Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma for COVID-19-Related Olfactory Dysfunction: A Controlled Study

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treating COVID-19-Related Anosmia, Hyposmia, and Parosmia: A Controlled Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection into the olfactory clefts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with persistent anosmia, hyposmia, and parosmia.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled study.

SETTING

Multicenter study.

METHODS

From March 2022 to July 2024, 514 COVID-19 patients undergoing PRP injection and olfactory training versus olfactory training (controls) for a persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD) were consecutively recruited from two medical centers. Subjects were evaluated from pre- to 3 months post-injection with the olfactory disorder questionnaire (ODQ) and the threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) test. Olfactory outcomes were compared between controls and patients considering the type of OD (anosmia, hyposmia, and parosmia).

RESULTS

The PRP group was composed of 416 patients with anosmia (N = 111; 26.7%), hyposmia (N = 160; 38.5%), and parosmia (N = 145; 34.9%). The baseline ODQ of patients with parosmia was significantly higher than those of the other groups (P = .001). The increase in TDI subscores and total score was significantly higher in all PRP subgroups compared to controls (P = 0.001). The ODQ significantly reduced from pre- to post-PRP injection in hyposmia and parosmia groups (P = 0.001). Patients with parosmia showed a significantly greater reduction in ODQ scores compared to the control group. The 3-month TDI score was negatively influenced by the age of patients (rs = -0.263; P = 0.001) and the duration of OD (rs = -0.213; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with parosmia experienced a stronger impact of OD on quality of life (QoL), and showed greater QoL improvement following PRP injections compared to other groups.

Long-term Outcomes of PRP Injections for Post-viral Olfactory Loss: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have previously been shown to benefit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced smell loss. It is unknown if that benefit is stable over time. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes at 1-year post-intervention.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study. Sixteen patients (10 PRP and six placebo) from the original PRP randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, and a further 16 patients from smell clinic who were a year out from initial treatment (six PRP patients and 10 non-PRP) were enrolled. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Tests (UPSITs) and visual analog scale (VAS) subjective scores were compared to initial scores.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups with respect to age, gender, race, duration of smell loss prior to intervention, smoking or diabetes status, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of phantosmia or parosmia, or baseline UPSIT score. The PRP group had a significantly higher change in UPSIT score at 1 year (p = 0.001), a higher number of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for the UPSIT (87.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.004), and a significantly greater change in VAS at 1 year (p = 0.001), compared to those who did not receive injections. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, no factors appeared to have a significant effect on these findings.

CONCLUSION

PRP injections into the olfactory cleft now have long-term data suggesting benefit in both subjective and psychophysical measures of smell, and improvements in both realms at 1 year are significantly higher than in those who do not receive the injections.

The role of platelet-rich plasma in biomedicine: A comprehensive overview

Biomedicine has seen significant advancements in the 21st century, with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) playing a crucial role in clinical practice. This blood derivative, enriched with platelet components, has shown great potential for promoting tissue repair and regeneration. Its wide range of applications and the presence of anti-inflammatory and growth-promoting factors make it a valuable tool in the field of biomedicine. The exploration of PRP in clinical settings has been gaining momentum. Despite its cost-effectiveness, safety, and therapeutic efficacy, the widespread clinical adoption of PRP has been hindered by the absence of consistent preparation standards and standardized treatment protocols. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the clinical uses, physiological roles, molecular mechanisms, and preparation techniques of PRP in biomedicine. The aim is to offer a thorough understanding of the potential applications and benefits of PRP in medical practice.

Parosmia: Pathophysiology and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Parosmia is a qualitative olfactory disorder in which there is a mismatch between the memory of an odor and the actual experience triggered by an odor. There has been a surge in parosmia-related publications since the COVID-19 pandemic. This review summarizes the latest clinical findings, theories on pathophysiology and potential treatment options.

RECENT ADVANCES

Potential models of parosmia include peripheral or central hypotheses, which refer to aberrancies in olfactory neuron regeneration or information processing in central olfactory centers respectively. This leads to an incomplete or disorganized pattern of olfactory information relay. Studies using gas chromatography and functional magnetic resonance imaging have identified molecular triggers and intracranial functional connectivity patterns in parosmia respectively. Parosmia tends to occur in a delayed fashion after virus-induced anosmia. It may run a protracted course, but typically improves over time. Currently there are no generally approved, objective ways to ascertain the presence and measure the extent of parosmia. Evidence-based treatment for parosmia remains elusive. In some people, this can lead to health and quality of life issues.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in long-lasting post-viral olfactory dysfunction: a case-series

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) effectiveness in patients with a long-lasting postviral olfactory dysfunction (LPOD).

METHODS

Forty-three consecutive patients with a long-lasting postviral OD were prospectively recruited. The injection of 1 mL of PRP was carried out in both olfactory clefts. The pre- to 6-month post-PRP injection change in olfaction was assessed with the olfactory disorder questionnaire (ODQ) and the threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) tests.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients received bilateral PRP injections (24 females). The mean age of patients was 58.9 ± 16.8 years. The mean duration of LPOD was 8.7 years. The pre to 6-month post-injection mean TDI significantly improved from 10.3 ± 10.2 to 20.12 ± 12.07 (p = 0.001). The mean ODQ significantly decreased from 29.8 ± 13.0 to 23.4 ± 11.3 (p = 0.013). The average change of the TDI and the ODQ were 9.8 and 6.4, respectively. Age was inversely associated with the 6-month threshold score.

