A multi-center phase Ib study of oxaliplatin (NSC#266046) in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors

Evaluation of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with cancer: Turkish validity and reliability study

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of peripheral neuropathy in children receiving Vincristine treatment is challenging. This study examined the Turkish validity and reliability of the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS-PV) measurement tool, which can measure Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms in children with cancer.

METHODS

A total of 53 children aged 5-17 years who received Vincristine treatment in two pediatric hematology-oncology centers participated in the study. Data was collected using the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS-PV), the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, and the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool (APPT). The correlation between the TNS-PV total score and other scales and the inter-rater reliability coefficient was evaluated.

FINDINGS

Of the children, 81.1% were diagnosed with ALL and 13.2% with Ewing Sarcoma. Cronbach's alpha values of form A and B of the TNS-PV scale were 0.628 and 0.639, respectively. As the cumulative Vincristine dose increased, the children's scores on TNS-PV were higher. A moderate and significant positive correlation was found between the TNS-PV form A total score and the worst subjective symptoms a, b (A), strength, tendon reflexes, and autonomic / constipation (r = 0.441, r = 0.545, r = 0.472, r = 0.536, p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

The TNS-PV form B total score was found to have a moderate level, significant correlation with CTCAE sensory neuropathy score and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, and a high level, significant positive correlation with CTCAE motor neuropathy score.

APPLICATION TO PRACTICE

The TNS-PV is valid and reliable for measuring Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in practice in Turkish children 5 years and older.

Platinum-Based Nanoformulations for Glioblastoma Treatment: The Resurgence of Platinum Drugs?

Current therapies for treating Glioblastoma (GB), and brain tumours in general, are inefficient and represent numerous challenges. In addition to surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are presently used as standards of care. However, treated patients still face a dismal prognosis with a median survival below 15-18 months. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the main chemotherapeutic agent administered; however, intrinsic or acquired resistance to TMZ contributes to the limited efficacy of this drug. To circumvent the current drawbacks in GB treatment, a large number of classical and non-classical platinum complexes have been prepared and tested for anticancer activity, especially platinum (IV)-based prodrugs. Platinum complexes, used as alkylating agents in the anticancer chemotherapy of some malignancies, are though often associated with severe systemic toxicity (i.e., neurotoxicity), especially after long-term treatments. The objective of the current developments is to produce novel nanoformulations with improved lipophilicity and passive diffusion, promoting intracellular accumulation, while reducing toxicity and optimizing the concomitant treatment of chemo-/radiotherapy. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents the access of the drugs to the brain and accumulation in tumour cells, so it represents a key challenge for GB management. The development of novel nanomedicines with the ability to (i) encapsulate Pt-based drugs and pro-drugs, (ii) cross the BBB, and (iii) specifically target cancer cells represents a promising approach to increase the therapeutic effect of the anticancer drugs and reduce undesired side effects. In this review, a critical discussion is presented concerning different families of nanoparticles able to encapsulate platinum anticancer drugs and their application for GB treatment, emphasizing their potential for increasing the effectiveness of platinum-based drugs.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in children and adolescent cancer patients

Brain cancer and leukemia are the most common cancers diagnosed in the pediatric population and are often treated with lifesaving chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy causes severe adverse effects and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting and debilitating side effect. CIPN can greatly impair quality of life and increases morbidity of pediatric patients with cancer, with the accompanying symptoms frequently remaining underdiagnosed. Little is known about the incidence of CIPN, its impact on the pediatric population, and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, as most existing information stems from studies in animal models or adult cancer patients. Herein, we aim to provide an understanding of CIPN in the pediatric population and focus on the 6 main substance groups that frequently cause CIPN, namely the vinca alkaloids (vincristine), platinum-based antineoplastics (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin), taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel), epothilones (ixabepilone), proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide). We discuss the clinical manifestations, assessments and diagnostic tools, as well as risk factors, pathophysiological processes and current pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the prevention and treatment of CIPN.

