High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Exertional Dyspnea in Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Modified Borg Scale (mBorg), the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the Dyspnea- 12 Scale (D- 12): cross-scale comparison assessing the development of dyspnea in early-stage lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Assessing breathlessness in early-stage lung cancer has been complicated by using different rating scales, potentially leading to overestimation or underestimation of the experience. This study aims to examine the interscale concordance among three frequently used scales, the Modified Borg Scale (mBorg), the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the Dyspnea-12 scale (D-12) and identify common factors contributing to breathlessness in post-operative early-stage lung cancer patients reported with refractory breathlessness.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted using the baseline data from a randomized controlled trial, focusing on 142 early-stage lung cancer patients. Breathlessness was evaluated using mBorg, NRS, and D-12 scales. Generalized linear regression explored relationships across scale ratings and identified factors associated with dyspnea.

RESULTS

The mean score on the mBorg scale was 4.28 ± 1.57 (range = 0-8), the NRS yielded a mean score of 4.73 ± 1.99 (range = 1-10), and the D-12 was 7.04 ± 2.88 (range = 2-17). This study revealed strong correlations among the mBorg, physical domain of D-12, and NRS scales (r = 0.67, p < 0.000), indicating that these measures yielded similar results in assessing the physical aspects of breathlessness. D-12 Total, and D-12 physical scores correlated highly with quality of life, while the D-12 emotional subscale showed weak correlations. Asthma and insomnia emerged as significant risk factors across all scales.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights interscale concordance and key contributors to breathlessness in operable early-stage lung cancer patients. All three scales validly measure dyspnea, with the D-12 and NRS offering a holistic assessment by including affective-dyspnea scores.

Outcomes of high-flow versus conventional oxygen therapy in adult medical and post-surgical oncology patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While the outcomes of patients with cancer have improved, the prognosis for those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains poor. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can be used as a management strategy to avoid IMV.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of HFNC compared to other non-invasive oxygenation techniques among patients with cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review was prospectively registered and followed PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted from inception to May 17th, 2023, across MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We included observational studies and randomized controlled trials enrolling adults (≥18 years of age) with an underlying cancer diagnosis that compared HFNC to at least one other form of non-invasive oxygenation.

RESULTS

Seven (n = 501) medical and 4 (n = 379) post-esophagectomy studies were included. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (n = 573; RR 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.48 to 1.36; I2 = 9 %) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (n = 540; RR 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.62 to 1.28; I2 = 47 %). HFNC was associated with lower nose/mouth dryness overall (n = 398; RR 0.37; 95 % CI: 0.24 to 0.58; I2 = 20 %). Across post-esophagectomy studies, HFNC was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (n = 309; MD -88.73 h; 95 % CI: 108.94 to -68.52 h; I2 = 0 %). Among medical studies, one study reported a shorter hospital LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized patients with cancer, there were no significant differences in mortality, IMV use, ICU LOS, or skin damage. Across both cohorts, HFNC was associated with shorter hospital LOS and lower rates of nose/mouth dryness compared to other non-invasive oxygen techniques.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022303621.

SEPAR Position Paper on the Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in the Home Setting

The purpose of this document is to establish SEPAR's official position on the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in the home management of patients with chronic respiratory diseases. This position statement is deemed necessary considering current evidence regarding HFNC use in chronic respiratory conditions, with the objective of standardizing its application. This consensus was developed by a panel of experts comprising specialists with established expertise in chronic respiratory failure and high-flow nasal cannula therapy. The panel of experts stablished recommendations in COPD, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung diseases, palliative care, rehabilitation, and chronic treatment settings.

Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Clinical Practice

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a noninvasive respiratory support system that delivers air that is heated at 31°C-38°C, humidified 100%, and oxygen-enriched at a constant high flow rate of 15-60 L/min. Because of its numerous physiological benefits, convenience, and minimal side effects, HFNC has been increasingly used over the past decade in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, yet the clinical benefits of long-term HFNC remain uncertain. Several studies have suggested its potential use as an alternative home oxygen therapy for patients with chronic stable lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, and bronchiectasis. The use of long-term home HFNC in patients with chronic respiratory failure is an emerging area with promising potential. Despite limited clinical research, this review aims to describe the physiology of HFNC use and summarize the current evidence on its long-term application, to provide healthcare providers with insights and perspectives on the potential role of long-term home HFNC.

