Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies

Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) analysis for fetuses with abnormal nasal bone

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities found on single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) in pregnancies with either an absent or hypoplastic nasal bone.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 333 fetuses with either nasal bone hypoplasia or absence identified on prenatal ultrasound. SNP array analysis and conventional karyotyping were performed in all the subjects. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities was adjusted for maternal age and other ultrasound findings. Fetuses with either an isolated nasal bone absence or hypoplasia, those that had additional soft ultrasound markers, and those where structural defects were found on ultrasound were divided into three groups: A, B, and C, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the total cohort of 333 fetuses, 76 (22.8%) had chromosomal abnormalities, including 47 cases of trisomy 21, 4 cases of trisomy 18, 5 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidy, and 20 cases of copy number variations of which 12 were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in group A (n = 164), B (n = 79), and C (n = 90) was 8.5%, 29.1% and 43.3%, respectively. The incremental yields by SNP-array compared with karyotyping in group A, B, and C were 3.0%, 2.5% and 10.7%, respectively (p > 0.05). Compared to karyotype analysis, SNP array detected an additional 2 (1.2%), 1 (1.3%), and 5 (5.6%) pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In the 333 fetuses, the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in women with advanced maternal age (AMA) was significantly higher than that in non-AMA women, (47.8% vs. 16.5%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In addition to Down's syndrome, many other chromosomal abnormalities are present in fetuses with abnormal nasal bone. SNP array can improve the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities associated with nasal bone abnormalities, especially in pregnancies with non-isolated nasal bone abnormalities and advanced maternal age.

The genetic landscape of chromosomal aberrations in 3776 Vietnamese fetuses with clinical anomalies during pregnancy

Background: Copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) is a powerful tool to discover structural genomic variation, but limitations associated with its retrospective study design and inadequate diversity of participants can be impractical for clinical application. Aim: This study aims to use CNV-seq to assess chromosomal aberrations in pregnant Vietnamese women. Materials & methods: A large-scale study was conducted on 3776 pregnant Vietnamese women with abnormal ultrasound findings. Results: Chromosomal aberrations were found in 448 (11.86%) women. Of these, 274 (7.26%) had chromosomal aneuploidies and 174 (4.61%) carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs. Correlations were established between chromosomal aberrations and various phenotypic markers. Conclusion: This comprehensive clinical study illuminates the pivotal role of CNV-seq in prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies featuring fetal ultrasound anomalies.

Women's attitudes towards disclosure of genetic information in pregnancy with varying levels of penetrance

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal-microarray-analysis (CMA) may reveal susceptibility-loci (SL) of varied penetrance for autism-spectrum-disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Attitudes of women/parents to disclosure of SL during pregnancy are understudied.

METHODS

A multiple-choice questionnaire was distributed to postpartum women. Data were collected on women's interest to receive prenatal genetic information with various levels of penetrance.

RESULTS

Women's (n = 941) disclosure choices were dependent on the magnitude of risk: approximately 70% supported disclosure of either full or 40% penetrance, 53% supported disclosure at a 20% risk threshold, and 40% supported disclosure at 10% or less. Although most women supported, rejected or were indecisive about disclosure consistently across all risk levels, nearly one-quarter (24%) varied their responses based on penetrance, and this was associated with religiosity, education, parity and concern about fetal health (p-values <0.04). Among those who varied their choices, the risk threshold was lower among secular women (20%) than among ultraorthodox women (40%). In a multivariable analysis, ultraorthodox women were much less likely to vary their choices on ASD disclosure compared with secular women (aOR = 0.37, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Women's attitudes toward disclosure are influenced by the level of risk and their individual characteristics. We therefore encourage engaging women/couples in disclosure decisions regarding uncertain and probabilistic results from prenatal genomic tests.

Prenatal Screening for Microdeletions and Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies

Noninvasive prenatal screening with cell-free DNA is now considered a first-line screening for common aneuploidies. Advancements in existing laboratory techniques now allow to interrogate the entirety of the fetal genome, and many commercial laboratories have expanded their screening panels to include screening for rare autosomal aneuploidies and copy number variants. Here, we review the currently available data on the performance of fetal cell-free DNA to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies and copy number variants that are associated with clinically significant microdeletion and microduplication syndromes and the current position of medical societies on routine screening for these syndromes.

The Effect of Resolution Level and Targeted Design in the Diagnostic Performance of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study was performed to assess the optimal resolution for prenatal testing by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), aiming to balance between maximum diagnostic yield and minimal detection of variants of uncertain significance (VOUS).

METHODS

This was a prospective study using data of 2,336 fetuses that underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis, and the samples were analyzed by aCGH. In total, six different aCGH platforms were studied; four different resolutions (0.18 Mb, 0.5 Mb, 1 Mb, and 2 Mb) and two platform designs (whole-genome [WG] and targeted). The results of these designs were compared based on their diagnostic yield and VOUS rate. The performance of the different designs was further analyzed according to indication for invasive testing.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield of copy number variants increased with increasing level of analysis. The detection rates of clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities were almost the same across our targeted array designs; 7.2% with 0.18 Mb backbone/0.05 Mb versus 7.1% with 0.5 Mb backbone/0.05 Mb (p >0.05). However, a significant difference in the rate of VOUS was observed; 9.4% with 0.18 Mb backbone/0.05 Mb versus 6% with 0.5 Mb backbone/0.05 Mb (p <0.001). After analyzing the results across different indications for testing, we found that the application of non-targeted platform designs and lower levels of resolution analysis (such as 1 Mb WG or 0.5 MbL/1 MbG WG) would offer similar diagnostic yield in most cases with major congenital anomalies, with lower VOUS rates. However, the sample size for many indication groups was too small to extract robust associations.

CONCLUSION

It appears that the targeted array platform with 0.5 Mb backbone resolution and 0.05 Mb on targeted gene-rich regions is optimal for routine chromosomal microarray analysis use in prenatal diagnosis. It may be beneficial to individualize the minimum resolution in specific referral indications as the indications for invasive prenatal testing may be quite heterogeneous.

Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Does Increased Resolution Equal Increased Yield?

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is considered a first-tier test for patients with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies and is also routinely applied in prenatal diagnosis. The current consensus size cut-off for reporting copy number variants (CNVs) in the prenatal setting ranges from 200 Kb to 400 Kb, with the intention of minimizing the impact of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Very limited data are currently available on the application of higher resolution platforms prenatally. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and impact of applying high-resolution CMA in the prenatal setting. To that end, we report on the outcomes of applying CMA with a size cut-off of 20 Kb in 250 prenatal samples and discuss the findings and diagnostic yield and also provide follow-up for cases with variants of uncertain significance. Overall, 19.6% (49) showed one or more chromosomal abnormalities, with the findings classified as Pathogenic (P) or Likely Pathogenic (LP) in 15.6% and as VUS in 4%. When excluding the cases with known familial aberrations, the diagnostic yield was 12%. The smallest aberration detected was a 32 Kb duplication of the 16p11.2 region. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that prenatal diagnosis with a high-resolution aCGH platform can reliably detect smaller CNVs that are often associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes while providing an increased diagnostic yield, regardless of the indication for testing, with only a marginal increase in the VUS incidence. Thus, it can be an important tool in the prenatal setting.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Sonographic Features of Skeletal Dysplasias but Normal Karyotype or Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: A Systematic Review

Skeletal dysplasias are a group of diseases characterized by bone and joint abnormalities, which can be detected during prenatal ultrasound. Next-generation sequencing has rapidly revolutionized molecular diagnostic approaches in fetuses with structural anomalies. This review studies the additional diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with prenatal sonographic features of skeletal dysplasias. This was a systematic review by searching PubMed for studies published between 2013 and July 2022 that identified the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing after normal karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for cases with suspected fetal skeletal dysplasias based on prenatal ultrasound. We identified 10 out of 85 studies representing 226 fetuses. The pooled additional diagnostic yield was 69.0%. The majority of the molecular diagnoses involved de novo variants (72%), while 8.7% of cases were due to inherited variants. The incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing over CMA was 67.4% for isolated short long bones and 77.2% for non-isolated cases. Among phenotypic subgroup analyses, features with the highest additional diagnostic yield were an abnormal skull (83.3%) and a small chest (82.5%). Prenatal exome sequencing should be considered for cases with suspected fetal skeletal dysplasias with or without a negative karyotype or CMA results. Certain sonographic features, including an abnormal skull and small chest, may indicate a potentially higher diagnostic yield.

