Vincristine toxicity with co-administration of fluconazole: Long-term concerns

Unlocking New Therapeutic Options for Vincristine-Induced Neuropathic Pain: The Impact of Preclinical Research

Vincristine, a vinca alkaloid, is used in chemotherapy protocols for cancers such as acute leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, neuroblastoma, cervical carcinoma, lymphomas, breast cancer, and melanoma. Among the common adverse effects of vincristine is peripheral neuropathy, with most patients receiving a cumulative dose over 4 mg/m2 who develop varying degrees of sensory neuropathy. The onset of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy can greatly affect patients' quality of life, often requiring dose adjustments or the discontinuation of treatment. Moreover, managing vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy is challenging, with few effective therapeutic strategies available. In the past decade, preclinical studies have explored diverse substances aimed at preventing or alleviating VIPN. Our review consolidates these findings, focusing on the analgesic efficacy and potential mechanisms of various agents, including pharmaceutical drugs, natural compounds, and antioxidants, that show promise in reducing neuropathic pain and protecting neural integrity in preclinical models. Key novel therapeutic options, such as metabolic agents (liraglutide), enzyme inhibitors (ulinastatin), antipsychotics (aripiprazole), interleukin-1 receptor antagonists (anakinra), hormones (oxytocin), and antioxidants (thioctic acid), are highlighted for their neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects. Through this synthesis, we aim to enhance the current understanding of VIPN management by identifying pharmacological strategies that target critical molecular pathways, laying the groundwork for future clinical studies. By clarifying these novel pharmacological approaches and elucidating their mechanisms of action, this review provides a foundation for developing more effective VIPN treatment strategies to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Genomic variations associated with risk and protection against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common and highly debilitating toxicity from vincristine treatment that affects quality of life and often requires dose reduction, potentially affecting survival. Although previous studies demonstrated genetic factors are associated with vincristine neuropathy risk, the clinical relevance of most identified variants is limited by small sample sizes and unclear clinical phenotypes. A genome-wide association study was conducted in 1100 cases and controls matched by vincristine dose and genetic ancestry, uncovering a statistically significant (p < 5.0 × 10-8) variant in MCM3AP gene that substantially increases the risk of neuropathy and 12 variants protective against neuropathy within/near SPDYA, METTL8, PDE4D, FBN2, ZFAND3, NFIB, PAPPA, LRRTM3, NRG3, VTI1A, ARHGAP5, and ACTN1. A follow-up pathway analysis reveals the involvement of four key pathways, including nerve structure and development, myelination, neuronal transmission, and cytoskeleton/microfibril function pathways. These findings present potential actionable genomic markers of vincristine neuropathy and offer opportunities for tailored interventions to improve vincristine safety in children with cancer. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the title National Active Surveillance Network and Pharmacogenomics of Adverse Drug Reactions in Children (ID NCT00414115, registered on December 21, 2006).

Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy in Patients Diagnosed with Solid and Hematological Malignancies: The Role of Dose Rounding

BACKGROUND

Vincristine is a vital constituent of chemotherapeutic regimens. Vincristine-induced neuropathy is a challenging adverse effect that impacts quality of life and treatment course. The dose rounding of chemotherapies is a strategy that is commonly used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the frequency of developed neuropathy in vincristine first-time users and the potential association with dose rounding remains elusive.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients administered vincristine for the first time between 2016 and 2022 using the King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) database. Patients were stratified into pediatric and adult groups. Neuropathy frequency, its association with demographic and clinical parameters, and the Impact of dose rounding were assessed using SPSS software version 28.

RESULTS

Approximately 34.6% of patients were diagnosed with neuropathy after vincristine administration. Autonomic neuropathy was common among affected adults and pediatric patients (55.1% and 56.1%, respectively), while cranial neuropathy was more frequent in pediatric patients. Higher BSA (p = 0.038) and Scr (p = 0.044) in the pediatric group, the presence of respiratory comorbidities (p = 0.044), and the use of azole antifungals (p < 0.001) in the adult group were significantly associated with neuropathy episodes. The rounding-up of vincristine doses was significantly associated with increased neuropathy occurrence (p < 0.001), while dose rounding-down was significantly associated with a decrease in neuropathy in both groups of patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that autonomic neuropathy is the most common vincristine-related neuropathy, regardless of the patient's age. Dose rounding is a significant determinant of vincristine-induced neuropathy in both groups. Further studies are needed to evaluate the variables that exacerbate or prevent neuropathy associated with the first-time use of vincristine.

Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (VIPN) in Pediatric Tumors: Mechanisms, Risk Factors, Strategies of Prevention and Treatment

Vincristine-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (VIPN) is a very common side effect of vincristine chemotherapy among pediatric patients with cancer. Neuropathy may be sensory, motor and/or autonomic, with consequent reduction, delay or discontinuation of vincristine-chemotherapy, but also pain, disability, reduced quality of life of patients and an increase in medical costs. Vincristine acts out its antineoplastic function by altering the normal assembly and disassembly of microtubules, with their consequent mitosis block and death. Vincristine leads to VIPN through a complex mechanism of damage, which occurs not only on the microtubules, but also on the endothelium and the mitochondria of nerve cells. Furthermore, both patient-related risk factors (age, race, ethnicity and genetic polymorphisms) and treatment-related risk factors (dose, time of infusion and drug-drug interactions) are involved in the pathogenesis of VIPN. There is a lack of consensus about the prophylaxis and treatment of VIPN among pediatric oncologic patients, despite several molecules (such as gabapentin, pyridoxine and pyridostigmine, glutamic acid and glutamine) having been already investigated in clinical trials. This review describes the molecular mechanisms of VIPN and analyzes the risk factors and the principal drugs adopted for the prophylaxis and treatment of VIPN in pediatric patients with cancer.

Severe Neuropathic Pain With Concomitant Administration of Vincristine and Posaconazole

Vincristine is a chemotherapeutic agent with a potential toxicity of sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Patients receiving chemotherapy are in an immunocompromised state and may require antifungal agents. Triazole antifungals are known inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Vincristine is a known CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 substrate, and concomitant administration with fluconazole or voriconazole has been reported to increase vincristine toxicity and peripheral neuropathy, but there is limited literature on posaconazole in this regard. This 5-year-old girl with pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia received vincristine while receiving posaconazole for a mucormycosis infection and developed unexpectedly severe peripheral neuropathy. After recovery, the child continued on mucormycosis prophylaxis with posaconazole with instructions to hold for 2 days before and on the day of vincristine administration. This case illustrates the potentiating effect that posaconazole had on vincristine-associated neurotoxicity, and our approach to mitigating that negative interaction.