High-flow nasal cannula in adults with chronic respiratory diseases during physical exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) affect at least 545 million people globally, leading to symptoms such as dyspnoea, fatigue and limited physical activity. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes aim to improve the exercise capacity and quality of life of patients with CRD through exercise training. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy shows potential as an adjunct treatment during exercise, but its effects on CRD populations are unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HFNC during exercise in people with CRD.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted and eight databases and other resources were searched from inception (28 June 2022) to 4 April 2023. Studies that used adult patients with CRD and randomised controlled trial that compared the effect of HFNC versus standard care (conventional oxygen therapy or room air) during exercise were included. Two authors independently selected trials, extracted the data, assessed risks of bias and employed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach to judging the certainty of evidence. We pooled trials using random-effect models and inverse variance estimation.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (n=8406) were included in the review (570 patients). The evidence suggests that HFNC increases exercise time after multiple training sessions (weighted mean difference (WMD)=160.58 s; 95% 95% CI=67.32-253.83, 2 studies) and increase after a single session (WMD=72.10 s; 95% CI=28.95-115.24, 11 studies). HFNC may result in little improvements in secondary outcomes (quality of life, dyspnoea, comfort, complications and adherence).

DISCUSSION

The evidence suggests that HFNC may increase functional exercise capacity and positively enhance secondary outcomes. Continued research is justified to elucidate the role of HFNC in PR during exercise training.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022336263.

Respiratory support in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An estimated 20% of emergency department (ED) patients require respiratory support (RS). Evidence suggests that nasal high flow (NHF) reduces RS need.

AIMS

This review compared NHF to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in adult ED patients.

METHOD

The systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) methods reflect the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NHF to COT or NIV use in the ED. Three summary estimates were reported: (1) need to escalate care, (2) mortality, and (3) adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

This SR and MA included 18 RCTs (n = 1874 participants). Two of the five MA conclusions were statistically significant. Compared with COT, NHF reduced the risk of escalation by 45% (RR 0.55; 95% CI [0.33, 0.92], p = .02, NNT = 32); however, no statistically significant differences in risk of mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI [0.68, 1.54]; p = .91) and AE (RR 0.98; 95% CI [0.61, 1.59]; p = .94) outcomes were found. Compared with NIV, NHF increased the risk of escalation by 60% (RR 1.60; 95% CI [1.10, 2.33]; p = .01); mortality risk was not statistically significant (RR 1.23, 95% CI [0.78, 1.95]; p = .37).

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

Evidence-based decision-making regarding RS in the ED is challenging. ED clinicians have at times had to rely on non-ED evidence to support their practice. Compared with COT, NHF was seen to be superior and reduced the risk of escalation. Conversely, for this same outcome, NIV was superior to NHF. However, substantial clinical heterogeneity was seen in the NIV delivered. Research considering NHF versus NIV is needed. COVID-19 has exposed the research gaps and slowed the progress of ED research.

Effects of high-flow nasal therapy on swallowing function: a scoping review

Background

High-flow nasal therapy is widely used in patients with respiratory failure in different clinical settings, but the effect of high-flow nasal therapy on respiratory-swallow coordination is unknown. Understanding this relationship is crucial, considering the necessity for patients to maintain adequate nutrition during daytime high-flow nasal therapy. This scoping review aims to synthesise available data on the effects of high-flow nasal therapy flow rates on swallowing function and the possible risk of aspiration during treatment, focusing on knowledge and evidence gaps.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to 30 May 2023 for studies reporting data on swallowing assessment in healthy adults or patients with acute or chronic respiratory failure receiving high-flow nasal therapy. Data on study design, patients' characteristics and quality outcomes were extracted.

Results

Eight studies were included, four including cohorts of healthy volunteers (n=148) and four including patients with acute or chronic respiratory failure (n=151). Study designs, patient populations and quality outcome measures were heterogeneous. Two studies indicated improvement while four articles showed impairment in swallowing function during high-flow nasal therapy; two studies showed that patients' overall clinical picture and underlying medical conditions influenced swallowing-breathing coordination rather than high-flow nasal therapy per se.