Using single nucleotide polymorphism array for prenatal diagnosis in a large multicenter study in Southern China

Numerous studies have evaluated the use of single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) in prenatal diagnostics, but very few have evaluated its application under different risk conditions. Here, SNP-array was used for the retrospective analysis of 8386 pregnancies and the cases were categorized into seven groups. Pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) were found in 699 (8.3%, 699/8386) cases. Among the seven different risk factor groups, the non-invasive prenatal testing-positive group had the highest pCNVs rate (35.3%), followed by the abnormal ultrasound structure group (12.8%), and then the chromosomal abnormalities in the couples group (9.5%). Notably the adverse pregnancy history group presented with the lowest pCNVs rate (2.8%). Further evaluation of the 1495 cases with ultrasound abnormalities revealed that the highest pCNV rates were recorded in those cases with multiple system structure abnormalities (22.6%), followed by the groups with skeletal system (11.6%) and urinary system abnormalities (11.2%). A total of 3424 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers were classified as having one, two, or three ultrasonic soft markers. The different pCNV rates in the three groups were statistically significant. There was little correlation between pCNVs and a previous history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting that genetic screening under these conditions should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Resistance to Change

Advances in medical technology do not follow a smooth process and are highly variable. Implementation can occasionally be rapid, but often faces varying degrees of resistance resulting at the very least in delayed implementation. Using qualitative comparative analysis, we have evaluated numerous technological advances from the perspective of how they were introduced, implemented, and opposed. Resistance varies from benign - often happening because of inertia or lack of resources to more active forms, including outright opposition using both appropriate and inappropriate methods to resist/delay changes in care. Today, even public health has become politicized, having nothing to do with the underlying science, but having catastrophic results. Two other corroding influences are marketing pressure from the private sector and vested interests in favor of one outcome or another. This also applies to governmental agencies. There are a number of ways in which papers have been buried including putting the thumb on the scale where reviewers can sabotage new ideas. Unless we learn to harness new technologies earlier in their life course and understand how to maneuver around the pillars of obstruction to their implementation, we will not be able to provide medical care at the forefront of technological capabilities.

Detection rates of abnormalities in over 10,000 amniotic fluid samples at a single laboratory

BACKGROUND

A growing number of cytogenetic techniques have been used for prenatal diagnosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the usefulness of karyotyping, BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in prenatal diagnosis during the second trimester based on our laboratory experience.

METHODS

A total of 10,580 pregnant women with a variety of indications for amniocentesis were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2020, of whom amniotic fluid samples were analysed in 10,320 women. The main technical indicators of participants in the three different technologies were summarized, and cases of chromosome abnormalities were further evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall abnormality detection rate of karyotyping among all the amniotic fluid samples was 15.4%, and trisomy 21 was the most common abnormality (20.9%). The total abnormality detection rate of the BoBs assay was 5.6%, and the diagnosis rate of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes that were not identified by karyotyping was 0.2%. The detection results of the BoBs assay were 100.0% concordant with karyotyping analysis in common aneuploidies. Seventy (87.5%) cases of structural abnormalities were missed by BoBs assay. The total abnormality detection rate of the SNP array was 21.6%. The detection results of common aneuploidies were exactly the same between SNP array and karyotyping. Overall, 60.1% of structural abnormalities were missed by SNP array. The further detection rate of pathogenic significant copy number variations (CNVs) by SNP was 1.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Karyotyping analysis combined with BoBs assay or SNP array for prenatal diagnosis could provide quick and accurate results. Combined use of the technologies, especially with SNP array, improved the diagnostic yield and interpretation of the results, which contributes to genetic counselling. BoBs assay or SNP array could be a useful supplement to karyotyping.

Contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype who underwent invasive testing for different indications.

METHODS

The results of invasive genetic testing performed at a tertiary center between September 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for invasive tests were classified as fetal structural malformation, presence of soft markers, and high risk in screening tests. CMA results were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (pCNVs), benign (bCNVs), and variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS).

RESULTS

A total of 830 invasive tests were performed and aneuploidy was detected in 11.2% of the fetuses. CMA was performed in 465 fetuses with normal karyotype, and pCNVs were detected in 6.9%. pCNVs were detected in 8.2% of fetuses with structural malformations, 6.5% in soft markers, and 4.7% in high risk in screening tests. Pathogenic variants were detected by NGS in 33.8% of fetuses with bCNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

pCNVs can be significantly detected not only in fetuses with structural malformations, but also in invasive testing with other indications. NGS significantly contributes to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural malformations.

Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses conceived by assisted reproductive technology by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis

Background

Invasive prenatal evaluation by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping might represent an important option in pregnant women, but limited reports have applied CMA and karyotyping of fetuses conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART). This study aimed to examine the value of CMA and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis after ART.

Methods

This retrospective study included all singleton fetuses conceived by ART from January 2015 to December 2021. Anomalies prenatally diagnosed based on karyotyping and CMA were analyzed. Prevalence rates for various CMA and karyotyping results were stratified based on specific testing indications including isolated-and non-isolated ART groups. The rates of CMA findings with clinical significance (pathogenic/likely pathogenic) and karyotype anomalies were assessed and compared to those of local control individuals with naturally conceived pregnancies and without medical indications.

Results

In total, 224 subjects were assessed by karyotyping and CMA. In the examined patients, chromosomal and karyotype abnormality rates were 3.57% (8/224) and 8.93% (20/224), respectively. This finding indicated a 5.35% (12/224)-incremental rate of abnormal CMA was obtained over karyotype analysis (p = 0.019). The risk of CMA with pathogenic findings for all pregnancies conceived by ART (5.80%, 13/224) was markedly elevated in comparison with the background value obtained in control individuals (1.47%, 9/612; p = 0.001). In addition, risk of CMA with clinically pathogenic results in isolated ART groups was significant higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p = 0.037).

Conclusions

Prenatal diagnosis including karyotyping and CMA is recommended for fetuses conceived by ART, with or without ultrasound findings.

Development of a clinical microarray system for genetic analysis screening

Objectives

Research on the relationship between diseases and genes and the advancement of genetic analysis technologies have made genetic testing in medical care possible. There are various methods for genetic testing, including PCR-based methods and next-generation sequencing; however, screening tests in clinical laboratories are becoming more diverse; therefore, novel measurement systems and equipment are required to meet the needs of each situation. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel microarray-based genetic analysis system that uses a Peltier element to overcome the issues of conventional microarrays, such as the long measurement time and high cost.

Methods

We constructed a microarray system to detect the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene polymorphisms UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 in patients eligible for irinotecan hydrochloride treatment for use in clinical laboratories. To evaluate the performance of the system, the hybridization temperature and reaction time were determined, and the results were compared with those obtained using a conventional hybridization oven.

Results

The hybridization temperature reached its target in 1/27th of the time required by the conventional system. We assessed 111 human clinical samples and found that our results agreed with those obtained using existing methods. The total time for the newly developed device was reduced by 85 min compared to that for existing methods, as the automated DNA microarray eliminates the time that existing methods spend on manual operation.

Conclusions

The surface treatment technology used in our system enables high-density and strong DNA fixation, allowing the construction of a measurement system suitable for clinical applications.

