The utility of nuchal translucency ultrasound in identifying rare chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by cell-free DNA screening

Strategies to Detect Chromosomal Anomalies Not Identified by NIPT

INTRODUCTION

Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (gwNIPT) has screening limitations for detectable chromosomal conditions and cannot detect microdeletions/microduplications (MD) or triploidy. Thickened nuchal translucency (NT) only detects around 10% of these cases.

METHODS

A 4-year retrospective study of singleton pregnancies undergoing first-line gwNIPT screening with subsequent CVS or amniocentesis. All MD cases, with or without gwNIPT screening, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 919 pregnancies with gwNIPT and invasive testing, 338 had a single chromosomal abnormality, with 9 false negative gwNIPT results (2.9%) and 26 undetectable abnormalities (18 MD, 8 triploidy) (7.7%). Twelve cases had a dual chromosomal abnormality and 4 returned a low-risk gwNIPT result. Only three (9%) of the "missed cases" had a large NT and two of these also had a structural abnormality. Approximately 90% of chromosomal anomalies missed by gwNIPT were detected by invasive prenatal testing indicated by one or more of the following: failed NIPT (9%), low PAPP-A (12%), early growth restriction (37%) and structural anomalies at pre-NIPT, 13- or 20-week ultrasounds (51%).

CONCLUSION

Most chromosomal abnormalities missed or unable to be found by gwNIPT are detected due to growth restriction or structural anomalies, not an enlarged NT. Failed NIPT and low PAPP-A concentrations contributed to detection.

How Useful is Nuchal Translucency in Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities Missed by Genome-Wide NIPT and What Measurement Threshold Should Be Used?

INTRODUCTION

Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (gwNIPT) has screening limitations for detectable genetic conditions and cannot detect microdeletions/microduplications (MD) or triploidy. Nuchal translucency (NT) increases with gestation and with genetic or structural abnormalities. This study aims to determine the utility of NT measurement in detecting genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT and the optimal NT threshold value.

METHODS

A 4-year retrospective study of singleton pregnancies undergoing first-line gwNIPT aneuploidy screening where invasive prenatal testing by CVS/or amniocentesis was subsequently undertaken. Population proportions for static and multiple of the median (MoM) NT cut-offs were derived from all 11-14 weeks ultrasound examinations.

RESULTS

Among 919 pregnancies with gwNIPT and invasive testing, 338 had a single genetic abnormality. There were 9 false negative GwNIPT results and a further 26 undetectable abnormalities (18 MD, 8 triploidy) in this cohort. Twelve had a dual chromosomal abnormality, four of which returned a low-risk gwNIPT. Thirty-three "missed cases" also had a 13-week scan, to which the various NT threshold values (3.0 mm, 1.6 MoM, 3.5 mm, and 1.9 MoM) were applied. In only 3 (9%) cases did the NT exceed 3.0 mm with similar detection rates (DR) for all higher cut-offs. Static and MoM-based NT cut-offs had similar positive predictive values (PPV).

CONCLUSION

Enlarged NT measurement is a poor predictor of genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT. When applied, the fixed NT cut-off of 3.5 mm provides a low FPR with a similar DR to lower cut-off thresholds, resulting in a higher PPV.

Outcomes of pregnancies with varying levels of nuchal translucency measurements: A population-based retrospective study in Ontario, Canada

INTRODUCTION

Nuchal translucency prenatal ultrasound is widely used to screen for chromosomal abnormalities. An elevated nuchal translucency has been associated with adverse outcomes such as pregnancy loss; however, extant studies investigating these associations have had important limitations, including selection bias. This study aimed to investigate the association between nuchal translucency measurements and pregnancy outcome, specifically, a composite of pregnancy loss, termination, stillbirth, or neonatal death.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study conducted with data from the prescribed perinatal registry in Ontario, Canada, Better Outcomes Registry & Network. All singleton pregnancies with an estimated date of delivery from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2021, and multiple marker screening including a nuchal translucency were included. Pregnancies with measurements 2.0- < 2.5 mm, 2.5- < 3.0 mm, 3.0- < 3.5 mm, 3.5- < 5.0 mm, 5.0- < 6.5 mm, and ≥6.5 mm were compared to a reference group with measurements <2.0 mm. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation to estimate associations between nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome, with adjustment for age at estimated date of delivery and gestational age at screening.

