Second-trimester Down syndrome maternal serum marker screening: a prospective study of 11 040 twin pregnancies

Multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus in a retrospective cohort of 141 patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple pregnancy with a complete hydatidiform mole and a normal fetus is prone to severe obstetrical complications and malignant transformation after birth. Prognostic information is limited for this rare form of gestational trophoblastic disease.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine obstetrical outcomes and the risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in women with multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus, and to identify risk factors for poor obstetrical and oncological outcomes to improve patient information and management.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective national cohort study of 11,411 records from the French National Center for Trophoblastic Disease registered between January 2001 and January 2022.

RESULTS

Among 11,411 molar pregnancies, 141 involved histologically confirmed multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus. Roughly a quarter of women (23%; 33/141) decided to terminate pregnancy because of presumed poor prognosis or by choice. Among the 77% of women (108/141) who continued their pregnancy, 16% of pregnancies (17/108) were terminated because of maternal complications, and 37% (40/108) ended in spontaneous miscarriage before 24 weeks' gestation. The median gestational age at delivery in the remaining 47% of pregnancies (51/108) was 32 weeks. The overall neonatal survival rate at day 8 was 36% (39/108; 95% confidence interval, 27-46) after excluding elective pregnancy terminations. Patients with free beta human chorionic gonadotropin levels <10 multiples of the median were significantly more likely to reach 24 weeks' gestation compared with those with free beta human chorionic gonadotropin levels >10 multiples of the median (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-36.5; P=.022). A lower free beta human chorionic gonadotropin level was also associated with better early neonatal survival (the median free beta human chorionic gonadotropin level was 9.4 multiples of the median in patients whose child was alive at day 8 vs 20.0 multiples of the median in those whose child was deceased; P=.02). The overall rate of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after a multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and a normal fetus was 26% (35/136; 95% confidence interval, 19-34). All 35 patients had low-risk International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics scores, and the cure rate was 100%. Termination of pregnancy on patient request was not associated with lower risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Maternal complications such as preeclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage were not associated with higher risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, and neither were high human chorionic gonadotropin levels or newborn survival at day 8.

CONCLUSION

Multiple pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting fetus carries a high risk of obstetrical complications. In patients who continued their pregnancy, approximately one-third of neonates were alive at day 8, and roughly 1 in 4 patients developed gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Therefore, the risk of malignant transformation appears to be higher compared with singleton complete moles. Low levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin may be indicative of better early neonatal survival, and this relationship warrants further study.

Cell-free DNA screening in twin pregnancies

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for fetal aneuploidies is clinically available and exhibits better performance than conventional serum screening tests. However, data on the clinical performance of cfDNA screening in twin pregnancies are limited. In this review, we summarized the clinical performance and evaluated the feasibility of cfDNA screening in twin pregnancies based on recent studies and recommendations. The performance of cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies is similar to that in singleton pregnancies. Specifically, cfDNA screening has a higher detection rate and lower false-positive rate compared with conventional serum screening. Consequently, recent international guidelines from several academic communities have recommended that cfDNA screening for aneuploidy in twin pregnancies could be considered. Moreover, twin pregnancies can present with specific conditions, such as different zygosities and vanishing twins; therefore, individualized counseling and management are required. Further clinical studies with more twin pregnancies are required for a more accurate analysis.

Prenatal Genetic Screening in Twin Pregnancy

Twin pregnancy presents unique considerations for aneuploidy screening. Pre-test counseling regarding benefits, alternatives, and options for aneuploidy screening should be provided to all patients carrying twin pregnancy. This article aims to review the options for aneuploidy screening in twin pregnancy including the potential benefits and limitations.

