Comparable survival for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with poor-risk cytogenetics following chemotherapy, matched related donor, or unrelated donor transplantation

Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative option for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies.

PROCEDURE

We present our 10-year experience (October 2012 to October 2021) of consecutive allo-HCT in patients with myeloid malignancies treated on the pediatric HCT service and conditioned with myeloablative targeted dose-busulfan (BU), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL). Twenty-three children, adolescents, and young adult patients (CAYA) (median age 15.4 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 17), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 4), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 2) underwent allo-HCT post-BU-FLU-MEL. Four patients had treatment-related AML/MDS. Donor/stem cell source was matched sibling donor (MSD) PBSC (n = 7), matched unrelated donor (MUD) PBSC (n = 2), umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 3), or haploidentical-BMT (n = 11). Risk stratification was low (n = 2), intermediate (n = 15), high (n = 3), and very high risk (n = 1). The two patients with CML had failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, the relapse rate is only 4.5% with an overall survival (OS) 100%, progression-free survival (PFS) 95.5%, and graft-versus-host-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) 67.8%. The donor source and the acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen significantly impacted grade II-IV aGvHD 66.7% versus 19.2% (p = .039) and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGvHD) 66.7% versus 0% (p = .002) in the patients receiving MSD or MUD PBSC compared to haplo-BMT, respectively, resulting in improved GRFS in haplo-BMT, 83.3% compared to 40% matched donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) (p = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that BU-FLU-MEL is efficacious conditioning for disease control in young patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing MSD or alternative donor allo-HCT, but in the setting of PBSC grafts with cyclosporine A-methotrexate (CSA-MTX) GvHD prophylaxis, it results in an unacceptably high incidence of GvHD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a meta-analysis

Identification of pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) candidates to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) is still a matter of debate. Currently, transplantation is reserved to patients considered at high risk of relapse based on cytogenetics, molecular biology, and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. However, no randomized clinical trial exists in the literature comparing transplantation with other types of consolidation therapy. Here, we provide an up-to-date meta-analysis of studies comparing allo-HSCT in CR1 with chemotherapy alone as a post-remission treatment in high-risk pediatric AML. The literature search strategy identified 10 cohorts from 9 studies performing as-treated analysis. The quantitative synthesis showed improved overall survival (OS) (relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.24; P = 0.0006) and disease-free survival (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.47; P = 0.0001) in the allo-HSCT group, with increased relapse rate in the chemotherapy group (relative risk, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; P = 0.006). Sensitivity analysis including prospective studies alone and excluding studies that reported the comparison only on intermediate-risk patients confirmed the benefit of allo-HSCT on OS. Further research should focus on individualizing allo-HSCT indications based on molecular stratification and MRD monitoring.

Efficacy of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Chemotherapy as Postremission Treatment of Children With Intermediate-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission

BACKGROUND

The role of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for children with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (IR-AML) in first complete remission has been controversial. The present study compared the effect of chemotherapy with unmanipulated haplo-HSCT as treatment of patients with IR-AML in first complete remission (CR1).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 80 children with IR-AML and compared the effects of chemotherapy (n = 47) with those of haplo-HSCT (n = 33) as treatment in CR1.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival, event-free survival (EFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 85.4% ± 4.1%, 73.2% ± 5.0%, and 25.4% ± 4.5%, respectively. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the patients in the haplo-HSCT group had a lower CIR (P = .059) and better EFS (P = .108), but roughly equivalent overall survival (P = .841). Multivariate analysis revealed chemotherapy and minimal residual disease (MRD) of ≥ 10^-3 after induction therapy as independent risk factors affecting CIR and EFS. EFS (P = .045) and CIR (P = .045) differed significantly between the 2 treatment groups in patients with MRD of ≥ 10^-3 after induction therapy.

CONCLUSION

Haplo-HSCT might be a feasible option for children with IR-AML in CR1, especially for patients with MRD of ≥ 10^-3 after induction therapy.