RESULTS

There were 414 268 singleton pregnancies included in the study. The risk of pregnancy loss, termination, stillbirth, or neonatal death increased with increasing levels of nuchal translucency measurements, with an adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of 11.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9, 14.3) in the group with measurements 3.5- < 5.0 mm. When pregnancies with diagnosed chromosomal abnormalities were excluded, this association remained strong, with an aRR of 6.4 (95% CI 4.8, 8.5). Among pregnancies with a live birth, those with a higher nuchal translucency measurement (>5.0 mm vs. <2.0 mm) were also at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes such as admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and APGAR score <7.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study using robust methods to reduce the risk of selection bias, we found that pregnancies with increased nuchal translucency measurements are less likely to result in a live birth, even with the exclusion of chromosomal abnormalities. Pregnancies with increased nuchal translucency measurements that resulted in a live birth may also be at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data

OBJECTIVE

We sought to analyze the genetic outcomes of fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th centile, and determine whether prenatal genetic counseling, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are truly beneficial for the outcomes of fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 535 pregnant women were included in this study, with a fetal NT > 95th centile at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation from January 2017 to December 2020. 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risk factors and NT > 99th centile received prenatal diagnostic karyotype analysis and CMA, and 211 pregnant women with fetal isolated increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile were selected to carry out NIPT.

RESULTS

A total of 211 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were included in the study, NIPT results showed that 8 high-risk cases were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. Overall, the detection rate of NIPT was 3.79%. A total of 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, along with other risk factors, and those with fetal NT > 99th centile, received karyotype analysis and CMA for prenatal diagnosis. Among them, a total of 73 genetic abnormalities were detected, including 45 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, 7 cases of structural abnormalities, and 21 cases of copy number variations (CNVs) with a size of less than 10 Mb. In addition, the 73 women with genetic abnormalities are divided into three groups based on the NT measurement (Group 1: Fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, Group 2: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile, and Group 3: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile). 13.11% (8/61) of pathogenic genetic abnormalities (6 chromosomal aneuploidy, 1 structural abnormality, and 1 likely pathogenic CNV) will be missed if genetic counseling and prenatal genetic testing were not conducted in fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risks. Pathogenic CNVs were the most common abnormalities in group 3, and one likely pathogenic CNV was detected in group 1 and group 3, respectively, and a total of 14 CNVs of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this study, we demonstrated that the critical value of NT > 95th centile for invasive detection or NIPT. Invasive testing combined with CMA may be recommended for fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile and with other risks. But when isolated NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, NIPT would be appropriate.

First-Trimester Ultrasound Screening in Routine Obstetric Practice

Technologic advances and ultrasonographer-physician experience in fetal imaging have led to significant improvements in our ability to distinguish between normal and abnormal fetal structural development in the latter part of the first trimester. As a critical component of pregnancy care, assessment of fetal anatomy at the end of the first trimester with a standardized imaging protocol should be offered to all pregnant patients regardless of aneuploidy screening results because it has been demonstrated to identify approximately half of fetal structural malformations. Early identification of abnormalities allows focused genetic counseling, timely diagnostic testing, and subspecialist consultation. In addition, a normal ultrasound examination result offers some degree of reassurance to most patients. Use of cell-free DNA alone for aneuploidy screening while foregoing an accompanying early anatomic evaluation of the fetus will result in many anomalies that are typically detected in the first trimester not being identified until later in pregnancy, thus potentially diminishing the quality of obstetric care for pregnant individuals and possibly limiting their reproductive options, including pregnancy termination.

Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies with different nuchal translucency cutoffs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficiency of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in cases with different cutoffs of nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyses pregnancies with NT ≥ 2.5 mm who underwent NIPT. Results of NT, NIPT, chromosomal diagnostic and pregnancy outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Study group was composed of 1470 single pregnancies, including 864 with NT 2.5-2.9 mm, 350 with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 256 with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Non-significant differences were found in the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT between different cutoffs of NT. There was one false positive case with NT 4.3 mm, screening for 47,XYY in NIPT showed normal in diagnostic testing. For cases with normal NIPT results, the residual risk is 1:20 (5%, 95%CI: 0.1-10.1%) in fetuses with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 1:15 (6.5%, 95%CI: 1.4%-11.5%) in fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. These false negative cases included one trisomy 21, seven pathogenic CNVs, one uniparental disomy and one single gene disorders.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the PPV of NIPT for screening chromosomal aberrations were similarly in different NT cutoffs, while false positive case does exist. After normal in NIPT, risk for chromosomal aberrations remained, especially pathogenic CNV and even common trisomy. Therefore, prenatal diagnosis was recommended and CMA was suggested to apply in pregnancies with NT ≥ 3.0 mm.

Safety of early cumulus cell removal combined with early rescue ICSI in the prevention of fertilization failure

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the clinical outcomes and safety implications of early cumulus cell removal after short-term insemination combined with early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in preventing fertilization failure?

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, a total of 14,360 cycles were divided into four groups based on insemination method and fertilization ability: conventional IVF group (n = 5519); early cumulus cell removal group (n = 4107); conventional ICSI group (n = 4215); and early rescue ICSI group (where failed or low fertilization was predicted, n = 519). Fertilization outcomes, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes and birth defects were analysed by comparing the early cumulus cell removal group with the conventional IVF group, and the early rescue ICSI group with the conventional ICSI group.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the outcomes of fertilization, pregnancy, neonates or birth defects between the conventional IVF group and the early cumulus cell removal group (P > 0.05). When compared with the conventional ICSI group, the early rescue ICSI group had similar rates of two pronuclei (2PN) at fertilization, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, live birth, sex, mean gestational age, very low birthweight, macrosomia and birth defects (P > 0.05) but a higher polyploidy rate, lower high-quality embryo rate (both P < 0.001), lower twin pregnancy rate (P < 0.01), lower rate of low birthweight, and a higher rate of normal birthweight (both P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Early cumulus cell removal combined with early rescue ICSI led to good pregnancy and neonatal outcomes without an increase in birth defects. This approach could therefore be an effective and safe method for patients with fertilization failure in conventional IVF.

How much can AI see in early pregnancy: A multi-center study of fetus head characterization in week 10-14 in ultrasound using deep learning

PURPOSE

To investigate if artificial intelligence can identify fetus intracranial structures in pregnancy week 11-14; to provide an automated method of standard and non-standard sagittal view classification in obstetric ultrasound examination METHOD AND MATERIALS: We proposed a newly designed scheme based on deep learning (DL) - Fetus Framework to identify nine fetus intracranial structures: thalami, midbrain, palate, 4th ventricle, cisterna magna, nuchal translucency (NT), nasal tip, nasal skin, and nasal bone. Fetus Framework was trained and tested on a dataset of 1528 2D sagittal-view ultrasound images from 1519 females collected from Shenzhen People's Hospital. Results from Fetus Framework were further used for standard/non-standard (S-NS) plane classification, a key step for NT measurement and Down Syndrome assessment. S-NS classification was also tested with 156 images from the Longhua branch of Shenzhen People's Hospital. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated for comparison among Fetus Framework, three classic DL models, and human experts with 1-, 3- and 5-year ultrasound training. Furthermore, 4 physicians with more than 5 years of experience conducted a reader study of diagnosing fetal malformation on a dataset of 316 standard images confirmed by the Fetus framework and another dataset of 316 standard images selected by physicians. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-Score of physicians' diagnosis on both sets are compared.