Revisiting Platinum-Based Anticancer Drugs to Overcome Gliomas

Although there are many patients with brain tumors worldwide, there are numerous difficulties in overcoming brain tumors. Among brain tumors, glioblastoma, with a 5-year survival rate of 5.1%, is the most malignant. In addition to surgical operations, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are generally performed, but the patients have very limited options. Temozolomide is the most commonly prescribed drug for patients with glioblastoma. However, it is difficult to completely remove the tumor with this drug alone. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the potential of anticancer drugs, other than temozolomide, against glioblastomas. Since the discovery of cisplatin, platinum-based drugs have become one of the leading chemotherapeutic drugs. Although many studies have reported the efficacy of platinum-based anticancer drugs against various carcinomas, studies on their effectiveness against brain tumors are insufficient. In this review, we elucidated the anticancer effects and advantages of platinum-based drugs used in brain tumors. In addition, the cases and limitations of the clinical application of platinum-based drugs are summarized. As a solution to overcome these obstacles, we emphasized the potential of a novel approach to increase the effectiveness of platinum-based drugs.

High-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in children with advanced malignant solid tumors: A retrospective analysis of 38 cases

The aim of the present study was to assess the toxicity and efficacy of autologous peripheral blood stem cell (APBSC) transplantation in children with advanced malignant solid tumors. The outcomes of 38 children with advanced malignant solid tumor, who were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in Beijing Tongren Hospital (Capital Medical University, Beijing, China) between September 2005 and November 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. The effects of treatment were evaluated according to the standard Bearman's criteria. The mean count of collected mononuclear cells and the cluster of differentiation 34⁺ cell count from 38 patients was 5.6±2.2×10⁸/kg and 3.8±2.6×10⁶/kg, respectively. From these 38 patients, the number of stem cells collected from 31 cases (81.6%) accorded with the transplantation standards. Three and 14 days after pretreatment in these 38 cases, there were 19 cases of grade I, 11 cases of grade II, five cases of grade III and three cases of grade IV (one case succumbed) adverse reaction. Following the treatment (23-40 days after pretreatment, during organ injury recovery), 37 cases obtained bone marrow reconstitution with a mean time of 12.3±3.1 days after APBSC reinfusion. The median survival time of the 37 patients was 49 months, and the survival rate at one, three and five years post-treatment was 91.9, 68.2 and 36.6%, respectively.

Phase I clinical trial of ifosfamide, oxaliplatin, and etoposide (IOE) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

Oxaliplatin, although related to cisplatin and carboplatin, has a more favorable toxicity profile and may offer advantages in combination regimens. We combined oxaliplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide (IOE) and estimated the regimen's maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in children with refractory solid tumors. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD were assessed at 3 dose levels in a 21-day regimen: day 1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (consistent dose); days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m/d (level 0) or 1500 mg/m/d (levels 1 and 2) and etoposide 75 mg/m/d (levels 0 and 1) or 100 mg/m/d (level 2). Course 1 filgrastim/pegfilgrastim was permitted after initial DLT determination, if neutropenia was dose limiting. Seventeen patients received 59 courses. Without filgrastim (n=9), DLT was neutropenia in 2 patients at dose level 1. No DLT was observed after adding filgrastim (n=8). There was no ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity >grade 1, or neurotoxicity >grade 2. One patient experienced a partial response and 9 had stable disease after 2 courses. In conclusion, the IOE regimen was well tolerated. Without filgrastim, neutropenia was dose limiting with MTD at ifosfamide 1200 mg/m/d and etoposide 75 mg/m/d. The MTD with filgrastim was not defined due to early study closure. Filgrastim allowed ifosfamide and etoposide dose escalation and should be included in future studies.

A phase I study of oxaliplatin and doxorubicin in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory extracranial non-hematopoietic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The combination of a platinum agent and anthracycline has shown activity in pediatric solid tumors. This trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of oxaliplatin combined with doxorubicin in pediatric patients with recurrent solid tumors.

METHODS

Oxaliplatin was administered on day 1 and Doxorubicin on days 1-3 of each 21 day course. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Three dose levels were evaluated: (1) oxaliplatin 105 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2); (2) oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2); and (3) oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 25 mg/m(2). Dexrazoxane was administered at 10 times the doxorubicin dose prior to doxorubicin infusion.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled. Dose level 1 was the determined MTD. Grade 2 cardiac DLT was seen in one of six patients on dose level 1, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two of five patients on dose level 2, and one each of grade 2 cardiac and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in five patients on dose level 3. Cardiac DLT was only noted in patients with prior exposure to both anthracycline and chest radiation. No grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity or mucositis was seen. Objective responses were noted in two patients with neuroblastoma and one each of mixed germ cell tumor, thymic neuroendocrine carcinoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin 105 mg/m(2) on day 1 combined with doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2) days 1-3 was the MTD. This combination shows sufficient activity to justify further studies in select pediatric tumors.