Sustained Impact of Anticoagulant Control Achieved in an Anticoagulation Management Service After Transfer of Management to the Primary Care Physician

Quality of warfarin management following transfer from an anticoagulation clinic to primary care

BACKGROUND

Advances in alternative oral anticoagulants has reduced use and clinician comfort with warfarin. Our specialty anticoagulation clinic (AC) operates at maximum capacity and must transfer patients to accept new referrals.

OBJECTIVES

To compare time within therapeutic range (TTR) during 6 months of AC care versus following transfer to primary care for a minimum of 6 months and to a maximum of 24 months. Secondarily, to compare frequency of INR assessments, proportion of INRs ≤1.5 and > 5, and rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events post-transfer to primary care.

METHODS

Mixed retrospective chart review and administrative audit with a before-after study design for patients managed by the University of Alberta's AC for at least 6 months that were transferred to primary care.

RESULTS

177 (27.7 %) patients were included, managed by the AC for 3.4 years (1.3, 7.9). TTR declined during the first 6 months post-transfer with AC care achieving 69.2 % and primary care 64.5 % (p = 0.02) and when compared to the 24-month interval (69.2 % vs 63.4 %; respectively; p = 0.003). A shorter interval between INRs in AC care was observed (28.9 (24.4) vs 34.5 (31.7) days, respectively; p = 0.0004). Similar numbers of critical INRs occurred between groups, whereas more INRs ≤1.5 occurred in primary care (7.3 % vs 4.7 %, respectively; p = 0.0003). Bleeding and thromboembolic event rates were balanced following transfer to primary care with both occurring at 9.4 % per patient year.

CONCLUSION

A decline in anticoagulation control after transfer to primary care was observed, which appeared to be driven by a greater proportion of subtherapeutic INRs.

Comparative effectiveness of warfarin management strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The management of warfarin therapy presents clinical challenges due to its narrow therapeutic index. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different management strategies in patients using warfarin.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and EBSCO Open Dissertation were searched from inception to 8 May 2024. Randomized controlled trials that compared the following interventions: patient self-management (PSM), patient self-testing (PST), anticoagulation management services (AMS), and usual care in patients prescribed warfarin for any indication were included. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank different interventions. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online platform. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023491978).

Findings

Twenty-eight trials involving 8100 participants were included, with follow-up periods of 1-24 months. Mean warfarin dosages were 4.9-7.2 mg/day. Only PSM showed a significant reduction of major TE risk compared with usual care (RR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.71; I2 = 0.0%) with moderate certainty of evidence. The 97.6% SUCRA also supported the beneficial effects of PSM over other interventions. The combined direct and indirect evidence showed significantly higher TTR in PSM compared with usual care (MD = 7.39; 95% CI: 2.39, 12.39), with very low certainty. However, direct evidence showed non-significant TTR improvement (MD = 6.49; 95% CI: -3.09, 16.07, I2 = 96.1%). No differences across various strategies were observed in all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and hospitalization.

Interpretation

PSM reduces the risk of major TE events compared with usual care, tends to improve anticoagulation control, and should be considered where appropriate.

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant ID 5R18HS027960).

Technology-Based Interventions in Oral Anticoagulation Management: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

An increasing number of patients have received prophylactic or therapeutic oral anticoagulants (OACs) for thromboembolic complications of diseases. The use of OACs is associated with both clinical benefits and risks. Considering the challenges imposed by this class of drugs, as well as the enormous progress made in portable device technology, it is possible that technology-based interventions may improve clinical benefits for patients and optimize anticoagulation management.

Objective

This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the role of technology-based interventions in the management of OACs.

Methods

We searched 6 databases—PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and PsycINFO—to retrieve relevant studies published as of November 1, 2019, to evaluate the effect of technology-based interventions on oral anticoagulation management. RevMan (version 5.3; Cochrane) software was used to evaluate and analyze clinical outcomes. The methodological quality of studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis. They reported data for 2218 patients (1110 patients in the intervention groups and 1108 patients in the control groups). A meta-analysis was performed on the effectiveness and safety data reported in the RCTs. Technology-based interventions significantly improved the effectiveness of oral anticoagulation management (mean difference [MD]=6.07; 95% CI 0.84-11.30; I²=72%; P=.02). The safety of oral anticoagulation management was also improved, but the results were not statistically significant. Bleeding events were reduced (major bleeding events MD=1.02; 95% CI 0.78-1.32; I²=0%; P=.90; minor bleeding events MD=1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.44; I²=41%; P=.73) and thromboembolism events were reduced (MD=0.71; 95% CI 0.49-1.01; I²=0%; P=.06). In general, patients were more satisfied with technology-based interventions, which could also improve their knowledge of anticoagulation management, improve their quality of life, and reduce mortality and hospitalization events.

