior BS with lower risks of mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and AKI.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed a correlation between prior BS and less severe COVID-19, which warrants further investigations to verify.