Treatment of Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Uruguay: Results of 2 Consecutive Protocols Over 20 Years

We evaluated the outcome of 71 children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia enrolled in 2 consecutive protocols in the main pediatric hospital in Uruguay. In the LAM97 protocol (n=34), patients received, as consolidation, autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), depending on the availability or not of a matched sibling donor. In the LAM08 protocol (n=37), patients were stratified into risk groups, autologous HSCT was abandoned, and allogeneic HSCT was limited to intermediate-risk patients with matched sibling donor and to all patients who fulfilled the high-risk criteria. Complete remission was achieved in 91% and 92% of patients in LAM97 and LAM08, respectively. Deaths in complete remission were 9.6% and 17.6%, respectively. The incidence of relapse was significantly higher in LAM97, 35.4%, versus 12.5% in LAM08. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival were 50.0% and 55.9% in LAM97 and 59.9% and 64.8% in LAM08. The 5-year overall survival rates in each of the risk groups were 85.7% and 100% for low risk, 50.0% and 61.2% for intermediate risk, and 42.9% and 50.0% for high risk in LAM97 and LAM08 protocols, respectively. Survival has improved over the last 2 decades, and results are comparable to those published in Europe and North America.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children and adolescents with high-risk cytogenetic AML: distinctly poor outcomes of FUS-ERG-positive cases

Allocating patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HR-AML) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is part of the standard treatment protocol; however, whether allo-HSCT truly improves the outcomes in these patients is debatable. Data on 169 children and adolescents with HR-AML who received their first allo-HSCT in first or second remission between 2000 and 2015 were extracted from a nationwide, Japanese HSCT registry. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 46.8-62.9%) and 69.6% (61.4-76.3%), respectively, for all the HR-AML patients. In univariate analysis, the cytogenetic subgroup had a significant impact on both the DFS (P = 0.011) and OS (P < 0.001) rates. In particular, 14 patients with t(16;21) showed an extremely poor outcome. Additionally, older age at allo-HSCT (10-19 years old, P = 0.025), myeloablative conditioning with total-body irradiation (P = 0.019), and grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, P = 0.049) were associated with inferior OS. The donor type and occurrence of chronic GVHD did not affect the outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed t(16;21) to be associated with increased overall mortality (hazard ratio = 4.416, P < 0.001). Because the outcome of patients with certain HR-AML subgroups, such as t(16;21)-positive cases, is extremely poor even with allo-HSCT in remission, a novel therapy is urgently required.

Comparison of survival outcome between donor types or stem cell sources for childhood acute myeloid leukemia after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter retrospective study of Study Alliance of Yeungnam Pediatric Hematology-oncology

We compared transplant outcomes between donor types and stem cell sources for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The medical records of children with AML in the Yeungnam region of Korea from January 2000 to June 2017 were reviewed. In all, 76 children with AML (male-to-female ratio = 46:30) received allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In total, 29 patients received HSCT from either a matched-related donor or a mismatched-related donor, 32 patients received an unrelated donor, and 15 patients received umbilical cord blood. In term of stem cell sources, bone marrow was used in 15 patients and peripheral blood in 46 patients. For all HSCT cases, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 73.1% (95% CI: 62.7-83.5) and the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 66.1% (95% CI: 54.5-77.7). There was no statistical difference in 5-year OS according to the donor types or stem cell sources (P = .869 and P = .911). There was no statistical difference in 5-year EFS between donor types or stem cell sources (P = .526 and P = .478). For all HSCT cases, the 5-year relapse rate was 16.1% (95% CI: 7.3-24.9) and the 5-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 13.3% (95% CI: 5.1-21.5). There was no statistical difference in the 5-year relapse rate according to the donor types or stem cell sources (P = .971 and P = .965). There was no statistical difference in the 5-year NRM between donor types or stem cell sources (P = .461 and P = .470).

Decreased relapsed rate and treatment-related mortality contribute to improved outcomes for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in successive clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved over the past 20 years even though the medications used for induction therapy have not changed.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from patients with AML who were enrolled in successive protocols (AML97 and AML02) to determine the contributors to the improved outcomes of the latter clinical trial.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in 5-year overall survival (48.9% vs 71.2%; P < .0001) and event-free survival (43.5% vs 61.8%; P = .002) from AML97 to AML02. The 5-year cumulative incidence of early death (ED)/treatment-related mortality (TRM) was reduced for patients treated in AML02 (18.5% vs 7.9%; P = .007). Although the overall incidence of refractory disease (6.5% vs 5.6%; P = .736) and relapse (29.3% vs 21.0%; P = .12) did not differ between the 2 studies, patients with low-risk AML who were treated in AML02 had a reduced incidence of relapse (27.3% vs 8.8%; P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved outcomes of the AML02 trial resulted from improved disease control for low-risk patients and overall decreased ED/TRM. These results emphasize the importance of supportive-care measures throughout chemotherapy courses and hematopoietic cell transplantation and the value of treatment intensity for patients with low-risk AML while underscoring the need for novel therapy, rather than increased therapy intensity, for children with high-risk AML. Cancer 2017;123:3791-3798. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Cytogenetics and outcome of allogeneic transplantation in first remission of acute myeloid leukemia: the French pediatric experience