Non-invasive cell-free DNA prenatal screening for trisomy 21 as part of primary screening strategy in twin pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

The performance of non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy is underevaluated, while serum marker-based strategies yield poor results. This study aimed to assess the performance of non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy as a first-tier test. Secondary objectives were to assess its failure rate and factors associated with failure.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included twin pregnancies in which non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA was performed as the primary screening strategy between May 2017 and October 2019. We used the NIPT VeriSeq® test for in-vitro diagnosis and set a fetal fraction cut-off of 4% for monochorionic pregnancies and 8% for dichorionic ones. Clinical data and pregnancy outcome were collected from physicians or midwives via a questionnaire or were retrieved directly on-site. We calculated the performance of non-invasive cell-free DNA screening for trisomy 21, analyzed its failure rate and assessed potentially associated factors.

RESULTS

Among 1885 twin pregnancies with follow-up, there were six (0.32%) confirmed cases of trisomy 21. The sensitivity of non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 was 100% (95% CI, 54.1-100%) and the false-positive rate was 0.23% (95% CI, 0.06-0.59%). The primary failure rate was 4.6%, with 4.0% being due to insufficient fetal fraction. A successful result was obtained for 65.4% of women who underwent a new blood draw, reducing the overall failure rate to 2.8%. Maternal body mass index, gestational age at screening as well as chorionicity were significantly associated with the risk of failure.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence of the high performance, at an extremely low false-positive rate, of non-invasive prenatal screening in twins as part of a primary screening strategy for trisomy 21. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonographic findings and poor prenatal diagnosis rates for twin pregnancies: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly used in the clinical prenatal screening of twin pregnancies, and its screening performance for chromosomal abnormalities requires further evaluation. For twin pregnancies with indications for prenatal diagnosis, there is a lack of clinical data to assess the prenatal diagnosis rate (PDR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of NIPT for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and the PDR in the second and third trimesters.

METHODS

Ultrasound scans were carried out for all twin pregnancies between 11 and 13^+ 6 gestational weeks. For twin pregnancies with nuchal translucency thickness˂3.0 mm and no foetal structural malformations, NIPT was performed after blood sampling, followed by routine ultrasound monitoring. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent NIPT at the prenatal diagnostic centre of Xiangya Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022 were included in the study. Genetic counselling was offered to each pregnant woman when the NIPT result indicated a high risk of abnormalities or abnormal ultrasonographic (USG) findings were detected. We followed up twin pregnancies for NIPT results, USG findings, prenatal diagnosis results and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

In 1754 twin pregnancies, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of NIPT for trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.9% and 75%, and the corresponding values for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were 100%, 99.9% and 50%, respectively. For the 14 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a high risk of abnormalities, the PDR was 78.6% (11/14). For the 492 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a low risk of abnormalities, the rate of USG findings in the second and third trimesters was 39.4% (194/492); of these pregnancies, prenatal diagnosis was recommended for 16.7% (82/492), but it was actually performed in only 8.3% (41/492), and the PDR was 50% (41/82). There was no significant difference in the PDR between the NIPT high-risk and low-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening performance of NIPT for SCA in twin pregnancies needs to be further evaluated. When abnormal NIPT results or USG findings are used as the main prenatal diagnostic indicator in the second and third trimesters, the PDR is poor.

Clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancies: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical efficiency of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy screening in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

A total of 1650 women with twin pregnancies were enrolled in the study, which underwent NIPT at the Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China from January 2013 to June 2022. Fetal karyotyping analysis was conducted in high-risk patients, with subsequent follow-up on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

In 1650 pregnancies, NIPT results showed ten cases of the fetal chromosome aneuploidy, of which six cases were true positive and four cases were false positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and false-positive rate (FPR) of trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.79%, 57.14%, and 0.18%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and FPR of trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 50%, and 0.06%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and FPR of trisomy 13 were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. No false negatives were detected and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% of the total. Eleven pregnancies failed the NIPT test with no-call due to the low fetal fraction (< 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

NIPT is a high-performing routine primary prenatal screening test in twin pregnancies, with high sensitivity and specificity in screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

PURPOSE

This workgroup aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for pregnant individuals at general risk for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 and to evaluate the utility of NIPS for other chromosomal disorders.

