Pregabalin and heart failure: A population-based study

Pregabalin Does Not Increase Risk of Heart Failure Exacerbation in Patients With Pre-existing Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Through actions of calcium channel trafficking inhibition and sodium/water retention, pregabalin may increase the risk of acute heart failure (AHF).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of heart failure (HF) acute exacerbations, measured by a composite of emergency department (ED) visits, per-patient per-year (PPPY) hospitalizations, time-to first ED admission, and time-to hospitalizations in pre-existing HF patients taking pregabalin compared with those who were pregabalin-naive.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of pregabalin users with HF were propensity score-matched to pregabalin-naïve patients with HF to evaluate the composite of ED admissions or PPPY hospitalizations, time-to first ED admission, and time-to hospitalizations during the 365 days post-index. Doubly robust generalized linear regression and Cox-proportional hazard regression modeling were undertaken for analysis of differences between groups.

RESULTS

The matched cohort of 385 pregabalin users and 3460 pregabalin nonusers were principally middle-aged, equally gender distributed, and primary Caucasian. Most patients were on guideline-directed HF medical therapy. The estimated cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was a hazard ratio of 1.099 (95% CI: 0.789-1.530; P = 0.58).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This large, single-center, cohort study shows pregabalin is not associated with an increased risk of AHF events in patients with pre-existing HF.

Cardiovascular risk of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with diabetic neuropathy

Background

Gabapentin and pregabalin are commonly prescribed medications to treat pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Gabapentin and pregabalin can cause fluid retention, which is hypothesized to be associated with cardiovascular diseases. However, whether long-term use of gabapentin and pregabalin is associated with adverse cardiovascular diseases remains unknown. This study aims to examine the association between gabapentin use, pregabalin use and several adverse cardiovascular events.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used propensity score matching within patient electronic health records (EHRs) from a multicenter database with 106 million patients from 69 health care organizations in the US. The study population comprised 210,064 patients who had a diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy and were prescribed diabetic neuropathy medications in their EHRs. The exposure cohort comprised patients who were prescribed gabapentin or pregabalin to treat diabetic neuropathy. The comparison cohort comprised patients who were not prescribed either gabapentin or pregabalin but were prescribed other drugs to treat diabetic neuropathy. The outcomes of interest were myocardial infarcts, strokes, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and venous thromboembolic events. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 3-month and 5-year risk for adverse cardiovascular events between the propensity score-matched cohorts.

Results

Both gabapentin and pregabalin were associated with increased risk of 5-year adverse cardiovascular events compared with the comparison group. In patients prescribed gabapentin, the highest risk was observed for deep venous thrombosis (HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82), followed by pulmonary embolism (HR: 1.5, 95% CI 1.27–1.76), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 1.27–1.47), stroke (HR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.2–1.43), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.14–1.38) and heart failure (HR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.07–1.21). In patients prescribed pregabalin, the highest risk was observed for deep venous thrombosis (HR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.31–1.88), followed by peripheral vascular disease (HR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.22–1.49), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.13–1.47), pulmonary embolism (HR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.04–1.59), stroke (HR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.12–1.42), and heart failure (HR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.11–1.3). There were significant associations between short-term (3 month) gabapentin use and heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Short-term (3 month) pregabalin use was associated with deep venous thrombosis, peripheral vascular disease.

Conclusion

In patients with diabetic neuropathy who were prescribed gabapentin and pregabalin, there is an increased risk for heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism with long-term use. Our findings suggest that increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events, along with other side effects, the efficacy of pain control and the degree of tolerance of the patient, should be considered when prescribing gabapentin and pregabalin long-term in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-022-01610-9.

Gabapentinoid-induced peripheral edema and acute heart failure: A translational study combining pharmacovigilance data and in vitro animal experiments

INTRODUCTION

Gabapentinoids are ligands of the α2-δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels (Cav) that have been associated with a risk of peripheral edema and acute heart failure in connection with a potentially dual mechanism, vascular and cardiac.

