Incarceration of a gravid uterus with massive placental enlargement and fetal triploidy at 19 weeks of gestation - A case report on the simultaneous presence of two rare conditions

This article reports a rare case of uterine incarceration in pregnancy concurrent with nonmolar fetal triploidy and massive placental enlargement in a 35-year-old primigravida. The patient presented with abdominal discomfort and peripheral edema at 19 weeks of gestation. Diagnostic assessments revealed a retroflexed uterus with a massively enlarged placenta and a severely growth-restricted fetus. Uterine repositioning was successfully achieved after rectal filling. However, spontaneous fetal demise led to vaginal delivery. The fetal autopsy confirmed female triploidy. Histopathology of the placenta showed no features of a partial mole. This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing uterine incarceration in pregnancy, the need for early intervention and the complexity of managing multiple concurrent pathologies.

Prenatal diagnosis of acrania/exencephaly/anencephaly sequence (AEAS): additional structural and genetic anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To analyse additional structural and genetic anomalies in fetuses with acrania/exencephaly/anencephaly sequence (AEAS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 139 fetuses with AEAS diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 in a single tertiary referral ultrasound department.

RESULTS

The median gestational age at diagnosis decreased from 15 weeks in 2006 to 13 weeks in 2020 (- 0.21 per each year; p = 0.009). In 103 fetuses, the defects were limited to the neural tube (NTD) (74.1%), in 36 fetuses (25.9%), there were additional structural non-NTD anomalies. The most common were ventral body wall defects present in 17.8% (23/139), followed by anomalies of the limbs (7.2%; 10/139), face (6.5%; 9/139) and heart (6.5%; 9/139). Genetic anomalies were diagnosed in 7 of the 74 conclusive results (9.5%; 7/74; trisomy 18, n = 5; triploidy, n = 1; duplication of Xq, n = 1). In univariate logistic regression models, male sex, limb anomalies and ventral body wall defects significantly increased the risk of genetic anomalies (OR 12.3; p = 0.024; OR 16.5; p = 0.002 and OR 10.4; p = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of fetuses with AEAS have additional structural non-NTD anomalies, which are mostly consistent with limb body wall complex. Genetic abnormalities are diagnosed in almost 10% of affected fetuses and trisomy 18 is the most common aberration. Factors that significantly increased the odds of genetic anomalies in fetuses with AEAS comprise male sex, limb anomalies and ventral body wall defects.

The Contribution of QF-PCR and Pathology Studies in the Diagnosis of Diandric Triploidy/Partial Mole

Objective: the aim of our study was to assess the contribution of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and pathology studies in the diagnosis of diandric triploidies/partial hydatidiform moles. Methods: this study included all fet al triploidies diagnosed by QF-PCR in chorionic villi or amniotic fluid in the 2 centers of BCNatal in which a maternal saliva sample was used to establish its parental origin. Pathology studies were performed in products of conception and concordance between a partial hydatidiform mole diagnosis and the finding of a diandric triploidy was assessed. Results: among 46 fetal triploidies, found in 13 ongoing pregnancies and in 33 miscarriages, there were 26 (56%) diandric triploidies. Concordant molecular (diandric triploidy) and pathology results (partial mole) were achieved in 14 cases (54%), while in 6 cases (23%) pathology studies were normal, and in the remaining 6 cases (23%) pathology studies could not be performed because miscarriage was managed medically. Conclusions: diandric triploidy is associated with partial hydatidiform mole and its diagnosis is crucial to prevent the development of persistent trophoblastic disease. QF-PCR analysis in chorionic villi or amniotic fluid provides a more accurate diagnosis of the parental origin of triploidy than the classical pathology studies.

Twin pregnancies discordant for digynic triploidy - A case series

OBJECTIVE

To analyse natural course and perinatal management in twin pregnancies discordant for digynic triploidy.

CASE REPORT

We present five cases of twins discordant for digynic triploidy. Pregnancy outcome was known for three of them. In one case, premature rupture of membranes occurred at 20 gestational weeks and both fetuses were miscarried. In two other pregnancies healthy co-twins were born at term after the triploid fetuses demise at 28 and 37 weeks. No maternal complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Twin pregnancies discordant for triploidy poses a challenge for perinatal management. Expectant management should be considered in digynic triploid cases.