Conclusions

Using technology to manage OACs can improve the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation management, result in higher patient satisfaction, and allow greater understanding of anticoagulation.

Clinical Outcomes of Telephone Service for Patients on Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes of telephone-based service for patients on warfarin. Methods: Five bibliographic databases and gray literature were searched for articles that reported the effects of telephone interventions provided to patients using warfarin compared with those receiving usual clinic-based care. Mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR) were used to calculate the effects of telephone intervention on time in therapeutic range (TTR) and visit in range (VIR), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were pooled and reported as incidence rate ratios. Results: A total of 1,840 articles were examined. Eight articles involving 8,087 subjects were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled estimates from seven studies showed no difference on TTR between the telephone service group and the usual care group (MD 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.56 to 8.16). In addition, VIR in the telephone service group was not different from the usual care group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.71). Moreover, patients in telephone service groups appeared to have a lower incidence of AEs compared with usual care groups. Discussion: Telephone-based service could be considered as an alternative anticoagulant management. However, owing to a lack of evidence from well-designed studies, further high-quality randomized control trials are warranted.

Expanding anticoagulation management services to include direct oral anticoagulants

Despite the ease of use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), these agents remain high risk medications and their clinical efficacy can be impacted by factors such as patient adherence, drug procurement barriers, bleeding leading to discontinuation, and prescribing that deviates from approved dosing regimens. Clinical monitoring of patients on DOACs should be performed by clinicians who specialize in anticoagulation and are familiar with the nuances of DOAC dosing, monitoring, and other components of anticoagulation management including peri-procedural management and care transitions. Although data for centralized warfarin management have consistently demonstrated improved clinical outcomes compared to traditional management by individual community providers, there are no published data addressing the impact of centralized management of DOACs on clinical outcomes or anticoagulation control. In addition, there is currently no consensus on how to incorporate patients on DOACs into this centralized model, despite recommendations for systematic follow-up by both the Anticoagulation Forum and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Based on the national recommendations and an identified institutional need, the Brigham and Women's Hospital Anticoagulation Management Service implemented a pilot program to expand services to include patients newly initiated on, or transitioned to, a DOAC. We describe our model for expansion of the AMS to include patients on DOACs.

Quality of Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Therapy in Long-Term Ambulatory Settings: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review to evaluate the quality of warfarin anticoagulation control in outpatient pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services (PMAS) compared with routine medical care (RMC).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, IPA, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception to May 2017. Search terms employed: ("pharmacist-managed" OR "pharmacist-provided" OR "pharmacist-led" OR "pharmacist-directed") AND ("anticoagulation services" OR "anticoagulation clinic" OR "anticoagulation management" OR "anticoagulant care") AND ("quality of care" OR "outcomes" OR "bleeding" OR "thromboembolism" OR "mortality" OR "hospitalization" OR "length of stay" OR "emergency department visit" OR "cost" OR "patient satisfaction").

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Criteria used to identify selected articles: English language; original studies (comments, letters, reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials were excluded); warfarin use; outpatient setting; comparison group present; time in therapeutic range (TTR) included as a measure of quality of anticoagulant control; study design was not a case report.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 177 articles identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Quality of anticoagulation control was better in the PMAS group compared with RMC in majority of the studies (N = 23 of 25, 92.0%). Clinical outcomes were also favorable in the PMAS group as evidenced by lower or equal risk of major bleeding (N = 10 of 12, 83.3%) or thromboembolic events (N = 9 of 10, 90.0%), and lower rates of hospitalization or emergency department visits (N = 9 of 9, 100%). When reported, PMAS have also resulted in cost-savings in all (N=6 of 6, 100%) of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with routine care, pharmacist-managed outpatient-based anticoagulation services attained better quality of anticoagulation control, lower bleeding and thromboembolic events, and resulted in lower health care utilization.