Oestrogen-mediated phosphorylation and stabilization of BRCA2 protein in breast

Dynamic interactions of dimeric hub proteins underlie their diverse functions and structures: A comparative analysis of 14-3-3 and LC8

Hub proteins interact with a host of client proteins and regulate multiple cellular functions. Dynamic hubs have a single binding interface for one client at a time resulting in competition among clients with the highest affinity. Dynamic dimeric hubs with two identical sites bind either two different client proteins or two chains of the same client to form homogenous complexes and could also form heterogeneous mixtures of interconverting complexes. Here, we review the interactions of the dimeric hubs 14-3-3 and LC8. 14-3-3 is a phosphoserine/threonine binding protein involved in structuring client proteins and regulating their phosphorylation. LC8 is involved in promoting the dimerization of client peptides and the rigidification of their disordered regions. Both 14-3-3 and LC8 are essential genes, with 14-3-3 playing a crucial role in apoptosis and cell cycle regulation, while LC8 is critical for the assembly of proteins involved in transport, DNA repair, and transcription. Interestingly, both protein dimers can dissociate by phosphorylation, which results in their interactome-wide changes. Their interactions are also regulated by the phosphorylation of their clients. Both form heterogeneous complexes with various functions including phase separation, signaling, and viral hijacking where they restrict the conformational heterogeneity of their dimeric clients that bind nucleic acids. This comparative analysis highlights the importance of dynamic protein-protein interactions in the diversity of functions of 14-3-3 and LC8 and how small differences in structures of interfaces explain why 14-3-3 is primarily involved in the regulation of phosphorylation states while LC8 is primarily involved in the regulation of assembly of large dynamic complexes.

Deciphering DNA repair gene mutational landscape in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma patients using next generation sequencing

Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) is a significant health concern with a complex genetic landscape impacting disease susceptibility and progression. This study aimed to unravel the spectrum of DNA repair gene mutations in Pakistani UCEC patients through Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and explore their potential functional consequences via downstream analyses. NGS analysis of genomic DNA from 30 UCEC patients was conducted to identify clinically significant pathogenic mutations in DNA repair genes. This analysis revealed mutations in 4 key DNA repair genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, and CDH1. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was employed to assess the prognostic value of these mutations on patient overall survival (OS) in UCEC. To delve into the functional impact of these mutations, we performed RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and western blot analyses on the mutated UCEC samples compared to their non-mutated counterparts. These results unveiled the up-regulation in the expression of the mutated genes, suggesting a potential association between the identified mutations and enhanced gene activity. Additionally, targeted bisulfite sequencing analysis was utilized to evaluate DNA methylation patterns in the promoters of the mutated genes. Strikingly, hypomethylation in the promoters of BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, and CDH1 was observed in the mutated UCEC samples relative to the non-mutated, indicating the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the altered gene expression. In conclusion, this study offers insights into the genetic landscape of DNA repair gene mutations in Pakistani UCEC patients. The presence of pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, and CDH1, coupled with their down-regulation and hypermethylation, suggests a convergence of genetic and epigenetic factors contributing to genomic instability in UCEC cells. These findings enhance our understanding of UCEC susceptibility and provide potential avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions in Pakistani UCEC patients.

ER-positive and BRCA2-mutated breast cancer: a literature review

BRCA2-mutated carriers have a high lifetime risk of breast cancer (BC), an early age of onset, and an increased risk of other cancers (including ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer). Almost 70-80% of BRCA2-mutated BC are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, which is a particular type of ER-positive BC that differs from sporadic ER-positive BC. This article reviews the clinicopathological features, treatment, and prognosis of ER-positive and BRCA2-mutated BC to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.

Breast cancers arising in subjects with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: Different biological and clinical entities with potentially diverse therapeutic opportunities

Breast cancers (BCs) arising in carriers of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) have long been considered as indistinguishable biological and clinical entities. However, the loss of function of BRCA1 or BRCA2 proteins has different consequences in terms of tumor cell reliance on estrogen receptor signaling and tumor microenvironment composition. Here, we review accumulating preclinical and clinical data indicating that BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation may differentially affect BC sensitivity to standard systemic therapies. Based on a different crosstalk between BRCA1 or BRCA2 and the ER pathway, BRCA2-mutated Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC may be less sensitive to endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i), whereas BRCA2-mutated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may be especially sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. If validated in future prospective studies, these data may have relevant clinical implications, thus establishing different treatment paths in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs.