OBJECTIVES & METHODS

All cases of peripheral edema or heart failure involving gabapentin or pregabalin reported to the French Pharmacovigilance Centers between January 1, 1994 and April 30, 2020 were included to describe their onset patterns (e.g., time to onset). Based on these data, we investigated the impact of gabapentinoids on the myogenic tone of rat third-order mesenteric arteries and on the electrophysiological properties of rat ventricular cardiomyocytes.

RESULTS

A total of 58 reports were included (gabapentin n = 5, pregabalin n = 53). The female-to-male ratio was 4:1 and the median age was 77 years (IQR 57-85, range 32-95). The median time to onset were 23 days (IQR 10-54) and 17 days (IQR 3-30) for non-cardiogenic edema and acute heart failure, respectively. Cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic peripheral edema occurred frequently after a dose escalation (27/45, 60%), and the course was rapidly favorable after discontinuation of gabapentinoid (median 7 days, IQR 5-13). On rat mesenteric arteries, gabapentinoids significantly decreased the myogenic tone to the same extent as verapamil and nifedipine. Acute application of gabapentinoids had no significant effect on Ca_v1.2 currents of ventricular cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentinoids can cause concentration-dependent peripheral edema of early onset. The primary mechanism of non-cardiogenic peripheral edema is vasodilatory edema secondary to altered myogenic tone, independent of Ca_v1.2 blockade under the experimental conditions tested.

Use of Pregabalin and Worsening Heart Failure: A Nationwide Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Concerns regarding the increased risk of worsening heart failure with pregabalin have been raised. We assessed the association between use of pregabalin and risk of worsening heart failure in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark using data from nationwide registers, from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. The study population consisted of patients 50 years of age or older with a diagnosis of heart failure who were new users of pregabalin or gabapentin (active comparator). We matched a total of 1395 new users of pregabalin to 1395 new users of gabapentin on a propensity score based on 55 covariates. Using proportional hazards regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for worsening heart failure (hospitalization with, or death from, heart failure) within 90 days of the start of treatment.

RESULTS

We observed 33 patients with worsening heart failure among users of pregabalin [incidence rate (IR) 105.7 per 1000 person-years] versus 43 patients among users of gabapentin (IR 133.8 per 1000 person-years), corresponding to an HR of 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-1.23]. The corresponding absolute risk difference was - 28.6 (95% CI - 66.8 to 31.3) per 1000 person-years. In sensitivity analysis using duloxetine as an alternative active comparator, including 847 new users of pregabalin and 847 new users of duloxetine, the results were similar (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60-1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found no evidence to support an association between the use of pregabalin and increased risk of worsening heart failure, compared with gabapentin and duloxetine.

Quality of reporting of drug exposure in pharmacoepidemiological studies

Purpose

Exposure definitions vary across pharmacoepidemiological studies. Therefore, transparent reporting of exposure definitions is important for interpretation of published study results. We aimed to assess the quality of reporting of exposure to identify where improvement may be needed.

Method

We systematically reviewed observational pharmacoepidemiological studies that used routinely collected health data, published in 2017 in six pharmacoepidemiological journals. Reporting of exposure was scored using 11 items of the ISPE‐ISPOR guideline on reporting of pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Results

Of the 91 studies included, all studies reported the type of exposure (100%), while most reported the exposure risk window (85%) and the exposure assessment window (98%). Operationalization of the exposure window was described infrequently: 16% (14/90) of the studies explicitly reported the presence or absence of an induction period if applicable, 11% (5/47), and 35% (17/49) reported how stockpiling and gaps between exposure episodes were handled, respectively, and 35% (17/49) explicitly mentioned the exposure extension. Switching/add‐on was reported in 62% (50/81). How switching between drugs was dealt with and specific drug codes were reported in 52 (57%) and 24 (26%) studies, respectively.

Conclusion

Publications of pharmacoepidemiological studies frequently reported the type of exposure, the exposure risk window, and the exposure assessment window. However, more details on exposure assessment are needed, especially when it concerns the operationalization of the exposure risk window (eg, the presence or absence of an induction period or exposure extension, handling of stockpiling and gaps, and specific codes), to allow for correct interpretation, reproducibility, and assessment of validity.

