Ultrasound Assessment of Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Meniscal Extrusion: A Reliability Study

The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the current understanding of the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound (US) demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity when compared to magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal injuries when compared to arthroscopy. Meniscal extrusion (ME) under US can be a reliable metric to evaluate for meniscal root tears in knees with and without osteoarthritis (OA). Sonographic ME is associated with development of OA in knees without OA. US following allograft meniscal transplant may be useful in predicting graft failure. US findings can be used to screen for discoid menisci and may demonstrate snapping of a type 3 discoid lateral meniscus. Shear wave elastography for meniscal injuries is in its infancy; however, increased meniscal stiffness may be seen with meniscal degeneration. Perimeniscal corticosteroid injections may provide short term relief from meniscal symptoms, and intrameniscal platelet-rich plasma injections appear to be safe and effective up to three years. Ultrasound-assisted meniscal surgery may increase the safety of all inside repairs near the lateral root and may assist in assessing meniscal reduction following root repair. Diagnostic US can demonstrate with high accuracy a variety of meniscal pathologies and can be considered a screening tool. Newer technologies such as shear wave elastography may allow us to evaluate characteristics of meniscal tissue that is not possible on conventional imaging. US-guided (USG) treatment of meniscal injuries is possible and may be preferable to surgery for the initial treatment of degenerative meniscal lesions. USG or US-assisted meniscal surgery is in its infancy.

Factors associated with medial meniscal extrusion in non-osteoarthritic knees with medial meniscus tears: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) plays an important role in the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Exploring the factors associated with MME in non-osteoarthritic knees may assist in the prevention of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors associated with pathologic MME in non-osteoarthritic knees with medial meniscus tears (MMTs).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred fifty patients with non-osteoarthritic knees who underwent arthroscopic surgery for MMT. Patients were divided into a pathologic MME group (n = 54) and a control group (n = 96) based on whether a pathologic MME was present on magnetic resonance (MR) images.

SETTING

Tertiary medical institution.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The MME distance was measured on a coronal MR image obtained at the midpoint of the medial femoral condyle. An MME distance ≥3 mm was considered to indicate pathologic MME. Demographic and clinical data were collected as variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with pathologic MME.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, body mass index (BMI) and the type of MMT were associated significantly with pathologic MME in the multivariable logistic regression model. Each unit higher in BMI was associated with a 13% higher risk of pathologic MME (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.28, p = .04). The odds of pathologic MME were approximately four times and three times higher for radial tears (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.25-15.03, p = .02) and complex tears (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.17-8.05, p = .02) than for horizontal and longitudinal tears.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI and the type of MMT were independent factors associated with pathologic MME in non-osteoarthritic knees with MMT. A higher BMI, radial tears, and complex tears were predisposed to pathologic MME.

Are Outcomes of Acute Meniscus Root Tear Repair Better Than Debridement or Nonoperative Management? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Meniscus root tears (MRTs) are defined as radial tears within 1 cm of the meniscus root insertion or an avulsion of the meniscus root itself. They lead to altered joint loading because of the failure to convert axial (compressive) loads into hoop stresses. Untreated MRTs can result in altered joint biomechanics and accelerated articular cartilage degeneration and the development of osteoarthritis (OA), yet optimal management remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To review treatment outcomes after acute MRTs by surgical repair, debridement, meniscectomy, or nonoperative treatment.

DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the evidence from human clinical studies was conducted with electronic searches of the PUBMED, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. One reviewer extracted the data and 2 reviewers assessed the risk of bias and performed synthesis of the evidence.

RESULTS

Eleven studies of low to moderate methodological quality were identified. All treatment options improved functional scores after >12 months. Arthroscopic repair may be associated with better functional outcomes when compared with partial meniscectomy and nonoperative management at 12-month follow-up. Radiographic progression of OA occurred in all treatment groups; there was some evidence that this was delayed after repair when compared with other treatments. Baseline severity of meniscal extrusion, varus malalignment, and pretreatment degeneration were predictors of poor functional outcomes. Age was not found to be an independent predictor of functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

The current level 3 and 4 evidence suggests that arthroscopic repair may result in slower progression of radiological deterioration compared with meniscectomy and nonoperative management. The current literature does not support the exclusion of patients from MRT repair on the basis of age. Patients undergoing acute MRT treatments (repair, debridement, or nonoperative) can be expected to experience improvement in functional outcomes after >12 months. The strength of conclusions are limited because of the paucity of high-quality studies on this subject. Further studies, preferably randomized sham controlled trials with function-oriented rehabilitation programs, are needed to compare treatment strategies and stratification of care based on the risk of meniscal extrusion.

REGISTRATION

CRD42018085092 (PROSPERO).