Conclusion

This scoping review found limited and controversial evidence on the impact of high-flow nasal therapy on swallowing function. Remarkably, methods for swallowing function assessment were quite heterogeneous. Additional research is required to test the effect of high-flow nasal therapy on respiratory-swallowing coordination.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly

Early career members of Assembly 2 (Respiratory Intensive Care) attended the 2023 European Respiratory Society International Congress in Milan, Italy. The conference covered acute and chronic respiratory failure. Sessions of interest to our assembly members and to those interested in respiratory critical care are summarised in this article and include the latest updates in respiratory intensive care, in particular acute respiratory distress syndrome and mechanical ventilation.

Dyspnoea relief as an inherent benefit of high flow nasal cannula therapy: A laboratory randomized trial in healthy humans

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Persistent dyspnoea is a public health issue for which the therapeutic arsenal is limited. This study tested high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNT) as a means to alleviate experimental dyspnoea.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy subjects underwent an experimental dyspnoea induced by thoracoabdominal elastic loading. HFNT was administered with alternately FiO2 of 100% (HFNT100) or 21% (HFNT21). The sensory (S-VAS) and affective (A-VAS) components of dyspnoea, transcutaneous CO2 pressure (PtcCO2 ), pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation (SpO2 ), heart rate, respiratory rate and skin galvanometry were monitored continuously. Three experimental sessions of 8 min were conducted: the first session consisted in familiarization with the experimental dyspnoea and the next two sessions tested the effects of HFNT100 and HFNT21 alternatively in a randomized order.

RESULTS

HFNT21 and HFNT100 significantly reduced dyspnoea, respectively of ∆A-VAS = 0.80 cm [-0.02-1.5]; p = 0.007 and ∆A-VAS = 1.00 cm [0.08-1.75]; p < 0.0001; ∆S-VAS = 0.70 cm [-0.15-1.98]), p < 0.0001 and ∆S-VAS = 0.70 cm [0.08-1.95]), p = 0.0002) with no significant difference between HFNT21 and HFNT100. HFNT did not significantly alter the respiratory rate or the heart rate, reduced PtcCO2 only on room air and GSR under both experimental conditions.

CONCLUSION

HFNT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the intensity of the sensory and affective components of dyspnoea, independent of oxygen addition. This relief of laboratory dyspnoea could result from a reduction of afferent-reafferent mismatch.

The Role of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Exercise Testing and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Review of the Current Literature

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has recently emerged as a crucial therapeutic strategy for hypoxemic patients both in acute and chronic settings. Indeed, HFNC therapy is able to deliver higher fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) with a heated and humidified gas flow ranging from 20 up to 60 L per minute, in a more comfortable way for the patient in comparison with Conventional Oxygen Therapy (COT). In fact, the flow keeps the epithelium of the airways adequately moisturized, thus positively affecting the mucus clearance. Finally, the flow is able to wash out the carbon dioxide in the dead space of the airways; this is also enhanced by a modest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) effect. Recent evidence has shown applications of HFNC in exercise training and chronic settings with promising results. In this narrative review, we explored how HFNC might contribute to enhancing outcomes of exercise training and pulmonary rehabilitation among patients dealing with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung diseases, and lung cancer.

Monitoring Changes in Oxygen Muscle during Exercise with High-Flow Nasal Cannula Using Wearable NIRS Biosensors