Genetic Analysis of Multiple Primary Malignant Tumors in Women with Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Familial cancer syndromes, which are commonly caused by germline mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, are generally considered to be the cause of primary multiple malignant neoplasias (PMMNs). Using targeted genomic sequencing, we screened for eight germline mutations: BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 T300G, BRCA1 2080delA, BRCA1 4153delA, BRCA1 5382insC, BRCA2 6174delT, CHEK2 1100delC, and BLM C1642T, which provoke the majority of cases of hereditary breast and ovary cancer syndrome (HBOC), in genomic (blood) DNA from 60 women with PMMNs, including breast (BC) and/or ovarian cancer(s) (OC). Pathogenic allelic forms were discovered in nine samples: in seven instances, it was BRCA1 5382insC, and in the following two, BRCA1 4153delA and BRCA1 T300G. The age of onset in these patients (46.8 years) was younger than in the general Russian population (61.0) for BC but was not for OC: 58.3 and 59.4, correspondingly. There were invasive breast carcinomas of no special type and invasive serous ovarian carcinomas in all cases. Two or more tumors of HBOC-spectrum were only in five out of nine families of mutation carriers. Nevertheless, every mutation carrier has relatives who have developed malignant tumors.

Therapeutic targeting of DNA damage repair pathways guided by homologous recombination deficiency scoring in ovarian cancers

The susceptibility of cells to DNA damage and their DNA repair ability are crucial for cancer therapy. Homologous recombination is one of the major repairing mechanisms for DNA double-strand breaks. Approximately half of ovarian cancer (OvCa) cells harbor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Considering that HRD is a major hallmark of OvCas, scholars proposed HRD scoring to evaluate the HRD degree and guide the choice of therapeutic strategies for OvCas. In the last decade, synthetic lethal strategy by targeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in HR-deficient OvCas has attracted considerable attention in view of its favorable clinical effort. We therefore suggested that the uses of other DNA damage/repair-targeted drugs in HR-deficient OvCas might also offer better clinical outcome. Here, we reviewed the current small molecule compounds that targeted DNA damage/repair pathways and discussed the HRD scoring system to guide their clinical uses.

The Interplay between the Cellular Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Estrogen

Cancer development is often connected to impaired DNA repair and DNA damage signaling pathways. The presence of DNA damage in cells activates DNA damage response, which is a complex cellular signaling network that includes DNA repair, activation of the cell cycle checkpoints, cellular senescence, and apoptosis. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic lesions that are mainly repaired by the non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways. Estrogen-dependent cancers, like breast and ovarian cancers, are frequently associated with mutations in genes that play a role in HRR. The female sex hormone estrogen binds and activates the estrogen receptors (ERs), ERα, ERβ and G-protein-coupled ER 1 (GPER1). ERα drives proliferation, while ERβ inhibits cell growth. Estrogen regulates the transcription, stability and activity of numerus DDR factors and DDR factors in turn modulate ERα expression, stability and transcriptional activity. Additionally, estrogen stimulates DSB formation in cells as part of its metabolism and proliferative effect. In this review, we will present an overview on the crosstalk between estrogen and the cellular response to DSBs. We will discuss how estrogen regulates DSB signaling and repair, and how DDR factors modulate the expression, stability and activity of estrogen. We will also discuss how the regulation of HRR genes by estrogen promotes the development of estrogen-dependent cancers.

Identifying novel biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma by weighted gene co-expression network analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor found in the bile duct epithelial cells, and the second most common tumor of the liver. However, the pivotal roles of most molecules of tumorigenesis in HCC are still unclear. Hence, it is essential to detect the tumorigenic mechanism and develop novel prognostic biomarkers for clinical application. The data of HCC mRNA-seq and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Co-expression modules and clinical traits were constructed by the Pearson correlation analysis, interesting modules were selected and gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis were performed. Intramodule analysis and protein-protein interaction construction of selected modules were conducted to screen hub genes. In addition, upstream transcription factors and microRNAs of hub genes were predicted by miRecords and NetworkAnalyst database. Afterward, a high connectivity degree of hub genes from two networks was picked out to perform the differential expression validation in the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database and Human Protein Atlas database and survival analysis in Kaplan-Meier plotter online tool. By utilizing WGCNA, several hub genes that regulate the mechanism of tumorigenesis in HCC were identified, which was associated with clinical traits including the pathological stage, histological grade, and liver function. Surprisingly, ZWINT, CENPA, RACGAP1, PLK1, NCAPG, OIP5, CDCA8, PRC1, and CDK1 were identified statistically as hub genes in the blue module, which were closely implicated in pathological T stage and histologic grade of HCC. Moreover, these genes also were strongly associated with the HCC cell growth and division. Network and survival analyses found that nine hub genes may be considered theoretically as indicators to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC or clinical treatment target, it will be necessary for basic experiments and large-scale cohort studies to validate further.

