Routine surveillance imaging after end of therapy for pediatric extracranial tumors: A retrospective analysis

The significance of surveillance imaging in children with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma

Primary bone tumors in children and adolescents, while rare, pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Children treated for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are offered a 5-year follow-up program after end of treatment, including radiological surveillance of primary location of tumor and the lungs. There is no consensus regarding how often and how the children should be followed with radiological imaging. This retrospective descriptive study of 69 patients (34 with Ewing sarcoma and 35 with osteosarcoma) investigated the consequences of abnormal findings in 1279 follow-up images. Nine relapses were detected, 4 in the Ewing group (3 local and 1 pulmonary) and 5 in the osteosarcoma group (1 local and 4 pulmonary). Of these, only two patients exhibited symptomatic relapses, with the remainder identified through imaging. The positive predictive value for relapse detection was 0.44 in the Ewing group, and 0.5 in the osteosarcoma group. In the Ewing sarcoma patient image follow-up program, the probability of anomaly detection was 12% (95% CI, 10-15). For osteosarcoma patients, the likelihood was 6% (95% CI, 4-8). Our data indicates that abnormal findings on follow-up images rarely represents relapse of tumor. As the surveillance protocol differs between the patient groups, wherein Ewing sarcoma patients primarily are monitored through MRI while osteosarcoma patients are predominantly tracked via X-rays, there is an increased occurrence of incidental findings in the first group. However, it is imperative to interpret imaging data in conjunction with clinical information, avoiding isolated reliance on imaging results when making treatment decisions.

A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Regular off-treatment imaging is often used to assess for recurrence of disease after childhood cancer treatment. It is unclear if this increases survival, or what burden surveillance places on patients, families, or health-care services. This systematic review examines the impact of routine surveillance imaging after treatment of pediatric extracranial solid tumors.

METHODS

Collaborative patient and public involvement informed the design and interpretation of this work. Thirteen electronic databases, conference proceedings, and trial registries were searched alongside reference list checking and forward citation searching from 1990 onwards. Studies were screened and data were extracted by two researchers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified ROBINS-I tool. Relevant outcomes were overall survival, psychological distress indicators, number of imaging tests, cost-effectiveness, and qualitative data regarding experiences of surveillance programs. PROSPERO (CRD42018103764).

RESULTS

Of 17 727 records identified, 55 studies of 10 207 patients were included. All studies used observational methods. Risk of bias for all except one study was moderate, serious, or critical. Data were too few to conduct meta-analysis; however, narrative synthesis was performed. Surveillance strategies varied, and poorly reported, involving many scans and substantial radiation exposure (eg, neuroblastoma, median 133.5 mSv). For most diseases, surveillance imaging was not associated with increased overall survival, with the probable exception of Wilms tumor. No qualitative or psychological distress data were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of routine surveillance imaging on survival in most pediatric extracranial solid tumors. More high-quality data are required, preferably through randomized controlled trials with well-conducted qualitative elements.

Does routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood solid tumours cause more harm than good? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

This systemic review aims to synthesise the current literature surrounding off-therapy surveillance imaging in children and young people with extra-cranial solid tumours, with a view to establishing if routine imaging studies after treatment for childhood cancer increase overall survival, increase the psychological distress caused to patients and families, result in other harms to patients and are cost-effective strategies. Within this manuscript, we also describe how patient and public involvement has impacted upon the protocol.

METHODS

The search will cover thirteen different databases, key conference proceedings and trial registers, as well as reference lists and forward citations of included papers. Prominent authors/clinicians in the field will be contacted. A full search strategy is provided. The study designs to be included in the review will be added in an iterative way (RCTs, quasi-randomised trials, prospective cohorts and retrospective cohorts). Qualitative studies will also be eligible for inclusion. We will include studies which examine a programme of surveillance imaging that aims to detect relapse in children or young people up to age 25 years who have completed treatment for a malignant extracranial solid tumour and have no evidence of active and ongoing disease at end of treatment. The primary outcome is overall survival, with secondary outcomes including psychological distress indicators, number of imaging tests performed, other harms of imaging and cost-effectiveness measures. Studies will be screened and data extracted by two researchers. Studies will be critically appraised using a stratified version of the ROBINS-I tool. Where appropriate, data will be synthesised using a random effects meta-analysis. A detailed analysis plan, including assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias, is provided.

DISCUSSION

The aim of routine surveillance imaging is to detect recurrence of disease before clinical symptoms and signs develop. Some studies have suggested that most relapses of childhood cancer are detected due to clinical symptoms or signs, particularly in those with extra-cranial solid tumours, and when these relapses are detected by imaging, there is no increase in survival. This review aims to establish whether routine surveillance imaging is beneficial, as well as evaluating the potential negative impacts of surveillance programmes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018103764.