METHODS

The NIPS Evidence-Based Guideline Work Group (n = 7) relied on the results from the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) systematic review to form the evidentiary basis of this guideline. Workgroup members used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework to draft recommendations. The guideline underwent extensive internal and external peer review with a public comment period before approval by the ACMG Board of Directors.

RESULTS

Evidence consistently demonstrated improved accuracy of NIPS compared with traditional screening methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton and twin gestations. Identification of rare autosomal trisomies and other microdeletion syndromes with NIPS is an emerging area of interest.

CONCLUSION

ACMG strongly recommends NIPS over traditional screening methods for all pregnant patients with singleton and twin gestations for fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and strongly recommends NIPS be offered to patients to screen for fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy.

Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women with Assisted Reproductive Pregnancy

Objective

This paper analyzes the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal chromosome aneuploidy in the screening of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF) pregnancies.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 3163 IVF-pregnant women who underwent NIPT at the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University and Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang Province from February 2015 to June 2019. Fetal or neonatal karyotype analysis was carried out in high-risk patients, with subsequent follow-up on pregnancy outcomes.

Results

NIPT results of 3163 pregnant women suggested 20 cases of high-risk fetal chromosome aneuploidy, of which 2185 cases were a single pregnancy. Of the 13 cases of high-risk chromosome aneuploidy in single pregnancies, seven were true positive, and six were false positive according to fetal or newborn chromosomal karyotype diagnosis. Twin pregnancies accounted for 978 cases in which NIPT indicated seven cases of high-risk chromosome aneuploidy; six of these cases were true positive, and one case was false positive according to fetal or newborn chromosomal karyotype diagnosis. The specificity, positive predictive value, and false-positive rate of trisomy 21 syndrome in IVF single embryo NIPT were 99.86%, 62.5%, and 0.14%, respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value, and false-positive rate of trisomy 18 syndrome were 99.95%, 66.67%, and 0.05%, respectively. The specificity of trisomy 13 syndrome was 99.91%, and the false-positive rate was 0.09%. The specificity of trisomy 21 syndrome in IVF twin NIPT was 99.89%, the positive predictive value was 83.33%, and the false-positive rate was 0.11%. The specificity and positive predictive value of fetal trisomy 18 syndrome were 100.00%, and the false-positive rate of it were 0.00%. Sensitivity and false-negative rates were 100% in all cases.

Conclusion

NIPT is an ideal prenatal test for IVF-pregnant women due to its high sensitivity and specificity in screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Fetal Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities

With more and more reproductive-aged women opting to pursue genetic screening during pregnancy, health care professionals must understand the variety of testing options available as well as the advantages and limitations of each testing option. Presently, no single screening test is universally believed to be superior because the combination of the specific test and the population being tested determines the range of potential identifiable conditions as well as the positive predictive values. As a result, pre- and posttest counseling are not always straightforward and may require discussions with multiple specialists including genetic counselors, obstetricians, and pediatricians/neonatologists. The purpose of this review is to summarize the screening options currently available to pregnant women to determine their risk of having a child affected by a chromosomal disorder. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities using ultrasonography, maternal serum analytes, cell-free DNA, and preimplantation genetic testing will be discussed here. Advances in the field, including the possible future use of cell-based noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) as a more accurate method for genetic screening and the incorporation of screening for copy number variants (microdeletions and duplications) into traditional cell-free NIPS will also be reviewed.

Screening for aneuploidy in twins

All pregnant women should be offered screening for aneuploidy. Twin pregnancies present unique challenges in aneuploidy screening. This review describes available aneuploidy screening options and their benefits and limitations in twin pregnancy, along with describing special circumstances, such as vanishing twins and diagnostic testing in twin pregnancy. No method of aneuploidy screening is as accurate in twin pregnancies as singleton pregnancies. Cell-free DNA screening should be considered a first-line approach; however, this option may not be available or may have limitations in certain clinical scenarios, such as vanishing twins. If cell-free DNA screening is not available, nuchal translucency and/or maternal serum marker screening can be offered.

Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231

The incidence of multifetal gestations in the United States has increased dramatically over the past several decades. For example, the rate of twin births increased 76% between 1980 and 2009, from 18.9 to 33.3 per 1,000 births (1). However, after more than three decades of increases, the twin birth rate declined 4% during 2014-2018 to 32.6 twins per 1,000 total births in 2018 (2). The rate of triplet and higher-order multifetal gestations increased more than 400% during the 1980s and 1990s, peaking at 193.5 per 100,000 births in 1998, followed by a modest decrease to 153.4 per 100,000 births by 2009 (3). The triplet and higher-order multiple birth rate was 93.0 per 100,000 births for 2018, an 8% decline from 2017 (101.6) and a 52% decline from the 1998 peak (193.5) (4). The long-term changes in the incidence of multifetal gestations has been attributed to two main factors: 1) a shift toward an older maternal age at conception, when multifetal gestations are more likely to occur naturally, and 2) an increased use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), which is more likely to result in a multifetal gestation (5). A number of perinatal complications are increased with multiple gestations, including fetal anomalies, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes. One of the most consequential complications encountered with multifetal gestations is preterm birth and the resultant infant morbidity and mortality. Although multiple interventions have been evaluated in the hope of prolonging these gestations and improving outcomes, none has had a substantial effect. The purpose of this document is to review the issues and complications associated with twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal gestations and present an evidence-based approach to management.

Management of Twin Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of National and International Guidelines

Importance

Twin pregnancies are associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity compared with singleton and require more intensive prenatal care.

Objective

The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from published guidelines on twin pregnancies.

Evidence Acquisition

A descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on the management of twin pregnancies was conducted.

Results

All the guidelines highlight the importance of an accurate assessment of chorionicity, amnionicity, and gestational age in the first trimester. They also recommend the performance of nuchal translucency and a detailed anomaly scan. The ultrasound surveillance protocol is similar in all guidelines, that is, every 2 weeks for monochorionic and every 4 weeks for dichorionic twins. On the other hand, there are differences regarding the timing and mode of delivery, especially in monochorionic diamniotic twins, in the definition and management of fetal growth discordance, the use of cervical length to screen for preterm birth, and the timing of corticosteroids' administration.

Conclusions

The differences in the reviewed guidelines on the management of twin pregnancies highlight the need for an adoption of an international consensus, in order to improve perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.

Performance of noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies: a retrospective study of 5469 twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for the fetal common aneuploidy screening in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

The data of 5469 women with twin pregnancies were collected in this retrospective observational study between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients underwent NIPS as first-line screening or after standard serum screening for fetal aneuploidy. The performance of NIPS was examined, and a regression analysis was performed to investigate testing failure in cases of low fetal fraction.

RESULTS

In this study, 2231 (40.8%) patients opted for NIPS as the primary prenatal screening test, and 3238 (59.2%) opted for serum screening, including 440 patients who opted for NIPS after serum screening. Among the 2671 pregnancies with available NIPS outcomes, 11 cases of aneuploidy were identified, seven of trisomy 21 and four of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). The sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 were 100% (95% CI, 56.1-100.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 99.8-100.0%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for SCA was 40.0% (95% CI, 13.7-72.6%). No false negatives were found, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI, 99.8-100.0%) in total. In 32 pregnancies who failed NIPS test without available NIPS outcomes due to low fetal fraction, the regression analysis demonstrated that increasing BMI and assisted reproductive technology treatment were significant independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS is a high-performing routine primary prenatal screening test in twin pregnancies, with a high PPV and low false positive rate for detecting trisomy 21. It is also useful to identify common sex chromosome aneuploidies in twin pregnancies, with similar performance to that reported in singleton pregnancy.

Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226

Prenatal testing for chromosomal abnormalities is designed to provide an accurate assessment of a patient's risk of carrying a fetus with a chromosomal disorder. A wide variety of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests are available; each offers varying levels of information and performance, and each has relative advantages and limitations. When considering screening test characteristics, no one test is superior in all circumstances, which results in the need for nuanced, patient-centered counseling from the obstetric care professional and complex decision making by the patient. Each patient should be counseled in each pregnancy about options for testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. It is important that obstetric care professionals be prepared to discuss not only the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities but also the relative benefits and limitations of the available screening and diagnostic tests. Testing for chromosomal abnormalities should be an informed patient choice based on provision of adequate and accurate information, the patient's clinical context, accessible health care resources, values, interests, and goals. All patients should be offered both screening and diagnostic tests, and all patients have the right to accept or decline testing after counseling.The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide current information regarding the available screening test options available for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and to review their benefits, performance characteristics, and limitations. For information regarding prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, refer to Practice Bulletin No. 162, Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders. For additional information regarding counseling about genetic testing and communicating test results, refer to Committee Opinion No. 693, Counseling About Genetic Testing and Communication of Genetic Test Results. For information regarding carrier screening for genetic conditions, refer to Committee Opinion No. 690, Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine and Committee Opinion No. 691, Carrier Screening for Genetic Conditions. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to further clarify methods of screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, including expanded information regarding the use of cell-free DNA in all patients regardless of maternal age or baseline risk, and to add guidance related to patient counseling.

Review of epidemiological factors (other than maternal age) that determine the prevalence of common autosomal trisomies

The birth prevalence of each common autosomal trisomy (21, 18 and 13) increases with advancing maternal age and this is the most important epidemiological risk factor. Prevalence during pregnancy is also dependent on gestational age. Other factors claimed to influence prevalence include paternal age, ethnicity, family history, premature reproductive aging, parity, twinning, smoking, environmental exposures, maternal medical conditions, and predispositions. We review the evidence for these associations since they may provide insights into causal mechanisms. When investigating potential co-factors it is important to adequately allow for maternal age and minimize its confounding contribution. This is well illustrated by reports of an inverse paternal age effect where there is strong correlation between parental ages. Gestational age at diagnosis, availability of prenatal screening, diagnostic testing, and elective termination of affected pregnancies and healthcare disparities also confound the studies on ethnicity, medical conditions, and predispositions or environmental factors. Data from twin zygosity studies demonstrate the importance of differences in fetal viability for affected pregnancies. We conclude that existing epidemiological evidence for most of the co-factors discussed should currently be considered tenuous; history of Down syndrome, albeit biased, may be an exception. The co-factors may yet provide clues to hitherto poorly understood causal pathways.

A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory

Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples.

Cell-free fetal DNA analysis in maternal plasma as screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in twin pregnancy the utility of non-invasive prenatal testing using circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in screening for the three main autosomal fetal trisomies.

METHODS

cfDNA testing was offered to 492 patients with a twin pregnancy without ultrasound anomaly as a first-line screening test or after routine serum screening. Data were collected prospectively and a retrospective analysis was performed. cfDNA analysis was performed by massively parallel sequencing. The fetal-fraction threshold used for test evaluation was 8%. Regression analysis was performed to investigate the effect on the test failure rate of maternal and pregnancy characteristics, and the performance of the test was also reported.

RESULTS

cfDNA analysis was performed as a first-line test (after the first-trimester scan) in 377 patients and following serum screening in 115. Of the 420 pregnancies for which outcome was available and cfDNA screening was assessed, 78.7% were dichorionic-diamniotic. The test failed on the first attempt in 12 (2.9%) pregnancies, and regression analysis demonstrated that only maternal weight was a significant independent predictor of test failure. A result was subsequently achieved in the 10 cases for which a second sample was obtained. cfDNA analysis identified all three cases of trisomy 21 and the only case of trisomy 18. For trisomy 21, the specificity was 99.8% (95% CI, 98.7-100.0%). When considering pregnancies according to whether they were conceived spontaneously or after assisted reproductive technology, there were no significant differences in terms of maternal weight or no-result rate for cfDNA screening between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In twin pregnancy without fetal ultrasound abnormality, cfDNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 had a high success rate and good performance. Therefore, in routine practice, cfDNA analysis could be considered as a first- or second-line screening test. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[Cell-free fetal DNA analysis in maternal plasma as a screening test for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing by cell-free circulating fetal DNA in maternal blood (cfDNA) in screening for trisomies 21 in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

CfDNA was performed in 492 patients with twin pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies in the first trimester as a first-line screening test or after serum screening. Data were collected prospectively and a retrospective analysis was done. CfDNA was executed by massive parallel technique. The fetal fraction threshold for test evaluation was 8%. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different parameters on the test failure rate. Performance of the test was also considered.