Single nucleotide polymorphism array in genetic evaluation of fetal ultrasound abnormalities: a retrospective follow-up study

Fetal ultrasound abnormalities may be complicated by cognitive dysfunction or developmental retardation, and ultrasonography cannot detect these problems; therefore, chromosome detection is required in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. To examine the effectiveness of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in genetic diagnosis of fetal ultrasound abnormalities, the prenatal samples of 805 pregnant women with fetal ultrasound abnormalities were collected for SNP array and karyotyping analysis. A 95.5% percentage of normal karyotypes and 4.5% percentage of abnormal karyotypes were observed, and aneuploidy was detected in 28 fetuses with abnormal karyotypes. SNP array identified 89 positives, including 55 cases (6.8%) with pathogenic copy number variation (CNVs) and 34 (4.2%) with variants of unknown significance (VOUS). In addition to 36 cases showing consistent results with karyotyping, SNP array detected 19 additional cases with pathogenic CNVs, including microdeletion/microduplication syndromes in 18 cases and uniparental disomy in one case. The detection rate of pathogenic CNVs was highest in fetuses with structural abnormalities of multiple systems complicated by non-structural abnormalities (13.7%) and lowest in those with structural abnormalities of a single system (4.2%). Presence of pathogenic CNVs was 12.2% in fetuses with structural abnormalities in the urinary system, followed by in the skeletal system (10.3%), while no pathogenic CNVs were identified in fetuses with structural abnormalities in the head and face, the respiratory system or the digestive system. An 89.6% follow-up rate was seen in the study sample, and 55 fetuses with pathogenic CNVs identified by SNP array were all given induction of labor. Our data demonstrate that SNP array improves the detection of genetics aberrations in fetuses with prenatal ultrasound abnormality relative to karyotyping.

Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) increases the diagnostic yield of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing but is not universally performed. Our objective was to identify provider and patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing prenatal genetic diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) at a single institution between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcome was the acceptance of CMA based on the genetic counselor ,GC who saw the patient. Secondary analyses assessed patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA.

RESULTS

2372 participants were included. Fifty-eight percent of participants accepted CMA. Acceptance of CMA varied significantly by GC, ranging from 31% to 90%. Patients with public insurance and those who identified as Black or Hispanic/Latina were less likely to have CMA performed (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.20-0.30, and 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). Even among those with a structural anomaly present, public insurance was associated with significantly lower odds of CMA being performed (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing varied based on the GC performing the counseling. Public insurance was associated with lower frequency of accepting CMA.

Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Microarrays in Fetuses with High-Risk Prenatal Indications: Polish Experience with 7400 Pregnancies

The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the comparative genomic hybridization to microarray (aCGH) technique for prenatal diagnosis, but also to assess the frequency of chromosomal aberrations that may lead to fetal malformations but are not included in the diagnostic report. We present the results of the aCGH in a cohort of 7400 prenatal cases, indicated for invasive testing due to ultrasound abnormalities, high-risk for serum screening, thickened nuchal translucency, family history of genetic abnormalities or congenital abnormalities, and advanced maternal age (AMA). The overall chromosomal aberration detection rate was 27.2% (2010/7400), including 71.2% (1431/2010) of numerical aberrations and 28.8% (579/2010) of structural aberrations. Additionally, the detection rate of clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) was 6.8% (505/7400) and 0.7% (57/7400) for variants of unknown clinical significance. The detection rate of clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs was 7.9% (334/4204) for fetuses with structural anomalies, 5.4% (18/336) in AMA, 3.1% (22/713) in the group of abnormal serum screening and 6.1% (131/2147) in other indications. Using the aCGH method, it was possible to assess the frequency of pathogenic chromosomal aberrations, of likely pathogenic and of uncertain clinical significance, in the groups of cases with different indications for an invasive test.

Pathologic whole exome sequencing analysis in fetuses with minor sonographic abnormal findings and normal chromosomal microarray analysis: case series

BACKGROUND

No current data exists regarding the occurrence of pathological results when using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis in a subgroup of fetuses with minor abnormalities and normal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) results.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to report our experience with in-utero WES abnormal results, found in fetuses with minor anomalies after a normal CMA result.

METHODS

A retrospective study conducted in a single tertiary center, during four years, included collating data regarding fetuses with minor structural abnormalities, normal CMA results, and abnormal triple WES test results.

RESULTS

Eleven fetuses were included in the study. Eight were with cardiovascular and lymphatic drainage alterations. Two fetuses developed late third-trimester macrocephaly (head circumference ≥ +2 standard deviations), and one fetus had unilateral mildly short and bowed femur bone. In seven cases (63.6%) the parents opted to terminate the pregnancy as a result of the WES analysis results.

CONCLUSION

Our case series raises the possibility that fetuses with even minor structural alterations and normal CMA results can have genetic variants revealable only by WES analysis which can provide critical information regarding pregnancy management.

Prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants in fetuses with congenital gastrointestinal obstruction

Background

Congenital gastrointestinal obstruction (CGIO) mainly refers to the stenosis or atresia of any part from the esophagus to the anus and is one of the most common surgical causes in the neonatal period. The concept of genetic factors as an etiology of CGIO has been accepted, but investigations about CGIO have mainly focused on aneuploidy, and the focus has been on duodenal obstruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of chromosome aberrations (including numeric and structural aberrations) in different types of CGIO. A second objective was to assess the risk of abnormal CNVs detected by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in fetuses with different types of CGIO.

Methods

Data from pregnancies referred for invasive testing and CNV-seq due to sonographic diagnosis of fetal CGIO from 2015 to 2020 were obtained retrospectively from the computerized database. The rates of chromosome aberrations and abnormal CNV-seq findings for isolated CGIOs and complicated CGIOs and different types of CGIOs were calculated.

Results

Of the 240 fetuses with CGIO that underwent karyotyping, the detection rate of karyotype abnormalities in complicated CGIO was significantly higher than that of the isolated group (33.8% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.01). Ninety-three cases with normal karyotypes further underwent CNV-seq, and CNV-seq revealed an incremental diagnostic value of 9.7% over conventional karyotyping. In addition, the incremental diagnostic yield of CNV-seq analysis in complicated CGIOs (20%) was higher than that in isolated CGIOs (4.8%), and the highest prevalence of pathogenic CNVs/likely pathogenic CNVs was found in the duodenal stenosis/atresia group (17.5%), followed by the anorectal malformation group (15.4%). The 13q deletion, 10q26 deletion, 4q24 deletion, and 2p24 might be additional genetic etiologies of duodenal stenosis/atresia.

Conclusions

The risk of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities and CNVs increased in the complicated CGIO group compared to that in the isolated CGIO group, especially when fetuses presented duodenal obstruction (DO) and anorectal malformation. CNV-seq was recommended to detect submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations for DO and anorectal malformation when the karyotype was normal. The relationship between genotypes and phenotypes needs to be explored in the future to facilitate prenatal diagnosis of fetal CGIO and yield new clues into their etiologies.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing in China

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in prenatal diagnosis toward expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in China.

METHODS

We conducted a national online survey among HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis, including specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine, obstetricians and gynaecologists, nurses in obstetrics and gynaecology, obstetric ultrasound doctors, and technicians in prenatal diagnosis laboratories. A total of 1882 questionnaires were collected, among which 1822 questionnaires met the research criteria and were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

More than 99% of all participants opted for NIPT for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. The rates of support for expanded NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, microdeletions and microduplications, and single-gene disorders were 93.9%, 88.6%, 89.4%, and 86.8%, respectively. Specialists in prenatal diagnosis and foetal medicine had greater knowledge but were less likely to support expanded NIPT compared to other participants. Knowledge increased with educational level, whereas support for expanded NIPT decreased with educational level.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 80% of HCPs working in prenatal diagnosis in China expressed support for expanding NIPT to conditions other than common trisomies. The degree of knowledge was negatively associated with the rate of support.

Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Compared with standard karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies and is thus recommended in many prenatal indications. However, evidence is still lacking on the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in cases of isolated fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the proportion of copy number variants detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and the incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotype in the detection of genetic abnormalities in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included all singleton fetuses diagnosed with fetal growth restriction and no structural ultrasound anomalies and referred to 13 French fetal medicine centers over 1 year in 2016. Fetal growth restriction was defined as an estimated fetal weight of <tenth percentile for gestational age identified in ultrasound reports. For this analysis, we selected fetuses who underwent invasive genetic testing with karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis results. Data were obtained from medical records and ultrasound databases and postmortem and placental examination reports in case of spontaneous stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy. Following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, copy number variants were classified into 5 groups as following: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of unknown significance, likely benign, and benign.