RESULTS

Nine intracranial structures identified by Fetus Framework in validation are all consistent with that of senior radiologists. For S-NS sagittal view identification, Fetus Framework achieved an AUC of 0.996 (95%CI: 0.987, 1.000) in internal test, at par with classic DL models. In external test, FF reaches an AUC of 0.974 (95%CI: 0.952, 0.995), while ResNet-50 arrives at AUC∼0.883, 95% CI 0.828-0.939, Xception AUC∼0.890, 95% CI 0.834-0.946, and DenseNet-121 AUC∼0.894, 95% CI 0.839-0.949. For the internal test set, the sensitivity and specificity of the proposed framework are (0.905, 1), while the first-, third-, and fifth-year clinicians are (0.619, 0.986), (0.690, 0.958), and (0.798, 0.986), respectively. For the external test set, the sensitivity and specificity of FF is (0.989, 0.797), and first-, third-, and fifth-year clinicians are (0.533, 0.875), (0.609, 0.844), and (0.663, 0.781), respectively.On the fetal malformation classification task, all physicians achieved higher accuracy and F1-Score on Fetus selected standard images with statistical significance (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We proposed a new deep learning-based Fetus Framework for identifying key fetus intracranial structures. The framework was tested on data from two different medical centers. The results show consistency and improvement from classic models and human experts in standard and non-standard sagittal view classification during pregnancy week 11-13+6.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

With further refinement in larger population, the proposed model can improve the efficiency and accuracy of early pregnancy test using ultrasound examination.

Cost of providing cell-free DNA screening for Down syndrome in Finland using different strategies

OBJECTIVES

A financial analysis is carried out to assess costs and benefits of providing cell-free DNA screening in Finland, using different strategies.

METHODS

Three cell-free DNA screening strategies are considered: Primary, all women; Secondary, those with positive Combined test; and Contingent, the 10-30% with the highest Combined test risks. Three costs are estimated: additional cost for 10,000 pregnancies compared with the Combined test; 'marginal' cost of avoiding a Down syndrome birth which occurs in a pregnancy that would have been false-negative using the Combined test; and marginal cost of preventing the iatrogenic loss of a non-Down syndrome birth which occurs in a pregnancy that would have been false-positive.

RESULTS

Primary cell-free DNA will require additional funds of €250,000. The marginal cost per Down syndrome birth avoided is considerably less than the lifetime medical and indirect cost; the marginal cost per unaffected iatrogenic fetal loss prevented is higher than one benefit measure but lower than another. If the ultrasound component of the Combined test is retained, as would be in Finland, the additional funds required rise to €992,000. Secondary cell-free DNA is cost-saving as is a Contingent strategy with 10% selected but whilst when 20-30% costs rise they are much less than for the Primary strategy and are cost-beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering the place of cell-free DNA screening it is important to make explicit the additional and marginal costs of different screening strategies and the associated benefits. Under most assumptions the balance is favorable for Contingent screening.

Reexamining the optimal nuchal translucency cutoff for diagnostic testing in the cell-free DNA and microarray era: results from the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage study

BACKGROUND

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recently recommended offering genetic counseling and diagnostic testing for enlarged nuchal translucency at ≥3.0 mm, regardless of previous negative screening with noninvasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform a population-based, individual record linkage study to determine the optimal definition of an enlarged nuchal translucency for the detection of atypical chromosome abnormalities.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of women resident in Victoria, Australia, undergoing combined first-trimester screening during the 24-month period from January 2015 to December 2016. Linkages between statewide results for combined first-trimester screening, prenatal diagnostic procedures, and postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were used to ascertain the frequency and type of chromosome abnormality by gestation and nuchal translucency measurement. An atypical chromosome abnormality was defined as any major chromosome abnormality other than whole chromosome aneuploidy involving chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y.

