Collection, storage, and infusion of stem cells in children with high-risk neuroblastoma: saving for a rainy day

Plerixafor combined with G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in children qualified for autologous transplantation- single center experience

Failure of autologous peripheral blood CD34⁺ stem cells collection can adversely affect the treatment modality for patients with hematological and nonhematological malignant diseases where high dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become part of their treatment. Plerixafor in conjunction with G-CSF is approved for clinical use as a mobilization agent. The clinical efficacy of Plerixafor in CD34⁺ cells collection was analyzed in our institution. A total of 13 patients aged 1-15,5 years received Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF: 7 with neuroblastoma, 2 with Ewing's sarcoma and single patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, germ cell tumor, retinoblastoma and Wilms tumor. Twelve patients (923%) achieved CD34+ cell counts of ≥ 20 × 10⁶/L after 1-7 doses of Plerixafor. The average 9,9 - fold increase in number of CD34⁺ cells were achieved following the first dose and 429 - fold after second dose of plerixafor. Among the 13 patients, 12 yielded the minimum required cell collection of 2 × 10⁶/kg within an average of 2 doses of Plerixafor. The mean number of apheresis days was 1.75. The median total number of collected CD34⁺ cells was 982 × 10⁶/kg. Plerixafor enables rapid and effective mobilization, and collection of sufficient number of CD34⁺ cells.

Assessment of Organ Dosimetry for Planning Repeat Treatments of High-Dose 131I-MIBG Therapy: 123I-MIBG Versus Posttherapy 131I-MIBG Imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate detailed organ-based radiation-absorbed dose for planning double high-dose treatment with I-MIBG.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 33 patients with high-risk refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma were treated with high-dose I-MIBG. Organ dosimetry was estimated from the first I-MIBG posttherapy imaging and from subsequent I-MIBG imaging prior to the planned second administration. Three serial whole-body scans were performed per patient 2 to 6 days after I-MIBG therapy (666 MBq/kg or 18 mCi/kg) and approximately 0.5, 24, and 48 hours after the diagnostic I-MIBG dose (370 MBq/kg or 10 mCi/1.73 m). Organ radiation doses were calculated using OLINDA. I-MIBG scan dosimetry estimations were used to predict doses for the second I-MIBG therapy and compared with I-MIBG posttherapy estimates.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD whole-body doses from I-MIBG and I-MIBG scans were 0.162 ± 112 and 0.141 ± 0.068 mGy/MBq, respectively. I-MIBG and I-MIBG organ doses were variable-generally higher for I-MIBG-projected doses than those projected using posttherapy I-MIBG scans. Mean ± SD doses to liver, heart wall, and lungs were 0.487 ± 0.28, 0.225 ± 0.20, and 0.40 ± 0.26, respectively, for I-MIBG and 0.885 ± 0.56, 0.618 ± 0.37, and 0.458 ± 0.56, respectively, for I-MIBG. Mean ratio of I-MIBG to I-MIBG estimated radiation dose was 1.81 ± 1.95 for the liver, 2.75 ± 1.84 for the heart, and 1.13 ± 0.93 for the lungs. No unexpected toxicities were noted based on I-MIBG-projected doses and cumulative dose limits of 30, 20, and 15 Gy to liver, kidneys, and lungs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For repeat I-MIBG treatment planning, both I-MIBG and I-MIBG imaging yielded variable organ doses. However, I-MIBG-based dosimetry yielded a more conservative estimate of maximum allowable activity and would be suitable for planning and limiting organ toxicity with repeat high-dose therapies.

Overview and recent advances in the treatment of neuroblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Children with neuroblastoma have widely divergent outcomes, ranging from cure in >90% of patients with low risk disease to <50% for those with high risk disease. Recent research has shed light on the biology of neuroblastoma, allowing for more accurate risk stratification and treatment reduction in many cases, although newer treatment strategies for children with high-risk and relapsed neuroblastoma are needed to improve outcomes. Areas covered: Neuroblastoma epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, and recent advances in treatment of both newly diagnosed and relapsed neuroblastoma. Expert commentary: The identification of newer tumor targets and of novel cell-mediated immunotherapy agents may lead to novel therapeutic approaches, and clinical trials for regimens designed to target individual genetic aberrations in tumors are underway. A combination of therapeutic modalities will likely be required to improve survival and cure rates for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Combined plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for harvesting high-dose hematopoietic stem cells: Possible niche for plerixafor use in pediatric patients

PB is a source of HSC, especially for autologous HCT in solid tumors. However, there is a risk of failing to achieve the target number of SC after mobilization with growth factors alone in patients who were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy or those in need for tandem transplants. SC were harvested from seven pediatric patients with solid tumors who were in need of autologous HCT following combination GCSF and plerixafor. Six of them received plerixafor after failing to achieve enough SC with GCSF only, while the seventh patient received the combined protocol upfront. All seven patients achieved the target number of SC according to their treatment protocol. There were no adverse events. All patients underwent autologous HCT using the harvested HSC and achieved full engraftment. A protocol for harvesting autologous HCT using GCSF and plerixafor is feasible and safe in children with solid tumors who had been heavily pretreated with chemotherapy or needed tandem transplants.