RESULTS

Of 682 referred fetuses diagnosed with isolated fetal growth restriction, both karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis were performed in 146 fetuses. Overall, the detection rate of genetic anomalies found by chromosomal microarray analysis was estimated to be 7.5% (11 of 146 [95% confidence interval, 3.3-11.8]), including 10 copy number variants classified as pathogenic and 1 copy number variant classified as likely pathogenic. Among the 139 fetuses with normal karyotype, 5 were detected with pathogenic and likely pathogenic copy number variants, resulting in an incremental yield of 3.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.5-6.6) in chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotype. All fetuses detected with pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants resulted in terminations of pregnancy. In addition, 3 fetuses with normal karyotype were detected with a variant of unknown significance (2.1%). Among the 7 fetuses with abnormal karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis did not detect trisomy 18 mosaicism in all fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that compared with karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies in fetuses diagnosed with isolated fetal growth restriction. These results support the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in addition to karyotype for isolated fetal growth restriction.

Identification of aneuploidy in dogs screened by a SNP microarray

Microarray analysis is an efficient approach for screening and identifying cytogenetic imbalances in humans. SNP arrays, in particular, are a powerful way to identify copy-number gains and losses representing aneuploidy and aneusomy, but moreover, allow for the direct assessment of individual genotypes in known disease loci. Using these approaches, trisomies, monosomies, and mosaicism of whole chromosomes have been identified in human microarray studies. For canines, this approach is not widely used in clinical laboratory diagnostic practice. In our laboratory, we have implemented the use of a proprietary SNP array that represents approximately 650,000 loci across the domestic dog genome. During the validation of this microarray prior to clinical use, we identified three cases of aneuploidy after screening 2053 dogs of various breeds including monosomy X, trisomy X, and an apparent mosaic trisomy of canine chromosome 38 (CFA38). This study represents the first use of microarrays for copy-number evaluation to identify cytogenetic anomalies in canines. As microarray analysis becomes more routine in canine genetic testing, more cases of chromosome aneuploidy are likely to be uncovered.

Universal chromosomal microarray analysis reveals high proportion of copy-number variants in low-risk pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the yield and utility of the routine use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for prenatal genetic diagnosis in a large cohort of pregnancies with normal ultrasound (US) at the time of genetic testing, compared with pregnancies with abnormal US findings.

METHODS

We reviewed all prenatal CMA results in our center between November 2013 and December 2018. The prevalence of different CMA results in pregnancies with normal US at the time of genetic testing ('low-risk pregnancies'), was compared with that in pregnancies with abnormal US findings ('high-risk pregnancies'). Medical records were searched in order to evaluate subsequent US follow-up and the outcome of pregnancies with a clinically relevant copy-number variant (CNV), i.e. a pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV or a susceptibility locus for disease with > 10% penetrance, related to early-onset disease in the low-risk group.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 6431 low-risk pregnancies that underwent CMA, the prevalence of a clinically significant CNV related to early-onset disease was 1.1% (72/6431), which was significantly lower than the prevalence in high-risk pregnancies (4.9% (65/1326)). Of the low-risk pregnancies, 0.4% (27/6431) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV, and another 0.7% (45/6431) had a susceptibility locus with more than 10% penetrance. Follow-up of the low-risk pregnancies with a clinically significant early-onset CNV revealed that 31.9% (23/72) were terminated, while outcome data were missing in 26.4% (19/72). In 16.7% (12/72) of low-risk pregnancies, an US abnormality was discovered later on in gestation, after genetic testing had been performed.

CONCLUSION

Although the background risk of identifying a clinically significant early-onset abnormal CMA result in pregnancies with a low a-priori risk is lower than that observed in high-risk pregnancies, the risk is substantial and should be conveyed to all pregnant women. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Benefit versus risk of chromosomal microarray analysis performed in pregnancies with normal and positive prenatal screening results: A retrospective study

Background

Most studies on chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and amniocentesis risks have not evaluated pregnancies with low risk for genetic diseases; therefore, the efficacy and safety of CMA and amniocentesis in this population are unclear. This study aimed to examine the benefits and risks of prenatal genetic diagnostic tests in pregnancies having low risk for chromosomal diseases.

Methods and findings

In this retrospective study, we used clinical data from a large database of 30,830 singleton pregnancies at gestational age 16–23 weeks who underwent amniocentesis for karyotyping with or without CMA. We collected socio-demographic, medical and obstetric information, along with prenatal screening, CMA and karyotyping results. Fetal loss events were also analysed. CMA was performed in 5,837 pregnancies with normal karyotype (CMA cohort). In this cohort, 4,174 women had normal prenatal screening results and the risk for identifying genetic abnormalities with >10% risk for intellectual disability by CMA was 1:102, with no significant difference between maternal age groups. The overall post-amniocentesis fetal loss rate was 1:1,401 for the entire cohort (n = 30,830) and 1:1,945 for the CMA cohort (n = 5,837). The main limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up of 3 weeks, which may not have been sufficient for detecting all fetal loss events.

Conclusion

The low risk for post-amniocentesis fetal loss, compared to the rate of severe genetic abnormalities detected by CMA, suggests that even pregnant women with normal prenatal screening results should consider amniocentesis with CMA.

Clinical Application of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnant Women with Advanced Maternal Age and Fetuses with Ultrasonographic Soft Markers

Background

In pregnant women with advanced maternal age (AMA) and fetuses with ultrasonographic (USG) soft markers it is always challenging to decide whether to implement chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or not. It is unclear whether CMA should be used in the fetuses with isolated USG soft markers, and there is still a lack of extensive sample research.

Material/Methods

We enrolled 1521 cases in our research and divided them into 3 groups as follows: pregnant women with isolated AMA (group 1, n=633), pregnant women whose fetuses had isolated USG soft markers (group 2, n=750), and pregnant women with AMA whose fetuses had isolated USG soft markers (group 3, n=138). All pregnant women underwent prenatal ultrasound and amniocentesis, and fetal cells in the amniotic fluid were used for genetic analysis of CMA. All participants signed a written informed consent prior to CMA.

Results

Abnormal findings were detected by CMA in 330 (21.70%) fetuses, including 37 (2.43%) clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), 52 (3.42%) benign or likely benign CNVs, and 240 (15.78%) variants of unknown significance. The frequency of clinically significant CNVs in group 1 and group 2 were significantly lower than that in group 3 (2.37% and 2.0% vs 5.07%, P<0.01). More than a half (59.46%, 22/37) of the pregnant women decided to continue their pregnancy despite having a fetus diagnosed with clinically significant CNV.

Conclusions

CMA can increase the diagnostic yield of fetal chromosomal abnormality for pregnant women with isolated AMA or/and their fetuses had isolated USG soft markers.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Chromosome Microarray Analysis, An Indian Experience

BACKGROUND

Karyotyping has been the gold standard for prenatal chromosome analysis. The resolution should be higher by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). The challenge lies in recognizing benign and pathogenic or clinically significant copy number variations (pCNV) and variations of unknown significance (VOUS). The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of CMA, to stratify the CMA results in various prenatal referral groups and to accumulate Indian data of pCNVs and VOUS for further interpretation to assist defined genetic counseling.

METHODS

Karyotyping and CMA were performed on consecutive referrals of 370 prenatal samples of amniotic fluid (n = 274) and chorionic villi (n = 96) from Indian pregnant women with high maternal age (n = 23), biochemical screen positive (n = 61), previous child abnormal (n = 59), abnormal fetal ultrasound (n = 205) and heterozygous parents (n = 22).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The overall diagnostic yield of abnormal results was 5.40% by karyotyping and 9.18% by CMA. The highest percentage of pCNVs were found in the group with abnormal fetal ultrasound (5.40%) as compared to other groups, such as women with high maternal age (0.81%), biochemical screen positive (0.54%), previous abnormal offspring (0.81%) or heterozygous parents group (1.62%). Therefore, all women with abnormal fetal ultrasound must undergo CMA test for genotype-phenotype correlation. CMA detects known and rare deletion/duplication syndromes and characterizes marker chromosomes. Accumulation of CNV data will form an Indian Repository and also help to resolve the uncertainty of VOUS. Pretest and posttest genetic counseling is essential to convey benefits and limitations of CMA and help the patients to take informed decisions.