Triploid pregnancy-Clinical implications

Triploidy is a life-limiting genetic aberration resulting from an extra haploid set of chromosomes of paternal (diandric triploidy) or maternal origin (digynic triploidy). Triploidy affects around 1%-2% of all conceptions. The majority of cases is miscarried at early developmental stages. In consequence of genomic imprinting, parental origin affects the phenotype of triploid pregnancies as well as the prevalence and spectrum of related maternal complications. Distinctive ultrasound features of both triploid phenotypes as well as characteristic patterns of biochemical markers may be useful in diagnosis. Molecular confirmation of the parental origin allows to predict the risk of complications, such as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, hyperthyroidism, hypertension, or preeclampsia associated with the paternal origin of triploidy. Diagnosis of partial hydatidiform mole associated with diandric triploidy is challenging especially in the first trimester pregnancy loss due to the limitations of both histopathology and ultrasound. We present important clinical aspects of triploid pregnancies and indicate unresolved issues demanding further studies.

Distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depending on gestational age

Purpose

To establish the distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depending on gestational age.

Methods

107 triploid samples tested prospectively in a single genetic department during a four-year period were analyzed for parental origin of triploidy by Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) (n=95) with the use of matching parental samples or by MS-MLPA (n=12), when parental samples were unavailable. Tested pregnancies were divided into three subgroups with regard to the gestational age at spontaneous pregnancy loss: <11 gestational weeks, 11–14 gestational weeks, and >14 gestational weeks.

Results

Diandric triploidy constituted overall 44.9% (46.5% in samples miscarried <11 gestational weeks, 64.3% in samples miscarried between 11 and 14 gestational weeks, and 27.8% in pregnancies which survived >14 gestational weeks).

Conclusions

The distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depends on gestational age. The majority of diandric triploid pregnancies is lost in the first trimester of pregnancy. In the second trimester, diandric cases are at least twice less frequent than digynic ones.

Recurrent fetal triploidy: is there a genetic cause?

Triploidy is currently understood as a sporadic genetic disorder, with no recognisable risk of recurrence nor identifiable risk factors. In cases of triploidy, chances of thriving through the second trimester of fetal development are very slim, with most of these pregnancies ending as early miscarriage. We report a case of repeated triploid pregnancies in the same woman, from different fathers, achieving the second trimester of pregnancy; elective termination was decided in both cases, after an amniocentesis revealing a triploid karyotype. Both triploid pregnancies are described and compared; prenatal laboratorial markers, sonographic features, clinical course and pathological findings are analysed and matched with fetal autopsy and placental pathological study. Reported findings strongly point to recurrent triploidy of maternal origin, and so the possibility of a genetic predisposition should be considered. Investigation is required to assess the presence of an underlying genetic mechanism in this setting, thus enabling a better genetic/obstetric counselling.

Genome-wide abnormalities in embryos: Origins and clinical consequences

Ploidy or genome-wide chromosomal anomalies such as triploidy, diploid/triploid mixoploidy, chimerism, and genome-wide uniparental disomy are the cause of molar pregnancies, embryonic lethality, and developmental disorders. While triploidy and genome-wide uniparental disomy can be ascribed to fertilization or meiotic errors, the mechanisms causing mixoploidy and chimerism remain shrouded in mystery. Different models have been proposed, but all remain hypothetical and controversial, are deduced from the developmental persistent genomic constitutions present in the sample studied and lack direct evidence. New single-cell genomic methodologies, such as single-cell genome-wide haplotyping, provide an extended view of the constitution of normal and abnormal embryos and have further pinpointed the existence of mixoploidy in cleavage-stage embryos. Based on those recent findings, we suggest that genome-wide anomalies, which persist in fetuses and patients, can for a large majority be explained by a noncanonical first zygotic cleavage event, during which maternal and paternal genomes in a single zygote, segregate to different blastomeres. This process, termed heterogoneic division, provides an overarching theoretical basis for the different presentations of mixoploidy and chimerism.