Exercise increases the cost of breathing (COB) due to increased lung ventilation (V˙E), inducing respiratory muscles deoxygenation (∇SmO2), while the increase in workload implies ∇SmO2 in locomotor muscles. This phenomenon has been proposed as a leading cause of exercise intolerance, especially in clinical contexts. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during exercise routines in rehabilitation programs has gained significant interest because it is proposed as a therapeutic intervention for reducing symptoms associated with exercise intolerance, such as fatigue and dyspnea, assuming that HFNC could reduce exercise-induced ∇SmO2. SmO2 can be detected using optical wearable devices provided by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology, which measures the changes in the amount of oxygen bound to chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, myoglobin, cytochrome oxidase) at the target tissue level. We tested in a study with a cross-over design whether the muscular desaturation of m.vastus lateralis and m.intercostales during a high-intensity constant-load exercise can be reduced when it was supported with HFNC in non-physically active adults. Eighteen participants (nine women; age: 22 ± 2 years, weight: 65.1 ± 11.2 kg, height: 173.0 ± 5.8 cm, BMI: 21.6 ± 2.8 kg·m-2) were evaluated in a cycle ergometer (15 min, 70% maximum watts achieved in ergospirometry (V˙O2-peak)) breathing spontaneously (control, CTRL) or with HFNC support (HFNC; 50 L·min-1, fiO2: 21%, 30 °C), separated by seven days in randomized order. Two-way ANOVA tests analyzed the ∇SmO2 (m.intercostales and m.vastus lateralis), and changes in V˙E and ∇SmO2·V˙E-1. Dyspnea, leg fatigue, and effort level (RPE) were compared between trials by the Wilcoxon matched-paired signed rank test. We found that the interaction of factors (trial × exercise-time) was significant in ∇SmO2-m.intercostales, V˙E, and (∇SmO2-m.intercostales)/V˙E (p < 0.05, all) but not in ∇SmO2-m.vastus lateralis. ∇SmO2-m.intercostales was more pronounced in CTRL during exercise since 5' (p < 0.05). Hyperventilation was higher in CTRL since 10' (p < 0.05). The ∇SmO2·V˙E-1 decreased during exercise, being lowest in CTRL since 5'. Lower dyspnea was reported in HFNC, with no differences in leg fatigue and RPE. We concluded that wearable optical biosensors documented the beneficial effect of HFNC in COB due to lower respiratory ∇SmO2 induced by exercise. We suggest incorporating NIRS devices in rehabilitation programs to monitor physiological changes that can support the clinical impact of the therapeutic intervention implemented.

Home High-Flow Therapy in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Physiological Rationale and Clinical Results

High-flow therapy (HFT) is the administration of gas flows above 15 L/min. It is a non-invasive respiratory support that delivers heated (up to 38 °C), humidified (100% Relative Humidity, RH; 44 mg H2O/L Absolute Humidity, AH), oxygen-enriched air when necessary, through a nasal cannula or a tracheostomy interface. Over the last few years, the use of HFT in critically ill hypoxemic adults has increased. Although the clinical benefit of home high-flow therapy (HHFT) remains unclear, some research findings would support the use of HHFT in chronic respiratory diseases. The aim of this review is to describe the HFT physiological principles and summarize the published clinical findings. Finally, we will discuss the differences between hospital and home implementation, as well as the various devices available for HHFT application.

High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients With Cancer at the End of Life

CONTEXT

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is frequently used to manage dyspnea in patients with cancer near the end of life. Because HFNC is restricted to the in-patient setting, patients on HFNC need to be liberated from it to be discharged from the hospital.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to assess the rate of successful liberation from HFNC in a palliative and supportive care unit (PSCU).

METHODS

The study is a retrospective chart review of all 374 adult patients with cancer on HFNC admitted to a palliative and supportive care unit at a tertiary medical center from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. We determined the proportion of patients who were liberated from HFNC (by day three and overall) and the proportion of patients discharged alive.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64, 54% were male and 73% were white. Only 16% (95% CI: 13-20) of the patients were discharged alive. Liberation from HFNC by day three and overall was accomplished in 23% and 25% of the patients respectively. Comparing the patients who could be liberated from HFNC vs. those who could not by day three, 38% vs. 9% were discharged alive respectively; and overall, 62% vs. 1% respectively (P < 0.001 in both cases).

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of patients with cancer at the end of life can be liberated from HFNC, and only a minority are discharged alive. This information is important when discussing goals of care with patients and their families before initiating HFNC.

Systematic review of the literature on the occurrence and characteristics of dyspnea in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea is a common and distressing symptom for oncology patients.However, dyspnea is not well-characterized and often underestimated by clinicians. This systematic review summarizes the prevalence, intensity, distress, and impact of dyspnea in oncology patients and identifies research gaps.

METHODS

A search of all of the relevant databases was done from 2009 to May 2022. A qualitative synthesis of the extant literature was performed using established guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred-seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Weighted grand mean prevalence of dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer was 58.0%. Intensity of dyspnea was most common dimension evaluated, followed by the impact and distress. Depression and anxiety were the most common symptoms that co-occurred with dyspnea.

CONCLUSION

Numerous methodologic challenges were evident across studies. Future studies need to use valid and reliable measures; evaluate the impact of dyspnea; and determine biomarkers for dyspnea.

Effect of dexamethasone on dyspnoea in patients with cancer (ABCD): a parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for palliation of dyspnoea in patients with cancer, despite scarce evidence to support their use. We aimed to assess the effect of high-dose dexamethasone versus placebo on cancer-related dyspnoea.