Detection of copy number variation associated with ventriculomegaly in fetuses using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays

Etiopathogenesis of fetal ventriculomegaly is poorly understood. Associations between fetal isolated ventriculomegaly and copy number variations (CNVs) have been previously described. We investigated the correlations between fetal ventriculomegaly-with or without other ultrasound anomalies-and chromosome abnormalities. 222 fetuses were divided into four groups: (I) 103 (46.4%) cases with isolated ventriculomegaly, (II) 41 (18.5%) cases accompanied by soft markers, (III) 33 (14.9%) cases complicated with central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, and (IV) 45 (20.3%) cases with accompanying anomalies. Karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array were used in parallel. Karyotype abnormalities were identified in 15/222 (6.8%) cases. Karyotype abnormalities in group I, II, III, and IV were 4/103 (3.9%), 2/41 (4.9%), 4/33 (12.1%), and 5/45 (11.1%), respectively. Concerning the SNP array analysis results, 31/222 (14.0%) were CNVs, CNVs in groups I, II, III, and IV were 11/103 (10.7%), 6/41 (14.6%), 9/33 (27.3%), and 5/45 fetuses (11.1%), respectively. Detections of clinical significant CNVs were higher in non-isolated ventriculomegaly than in isolated ventriculomegaly (16.81% vs 10.7%, P = 0.19). SNP arrays can effectively identify CNVs in fetuses with ventriculomegaly and increase the abnormal chromosomal detection rate by approximately 7.2%, especially ventriculomegaly accompanied by CNS anomalies.

Severe congenital contractural arachnodactyly caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in FBN2

Fibrillin-2, encoded by FBN2, plays an important role in the early process of elastic fiber assembly. To date, heterozygous pathogenic variants in FBN2 have been shown to cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA; Beals-Hecht syndrome). Classical CCA is characterized by long and slender fingers and toes, ear deformities, joint contractures at birth, clubfeet, muscular hypoplasia and often tall stature. In individuals with a severe CCA form, different cardiovascular or gastrointestinal anomalies have been described. Here, we report on a 15-year-old girl with a severe form of CCA and novel biallelic variants in FBN2. The girl inherited the missense variant c.3563G > T/p.(Gly1188Val) from her unaffected father and the nonsense variant c.6831C > A/p.(Cys2277*) from her healthy mother. We could detect only a small amount of FBN2 transcripts harboring the nonsense variant in leukocyte-derived mRNA from the patient and mother suggesting nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. As the father did not show any clinical signs of CCA we hypothesize the missense variant c.3563G > T to be a hypomorphic allele. Taken together, our data suggests that severe CCA can be inherited in an autosomal-recessive manner by compound heterozygosity of a hypomorphic and a null allele of the FBN2 gene.

Clinical Application of Easychip 8x15K Platform in 4106 Pregnancies Without Ultrasound Anomalies

Clinical utility of Array-CGH Easychip 8x15K platform can be assessed by testing its ability to detect the occurrence of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), and occurrence of variants of uncertain significance (VoUS) in pregnancies without structural fetal malformations. The demand of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis is progressively increasing in uneventful pregnancies. However, depending on such platform resolution, a genome-wide approach also provides a high risk of detecting VoUS and incidental finding (IF) also defined as "toxic findings." In this context, novel alternative strategies in probe design and data filtering are required to balance the detection of disease causing CNVs and the occurrence of unwanted findings. In a cohort of consecutive pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies, a total of 4106 DNA samples from cultured and uncultured amniotic fluid or chorionic villi were collected and analyzed by a previously designed Array-CGH mixed-resolution custom platform, which is able to detect pathogenic CNVs and structural imbalanced rearrangements limiting the identification of VoUS and IF. Pathogenic CNVs were identified in 88 samples (2.1%), 19 of which (0.5%) were undetectable by standard karyotype. VoUS accounted for 0.6% of cases. Our data confirm that a mixed-resolution and targeted array CGH platform, as Easychip 8x15K, yields a similar detection rate of higher resolution CMA platforms and reduces the occurrence of "toxic findings," hence making it eligible for a first-tier genetic test in pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies.

Prenatal array comparative genomic hybridization in a well-defined cohort of high-risk pregnancies. A 3-year implementation results in a public tertiary academic referral hospital

OBJECTIVE

To find out whether the diagnostic yield of prenatal array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) can be improved by targeting preselected high-risk pregnancies.

METHOD

All the in-house arrays ordered by the Fetomaternal Medical Center from February 2016 until December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The indications for array analysis included fetal structural abnormalities, increased nuchal translucency ≥3.5 mm and a chromosomal abnormality in a parent or a sibling. Common aneuploidies were excluded.

RESULTS

Diagnostic yield was 15.1% in the entire patient cohort and as high as 20% in fetuses with multiple structural anomalies. The diagnostic yield was lowest in the group with isolated growth retardation. A total of 76 copy number variants (CNVs) were reported from a total of 65 samples, including 16 CNVs associated with a well-described microdeletion/microduplication syndrome, six autosomal trisomies in mosaic form, and three pathogenic single-gene deletions with dominant inheritance and 12 CNVs known to be risk factors for eg developmental delay.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic yield of aCGH was higher than what has previously been reported in less defined patient cohorts. However, the number of CNVs with unclear correlation to the fetal ultrasound findings was still relatively high. The importance of adequate pre- and posttest counseling must therefore be emphasized.

Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226

Prenatal testing for chromosomal abnormalities is designed to provide an accurate assessment of a patient's risk of carrying a fetus with a chromosomal disorder. A wide variety of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests are available; each offers varying levels of information and performance, and each has relative advantages and limitations. When considering screening test characteristics, no one test is superior in all circumstances, which results in the need for nuanced, patient-centered counseling from the obstetric care professional and complex decision making by the patient. Each patient should be counseled in each pregnancy about options for testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. It is important that obstetric care professionals be prepared to discuss not only the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities but also the relative benefits and limitations of the available screening and diagnostic tests. Testing for chromosomal abnormalities should be an informed patient choice based on provision of adequate and accurate information, the patient's clinical context, accessible health care resources, values, interests, and goals. All patients should be offered both screening and diagnostic tests, and all patients have the right to accept or decline testing after counseling.The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide current information regarding the available screening test options available for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and to review their benefits, performance characteristics, and limitations. For information regarding prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, refer to Practice Bulletin No. 162, Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders. For additional information regarding counseling about genetic testing and communicating test results, refer to Committee Opinion No. 693, Counseling About Genetic Testing and Communication of Genetic Test Results. For information regarding carrier screening for genetic conditions, refer to Committee Opinion No. 690, Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine and Committee Opinion No. 691, Carrier Screening for Genetic Conditions. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to further clarify methods of screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, including expanded information regarding the use of cell-free DNA in all patients regardless of maternal age or baseline risk, and to add guidance related to patient counseling.

The role of chromosomal microarray analysis among fetuses with normal karyotype and single system anomaly or nonspecific sonographic findings

INTRODUCTION

Chromosomal microarray analysis is recommended as the first-tier test for the evaluation of fetuses with structural anomalies. This study aims to investigate the incremental diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray over conventional karyotyping analysis in fetuses with anomalies restricted to one anatomic system and those with nonspecific anomalies detected by sonography.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 749 fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis for abnormal ultrasound findings isolated to one anatomic system and normal karyotype, utilizing chromosomal microarray. Overall, 495 (66%) fetuses had anomalies confined to one anatomic system and 254 (34%) had other nonspecific anomalies including increased nuchal translucency (≥3.5 mm), cystic hygroma, intrauterine growth restriction and hydrops fetalis.

RESULTS

Fetuses with ultrasound anomalies restricted to one anatomic system had a 3.0% risk of carrying a pathogenic copy number variant; the risk varied dependent on the anatomic system affected. Fetuses with confined anomalies of the cardiac system had the highest diagnostic yield at 4.6%, but there were none in the urogenital system. Fetuses with nonspecific ultrasound anomalies had the highest diagnostic yield in fetuses with an intrauterine growth restriction at 5.9%. Overall, fetuses with a nonspecific ultrasound anomaly were affected with pathogenic copy number variants in 1.6% in the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray in fetuses with normal karyotype and ultrasound abnormality confined to a single anatomic system was highest if it involved cardiac defects or intrauterine growth restriction. This diagnostic yield ranges from 0% to 4.6% depending on the anatomic system involved. Chromosomal microarray has considerable diagnostic value in these pregnancies.

Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies: An 8-year long observational study from a tertiary care university hospital

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of DNA copy number variants (CNVs) detected with array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. Secondary objectives were to describe the prevalence of CNV in specific CNS abnormalities, in isolated defects or associated with other malformations or fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

Observational cohort study in 238 fetuses with CNS anomalies in which an array-CGH had been performed between January 2009 and December 2017. Pathogenic CNV and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reported.

RESULTS

Pathogenic CNVs were found in 16/238 cases (6.7%), VUS in 18/238 (7.6%), and normal result in 204/238 (85.7%) cases. Pathogenic CNVs were more frequent in posterior fossa anomalies (cerebellar hypoplasia 33%, megacisterna magna 20%), moderate ventriculomegaly (11%) and spina bifida (3.7%). Pathogenic CNVs and VUS were found in 7/182 (3.8%) and 14/182 (7.7%) cases of isolated anomalies, in 9/49 (18.4%) and 4/49 (8.2%) presenting another malformation, and in 0/7 and 0/7 cases with associated FGR (P = .001, P = .741, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results provide strong evidence toward performing array in fetuses with CNS anomalies, particular in cases of posterior fossa anomalies. The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs is higher in association with other malformations.

Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To categorise the variants of uncertain significance found with prenatal chromosomal microarray and determine the proportion of such variants that are associated with a well-known phenotype in order to establish how often they remain truly of uncertain significance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The University of California, San Francisco.

POPULATION

All patients with a variant of uncertain significance on prenatal microarray between 2014 and 2018.

METHODS

Each variant was classified as a copy number variant that (a) contains Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-annotated disease-causing genes ('OMIM morbid genes'); (b) confers autosomal recessive carrier status; (c) is associated with incomplete penetrance; (d) is >1 Mb in size without OMIM morbid genes; (e) demonstrates mosaicism; or (f) contains significant regions of homozygosity. For each variant of uncertain significance, we examined the existing literature to determine whether the predicted phenotype(s) was known.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prevalence and classification of variants and how much information is available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

RESULTS

Of 970 prenatal microarrays, 55 (5.8%) had at least one variant of uncertain significance. The most common were copy number variants containing OMIM morbid genes (36.8%). In all, 48 (84.2%) were associated with a known phenotype; 55 (96.5%) had data available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of variants of uncertain significance with prenatal microarray was 5.8%. In the large majority of cases, data were available regarding the predicted phenotype.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Variants of uncertain significance occur in 5.8% of prenatal microarrays. In the overwhelming majority of cases, outcome information is available.

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in late trimester pregnancy using cordocentesis

Because the numbers of detected fetal abnormalities increase as gestation progresses, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of cordocentesis for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis tests in 754 women during third trimester pregnancy. Conventional karyotyping was performed on all fetuses, and Affymetrix CytoScan HD was used for SNP-array testing. In addition to the 24 cases with chromosomal abnormalities detected with conventional karyotyping analysis, the SNP-array test identified 56 (7.4%) cases with normal karyotypes but abnormal copy number variations (CNVs). Of those, 24 were pathogenic CNVs and 32 were of uncertain clinical significance. In 742 of the cases, there were abnormal sonographic findings, and cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 76 cases (10.2%). The largest number of abnormalities involved multiple malformations (21.7%), followed by defects in the lymphatics or effusion (19.0%) or urogenital system (15.3%). The use of SNP-array test fully complemented chromosome karyotype analysis after late cordocentesis. It also improved the detection rate for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and was effective for preventing and controlling the occurrence of birth defects.

Detection of copy number variants with chromosomal microarray in 10 377 pregnancies at a single laboratory

Introduction

Invasive prenatal testing with chromosomal microarray analysis may be a relevant option for all pregnant women, but there is only moderate‐quality evidence for such an offer. We intended to study the prevalence of copy number variants (CNVs) in prenatal samples using a single SNP‐array platform stratified by indication.

Material and methods

A cross‐sectional study was performed based on a cohort. From January 2015 to December 2017, a total of 10 377 prenatal samples were received for prenatal single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐array in the laboratory of the Genetics Generation Advancement Corporation. Indications for chromosomal microarray analysis studies included the confirmation of an abnormal karyotype, ultrasound abnormalities, advanced maternal age and parental anxiety. CNVs and region of homozygosity identified by the SNP‐array were analyzed.

Results

Of 10 377 cases, 689 had ultrasound abnormalities and 9688 were ascertained to have other indications. The overall prevalence of CNVs was 2.1% (n = 223/10 377, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9‐2.4), but the prevalence was 4.4% (95% CI 3.0‐6.1) for cases referred with abnormal ultrasound findings and 2.0% (95% CI 1.7‐2.3) for other indications. Of the 223 CNVs detected, 42/10 377 were pathogenic (0.4%, 95% CI 0.3‐0.6), 84 were susceptibility CNV (0.8%, 95% CI 0.6‐1.0) and 97 were variants of uncertain significance (0.9%, 95% CI 0.8‐1.1). Using an SNP‐based platform allowed for the detection of paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 in a fetus with ultrasound abnormality.

Conclusions

With an indication of advanced maternal age but normal ultrasound scans, the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was 0.4% and that of susceptibility CNV 0.7%. As CNVs are independent of maternal age, the prevalence is likely the same for younger women. Thus, this study provides further evidence that chromosomal microarray analysis should be available for all women who wish to receive diagnostic testing, as this risk is above the cut‐off of 1:300 for Down syndrome, leading to the suggestion of invasive testing. A chromosomal microarray analysis based on SNP‐array platform is preferable, as it can also detect uniparental disomy in addition to copy number variants.

Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with or without ultrasound abnormalities in women of advanced maternal age

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been suggested to be routinely conducted for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities (UA), especially with ultrasound structural anomalies (USA). Whether to routinely offer CMA to women of advanced maternal age (AMA) without UA when undergoing invasive prenatal testing is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of CMA in detecting clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses, with or without UA, of women with AMA.

METHODS

Data from singleton pregnancies referred for prenatal CMA due to AMA, with or without UA were obtained. The enrolled cases were divided into AMA group (group A) and AMA accompanied by UA group (group B). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology and conventional karyotyping were performed simultaneously.

RESULTS

A total of 703 cases were enrolled and divided into group A (N = 437) and group B (N = 266). Clinically significant abnormalities were detected by CMA in 52 cases (7.4%, 52/703; the value in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (3.9% vs 13.2%, P < .05); no statistic difference was observed with respect to submicroscopic variants of clinical significance between the two groups (0.9% vs 2.6%, P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Chromosomal microarray analysis should be available to all women with AMA undergoing invasive prenatal testing, regardless of ultrasound findings.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of chromosomal microarray as a primary test for prenatal diagnosis in Hong Kong

Background

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) has been shown to be cost-effective over karyotyping in invasive prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies. Yet, information regarding preceding and subsequent tests must be considered as a whole before the true cost-effectiveness can emerge. Currently in Hong Kong, karyotyping is offered free as the standard prenatal test while genome-wide array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH), a form of CMA, is self-financed. A new algorithm was proposed to use aCGH following quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) as primary test instead of karyotyping. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the proposed algorithm versus the current algorithm for prenatal diagnosis in Hong Kong.

Methods

Between November 2014 and February 2016, 129 pregnant women who required invasive prenatal diagnosis at two public hospitals in Hong Kong were prospectively recruited. The proposed algorithm was performed for all participants in this demonstration study. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, cost and outcome (diagnostic rate) data were compared with that of a hypothetical scenario representing the current algorithm. Further analysis was performed to incorporate women’s willingness-to-pay for the aCGH test. Impact of government subsidies on the aCGH test was explored as a sensitivity analysis.

Results

The proposed algorithm dominated the current algorithm for prenatal diagnosis. Both algorithms were equally effective but the proposed algorithm was significantly cheaper (p ≤ 0.05). Taking into account women’s willingness-to-pay for an aCGH test, the proposed algorithm was more effective and less costly than the current algorithm. When the government subsidy reaches 100%, the maximum number of diagnoses could be made.

Conclusion

By switching to the proposed algorithm, cost saving can be achieved whilst maximizing the diagnostic rate for invasive prenatal diagnosis. It is recommended to implement aCGH as a primary test following QF-PCR to replace the majority of karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis in Hong Kong.