5-day/5-drug myeloablative outpatient regimen for resistant neuroblastoma

5-day/5-drug (5D/5D) is a novel high-dose regimen administered with autologous hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). It was designed to maximize cytoreduction via high dosing of synergistically interacting agents, while minimizing morbidity in patients with resistant neuroblastoma (NB) and ineligible for clinical trials due to myelosuppression from previous therapy. 5D/5D comprises carboplatin 500 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-2, irinotecan 50 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3, temozolomide 250 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3, etoposide 200 mg/m(2)/day on days 3-5 and cyclophosphamide 70 mg/kg/day on days 4-5. HSCT is on day 8. Sixteen patients received 21 courses. Treatment was in the outpatient clinic. Responses were noted against progressive disease (PD) that had developed while patients were off, or receiving only low-dose, chemotherapy but not against PD that emerged despite high-dose chemotherapy. Responses were also seen in patients with PD or stable disease after (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy. Grade 3 toxicities were limited to transient elevations in liver enzymes (three courses) and hyponatremia (one course). Bacteremia occurred in 2/21 (10%) courses. Hematological recovery allowed patients to be enrolled on clinical trials. In conclusion, 5D/5D (including HSCT) spares vital organs, entails modest morbidity, shows activity against resistant NB and helps patients meet eligibility requirements for formal clinical trials.

Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with metastatic neuroblastoma

Current therapies for high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) necessitate the availability of several aliquots of autologous peripheral blood stem cells to reverse-associated myelosuppression. Priming with the CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor plus G-CSF was associated with successful stem cell harvest in 5/7 heavily prior-treated patients with stage 4 NB who had previously failed G-CSF priming. Minimal residual disease was not detected in harvested cells from any patient despite the presence of disease in bone/bone marrow in 6/7. Hematopoietic reconstitution was achieved in all three patients receiving plerixafor-primed stem cells after myeloablative therapy. Plerixafor is an effective and safe agent for stem cell collection in patients with NB.

High-dose carboplatin-irinotecan-temozolomide: treatment option for neuroblastoma resistant to topotecan

BACKGROUND

We report a retrospective study of a novel regimen for neuroblastoma (NB) resistant to standard induction or salvage chemotherapy which now routinely includes topotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients received carboplatin (500 mg/m(2)/day, 2×)-irinotecan (50 mg/m(2)/day, 5×)-temozolomide (250 mg/m(2)/day, 5×) (HD-CIT). Only one course was planned. Patients with thrombocytopenia indicative of poor bone marrow (BM) reserve resulting from extensive prior therapy received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) post-HD-CIT.

RESULTS

Modest acute toxicity allowed outpatient treatment. Low-grade diarrhea was common; there was no mucositis, nephrotoxicity, or cardiotoxicity. Myelosuppression was prolonged but uncomplicated. The absolute neutrophil count reached 500/µl on days 20-30 (median, 25) in 25 patients with satisfactory BM reserve, and on days 9-14 (median, 11) post-PBSC infusion. Anti-NB activity was common against refractory (non-progressing) disease or new relapse occurring off therapy (68% objective response rate), but not against disease progressing on therapy. Seven of 26 patients treated for refractory NB are progression-free and in complete remission following subsequent therapy, including anti-G(D2) immunotherapy, at ≥ 29+ months post-HD-CIT.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-CIT is appealing as salvage or consolidative therapy because of anti-NB activity and modest non-hematologic toxicity. PBSC support is unnecessary when BM reserve is intact. The wide antineoplastic activity of its three components and their potential for activity against disease in the central nervous system support applicability to other cancers.

High-dose cyclophosphamide-irinotecan-vincristine for primary refractory neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

We used a novel regimen for neuroblastoma (NB) that had responded inadequately to standard chemotherapy which now includes topotecan in induction or second-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 38 patients who received one or two courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide (140 mg/kg)-irinotecan (CPT-11) (250 mg/m(2))-vincristine (HD-CCV) as treatment for NB that had responded incompletely to induction but had never progressed. Treatment was outpatient and was preceded and followed by extent-of-disease and toxicity evaluations because the patients were being considered for enrolment on formal protocols. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from day 1 of HD-CCV.