RESULTS

Of the 81,244 singleton pregnancies undergoing combined first-trimester screening, 491 (0.60%) had a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm, 534 (0.66%) had a nuchal translucency of 3.0 to 3.4 mm, and 80,219 (98.74%) had a nuchal translucency of < 3.0 mm. When grouped by nuchal translucency multiples of the median (MoM), 192 (0.24%) had a nuchal translucency of ≥3.0 MoM, 513 (0.63%) had a nuchal translucency of 1.9 to 2.9 MoM, and 80,539 (99.13%) had a nuchal translucency of <1.9 MoM. A total of 1779 pregnancies underwent prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing, of which 89.60% were performed by whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray. The frequency of total major chromosome abnormalities was significantly higher in the group with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm (147 of 491, 29.94%) than the group with a nuchal translucency of 3.0 to 3.4 mm (21 of 534, 3.93%) or a nuchal translucency of <3.0 mm (71 of 80,219, 0.09%) (P<.001). There were 93 atypical chromosome abnormalities in the total screened cohort. The frequency of an atypical chromosome abnormality was 4.07% (95% confidence interval, 2.51-6.22), 0.37% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-1.35), and 0.09% (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.11) in the groups with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm, 3.0 to 3.4 mm, and <3.0 mm, respectively. The frequency of atypical chromosome abnormalities was 4.69% (95% confidence interval, 2.17-8.71), 2.53% (95% confidence interval, 1.36-4.29), and 0.09% (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.11) in the groups with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.0 MoM, 1.9 to 2.9 MoM, and <1.9 MoM, respectively. When defining thresholds for offering diagnosis with chromosomal microarray at 11 to 13 weeks, both a nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM and a fixed threshold of 3.0 mm captured 22 of 93 fetuses (23.7%) with an atypical chromosome abnormality. Of these, 50.0% had a coexisting fetal abnormality on ultrasound. However, the gestation-specific threshold of 1.9 MoM had a better specificity than 3.0 mm. The positive predictive value of an enlarged nuchal translucency for any atypical chromosome abnormality was 1 in 47 for nuchal translucency of >3.0 mm and 1 in 32 for nuchal translucency of >1.9 MoM. Our nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM captured 0.87% of fetuses, thus approximating the 99th centile.

CONCLUSION

A gestational age-adjusted nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM or 99th centile is superior to the fixed cutoff of 3.0 mm for the identification of atypical chromosome abnormalities. The risk of an atypical chromosome abnormality in a fetus with an enlarged nuchal translucency is more than tripled in the presence of an additional ultrasound abnormality.

Increased nuchal translucency after low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing: What should we tell prospective parents?

Three decades ago, the observation that first trimester fetuses with excess fluid accumulation at the back of the neck were more likely to be aneuploid, gave rise to a new era of prenatal screening. The nuchal translucency (NT) measurement in combination with serum biomarkers and maternal age, resulted in the first trimester combined screening (FTCS) program. The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) over the past decade has introduced the option for parents to receive highly sensitive and specific screening information for common trisomy from as early as 10 weeks gestation, altering the traditional pathway FTCS pathway. The retention of the 11-13-week NT ultrasound remains important in the detection of structural anomalies; however, the optimal management of pregnancies with a low-risk NIPT result and an isolated increased NT measurement in an era of advanced genomic testing options is a new dilemma for clinicians. For parents, the prolonged period between the initial diagnosis in first trimester, and prognostic information at each successive stage of investigations up to 22-24 weeks, can be emotionally challenging. This article addresses the common questions from parents and clinicians as they navigate the uncertainty of having a fetus diagnosed with an increased NT after a low-risk NIPT result and presents suggested approaches to management.

The Value of Prenatal Systematic Ultrasonic Examination of Fetal Structural Abnormality in Diagnosing Fetal Structural Abnormality

In order to explore the value of prenatal systematic ultrasound examination of fetal structural abnormality in the diagnosis of fetal structural abnormality, this paper retrospectively analyzed 200 cases of fetal abnormality referrals from December 2017 to December 2019 in the prenatal systematic ultrasound examination of the designated hospital in this study of pregnant women. By sorting, summarizing and summarizing the actual conditions of the systematic ultrasound examination of each prenatal fetal abnormal section, this study calculated, recorded and analyzed the detection rate, missed diagnosis rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the systematic ultrasound examination of structural abnormality, and then discussed the value of prenatal systematic ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal structural abnormality. The results showed that, 185 cases were detected out of 200 fetal abnormality with the detection rate of 92.5%; missed diagnosis rate is 7.3%; detection sensitivity is 87.43%; and specificity is 76.58%. Among them, the detection rate of malformations of different diseases from high to low is cardiovascular system (97.54%), nervous system (93.16%), respiratory system (90.62%), facial system (87.54%), and urinary system (85.47%). Therefore, the prenatal systematic ultrasound fetal structural abnormality examination for pregnant women can achieve good diagnostic results, can provide pregnant women with fetal structural abnormality the opportunity to terminate pregnancy early, and effectively reduce the birth of structural abnormal fetuses and the burden of family and society, having important clinical significance and reducing.