CONCLUSION

PRP appears to be a promising therapeutic strategy for long-lasting postviral OD. Our findings support the conduction of controlled randomized trial in this population of patients.

Treatment of COVID-19 Associated Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

COVID -19 associated olfactory dysfunction is widespread, yet effective treatment strategies remain unclear. This article aims to provide a comprehensive systematic review of therapeutic approaches and offers evidence-based recommendations for their clinical application.

RECENT FINDINGS

A living Cochrane review, with rigorous inclusion criteria, has so far included 2 studies with a low certainty of evidence. In this systematic review we list clinical data of 36 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies published between Jan 1, 2020 and Nov 19, 2023 regarding treatment options for COVID-19 associated olfactory dysfunction. Nine treatment groups were analysed, including olfactory training, local and systemic corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), calcium chelators, vitamin supplements including palmitoylethanolamide with luteolin, insulin, gabapentin and cerebrolysin. Primary objective was the effect of the studied treatments on the delta olfactory function score (OFS) for objective/psychophysical testing. Treatments such as PRP and calcium chelators demonstrated significant improvements on OFS, whereas olfactory training and corticosteroids did not show notable efficacy for COVID-19 associated olfactory dysfunction.

Topical platelet-rich plasma as a possible treatment for olfactory dysfunction-A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction (OD) affects many survivors of COVID-19. Prior studies have investigated the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for OD. We describe the first randomized controlled trial investigating topical PRP for OD treatment and contribute to existing literature illustrating PRP as an emerging therapeutic.

METHODS

This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted from July 2022 to December 2023. Adult patients with OD ≥6 months secondary to COVID-19 with Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) scores of ≤8/12 or SCENTinel odor intensity of ≤40/100 were included. Patients were randomized to three, monthly PRP or placebo-impregnated Surgifoam treatments into bilateral olfactory clefts. The BSIT, SCENTinel, and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) were completed monthly through month 12.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients screened, 83 participated. No significant differences in age, OD duration, BSIT, SCENTinel, or QOD-NS scores were found between PRP (n = 42) and placebo (n = 41) patients at baseline. PRP patients experienced a statistically significant increase in BSIT scores from baseline at months 5‒9, 11, and 12, while placebo patients did not (p < 0.05). However, total BSIT scores were similar between the two groups throughout the study. Neither the SCENTinel odor intensity scores nor the change from baseline were significantly different between the treatment groups. At month 12, PRP patients experienced minor improvement in OD-related quality-of-life compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to describe topical PRP as a safe, experimental treatment for OD in humans. PRP may impact odor identification in post-COVID-19 OD patients, although the lack of difference in total BSIT scores highlights the need for further study.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Treatment of Long COVID Olfactory Disorders: A Comprehensive Review

Background: Long COVID has brought numerous challenges to healthcare, with olfactory dysfunction (OD) being a particularly distressing outcome for many patients. The persistent loss of smell significantly diminishes the affected individual's quality of life. Recent attention has been drawn to the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy as a treatment for OD. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP therapy in ameliorating OD, especially when associated with long-term COVID-19. Methods: We executed a comprehensive search of the literature, encompassing clinical trials and observational studies that utilized PRP in treating OD limited to COVID-19. We retrieved and comprehensively discussed data such as design, participant demographics, and reported outcomes, focusing on the efficacy and safety of PRP therapy for OD in COVID-19 patients. Results: Our comprehensive analysis interestingly found promising perspectives for PRP in OD following COVID-19 infection. The collective data indicate that PRP therapy contributed to a significant improvement in olfactory function after COVID-19 infection. Conclusions: The evidence amassed suggests that PRP is a promising and safe therapeutic option for OD, including cases attributable to Long COVID-19. The observed uniform enhancement of olfactory function in patients receiving PRP highlights the necessity for well-designed, controlled trials. Such studies would help to refine treatment protocols and more definitively ascertain the efficacy of PRP in a broader, more varied patient cohort.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patients with Olfactory Dysfunction: Myth or Reality? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

With promising outcomes, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently been suggested as a treatment for olfactory dysfunction (OD).

METHODS

Clinical studies utilizing PRP in OD caused by COVID-19, trauma, anesthetic exposure, viral infection, and chronic rhinosinusitis were included in a systematic review.

RESULTS

Ten clinical studies were qualitatively analyzed. Six of these studies used the PRP for OD caused by COVID-19, one on OD after functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and three on post-infectious or post-trauma OD. The population included 531 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 63.

CONCLUSION

The use of PRP may be a risk-free and efficient therapeutic option with very encouraging outcomes. Indeed, it enhances olfactory perception in patients who not only exhibit COVID-19 infection aftereffects, but also in those who have lost their sense of smell due to trauma, rhinosinusitis, rhinitis, or even surgery. To evaluate the PRP's therapeutic benefits in OD patients and to compare the efficacy of different therapeutic protocols with regard to treatment schedules, there is an urgent need for focused controlled trials.