The yield of chromosomal microarray analysis among pregnancies terminated due to fetal malformations

Background: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is preferred for genetic work-up when fetal malformations are detected prenatally.Objectives: To assess the detection rate of CMA after pregnancy termination due to abnormal ultrasound findings.Methods: CMA was successfully performed in 71 pregnancies using fetal DNA (mainly from skin) or placenta. Data regarding clinical background, pregnancy work-up, and CMA were analyzed.Results: Findings were abnormal in 17 cases (23.9%), of which 13 were detectable by karyotype. The incremental yield of CMA was 4/71 (5.6%); 1/32 (3.1%) for cases with an isolated anomaly and 3/39 (7.7%) for cases with nonisolated anomalies.Conclusions: CMA yield from terminated pregnancies was 23.9%. Although most chromosomal abnormalities are detectable by karyotype, CMA does not require viable dividing cells; hence, it is more practical for work-up after termination. In most cases, the diagnosis was followed by consultation regarding the risk of recurrence and recommendations for testing in subsequent pregnancies.

A new case of SMABF2 diagnosed in stillbirth expands the prenatal presentation and mutational spectrum of ASCC1

Spinal muscular atrophy with congenital bone fractures 2 (SMABF2) is a rare autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder characterized by arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and prenatal fractures of the long bones, with poor prognosis. The most affected patients present with biallelic loss-of-function nucleotide variants in ASCC1 gene, coding a subunit of the transcriptional coactivator ASC-1 complex, although the exact pathogenesis is yet unknown. This work describes the first case of SMABF2 in a stillbirth with documented evolution of the disease in the prenatal period. A microdeletion copy number variant (CNV) of about 64 Kb, involving four exons of ASCC1, was firstly detected by microarray analysis, requested for arthrogryposis and hydrops. Subsequent exome analysis disclosed a nucleotide variant of the same gene [c.1027C>T; (p. Arg343*)], resulting in the introduction of a premature termination codon. This stillbirth represents the first case of ASCC1 compound heterozygosity, due to an exonic microdeletion and a nucleotide variant, expanding the mutational spectrum of this gene. It also provides further evidence that exonic CNVs are an underestimated cause of disease-alleles and that the integrated use of the last generation genetic analysis tools, together with careful clinical evaluations, are fundamental for the characterization of rare diseases even in the prenatal setting.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results From Pregnancies With Various Ultrasonographic Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To examine chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with various ultrasonographic anomalies and to characterize the copy number variants in diverse fetal phenotypes.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined chromosomal microarray analyses of amniocenteses performed nationwide as a result of fetal ultrasonographic anomalies (structural defects, fetal growth restriction, and polyhydramnios) between January 2013 and September 2017. The rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray findings was compared between the different phenotypes and with a previously described control population of 15,225 pregnancies with normal ultrasonographic findings.

RESULTS

Clinically significant chromosomal microarray aberrations were detected in 272 of 5,750 pregnancies (4.7%): 115 (2%) karyotype-detectable and 157 (2.7%) submicroscopic. Most commonly detected copy number variants were 22q11.21 deletions (0.4%) followed by 22q11.21 gain of copy number (0.2%). Specific copy number variants detected among pregnancies with abnormal ultrasonographic findings were up to 20-fold more prevalent compared with low-risk pregnancies. Some variants were associated with specific phenotypes (eg, 22q11.21 microdeletions with cardiovascular and 17q12 microdeletions with genitourinary defects).

CONCLUSION

The rate of abnormal amniotic chromosomal microarray analysis results is twice that of karyotypic abnormalities in pregnancies with various abnormal ultrasonographic findings.

C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis

BACKGROUND

In prenatal diagnosis, CMA has begun to emerge as a favorable alternative to karyotype analysis, but it could not identify balanced translocations, triploidies, inversion and heteromorphisms. Therefore, conventional cytogenetic and specific staining methods still play an important role in the work-up of chromosome anomaly. This study investigated the application of C-banding and AgNOR-staining techniques in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structure abnormalities.

RESULTS

Among the 2970 samples, the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms was 8.79% (261/2970). The most frequent was found to be chromosome Y (2.93%, 87/2970), followed by chromosome 1 (1.65 %, 49/2970), 9 (1.52 %, 45/2970), 22 (0.77 %, 23/2970) and 15 (0.64 %, 19/2970). We compared the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms between recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) group and control group. The frequency of autosomal hetermorphisms in RSA group was 7.63% higher than that in control group (5.78%), while the frequency of Y chromosomal heteromorphisms was 4.76% lower than that in control group (5.71%). Here we summarized 4 representative cases, inv (1) (p12q24), psu dic (4;17) (p16.3;p13.3), r(X)(p11; q21) and an isodicentric bisatellited chromosome to illustrate the application of C-banding or AgNOR-staining, CMA or NGS was performed to detect CNVs if necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to identify chromosomal heteromorphisms and marker chromosomes or some structural rearrangements involving the centromere or acrocentric chromosomes. Our results suggested that there was no evidence for an association between chromosomal heteromorphisms and infertility or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Undoubtedly, sometimes we needed to combine the results of CMA or CNV-seq to comprehensively reflect the structure and aberration of chromosome segments. Thus, accurate karyotype reports and genetic counseling could be provided.

Indications for genetic testing leading to termination of pregnancy

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to assess the distribution of genetic abnormalities leading to termination of pregnancy and its fluctuation during the past 8 years in light of those technical advances.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of all pregnant women who underwent termination of pregnancy because of genetic aberrations in their fetuses from January 2010 through April 2018 in our medical center. The information that was gathered included: maternal age, results of the nuchal scan, results of the first- and second-trimester biochemical screening, ultrasonographic findings, reasons for conducting a genetic evaluation, gestational age at which termination of pregnancy was carried out, and the type of genetic aberration.

RESULTS

816 women underwent termination of pregnancy at our institution due to genetic aberrations, most of them because of positive biochemical screening (n = 297, 36%) or because of maternal anxiety (n = 283, 35%). Findings in chromosomal microarray led to termination of pregnancy in 100 women (100/816, 12%). Chromosomal microarray had been performed due to maternal choice and not because of accepted medical indications among most of the women who underwent termination of pregnancy due to findings on chromosomal microarray (69/100, 69%).

CONCLUSION

Performing chromosomal microarray on a structurally normal fetus and identifying abnormal copy number variants may give the parents enough information for deciding on the further course of the pregnancy.

What have we learned from 691 prenatal chromosomal microarrays for ventricular septal defects?

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) represents the most common type of congenital cardiac anomaly, affecting more than 1 in 300 live births. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence and nature of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in a large cohort of pregnancies with VSD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data acquisition was performed through the Ministry of Health computerized database. All CMA results performed due to VSD during 2013-2017 were included. The rates of clinically significant CMA results of cases with isolated and non-isolated VSD were compared with two control populations-a systematic review of 9272 pregnancies and a local cohort of 5541 fetuses with normal ultrasound.

RESULTS

Overall, 691 CMA analyses performed due to a sonographic indication of VSD were detected. Of 568 pregnancies with isolated VSD, eight (1.4%) clinically significant copy number variants were detected, a nonsignificant difference compared with low risk pregnancies. Of the 123 pregnancies with non-isolated VSDs, 18 (14.6%) clinically significant CMA results were detected, a considerably increased risk compared with control pregnancies. Karyotype-detectable anomalies constituted 12 of the 18 abnormal CMA results in non-isolated VSD group (66.7%), a significantly higher proportion compared with 2 of 8 (25%) in isolated VSD cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of our study, representing the largest number of CMA results in pregnancies with VSD, suggest that the rate of abnormal CMA findings in isolated VSD does not differ from pregnancies with normal ultrasound. This observation is true for populations undergoing routine common trisomy screening tests and early sonographic evaluation, as well as widely available non-invasive prenatal screening. Conversely, CMA analysis yields a high detection rate in pregnancies with non-isolated VSD. Our results question the recommendation to perform invasive prenatal testing for CMA in pregnancies with isolated VSD.

The epidemic of abnormal copy number variant cases missed because of reliance upon noninvasive prenatal screening

OBJECTIVE

To assess the implications of increasing utilization of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), which may reach 50% with the concomitant decrease in diagnostic procedures (DPs) for its impact on detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

METHODS

We studied our program's statistics over 5 years for DPs and utilization of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We then modeled the implications in our program if DP had not fallen and nationally of a 50% DP and aCGH testing rate using well-vetted expectations for the diagnosis of abnormal copy number variants (CNVs).