Obstetric complications in pregnancies with life-limiting malformations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The implementation of palliative care at birth has led to a significant rise in the number of couples who choose to continue with pregnancies complicated by life-limiting malformations (LLMs). Prenatal counselling and appropriate antenatal/perinatal management in these cases are poorly studied and may pose significant challenges. The purpose of this review is to outline specific obstetric risks and to suggest management for mothers who choose to continue with pregnancies with the most common LLMs.

RECENT FINDINGS

In pregnancies complicated by LLMs where parents opt for expectant management, clinicians should respect parental wishes, whilst openly sharing potential serious maternal medical risks specific for the identified abnormalities. The focus of both antenatal and perinatal care should be maternal wellbeing rather than foetal survival. Follow-up ultrasound examinations and maternal surveillance should be aimed at achieving timely diagnosis and effective management of obstetric complications. A clear perinatal plan, agreed with the couples by a multi-disciplinary team including a foetal medicine specialist, a neonatologist and a geneticist, is crucial to reduce maternal morbidity.

SUMMARY

This review provides a useful framework for clinicians who face the challenges of counselling and managing cases complicated by LLMs where parents opt for pregnancy continuation.

Analysis of tissue from pregnancy loss and aborted fetus with ultrasound anomaly using subtelomeric MLPA and chromosomal array analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and types of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancy loss and aborted fetuses with anomaly and compare the performance of subtelomeric MLPA and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in these specimens.

METHODS

Samples were collected from spontaneous miscarriages, stillbirths and aborted fetuses with anomaly between January 2015 and April 2019. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected using subtelomeric MLPA and CMA.

RESULTS

Among the 172 miscarriage samples, CMA detected pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities in 88 cases. MLPA could identified all aneuploidies and most pathogenic CNVs, missing all polyploidies; Of the 30 stillbirths, one pathogenic CNV and two VOUS were identified by CMA, all of which were missed from MLPA; Of the 135 aborted fetuses with anomaly, CMA identified pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities in 32 fetuses (23.7%); 18.95% in fetuses with isolated, and 35% in fetuses with multiple anomalies. MLPA can identify all aneuploidies but missing most pathogenic CNVs.

CONCLUSION

Our systematical comparison of subtelomeric MLPA and CMA for chromosomal analysis of tissue from pregnancy loss and aborted fetuses with anomaly is useful for assessing clinical utility of these techniques. MLPA screening, coupled with CMA analysis, is a cost-effective approach to detect chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage and anomalous fetuses. However, MLPA might not be appropriate for chromosome analysis in stillbirth without structural anomaly; further research with more samples is needed.

Prenatal sonographic features can accurately determine parental origin in triploid pregnancies

Objective

To describe the prenatal sonographic features and maternal biochemical markers in triploid pregnancies and to assess whether prenatal phenotype can determine genetic origin.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included all triploid pregnancies diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 in two Fetal Medicine Units in Amsterdam. Fetal growth, presence of structural anomalies, extra‐fetal anomalies, and maternal biochemical markers were retrieved. Asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction was diagnosed when the head‐to‐abdominal circumference (HC/AC) ratio was >95th centile. Parental origin was analyzed via molecular genotyping in 46 cases (38.3%).

Results

One hundred and twenty triploid pregnancies were identified, of which 86 cases (71.6%) were detected before 18 weeks of gestation. Triploidy of maternal origin was found in 32 cases (69.6%) and was associated with asymmetrical growth restriction, a thin placenta, and low pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A and free beta‐human chorionic gonadotrophin (β‐hCG) levels. Triploidy of paternal origin was found in 14 cases (30.4%) and was associated with an increased nuchal translucency, placental molar changes, and a high free β‐hCG. Prospective prediction of the parental origin of the triploidy was made in 30 of the 46 cases based on phenotypical ultrasound presentation, and it was correct in all cases.

Conclusion

Asymmetrical growth restriction with severe HC/AC discrepancy is pathognomonic of maternal triploidy. Placental molar changes indicate a paternal triploidy. Moreover, triploidy can present with an abnormal first trimester combined test, with serum levels on the extreme end. When available results of maternal serum markers can support the diagnosis of parental origin of the triploidy, an accurate assessment of the parental origin based on prenatal sonographic features is possible, making DNA analysis redundant.