BRCA Genes: The Role in Genome Stability, Cancer Stemness and Therapy Resistance

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process, and tumors frequently harbor multiple mutations regulating genome integrity, cell division and death. The integrity of cellular genome is closely controlled by the mechanisms of DNA damage signaling and DNA repair. The association of breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 with breast and ovarian cancer development was first demonstrated over 20 years ago. Since then the germline mutations within these genes were linked to genomic instability and increased risk of many other cancer types. Genomic instability is an engine of the oncogenic transformation of non-tumorigenic cells into tumor-initiating cells and further tumor evolution. In this review we discuss the biological functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and the role of BRCA mutations in tumor initiation, regulation of cancer stemness, therapy resistance and tumor progression.

Post-transcriptional Regulation of BRCA2 through Interactions with miR-19a and miR-19b

Breast cancer type 2, early onset susceptibility gene (BRCA2) is a major component of the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. It acts as a tumor suppressor whose function is often lost in cancers. Patients with specific mutations in the BRCA2 gene often display discrete clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. However, a subset of sporadic cancers has wild type BRCA2 and display defects in the homology-directed repair pathway, which is the hallmark of ‘BRCAness.’ The mechanisms by which BRCAness arises are not well understood but post-transcriptional regulation of BRCA2 gene expression by microRNAs (miRNAs) may contribute to this phenotype. Here, we examine the post-transcriptional effects that some members of the six-miRNA cluster known as the miR-17/92 cluster have on the abundance of BRCA2’s messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein. We discuss two interactions involving the miR-19a and miR-19b members of the cluster and the 3′UTR of BRCA2’s mRNA. We investigated these miRNA:mRNA interactions in 15 cell lines derived from pancreatic, breast, colon, and kidney tissue. We show that over-expression of these two miRNAs results in a concomitant decrease of BRCA2’s mRNA and protein expression in a subset of the tested cell lines. Additionally, using luciferase reporter assays we identified direct interactions between miR-19a/miR-19b and a miRNA response element (MRE) in BRCA2’s 3′UTR. Our results suggest that BRCA2 is subject to a complex post-transcriptional regulatory program that has specific dependencies on the genetic and phenotypic background of cell types.

Estrogen signaling and the DNA damage response in hormone dependent breast cancers

Estrogen is necessary for the normal growth and development of breast tissue, but high levels of estrogen are a major risk factor for breast cancer. One mechanism by which estrogen could contribute to breast cancer is via the induction of DNA damage. This perspective discusses the mechanisms by which estrogen alters the DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA repair through the regulation of key effector proteins including ATM, ATR, CHK1, BRCA1, and p53 and the feedback on estrogen receptor signaling from these proteins. We put forward the hypothesis that estrogen receptor signaling converges to suppress effective DNA repair and apoptosis in favor of proliferation. This is important in hormone-dependent breast cancer as it will affect processing of estrogen-induced DNA damage, as well as other genotoxic insults. DDR and DNA repair proteins are frequently mutated or altered in estrogen responsive breast cancer, which will further change the processing of DNA damage. Finally, the action of estrogen signaling on DNA damage is also relevant to the therapeutic setting as the suppression of a DDR by estrogen has the potential to alter the response of cancers to anti-hormone treatment or chemotherapy that induces DNA damage.

The negative interplay between Aurora A/B and BRCA1/2 controls cancer cell growth and tumorigenesis via distinct regulation of cell cycle progression, cytokinesis, and tetraploidy

