Phase I study of vinblastine and temsirolimus in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: Canadian Cancer Trials Group Study IND.218

Advances in the treatment of solid tumors in children and adolescents

Tumor is one of the leading causes of death in children (0 to 14-year-old) and adolescents (15 to 19-year-old) worldwide. Unlike adult tumors, childhood and adolescent tumors are unique in their type, molecular characteristics, and pathogenesis, and their treatment involves many challenges. In recent years, with the development of a large number of clinical studies, the survival rate of children and adolescents with tumors has improved significantly. The extensive research and application of optimized treatment regimens and new targeted drugs have led to new hope for the treatment of childhood and adolescent tumors. This article reviews the clinical and basic research and treatment of childhood and adolescent tumors and provides new ideas for the future development of precise treatment of childhood and adolescent tumors.

SFCE-RAPIRI Phase I Study of Rapamycin Plus Irinotecan: A New Way to Target Intra-Tumor Hypoxia in Pediatric Refractory Cancers

Simple Summary

More and more relapsing or refractory pediatric cancers are described to present hypoxic features linked to a worse outcome. Therefore, the aim of our phase I study RAPIRI was the targeting of the central node mTor/HIF-1α with rapamycin plus irinotecan and determine the appropriated dose of this combination. As expected, the tolerance was optimal across all dose levels and no maximum tolerated dose of both drugs was reached. The pharmacokinetics (PK) helped us to refine the doses to use in the future phase II trial and the importance of PK follow-up in such combination. We also confirmed in almost half of the interpretable patients for tumor response a non-progressive disease. All those observations additionally to the ancillary’s studies provide strong evidence to propose a next trial focusing on brain tumors and sarcomas and using biweekly 125 mg/m² irinotecan dose with a PK follow-up and a rapamycin dose of 1.5 mg/m²/day, reaching a blood concentration above 10 µg/L.

Abstract

Hypoxic environment is a prognostic factor linked in pediatric cancers to a worse outcome, favoring tumor progression and resistance to treatments. The activation of mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin (mTor)/hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α pathway can be targeted by rapamycin and irinotecan, respectively. Therefore, we designed a phase I trial associating both drugs in pediatric refractory/relapsing solid tumors. Patients were enrolled according to a 3 + 3 escalation design with ten levels, aiming to determine the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) of rapamycin plus irinotecan. Rapamycin was administered orally once daily in a 28-day cycle (1 to 2.5 mg/m²/day), associating biweekly intravenous irinotecan (125 to 240 mg/m²/dose). Toxicities, pharmacokinetics, efficacy analyses, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Forty-two patients, aged from 2 to 18 years, were included. No MTD was reached. Adverse events were mild to moderate. Only rapamycin doses of 1.5 mg/m²/day reached over time clinically active plasma concentrations. Tumor responses and prolonged stable disease were associated with a mean irinotecan area under the curve of more than 400 min.mg/L. Fourteen out of 31 (45.1%) patients had a non-progressive disease at 8 weeks. Most of them were sarcomas and brain tumors. For the phase II trial, we can then propose biweekly 125 mg/m² irinotecan dose with a pharmacokinetic (PK) follow-up and a rapamycin dose of 1.5 mg/m²/day, reaching a blood concentration above 10 µg/L.

Mitotic Poisons in Research and Medicine

Cancer is one of the greatest challenges of the modern medicine. Although much effort has been made in the development of novel cancer therapeutics, it still remains one of the most common causes of human death in the world, mainly in low and middle-income countries. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), cancer treatment services are not available in more then 70% of low-income countries (90% of high-income countries have them available), and also approximately 70% of cancer deaths are reported in low-income countries. Various approaches on how to combat cancer diseases have since been described, targeting cell division being among them. The so-called mitotic poisons are one of the cornerstones in cancer therapies. The idea that cancer cells usually divide almost uncontrolled and far more rapidly than normal cells have led us to think about such compounds that would take advantage of this difference and target the division of such cells. Many groups of such compounds with different modes of action have been reported so far. In this review article, the main approaches on how to target cancer cell mitosis are described, involving microtubule inhibition, targeting aurora and polo-like kinases and kinesins inhibition. The main representatives of all groups of compounds are discussed and attention has also been paid to the presence and future of the clinical use of these compounds as well as their novel derivatives, reviewing the finished and ongoing clinical trials.

A phase I study of sirolimus in combination with metronomic therapy (CHOAnome) in children with recurrent or refractory solid and brain tumors

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and response of sirolimus combined with oral metronomic therapy in pediatric patients with recurrent and refractory solid and brain tumors.

PROCEDURE

Patients younger than 30 years of age with recurrent, refractory, or high-risk solid and brain tumors were eligible. Patients received six-week cycles of sirolimus with twice daily celecoxib, and alternating etoposide and cyclophosphamide every three weeks, with Bayesian dose escalation over four dose levels (NCT01331135).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled: four on dose level (DL) 1, four on DL2, eight on DL3, and two on DL4. Diagnoses included solid tumors (Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, rhabdoid tumor, retinoblastoma) and brain tumors (glioblastoma multiforme [GBM], diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, high-grade glioma [HGG], medulloblastoma, ependymoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, low-grade infiltrative astrocytoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, nongerminomatous germ cell tumor]. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 4 neutropenia) was observed on DL2, two DLTs (grade 3 abdominal pain and grade 3 mucositis) on DL3, and two DLTs (grade 3 dehydration and grade 3 mucositis) on DL4. The recommended phase II dose of sirolimus was 2 mg/m² (DL3). Best response was stable disease (SD) in eight patients, and partial response (PR) in one patient with GBM. A patient with HGG was removed from the study with SD and developed PR without further therapy. Western blot analysis showed inhibition of phospho-S6 kinase in all patients during the first cycle of therapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of sirolimus with metronomic chemotherapy is well tolerated in children. A phase II trial of this combination is ongoing.