METHODS

The parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled ABCD (Alleviating Breathlessness in Cancer Patients with Dexamethasone) trial was done at the at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the general oncology clinic at Lyndon B Johnson General Hospital (both in Houston, TX, USA). Ambulatory patients with cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with an average dyspnoea intensity score on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0=none, 10=worst) over the past week of 4 or higher were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dexamethasone 8 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days followed by 4 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days, or matching placebo capsules for 14 days. Pharmacists did permuted block randomisation with a block size of six, and patients were stratified by baseline dyspnoea score (4-6 vs 7-10) and study site. Patients, research staff, and clinicians were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was change in dyspnoea NRS intensity over the past 24 h from baseline to day 7 (±2 days). Analyses were done by modified intention-to-treat (ie, including all patients who were randomly assigned and started the study treatment, regardless of whether they completed the study). Enrolment was stopped after the second preplanned interim analysis, when the futility criterion was met. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03367156) and is now completed.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 11, 2018, and April 23, 2021, we screened 2867 patients, enrolled 149 patients, and randomly assigned 128 to dexamethasone (n=85) or placebo (n=43). The mean change in dyspnoea NRS intensity from baseline to day 7 (±2 days) was -1·6 (95% CI -2·0 to -1·2) in the dexamethasone group and -1·6 (-2·3 to -0·9) in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference (mean 0 [95% CI -0·8 to 0·7]; p=0·48). The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were infections (nine [11%] of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group vs three [7%] of 43 in the placebo group), insomnia (seven [8%] vs one [2%]), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (three [4%] vs none [0%]). Serious adverse events, all resulting in hospital admissions, were reported in 24 (28%) of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group and in three (7%) of 43 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.

INTERPRETATION

High-dose dexamethasone did not improve dyspnoea in patients with cancer more effectively than placebo and was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events. These data suggest that dexamethasone should not be routinely given to unselected patients with cancer for palliation of dyspnoea.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute.

Noninvasive respiratory supports for the relief of terminal breathlessness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breathlessness is a common symptom in patients with respiratory failure in the terminal phase of their illness. Noninvasive methods of oxygen delivery are frequently used in the palliative setting. We review the evidence supporting noninvasive respiratory supports for the relief of terminal breathlessness in those with life-limiting illnesses.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is limited evidence to support the use of supplemental oxygen for patients without hypoxia. It is unclear whether the symptomatic benefit of oxygen therapy relates to the oxygen delivery and/or airflow across the nasal mucosa. Early trials suggest that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy improves breathlessness at rest and on exertion for patients with cancer. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) also appears to improve breathlessness in the palliative setting; however, potential harms include facial pressure injuries, claustrophobia and anxiety. Goals of care should be explicitly discussed and frequently reviewed given that these interventions have the potential for harm and can be challenging to withdraw.

SUMMARY

HFNC oxygen therapy and NIV appear to reduce breathlessness in the palliative setting. Further high-quality trials are needed to confirm the symptomatic benefits of noninvasive respiratory supports on breathlessness for patients with cancer.

Impact of end-of-life respiratory modalities on quality of dying and death and symptom relief in patients with interstitial lung disease: a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Respiratory modalities applied at the end of life may affect the burden of distressing symptoms and quality of dying and death (QODD) among patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, there have been few studies into respiratory modalities applied to these patients near death. We hypothesized that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) might contribute to improved QODD and symptom relief in patients with end-stage ILD.

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study examined the proportion of end-of-life respiratory modalities in a hospital setting and explored its impact on QODD and symptom relief among patients dying with ILD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ILD who died in four participating hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019 were identified and divided into four groups according to end-of-life respiratory modality: conventional oxygen therapy (COT), HFNC, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). In addition, a mail survey was performed to quantify the QODD and symptom relief at their end of life from a bereaved family's perspective. QODD and symptom relief were quantified using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) for patients with a completed bereavement survey. The impact of end-of-life respiratory modalities on QODD and symptom relief was measured by multivariable linear regression using COT as a reference.