RESULTS

Our DP fell 40% from 2013-2017. Utilization of aCGH for DP nearly tripled. We detected 28 abnormal CNVs. If DP had not fallen, we likely would have detected 60. With 4 million US births per year, 2 million DPs would detect 30 000 abnormal CNVs and 4000 standard aneuploidies. At a 1/500 complication-pregnancy loss rate, the detection/complication ratio is 8.5/1.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive prenatal screening has significantly changed the practice of prenatal screening. However, while increasing the detection of Down syndrome, the concomitant decrease in DP and lack of aCGH results in missing many more abnormalities than the increase in Down syndrome and complications of DP combined. From a public health perspective, such represents a missed opportunity for overall health care delivery.

Expanding the indications for cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation: clinical considerations and implications

Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA has been widely integrated into routine obstetrical care. The scope of cell-free DNA testing has expanded from trisomies 21, 18, and 13 to include sex chromosome conditions, panels of specific microdeletions, and more recently genome-wide copy number variants and rare autosomal trisomies. Because the technical ability to test for a condition does not necessarily correspond with a clinical benefit to a population or to individual pregnant women, the benefits and harms of screening programs must be carefully weighed before implementation. Application of the World Health Organization criteria to cell-free DNA screening is informative when considering implementation of expanded cell-free DNA test menus. Most microdeletions and duplications are rare to the point that the prevalence has not even been defined and their natural history cannot be reliably predicted in the prenatal period. At the current time, scientific evidence regarding clinical performance of expanded cell-free DNA panels is lacking. Expanded cell-free DNA menus therefore create a dilemma for diagnosis, treatment, and counseling of patients. The clinical utility of expanding cell-free DNA testing to include panels of microdeletions and genome-wide assessment of large chromosomal imbalances has yet to be demonstrated; as such, the clinical implementation of this testing is premature.

Role of late amniocentesis in the era of modern genomic technologies

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, amniocentesis is performed between 17 and 23 weeks of gestation. This enables decisions regarding the course of pregnancy to be made before viability. Less frequently, amniocentesis is performed in the third trimester. Advanced genomic technologies such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) provide more detailed information about the fetus compared with traditional G-banded chromosomal analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the indications for and safety of late amniocentesis, genetic-test results (especially in the context of CMA technology) and outcome of pregnancies that underwent the procedure after 24 weeks.

METHODS

Medical records were analyzed retrospectively of all women in whom amniocentesis was performed at a gestational age of 24 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks, at Hadassah Medical Center, between June 2013 and March 2017. Parameters investigated included indications for late amniocentesis, complications, CMA results and pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

During the study period, 291 women (303 fetuses, 277 singleton and 14 twin pregnancies; in two twin pairs, one fetus was terminated before amniocentesis) underwent late amniocentesis. CMA was performed in all instances of amniocentesis. The most frequent indication was abnormal sonographic finding(s) (204/303 fetuses, 67%). Preterm delivery occurred in 1.7% and 5.1% of pregnancies within the first week and within 1 month following the procedure, respectively. Aneuploidy was detected in nine (3%) fetuses and nine (3%) others had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variant, suggesting that CMA doubled the diagnostic yield of traditional karyotyping. Maximal diagnostic yield (17.5%) was achieved for the subgroup of fetuses referred with abnormal sonographic findings in two or more fetal anatomical systems. Variants of uncertain significance or susceptibility loci were found in another nine (3%) fetuses.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnancies undergoing late amniocentesis, CMA increased detection rates of fetal abnormalities and had a shorter turnaround time compared with traditional chromosomal analysis; therefore, late amniocentesis may serve as a helpful tool for detecting fetal abnormalities or reassuring parents following late-appearing abnormal sonographic findings. However, CMA may expose findings of uncertain significance, about which the couple should be precounseled. The procedure appears to be safe. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The frequency of CNVs in a cohort population of consecutive fetuses with congenital anomalies after the termination of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The implementation of molecular karyotyping has resulted in an improved diagnostic yield in the genetic diagnostics of congenital anomalies, detected prenatally or after the termination of pregnancy. However, the systematic epidemiologic ascertainment of copy number variations in the etiology of congenital anomalies has not yet been sufficiently explored.

METHODS

Consecutive fetuses, altogether 204, with major single or multiple congenital anomalies were ascertained by using the SLOCAT registry for the period from 2011 to 2015. After excluding aneuploidies by using conventional karyotyping or Quantitative Fluorescence-Polymerase Chain Reaction, array comparative genomic hybridization was performed for the detection of copy number variations.

RESULTS

We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations in 14 fetuses (6.8%); 2.9% in fetuses with isolated, and 3.9% in fetuses with multiple congenital anomalies. Additionally, aneuploidies and major structural chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 40.2%.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic approach of ascertaining congenital anomalies resulted in explaining the etiology of congenital anomalies in 47% of fetuses after the termination of pregnancy. By using array comparative genomic hybridization, we found that copy number variations represent an important part in the etiology of multiple, as well as isolated congenital anomalies, which indicates the importance of analyzing copy number variations in the diagnostic approach of fetuses with congenital anomalies after the termination of pregnancy.

Prenatal diagnosis of de novo monosomy 18p deletion syndrome by chromosome microarray analysis: Three case reports

RATIONALE

Monosomy 18p deletion syndrome refers to a rare chromosomal disorder resulting from the part deletion of the short arm of chromosome 18. Prenatal diagnosis of de novo 18p deletion syndrome is a challenge due to its low incidence and untypical prenatal clinical presentation.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three cases received amniocentesis due to increased nuchal translucency (INT), high risk for Down syndrome, and INT combined intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), respectively.

DIAGNOSIS

The 3 cases were diagnosed with de novo monosomy 18p deletion syndrome by amniocentesis and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA).

INTERVENTIONS

Karyotype analysis and CMA were used to analyze the abnormal chromosome.

OUTCOMES

Case 1 and case 2 revealed 13.87 and 12.68 Mb deletions by array-CGH analysis, respectively. Case 3 revealed 6.9 Mb deletions in 18p11.32p11.31 and 7.5 Mb deletions in 18p11.23p11.21 by single nucleotide polymorphism array. All of the pregnancies were terminated due to the abnormal chromosome.

LESSONS

The fetal phenotype of monosomy 18p deletion syndrome shows great variability and may not be evident during the pregnancy. CMA may be served as an effective tool for the diagnosis of prenatal monosomy 18p deletion syndrome diagnosis.

Genetic and expression changes in TNF-α as a risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis in northeast India

Antitumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy is used as a clinical intervention for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but differences exist in response to the treatment which makes the candidature of the screening of TNF-α alteration(s) at genetic and expression levels an important agenda prior to treatment. This study aims to determine the associative role of TNF-α -308G/A polymorphism and differential expression of TNF-α in the pathogenesis of RA. A case-control study where a total of 126 RA patients were enrolled based on ACR-EULAR (2010) criteria, along with 160 community matched age and sex controls over a period of three years. The differential expression level of TNF-α mRNA and protein level was studied and TNF-α -308G/A polymorphism was screened by T-ARMS PCR assay. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. mRNA expression level of TNF-α was upregulated in RA cases (avg. 15.85 ± 9.52 fold) compared to control. TNF-α protein level was found to be higher in RA cases (28.62±7.17 pg/mL) compared to control (23.14±6.91 pg/mL). TNF-α -308 variant GA genotype was higher in RA (46.03%) than in control (25%). The presence of TNF-α -308 variant A allele was associated with increased risk of RA susceptibility (odds ratio (OR) = 2.559 at 95% confidence interval (CI), P< 0.001) but not severity (OR = 1.617 at 95% CI, P = 0.571). The presence of -308 variant genotype was associated with a higher TNF-α mRNA and protein expression. The presence of TNF-α -308A allele is associated with increased risk of RA susceptibility and differential TNF-α expression, and has prognostic significance. Association of higher TNF-α pro-inflammatory cytokine levels with northeast Indian patients makes them suitable subjects for anti-TNF-α therapy.