It is well known that the activation of Aurora A/B (Aur A/B) or inactivation of BRCA1/2 induces tumor formation. Others and we have reported that the mutual suppression between Aur A/B and BRCA1/2 may manipulate cancer cell growth and tumorigenesis, however, the interactive regulation and mechanism between these molecules are still elusive. In this study, by consecutive silencing of Aur A/B or/and BRCA1/2 with specific shRNAs, we showed that, in BRCA2-deficient pancreatic cancer cell line Capan-1 and in ovarian cancer cell line OVCA433, Aur A/B and BRCA1/2 inversely regulated the expression of each other likely through proteasome-mediated proteolysis but not through gene transcription. Aur A/B and BRCA1/2 conversely regulated cell cycle progression mainly through control of p53 and cyclin A. Moreover, the disruption of Aur A/B blocked abnormal cytokinesis and decreased cell multinuclearity and chromosome tetraploidy, whereas the deprivation of BRCA1/2 promoted the abnormal cytokinesis and enhanced the cell multinuclearity and tetraploidy. Furthermore, we showed by animal assays that the depletion of Aur A/B inhibited tumor growth of both cell lines, while the knockdown of BRCA1/2 promoted the tumor growth. However, the concurrent silencing of Aur A/B and BRCA1/2 diminished the effects of these molecules on the regulation of cell cycle, cytokinesis, and tetraploidy, leading to the burdened tumor sizes similar to those induced by scrambled shRNA-treated control cells. In summary, our study revealed that the negative interplay between Aur A/B and BRCA1/2 inversely controls the cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell multinuclearity, and tetraploidization to modulate tumorigenesis.

SULT1A1 gene deletion in BRCA2-associated male breast cancer: a link between genes and environmental exposures?

SULT1A1, a member of sulfotransferase superfamily, is a drug and hormone metabolizing enzyme involved in the metabolism of a variety of potential mammary carcinogens of endogenous and exogenous origin. Interestingly, the metabolic activity of SULT1A1 can be affected by variations in gene copy number. Male Breast Cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and less investigated disease compared to female BC (FBC). As in FBC, the concurrent effects of genetic risk factors, particularly BRCA2 mutations, increased exposure to estrogens and environmental carcinogens play a relevant role in MBC. By quantitative real-time PCR with TaqMan probes, we investigated the presence of SULT1A1 gene copy number variations (CNVs) in a series of 72 MBCs. SULT1A1 gene deletion was observed in 10 of the 72 MBCs (13.9%). In a multivariate analysis association between BRCA2 mutation and SULT1A1 gene deletion emerged (p = 0.0005). Based on the evidence that the level of SULT1A1 enzyme activity is correlated with CNV, our data suggest that in male breast tumors SULT1A1 activity may be decreased. Thus, it can be hypothesized that in a proportion of MBCs, particularly in BRCA2-associated MBCs, the level of estrogens and environmental carcinogens exposure might be increased suggesting a link between gene and environmental exposure in the pathogenesis of MBC.

Baseline E(2) levels are higher in BRCA2 mutation carriers: a potential target for prevention?

PURPOSE

BRCA gene mutations and elevated serum estradiol (E(2)) are well-known risk factors for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between BRCA gene mutations and serum E(2) level.

METHODS

We measured baseline (menstrual cycle day 2-3) E(2) levels of 96 women with breast cancer who underwent BRCA testing.

RESULTS

The mean age, parity, and age at menarche did not differ between women with and without BRCA1/2 mutations. Basal serum E(2) level was significantly higher in women with BRCA2 mutations compared to women with BRCA1 mutations or without BRCA mutations (71.7 ± 41.6 vs. 45.5 ± 20.7 vs. 38.5 ± 12.6 pg/ml in BRCA2 mutation carriers, BRCA1 mutation carriers, and non-carriers, respectively, p value = 0.03). Women with BRCA2 mutations had 3.1 times as great risk for high basal E(2) level (>48 pg/ml) as women without BRCA mutations after adjusting for age and BMI (95 % confidence interval: 1.3, 7.6). BRCA mutation carriers with high serum E(2) level were significantly younger than the carriers with low serum E(2) level (31.4 ± 3.1 vs. 34.7 ± 4.9 years, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we found an association between high basal serum E(2) levels and BRCA2 mutations. Our results suggest that increased production of E(2) may have a role in the pathogenesis of BRCA2-mutation-related breast cancer.

Up-regulation of miR-1245 by c-myc targets BRCA2 and impairs DNA repair

BRCA2, a clinical prognostic factor, is significantly up-regulated in mRNA level, while its protein expression is often decreased in sporadic breast cancer. However, how BRCA2 protein expressions are suppressed in these tumors remains unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that miR-1245 directly suppressed BRCA2 3'-UTR and translation, impaired homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair, reduced DNA damage-induced Rad51 nuclear foci, and rendered cells hypersensitive to γ-irradiation (IR), ultimately inducing high chromosomal abnormalities in normal breast cells and breast cancer cells. Conversely, inhibiting miR-1245 in breast cancer cells enhanced BRCA2 levels and induced resistance to IR. Furthermore, we demonstrated that c-myc up-regulated miR-1245 expression via direct binding to the miR-1245 promoter, which led to down-regulation of BRCA2 and reduction in HR efficiency. Significantly, miR-1245 levels in primary breast tumors correlated with c-myc overexpression and BRCA2 suppression. These findings uncover a BRCA2 regulatory and signaling pathway in sporadic breast cancer and support a functionally and clinically relevant epigenetic mechanism in cancer pathogenesis.

