Comparison of myelosuppression using the D-index between children and adolescents/young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during induction chemotherapy

Revisiting the Real-World Prognosis of Intensive Chemotherapy in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Retrospective Analysis from Tokyo

We investigated whether reduced intensity-chemotherapy (IC) is associated with decreased toxicity and longer overall survival (OS) in elderly AML patients. Age-dependent dose-reduced IC was administered to 110 AML patients between 2004 and 2021. We assessed myelosuppressive toxicity, clinical efficacy, and safety of our regimen using the depth index (D-index). Patients of 66-79 years of age (younger elderly [YE], n = 52) and ≥ 80 years (older elderly [OE], n = 19) were compared to a control group of patients of ≤ 65 years of age (n = 39). Although no significant differences were observed in the number of days with neutrophil count < 500/µl, the D-index, or the onset of sepsis among the groups, OS significantly differed (median OS: control, 578 days [317 days-NA]; YE, 281 days [158-515 days]; OE, 185 days [72-373 days]; p = 0.0001). IC for elderly AML patients achieved negative treatment outcomes despite a reduction in myelosuppressive toxicity, with no data beyond a median OS of 14.7 months for Azacytidine + Venetoclax therapy in a phase 3 VIALE-A trial. Although the findings were negative, the present results provide insights into appropriate IC regimens for elderly AML patients in the future.

Early Discharge of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients During Induction Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Is It Safe?

There is a lack of consensus for safely discharging adolescent and young adults (AYA) with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. From 2017 to 2019 we evaluated predefined early discharge criteria for 41 AYA patients during induction chemotherapy. Only 17% (7/41) of patients met criteria for early discharge. Two (29%) patients who were discharged early were readmitted, but not to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This outcome was compared to a historic cohort at our institution of 73 patients who were discharged without predefined discharge criteria. Twenty-seven (37%, p = 0.7) patients were readmitted, but 13 (48%) were readmitted to the PICU (p = 0.004).

Impact of Blinatumomab Treatment on Bone Marrow Function in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Myelosuppression is a side effect of chemotherapy, in which the production of red and white blood cells and platelets is reduced, increasing risk of infections. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE^®) molecule, is a novel anticancer drug that kills acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells while sparing majority of the normal bone marrow cells. Results from our study, which compared the effects of blinatumomab treatment with chemotherapy on bone marrow function in a large number of patients with ALL, indicated that the decrease in blood cell counts was more severe and lasted longer after chemotherapy compared with blinatumomab treatment, in which the effects were transient. Survival in patients treated with blinatumomab achieving complete remission was more similar between those with incomplete recovery of blood cell counts versus those with complete blood cell counts than the corresponding survival outcomes seen with chemotherapy. In conclusion, blinatumomab treatment caused transient myelosuppression when compared with chemotherapy.

Abstract

Association of blinatumomab treatment with myelosuppression was examined in this study. Peripheral blood counts were assessed prior to, during, and after blinatumomab treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph−) B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 267) and Ph+ BCP-ALL (n = 45) from the TOWER and ALCANTARA studies, respectively, or chemotherapy in patients with Ph− BCP-ALL (n = 109) from the TOWER study; all the patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL and responders achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with partial/incomplete hematological recovery (CRh/CRi) were evaluated. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in patients achieving CR and CRh/CRi. Median leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts increased during two blinatumomab cycles but remained low longer after chemotherapy. Among the responders, there was a trend that a greater proportion of patients achieved CR with blinatumomab (Ph−, 76.5%; Ph+, 77.8%) versus with chemotherapy (Ph−, 63.6%). In the TOWER study, the survival prognosis for patients achieving CRh/CRi versus CR with blinatumomab was more similar (median OS, 11.9 (95% CI, 3.9–not estimable (NE)) vs. 15.0 (95% CI, 10.4–NE) months, p = 0.062) than with chemotherapy (5.2 (95% CI, 1.6–NE) vs. 18.9 (95% CI, 9.3–NE) months, p = 0.013). Blinatumomab treatment, with only temporary and transient myelosuppression, resulted in a greater survival benefit than chemotherapy.