We analyzed the impact of cytogenetics on 193 children enrolled in two successive French trials (LAME89/91 and ELAM02), who received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during CR1. Detailed karyotype was available for 66/74 (89%) in LAME89/91 and 118/119 (99%) in ELAM02. Several karyotype and transplant characteristics differed according to therapeutic protocol: unfavorable karyotypes were more frequent in ELAM02 (36% vs 18%), pretransplant chemotherapy included high-dose cytarabine in ELAM02 and not in LAME89/91, IV replaced oral busulfan in the conditioning regimen, methotrexate was removed from post-transplant immunosuppression, and matched unrelated donor and cord blood transplantation were introduced. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 78.2% in LAME89 and 81.4% in ELAM02. OS was significantly lower for the unfavorable cytogenetic risk group in LAME89/91 when compared with intermediate and favorable groups (50% vs 90.6 and 86.4%, P=0.001). This difference was no longer apparent in ELAM02 (80.9% vs 71.3% and 5/5, respectively). Survival improvement for children with unfavorable karyotype was statistically significant (P=0.026) and was due to decrease in relapse risk. Five-year transplantation-related mortality was 6.75% in LAME89/91. In ELAM02, it was 3.2% for patients with a sibling donor and 10.9% with an unrelated donor or cord blood. We conclude that the outcome of children with unfavorable karyotype transplanted in CR1 has improved.

Advances in treatment of de-novo pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the current management of de-novo pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML), excluding promyelocytic leukemia and myeloid neoplasms of patients with constitutional trisomy 21. The biology of pediatric AML, which differs from that of its adult counterpart, is briefly discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although survival of childhood AML has improved substantially over the past 40 years, progress has reached a plateau. Pediatric AML comprises several subtypes with diverse prognosis. Currently, about 35% of patients die of the disease, and survivors have many debilitating late effects. Clinical trials reported over the past 5 years have revealed several therapeutic concepts. First, initial intensive myelosuppressive chemotherapy is necessary to sufficiently reduce minimal residual disease and is associated with improved disease-free survival. Second, postremission chemotherapy with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is necessary to eradicate AML. Third, central nervous system leukemia can be adequately managed with intrathecal chemotherapy and rarely requires radiotherapy. Finally, small differences in survival among clinical trials are explained by patient selection and quality of supportive care.

SUMMARY

The most crucial steps for progress are greater understanding of the biology of pediatric AML and introduction of new agents targeting specific AML subtypes and age-specific factors.

Similar outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donor and umbilical cord blood vs. sibling donor for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: Multicenter experience in China

In a multicenter study, we have conducted a retrospective study on 73 pediatric AML patients who were primary refractory or in greater than CR1 and investigated MSD (or MMSD) (n = 20), URD (n = 23), and UCB (n = 30) HCT between January 1998 and October 2009. The median day to neutrophil engraftment was similar in all groups. The median day to platelet engraftment was longer in the UCB group. The number of HLA mismatch was higher in the UCB group (p = 0.034); however, the cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was not different among all groups (p = 0.125); furthermore, cGVHD was lower in the UCB group (p = 0.078). The risk of relapse did not differ among all groups (RR = 1.28, p = 0.125), but the patients of MSD (or MMSD) grafts had a trend of higher risk recurrence. Sixty-two patients survived with a median follow-up of 58.2 months. Five-yr LFS was 73.1%, 59.8%, and 59.6% for URD, UCB, and MSD (or MMDS), respectively (p = 0.426). Five-yr LFS in CR1 was 68.9%, with a significantly better result compared to 41.7% in CR2 (p = 0.025). Our comparisons suggest that pediatric AML patients receiving UCB had a higher early TRM, a lower cGVHD rate, and a similar long-term survival. The outcome of URD and UCB is comparable to that of a suitable sibling for pediatric AML.

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients

The objectives of this review were to discuss standard and investigational treatment strategies for adolescent and young adult with acute myeloid leukemia, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescent and young adult patients (AYAs) may need a different type of therapy than those currently used in children and older patients. As soon as AML is diagnosed, AYA patient should be offered to participate in well-designed clinical trials. The standard treatment approach for AYAs with AML is remission induction chemotherapy with an anthracycline/cytarabine combination, followed by either consolidation chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation, depending on the ability of the patient to tolerate intensive treatment and cytogenetic features. Presently, continuing progress of novel drugs targeting specific pathways in acute leukemia may bring AML treatment into a new era.