RESULTS

Among 177 patients analyzed for end-of-life respiratory modalities, 80 had a completed bereavement survey. The most common end-of-life respiratory modality was HFNC (n = 76, 42.9%), followed by COT (n = 62, 35.0%), NIV (n = 27, 15.3%), and IMV (n = 12, 6.8%). Regarding the place of death, 98.7% of patients treated with HFNC died outside the intensive care unit. Multivariable regression analyses revealed patients treated with HFNC had a higher GDI score for QODD [partial regression coefficient (B) = 0.46, 95% CI 0.07-0.86] and domain score related to symptom relief (B = 1.37, 95% CI 0.54-2.20) than those treated with COT.

CONCLUSION

HFNC was commonly used in patients with end-stage ILD who died in the hospital and was associated with higher bereaved family ratings of QODD and symptom relief. HFNC might contribute to improved QODD and symptom relief in these patients who die in a hospital setting.

High-flow nasal OXYGEN therapy

OBJECTIVE

To report data of the use of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) in the palliative care setting.

METHODS

Five hypoxaemic patients were treated by HFNT in a 1-year period in a palliative care setting, either in the last days of life or as part of an intensive treatment for a reversible cause of hypoxic dyspnoea.

RESULTS

Four patients had a similar clinical pattern. After starting HFNT, dyspnoea intensity decreased and oxygen saturation improved, providing a clinical improvement for a duration of 2-3 days, but after 48-72 hours, their conditions deteriorated and patients underwent palliative sedation. Indeed, one patient with pulmonary embolism and pneumonia was treated by HFNT successfully and was discharged home 2 weeks after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

HFNT may be helpful for severely hypoxaemic patients who are unresponsive to common measures adopted in the last weeks/days of life of patients with advanced cancer or to treat reversible conditions. The findings of this case series showed the ethical and psychological aspects of end of life, particularly for caregivers. Future studies should assess an early use of this device in combination with lower doses of opioids or as an alternative to their use.

High flow nasal therapy in the management of hypoxemic dyspnea at the end of life

Refractory dyspnea is challenging for physicians treating patients near to the end of life. High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT). We report a case in which HFNS was effective in a patient in the last days of life to mitigate dyspnea allowing a minimal quality of life for some days before dying. HFNT may be helpful for severely hypoxemic patients who are unresponsive to common measured adopted in the last weeks-days of life of advanced cancer patients. Future studies should assess an early use of this device in combination with lower doses of opioids or as an alternative.

High-Flow Oxygen and High-Flow Air for Dyspnea in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of high-flow oxygen (HFOx) and high-flow air (HFAir) on dyspnea in nonhypoxemic patients is not known. We assessed the effect of HFOx, HFAir, low-flow oxygen (LFOx), and low-flow air (LFAir) on dyspnea.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

This double-blind, 4×4 crossover clinical trial enrolled hospitalized patients with cancer who were dyspneic at rest and nonhypoxemic (oxygen saturation >90% on room air). Patients were randomized to 10 minutes of HFOx, HFAir, LFOx, and LFAir in different orders. The flow rate was titrated between 20-60 L/minute in the high-flow interventions and 2 L/minute in the low-flow interventions. The primary outcome was dyspnea numeric rating scale (NRS) "now" where 0 = none and 10 = worst.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (mean age 51 years, 58% female) completed 55 interventions in a random order. The absolute change of dyspnea NRS between 0 and 10 minutes was -1.8 (SD 1.7) for HFOx, -1.8 (2.0) for HFAir, -0.5 (0.8) for LFOx, and - 0.6 (1.2) for LFAir. In mixed model analysis, HFOx provided greater dyspnea relief than LFOx (mean difference [95% confidence interval] -0.80 [-1.45, -0.15]; p = .02) and LFAir (-1.24 [-1.90, -0.57]; p < .001). HFAir also provided significantly greater dyspnea relief than LFOx (-0.95 [-1.61, -0.30]; p = .005) and LFAir (-1.39 [-2.05, -0.73]; p < .001). HFOx was well tolerated. Seven (54%) patients who tried all interventions blindly preferred HFOx and four (31%) preferred HFAir.

CONCLUSION

We found that HFOx and HFAir provided a rapid and clinically significant reduction of dyspnea at rest in hospitalized nonhypoxemic patients with cancer. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02932332).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This double-blind, 4×4 crossover trial examined the effect of oxygen or air delivered at high- or low-flow rates on dyspnea in hospitalized nonhypoxemic patients with cancer. High-flow oxygen and high-flow air were significantly better at reducing dyspnea than low-flow oxygen/air, supporting a role for palliation beyond oxygenation.