Heart Failure: A Palliative Medicine Review of Disease, Therapies, and Medications With a Focus on Symptoms, Function, and Quality of Life

Despite significant advances in heart failure (HF) treatment, HF remains a progressive, extremely symptomatic, and terminal disease with a median survival of 2.1 years after diagnosis. HF often leads to a constellation of symptoms, including dyspnea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, insomnia, pain, and worsened cognitive function. Palliative care is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their caregivers facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness and therefore is well suited to support these patients. However, historically, palliative care has often focused on supporting patients with malignant disease, rather than a progressive chronic disease such as HF. Predicting mortality in patients with HF is challenging. The lack of obvious transition points in disease progression also raises challenges to primary care providers and specialists to know at what point to integrate palliative care during a patient's disease trajectory. Although therapies for HF often result in functional and symptomatic improvements including health-related quality of life (HRQL), some patients with HF do not demonstrate these benefits, including those patients with a preserved ejection fraction. Provision of palliative care for patients with HF requires an understanding of HF pathogenesis and common medications used for these patients, as well as an approach to balancing life-prolonging and HRQL care strategies. This review describes HF and current targeted therapies and their effects on symptoms, hospital admission rates, exercise performance, HRQL, and survival. Pharmacological interactions with and precautions related to commonly used palliative care medications are reviewed. The goal of this review is to equip palliative care clinicians with information to make evidence-based decisions while managing the balance between optimal disease management and patient quality of life.

Gabapentinoids: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and considerations for clinical practice

The gabapentinoids are often recommended as first-line treatments for the management of neuropathic pain. The differing pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles can have implications for clinical practice. This article has summarised these key differences. In addition to their use in managing neuropathic pain, gabapentinoids are increasingly being used for off-label conditions despite the lack of evidence. Prescription rates for off-label conditions have overtaken that for on-label use. Similarly, the use of gabapentinoids in the perioperative period is now embedded in clinical practice despite conflicting evidence. This article summarises the risks associated with this increasing use. There is increasing evidence of the potential to cause harm in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and increasing prevalence of abuse. The risk of respiratory depression in combination with opioids is of particular concern in the context of the current opioid crisis. This article describes the practical considerations involved that might help guide appropriate prescribing practices.

Telmisartan and captopril ameliorate pregabalin-induced heart failure in rats

Pregabalin (PRG) is highly effective in the treatment of epilepsy, neuropathic pain and anxiety disorders. Despite its potential benefits, PRG administration has been reported to induce or exacerbate heart failure (HF). It has been previously documented that overactivation of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in HF pathophysiological mechanism. The target of the current study was to examine the possible cardioprotective effect of telmisartan (Tel), an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, compared with that of captopril (Cap), an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, in ameliorating PRG-induced HF in rats by assessing morphometric, echocardiographic and histopathological parameters. Furthermore, to investigate the role of RAS blockade by the two drugs in guarding against PRG-induced changes in cardiac angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7) and angiotensin II (Ang II) levels, in addition to myocardial expression of ACE2, ACE, Mas receptor (MasR) and AT1R. Results showed that PRG administration induced morphometric, echocardiographic and histopathological deleterious alterations and significantly elevated cardiac Ang II, ACE and AT1R levels, while reduced Ang 1-7, ACE2 and MasR cardiac levels. Concurrent treatment with either Tel or Cap reversed PRG-induced morphometric, echocardiographic and histopathological abnormalities and revealed prominent protection against PRG-induced HF via downregulation of ACE/Ang II/AT1R and upregulation of ACE2/Ang 1-7/MasR axes. These are the first findings to demonstrate that the potential benefits of Tel and Cap are mediated by counteracting the altered balance between the RAS axes induced by PRG. Hence; Tel and Cap may attenuate PRG-induced HF partially through stimulation of ACE2/Ang 1-7/MasR pathway.