1
|
Freeman J, Nikjou D, Maloney J, Covington S, Pew S, Wie C, Strand N, Abd-Elsayed A. The Role of Orthoses in Chronic Axial Spinal Conditions. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:501-506. [PMID: 38407764 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01233-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Bracing represents a prevalent conservative, non-surgical approach used in the management of chronic spinal conditions such as spondylosis, degenerative disc disease, and spondylolisthesis. A wide variety of orthoses are available to aid in addressing cervical, thoracic, lumbar, thoracic, and SI joint pain. In this review, we aim to comprehensively examine brace types with their current applications and implications of usage. RECENT FINDINGS There are multiple cervical bracing options, such as soft and rigid collars, to assist in managing acute trauma and chronic degenerative conditions. The review highlights the nuanced decision-making process between hard and soft collars based on the severity of bone or ligamentous injury and neurological findings. Orthoses for low back pain are commonly used. The review highlights the challenges of chronic neck and lower back pain, emphasizing the importance of clinicians exploring all treatment strategies including braces which can improve function and reduce pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Freeman
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Devin Nikjou
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Scott Pew
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Natalie Strand
- Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Anesthesiology Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christopher SM, Donnelly G, Brockwell E, Bo K, Davenport MH, De Vivo M, Dufour S, Forner L, Mills H, Moore IS, Olson A, Deering RE. Clinical and exercise professional opinion of return-to-running readiness after childbirth: an international Delphi study and consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 2024; 58:299-312. [PMID: 38148108 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Female athletes have identified a lack of guidance as a barrier to successfully returning to running postpartum, and existing guidelines are vague. Our aim was to define the current practice of determining postpartum run-readiness through a consensus survey of international clinicians and exercise professionals in postpartum exercise to assist clinicians and inform sport policy changes.A three-round Delphi approach was used to gain international consensus from clinicians and exercise professionals on run-readiness postpartum. Professionals who work with postpartum runners participated in an online survey to answer open-ended questions about the following postpartum return-to-running topics: definitions (runner and postpartum), key biopsychosocial milestones that runners need to meet, recommended screening, timeline to initiate running, support items, education topics and factors that contribute to advising against running. Consensus was defined as ≥75% participant agreement.One hundred and eighteen professionals participated in round I, 107 participated in round II (response rate 90.6%) and 95 participated in round III (response rate 80.5%). Responses indicated that, following a minimum 3-week period of rest and recovery, an individualised timeline and gradual return to running progression can be considered. Screening for medical and psychological concerns, current physical capacity, and prior training history is recommended prior to a return to running.This study proposes recommendations for the initial guidance on return-to-running postpartum, framed in the context of current research and consensus from professionals. Future research is needed to strengthen and validate specific recommendations and develop guidelines for best practice when returning-to-running after childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shefali Mathur Christopher
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy, Tufts University, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Elon University, Elon, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gráinne Donnelly
- Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Kari Bo
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Margie H Davenport
- Program for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marlize De Vivo
- Perinatal Physical Activity Research Group, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Section of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
- Active Pregnancy Foundation, None, UK
| | - Sinead Dufour
- The World of my Baby (WOMB), Faculty of Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori Forner
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hayley Mills
- Perinatal Physical Activity Research Group, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Section of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Isabel S Moore
- Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Rita E Deering
- Department of Physical Therapy, Carroll University, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sward L, Manning N, Murchison AB, Ghahremani T, McCaulley JA, Magann EF. Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy: A Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2023; 78:349-357. [PMID: 37322996 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Pelvic girdle pain is often thought to be a recent phenomenon, but this condition was described as early as 400 BC by Hippocrates. Despite being identified for years, confusion continues about the definition and management of this ailment affecting many pregnancies. Objective The purpose of the review is to assess the incidence, etiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and pregnancy outcomes/recovery of current pregnancies, and outcomes of future pregnancies complicated by pelvic girdle pain. Evidence Acquisition Electronic databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched from 1980 to 2021 with the only limitation being that the articles were in English. Studies were selected that examined associations between pelvic pain/pelvic girdle pain and pregnancy. Results There were 343 articles identified. After reviewing the abstracts, 88 were used in this review. Pelvic girdle pain is a common condition of pregnancy, affecting a reported 20% of pregnant women. The pathophysiology is poorly understood and likely multifactorial, involving both hormonal and biomechanical changes that occur during pregnancy. Several risk factors have been identified. This diagnosis is most commonly made based on symptoms related to pelvic pain during pregnancy. Treatment should be multimodal, including pelvic girdle support, stabilizing exercises, analgesia, and potentially complementary therapies. The effects on future pregnancies are uncertain, although some limited information suggests an increased risk of recurrent PGP in subsequent pregnancies. Conclusions Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy is a common condition that is often overlooked as a normal part of pregnancy but has a significant impact on quality of life during, after, and in subsequent pregnancies. Multimodal therapies are available and are largely low cost and noninvasive. Relevance Our aim is to increase the awareness of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy as a common but often underdiagnosed and undertreated condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nirvana Manning
- Associate Professor, Department Chairperson, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Amanda B Murchison
- Associate Professor, Residency Director, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA
| | - Taylor Ghahremani
- Fellow, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | | | - Everett F Magann
- Professor, MFM Fellowship Director, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| |
Collapse
|