Early prenatal detection of triploidy: a 9-year experience in mainland China

Objective: In this study, we report the indications for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis of triploid cases, in an attempt to identify clues to early diagnosis.Study design: This was a retrospective analysis of prenatal cases of triploidy during a 9-year period at mainland China. Clinical data were reviewed for these cases, including maternal demographics, indications for invasive testing, fetal ultrasound findings, and pregnancy outcomes.Results: A total of 22 singleton pregnancies affected with triploid fetuses were detected. The fetal karyotype included 69,XXX (72.7%) and 69,XXY (27.3%). Eighteen cases were identified by the first trimester screening program. One case was missed by maternal cell-free DNA testing, but detected by second trimester anatomy scan. Three cases escaped the first trimester screening and were detected by second trimester anatomy scan.Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that most triploid cases can be diagnosed prenatally during the first trimester. The early asymmetrical fetal growth restriction, structural anomalies, and extremely high risk serum screening result for trisomy 21 or 18 should alert the physicians to the investigation of triploidy.Key Message: Ultrasound-based first-trimester screening plays a major role in early diagnosis of fetal triploidy. Future replacement of routine first-trimester screening by cell-DNA testing might miss the chance of early diagnosis and management of triploid pregnancies.

The Placental Basis of Fetal Growth Restriction

Placental dysfunction is a major contributing factor to fetal growth restriction. Placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction occurs through chronic fetal hypoxia owing to poor placental perfusion through a variety of mechanisms. Maternal vascular malperfusion is the most common placental disease contributing to fetal growth restriction; however, the role of rare placental diseases should not be overlooked. Although the features of maternal vascular malperfusion are identifiable on placental pathology, antepartum diagnostic methods are evolving. Placental imaging and uterine artery Doppler, used in conjunction with angiogenic growth factors (specifically placenta growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1), play an increasingly important role.

A system-based approach to the genetic etiologies of non-immune hydrops fetalis

A wide spectrum of genetic causes may lead to nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), and a thorough phenotypic and genetic evaluation are essential to determine the underlying etiology, optimally manage these pregnancies, and inform discussions about anticipated prognosis. In this review, we outline the known genetic etiologies of NIHF by fetal organ system affected, and provide a systematic approach to the evaluation of NIHF. Some of the underlying genetic disorders are associated with characteristic phenotypic features that may be seen on prenatal ultrasound, such as hepatomegaly with lysosomal storage disorders, hyperechoic kidneys with congenital nephrosis, or pulmonary valve stenosis with RASopathies. However, this is not always the case, and the approach to evaluation must include prenatal ultrasound findings as well as genetic testing and many other factors. Genetic testing that has been utilized for NIHF ranges from standard chromosomal microarray or karyotype to gene panels and broad approaches such as whole exome sequencing. Family and obstetric history, as well as pathology examination, can yield additional clues that are helpful in establishing a diagnosis. A systematic approach to evaluation can guide a more targeted approach to genetic evaluation, diagnosis, and management of NIHF.

Digynic triploidy in a fetus presenting with semilobar holoprosencephaly

OBJECTIVE

We present digynic triploidy in a fetus with semilobar holoprosencephaly (HPE).

CASE REPORT

A 32-year-old, gravid 1, para 0, woman underwent prenatal ultrasound examination at 12 weeks of gestation, and the ultrasound showed relative macrocephaly, a small non-cystic placenta, and a fetus with absent nasal bone and semilobar HPE. The pregnancy was terminated subsequently, and a 50-g fetus was delivered with a relatively enlarged head and premaxillary agenesis. The placenta was small and non-cystic. Postnatal cytogenetic analysis of the umbilical cord revealed a karyotype of 69, XXX. Postnatal DNA marker analysis using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction assays and the polymorphic short tandem repeat markers for chromosome 18 and 20 on the placental tissues showed a diallelic pattern with a dosage of 1:2 (paternal allele to maternal allele ratio), indicating a maternal origin of the triploidy.

CONCLUSION

Fetuses with digynic triploidy may present relative macrocephaly, semilobar HPE and a small placenta on prenatal ultrasound.