Pediatric AML: From Biology to Clinical Management

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents 15%-20% of all pediatric acute leukemias. Survival rates have increased over the past few decades to ~70%, due to improved supportive care, optimized risk stratification and intensified chemotherapy. In most children, AML presents as a de novo entity, but in a minority, it is a secondary malignancy. The diagnostic classification of pediatric AML includes a combination of morphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotyping and molecular genetics. Outcome is mainly dependent on the initial response to treatment and molecular and cytogenetic aberrations. Treatment consists of a combination of intensive anthracycline- and cytarabine-containing chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in selected genetic high-risk cases or slow responders. In general, ~30% of all pediatric AML patients will suffer from relapse, whereas 5%-10% of the patients will die due to disease complications or the side-effects of the treatment. Targeted therapy may enhance anti-leukemic efficacy and minimize treatment-related morbidity and mortality, but requires detailed knowledge of the genetic abnormalities and aberrant pathways involved in leukemogenesis. These efforts towards future personalized therapy in a rare disease, such as pediatric AML, require intensive international collaboration in order to enhance the survival rates of pediatric AML, while aiming to reduce long-term toxicity.

Pediatric AML: From Biology to Clinical Management

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents 15%–20% of all pediatric acute leukemias. Survival rates have increased over the past few decades to ~70%, due to improved supportive care, optimized risk stratification and intensified chemotherapy. In most children, AML presents as a de novo entity, but in a minority, it is a secondary malignancy. The diagnostic classification of pediatric AML includes a combination of morphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotyping and molecular genetics. Outcome is mainly dependent on the initial response to treatment and molecular and cytogenetic aberrations. Treatment consists of a combination of intensive anthracycline- and cytarabine-containing chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in selected genetic high-risk cases or slow responders. In general, ~30% of all pediatric AML patients will suffer from relapse, whereas 5%–10% of the patients will die due to disease complications or the side-effects of the treatment. Targeted therapy may enhance anti-leukemic efficacy and minimize treatment-related morbidity and mortality, but requires detailed knowledge of the genetic abnormalities and aberrant pathways involved in leukemogenesis. These efforts towards future personalized therapy in a rare disease, such as pediatric AML, require intensive international collaboration in order to enhance the survival rates of pediatric AML, while aiming to reduce long-term toxicity.

A critical review of which children with acute myeloid leukaemia need stem cell procedures

The last decades have seen parallel improvements in chemotherapy-based and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) regimens for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in children. There has been no consensus on indication for HSCT. Reserving HSCT for high-risk and relapsed patients spare many patients from the long-term toxicity of this treatment. The results of matched unrelated donor HSCT equal family donor transplantation and the presence of a matched sibling should no longer be a transplant indication. Minimal residual disease measured by flow cytometry may identify poor responders benefitting from HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) and those with a favourable response to induction therapy who do not need HSCT even with adverse cytogenetic aberrations. FLT3-internal tandem duplication without NPM1 mutation has a very high relapse rate despite favourable response and HSCT is indicated in CR1 in these cases. Finding the optimal indications for HSCT is a delicate balance between risk of relapse and late effects.

Transplantation for children with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparison of outcomes with reduced intensity and myeloablative regimens

The safety and efficacy of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for the treatment of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia is unknown. We compared the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in children with acute myeloid leukemia using RIC regimens with those receiving myeloablative-conditioning (MAC) regimens. A total of 180 patients were evaluated (39 with RIC and 141 with MAC regimens). Results of univariate and multivariate analysis showed no significant differences in the rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, leukemia-free, and overall survival between treatment groups. The 5-year probabilities of overall survival with RIC and MAC regimens were 45% and 48%, respectively (P = .99). Moreover, relapse rates were not higher with RIC compared with MAC regimens (39% vs 39%; P = .95), and recipients of MAC regimens were not at higher risk for transplant-related mortality compared with recipients of RIC regimens (16% vs 16%; P = .73). After carefully controlled analyses, we found that in this relatively modest study population, the data supported a role for RIC regimens for acute myeloid leukemia in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The data also provided justification for designing a carefully controlled randomized clinical trial that examines the efficacy of regimen intensity in this population.