PRENATAL IMAGING FEATURES RELATED TO RAC3 PATHOGENIC VARIANT AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

An unusual presentation of de novo RAC3 variation in prenatal diagnosis

Pathogenic variants in RAC3 cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with brain malformations and craniofacial dysmorphism, called NEDBAF. This gene encodes a small GTPase, which plays a critical role in neurogenesis and neuronal migration. We report a 31 weeks of gestation fetus with triventricular dilatation, and temporal and perisylvian polymicrogyria, without cerebellar, brainstem, or callosal anomalies. Trio whole exome sequencing identified a RAC3 (NM_005052.3, GRCh38) probably pathogenic de novo variant c.276 T>A p.(Asn92Lys). Eighteen patients harboring 13 different and essentially de novo missense RAC3 variants were previously reported. All the patients presented with corpus callosum malformations. Gyration disorders, ventriculomegaly (VM), and brainstem and cerebellar malformations have frequently been described. The only previous prenatal case associated with RAC3 variant presented with complex brain malformations, mainly consisting of midline and posterior fossa anomalies. We report the second prenatal case of NEDBAF presenting an undescribed pattern of cerebral anomalies, including VM and polymicrogyria, without callosal, cerebellar, or brainstem malformations. All neuroimaging data were reviewed to clarify the spectrum of cerebral malformations.

Lessons learnt from prenatal exome sequencing

Background

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) for monogenic disorders in fetuses with structural anomalies increases diagnostic yield. In England there is a national trio ES service delivered from two laboratories. To minimise incidental findings and reduce the number of variants investigated, analysis uses a panel of 1205 genes where pathogenic variants may cause abnormalities presenting prenatally. Here we review our laboratory's early experience developing and delivering ES to identify challenges in interpretation and reporting and inform service development.

Methods

A retrospective laboratory records review from 01.04.2020 to 31.05.2021.

Results

Twenty‐four of 116 completed cases were identified as challenging including 13 resulting in difficulties in analysis and reporting, nine where trio inheritance filtering would have missed the diagnosis, and two with no prenatal diagnosis; one due to inadequate pipeline sensitivity, the other because the gene was not on the panel. Two cases with copy number variants identified were not detectable by microarray.

Conclusions

Variant interpretation requires close communication between referring clinicians, with occasional additional examination of the fetus or parents and communication of evolving phenotypes. Inheritance filtering misses ∼5% of diagnoses. Panel analysis reduces but does not exclude incidental findings. Regular review of published literature is required to identify new reports that may aid classification.

What's already known about this topic?

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) for monogenic disorders in fetuses with structural anomalies is known to increase diagnostic yield

Diagnostic prenatal ES services are being embedded into clinical practice internationally

What does this study add?

This study identifies challenges encountered running a diagnostic prenatal ES service including those in variant interpretation and reporting, incidental findings and ethical issues

It demonstrates that solely relying on trio inheritance filtering will miss ∼5% of diagnoses

Close communication between scientists and referring clinicians is essential to identify evolving phenotypes

Regular review of published literature is required to identify new reports that may alter variant classification