RESULTS

Common toxicities were grade 4 myelosuppression and grade 2 diarrhoea. Responses--5 complete (CR), 3 partial (PR), 4 mixed (MR)--occurred in 12/28 (43%) patients treated ≤9 months, and in 1/10 (10%) patients treated >10 months, from diagnosis. HD-CCV was the initial salvage regimen after topotecan-containing induction in 5 patients, achieving 1 CR, 1 MR and 3 stable disease (NR). HD-CCV produced responses (2 PR, 3 MR) in all 5 patients previously treated with CPT-11/ temozolomide. In contrast, all 6 patients treated post-HD-CCV with CPT-11/temozolomide had NR to the latter. Post-HD-CCV treatments included immunotherapy, targeted radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. PFS was 64% (±8%) at 24 months, with 20 patients progression-free at 2+-to-36+ (median 16+) months and 10 in first CR at 9+-to-36+ (median 16+) months.

CONCLUSIONS

HD-CCV offers a treatment option against topotecan-resistant NB. Results support the concept that combining CPT-11 with very high doses of alkylators can yield greater antitumour effect.

Peripheral blood stem cell support for multiple cycles of dose intensive induction therapy is feasible with little risk of tumor contamination in advanced stage neuroblastoma: a report from the Childrens Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Poor outcome in Stage 4 neuroblastoma may be improved with increased dose intensity of therapy. We investigated the feasibility of sequential collection and infusion of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as hematopoietic support for non-myeloablative dose intensive induction chemotherapy given every 21-28 days.

METHODS

Twenty-two children with Stage 4 neuroblastoma (>or=1 year of age) received two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)), doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)), and vincristine (2 mg/m(2)) followed by three cycles of interpatient dose escalating carboplatin (Dose Level 0 = 800 mg/m(2); Dose Level 1 = 1,000 mg/m(2)), high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)), and etoposide (600 mg/m(2)). PBSC were harvested following cycle 2, 3, and 4 in Cohort 1 and infused after each subsequent cycle. In Cohort 2, PBSC were harvested after cycle 2 and split into three aliquots for infusion. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and ability to administer cycles within 28 days was assessed.

RESULTS

Sufficient PBSC (>or=2 x 10(6) CD34 cells/kg per infusion) were collected from 17/21 eligible patients with minimal toxicity and no detectable neuroblastoma cells by immunocytology. Carboplatin at 1000 mg/m(2) resulted in DLT of delayed platelet recovery >28 days in 4/8 patients. Despite de-escalation to 800 mg/m(2), platelet DLT occurred in 4/7 Cohort 1 and 3/7 Cohort 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

As defined in this protocol, doses of carboplatin were not tolerable with the PBSC dose administered. However, it was feasible to collect sufficient PBSC from small neuroblastoma patients to use as hematopoietic support with minimal risk of tumor contamination and toxicity.

Autologous and allogeneic cellular therapies for high-risk pediatric solid tumors

Since the 1950s, the overall survival of children with cancer has gone from almost zero to approaching 80%. Although there have been notable successes in treating solid tumors such as Wilms tumor, some childhood solid tumors have continued to elude effective therapy. With the use of megatherapy techniques such as tandem transplantation, dose escalation has been pushed to the edge of dose-limiting toxicities, and any further improvements in event-free survival will have to be achieved through novel therapeutic approaches. This article reviews the status of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for many pediatric solid tumor types. Most of the clinical experience in transplant for pediatric solid tumors is in the autologous setting, so some general principles of autologous HSCT are reviewed. The article then examines HSCT for diseases such as Hodgkin disease, Ewing sarcoma, and neuroblastoma, and the future of cell-based therapies by considering some experimental approaches to cell therapies.

Stem cell source and outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children and adolescents with acute leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from siblings, unrelated donors or HLA mismatched family members has become an important procedure to offer a chance of cure to children and adolescents with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse and those with certain genetic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) was the only stem cell source for many years. During the past 15 years, peripheral blood stem cells from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized healthy donors, or umbilical cord blood from related or unrelated donors, have become available. Each stem cell source has different risks/benefits for patients and donors, the choice depending not only on availability, but also on HLA compatibility and urgency of the HSCT. This review will analyze the advantages and limitations of each of these options, and the main criteria which can be applied when choosing the appropriate stem cell source for pediatric transplant recipients with acute leukemia.

Stem cell transplantation for neuroblastoma

High-risk neuroblastoma is a childhood malignancy with a poor prognosis. Gradual improvements in survival have correlated with therapeutic intensity, and the ability to harvest, process and store autologous hematopoietic stem cells has allowed for dose intensification beyond marrow tolerance. The use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell rescue in consolidation has resulted in improvements in survival, although further advances are still needed. Newer approaches to SCT and supportive care, most notably the transition to PBSC, have resulted in further improvement in survival and decreases in treatment-related mortality. Research into experimental approaches to hematopoietic SCT is ongoing.