High RAD51 mRNA expression characterize estrogen receptor-positive/progesteron receptor-negative breast cancer and is associated with patient's outcome

Mutations in DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair genes are involved in the pathogenesis of hereditary mammary tumors, it is, however, still unclear whether defects in this pathway may play a role in sporadic breast cancer. In this study, we initially determined mRNA expression of 15 DSB related genes by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in paired normal tissue and cancer specimen from 20 breast cancer cases to classify them into homogeneous clusters. G22P1/ku70, ATR and RAD51 genes were differentially expressed in the three branches recognized by clustering analysis. In particular, a breast cancer subgroup characterized by high RAD51 mRNA levels and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/progesteron receptor (PR)-negative phenotype was identified. This result was confirmed by the analysis of G22P1/ku70, ATR and RAD51 mRNA levels on paired normal and tumor specimens from an extended breast cancer cohort (n = 75). RAD51 mRNA levels were inversely associated with PR status (p = 0.02) and the highest levels were, indeed, detected in ER-positive/PR-negative tumors (p = 0.03). RAD51 immunostaining of a tissue microarray confirmed the inverse relationship between high RAD51 expression and negative PR status (p = 0.002), as well as, the association with ER-positive/PR-negative phenotype (p = 0.003). Interestingly, the analysis of microarray expression data from 295 breast cancers indicate that RAD51 increased mRNA expression is associated with higher risk of tumor relapse, distant metastases and worst overall survival (p = 0.015, p = 0.009 and p = 0.013 respectively). Our results suggest that RAD51 expression determination could contribute to a better molecular classification of mammary tumors and may represent a novel tool for evaluating postoperative adjuvant therapy for breast cancer patients.

Effects of combined radiofrequency radiation exposure on the cell cycle and its regulatory proteins

The aim of this study was to investigate whether single or combined radio frequency (RF) radiation exposure has effects on the cell cycle and its regulatory proteins. Exposure of MCF7 cells to either single (837 MHz) or combined (837 and 1950 MHz) RF radiation was conducted at specific absorption rate values of 4 W/kg for 1 h. During the exposure period, the chamber was made isothermal by circulating water through the cavity. After RF radiation exposure, DNA synthesis rate and cell cycle distribution were assessed. The levels of cell cycle regulatory proteins, p53, p21, cyclins, and cyclin-dependent kinases were also examined. The positive control group was exposed to 0.5 and 4 Gy doses of ionizing radiation (IR) and showed changes in DNA synthesis and cell cycle distribution. The levels of p53, p21, cyclin A, cyclin B1, and cyclin D1 were also affected by IR exposure. In contrast to the IR-exposed group, neither the single RF radiation- nor the combined RF radiation-exposed group elicited alterations in DNA synthesis, cell cycle distribution, and levels of cell cycle regulatory proteins. These results indicate that neither single nor combined RF radiation affect cell cycle progression.

Oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones and risk of contralateral breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and noncarriers: the WECARE Study

The potential effects of oral contraceptive (OC) and postmenopausal hormone (PMH) use are not well understood among BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) deleterious mutation carriers with a history of breast cancer. We investigated the association between OC and PMH use and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in the WECARE (Women's Environment, Cancer, and Radiation Epidemiology) Study. The WECARE Study is a population-based case-control study of 705 women with asynchronous CBC and 1,398 women with unilateral breast cancer, including 181 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Risk-factor information was assessed by telephone interview. Mutation status was measured using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography followed by direct sequencing in all participants. Outcomes, treatment, and tumor characteristics were abstracted from medical records. Ever use of OCs was not associated with risk among noncarriers (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.66-1.15) or BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.21-3.13). BRCA1 carriers who used OCs had a nonsignificant greater risk than nonusers (RR = 2.38; 95% CI = 0.72-7.83). Total duration of OC use and at least 5 years of use before age 30 were associated with a nonsignificant increased risk among mutation carriers but not among noncarriers. Few women had ever used PMH and we found no significant associations between lifetime use and CBC risk among carriers and noncarriers. In conclusion, the association between OC/PMH use and risk of CBC does not differ significantly between carriers and noncarriers; however, because carriers have a higher baseline risk of second primaries, even a potential small increase in risk as a result of OC use may be clinically relevant.