Sonographic evaluation of the degree of medial meniscal extrusion during Thessaly test in healthy knees

OBJECTIVE

The Thessaly test is a commonly used orthopedic test for meniscus tear evaluation. The study's objective is to evaluate the degree of medial meniscal extrusion during different loading phases of the Thessaly test.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 60 healthy knees (35 participants) was examined and the data sets were collected from October 8, 2018 through February 8, 2019. Sonographic measurement of the degree of physiologic extrusion of the medial meniscus deep to the medial collateral ligament was taken by two examiners at six different loading phases: supine, standing, 5° knee-flexion with internal (IR)/external (ER) rotation and 20° knee-flexion with IR/ER. The difference in meniscal extrusion by knee position was compared with ANOVA. Interexaminer reproducibility assessment was analyzed using limits of agreement.

RESULTS

The mean meniscal extrusion for each position was-supine: 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, standing: 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, 5° IR: 2.3 ± 0.9 mm, 5° ER: 2.4 ± 0.7 mm, 20° IR: 1.9 ± 0.8 mm, and 20° ER: 2.3 ± 0.7 mm. Significant increase in extrusion was observed from supine to standing (p < 0.05) and from 20° IR to 20° ER (p = 0.015). Significant decreased measurement was observed from standing to 5° IR (p < 0.05), 5° ER (p < 0.05), 20° IR (p < 0.05) and 20° ER (p < 0.05). There is no significant change between 5° IR and 5° ER (p = 1.0). Agreement parameters revealed that the differences between examiner measurements were minimal; 75% of both examiners' meniscal extrusion measurements were within 1.0 mm with 97% of measurements falling within 2.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our study's novel findings showed various degrees of physiological extrusion of the medial meniscus in asymptomatic knees during the loading phases involved in the Thessaly test. Physiological MME does exist and should not be defaulted to pathologic meniscus as previously described. Agreement parameters suggest that measurement of meniscal extrusion during the Thessaly test is reproducible between different examiners.

Sonographic evaluation of lateral meniscal extrusion: implementation and validation

INTRODUCTION

Meniscal extrusion (ME) is an important indicator of and prognostic factor for various knee pathologies. To date, no standardized protocol for the ultrasound-based examination of lateral ME exists. The purpose of the present study was to test the reliability and validity of lateral ME measurements using a standardized ultrasound-based examination protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group consisting of 11 healthy volunteers (Group I, male and female, 18-45 years) as well as a group of 10 consecutive patients who had undergone all-inside lateral meniscal radial tear repair were included (Group II, male and female, 23-43 years). Lateral ME, the main outcome parameter, was measured by ultrasound (US; both groups) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Group II only). Both knees of all subjects were examined in an unloaded state and under axial compression of the knee (50% of body weight). Repeated measurements obtained in Group I by 2 observers were used for reliability testing, and the validity of US was assessed through comparison with MRI data (Group II).

RESULTS

A total of 66 US images of Group I, obtained by each observer, were analyzed for reliability testing. Forty US and MR images of Group II were assessed for validation. Results showed good interrater (ICC = 0.904) and excellent intrarater (ICC = 0.942) reliability of US-based measurements of lateral ME. Agreement with MRI results was poor (ICC = 0.439), with US systematically overestimating results by 1.1 mm on average.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound is a reliable, quick and cost-effective technique for lateral ME measurement, but results are not readily comparable with MRI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the European Union Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT-Number: 2017-005037-24).

The Difference in Medial Meniscal Extrusion between Non-Weight-Bearing and Weight-Bearing Positions in People with and without Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) has been correlated with medial meniscal injury and progression of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the difference in MME between non-weight-bearing (supine) and weight-bearing (standing) positions in patients with and without medial knee OA. Determine the correlation between body mass index (BMI), Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and MME.

DESIGN

Prospective.

SETTING

Tertiary institution PM&R Department.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty five participants (29 female, 16 male), 24 with healthy knees and 21 with OA.

METHODS OR INTERVENTIONS

A single physician sonographer measured supine and standing MME with ultrasound (US) on each participant. The physician was blinded to all measurements. BMI was recorded on all participants. KL grades and KOOS questionnaires were obtained for the OA group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

MME in supine and standing positions, change in MME from supine to standing, BMI, KL grade, and KOOS subscale scores.

RESULTS

MME increased .52 mm from supine to standing (P < .001). MME was greater in the OA group in both the supine (P = .002) and standing (P < .001) positions. Increasing BMI was moderately correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .001, standing <.001). Increasing age was correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .012, standing P = .002). Increasing KL grade (from 1 to 4) was correlated with increasing MME (supine P = .015, standing = .006). There was a small-to-moderate correlation between KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) subscale score and change in MME from supine to standing (P = .035). The change in MME from supine to standing positions had a small-to-moderate correlation (P = .035) with KOOS ADL subscale score alone but did not correlate with any of the other KOOS subscale scores or KOOS total scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested a standing MME value of 4.2 mm provides a positive likelihood ratio of 6.02 for knee OA.

CONCLUSIONS

MME is greater in those with OA and with weight-bearing. MME correlates with BMI, age, KL grade, and the KOOS ADL subscale score. Finally, standing MME of 4.2 mm yielded a higher positive likelihood ratio to differentiate between healthy knees and those with medial compartment OA than the previously reported value of 3.0 mm.