RESULTS

In 377 patients, the test was prescribed first line and in 115 after standard serum screening. Twelve tests (2.9%) have initially failed on the 420 pregnancies with available outcomes and regression analysis found only maternal weight as a significant independent factor of test failure. A second test was performed on 10 patients, all of them had an available result. cfDNA identified all 3 cases of trisomy 21. The sensitivity was 100.0% (95% CI [29.2-100.0%]) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI [98.7-100.0%]). There was no significant difference between spontaneous pregnancies and those induced by assisted reproductive technologies (ART), in terms of fetal fraction percentage, no-call results for cfDNA screening, maternal weight, or test performance between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In twin pregnancies without fetal ultrasound abnormalities, the performance and success rate of the cfDNA are excellent. Therefore, cfDNA could be offered in routine practice as a first-line screening test in this population.

Screening for fetal aneuploidy

Screening is currently recommended in pregnancy for a number of genetic disorders, chromosomal aneuploidy, and structural birth defects in the fetus regardless of maternal age or family history. There is an overwhelming array of sonographic and maternal serum-based options available for carrying out aneuploidy risk assessment in the first and/or second trimester. As with any screening test, the patient should be made aware that a "negative" test or "normal" ultrasound does not guarantee a healthy baby and a "positive" test does not mean the fetus has the condition. The woman should have both pre- and post-test counseling to discuss the benefits, limitations, and options for additional testing. Rapid advancements of genetic technologies have made it possible to screen for the common aneuploidies traditionally associated with advanced maternal age with improved levels of accuracy beyond serum and ultrasound based testing. Prenatal screening for fetal genetic disorders with cell-free DNA has transformed prenatal care with yet unanswered questions related to the financial, ethical, and appropriate application in the provision of prenatal risk assessment.

Prenatal screening and diagnosis of aneuploidy in multiple pregnancies

Prenatal screening for aneuploidy has changed significantly over the last 30 years, from being age-based to maternal serum and ultrasound based techniques. Multiple pregnancies present particular challenges with regards to screening as serum-based screening techniques are influenced by all feti while ultrasound-based techniques can be fetus specific. Tests currently available tend to not perform as well in multiple compared to singleton pregnancies. Considerations must be given to these variations when discussing and performing screening for aneuploidy in this situation. Prenatal invasive diagnosis techniques in multiple pregnancies bring their own challenges from a technical and counselling point of view, in particular with regards to sampling error, mapping and assignment of results and management of abnormal results. This review addresses these particular challenges and provides information to facilitate care.

[Specificities of screening for aneuploidies in twin pregnancies]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most efficient and tailored screening method for aneuploidies in twins for the French population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Articles were searched using the PubMed and the Cochrane libraries.

RESULTS

In cases of twin pregnancies, the aneuploidy's risk related to maternal age as well as gestational age must be considered as being the same as in singletons. In bichorionic twins, we have to consider individually the nuchal translucency thickness of each twin. In monochorionic twins, we have to consider a range of risks related to the nuchal translucency measurements of each twins. The additional benefit of maternal serum biochemistry screening in twins is not as established as in singletons.

CONCLUSION

The most appropriate method of screening for aneuploidies in twin pregnancies is based during the first trimester of pregnancy on the risk related to maternal age combined with those related to the nuchal translucency measurement. In the absence of first-trimester screening, it is possible to offer a screening method based on the second trimester maternal serum biochemistry and/or by a targeted ultrasound.