1
|
Edward JS, Rayens MK, McLouth LE, Eisele LP, Scales J, Williams LB, Hildebrandt G. A dyadic analysis of financial toxicity and health-related quality of life among bone marrow transplant patients and their caregivers. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6303. [PMID: 38342820 PMCID: PMC10947586 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Relatively few dyad-based studies have evaluated the shared psychosocial and financial toxicity (FT) experiences of hematologic patients and their caregivers, especially those undergoing bone marrow transplantations (BMTs). This study evaluated the association of FT with health-related quality of life (QOL) among BMT patient-caregiver dyads. METHODS Survey and electronic health record data were collected between April 2021 and January 2022 from BMT patients and their caregivers pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). Thirty-four patient-caregiver dyads completed surveys; all dyads included a patient experiencing elevated T1 FT. The effect of the total FT score (i.e., the combination of psychological response, coping behaviors, and material conditions domain scores) on physical health, mental health, anxiety, depression and distress scores was evaluated using Actor-Partner Interdependence Modeling (APIM). RESULTS Patients and caregivers who reported lower total FT scores had better physical and mental health, and lower anxiety, depressive symptoms, distress (APIM actor effects). None of the partner effects were significant in the APIM models. Other model findings indicated that compared with caregivers, patients had lower reported physical health; mental health scores were higher, on average, for all participants at the T2 compared with T1; and members of dyads whose caregiver took time off work reported better physical health and lower depressive symptoms and distress than those whose caregiver did not. CONCLUSIONS Our study addresses a significant gap in dyad-based cancer FT studies; the findings underscore the need for additional research to help develop tailored dyad-level FT interventions for improving health-related QOL among BMT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean S Edward
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Mary Kay Rayens
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Laurie E McLouth
- Department of Behavioral Health, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Lori P Eisele
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Joan Scales
- Psycho-oncology Program, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - Gerhard Hildebrandt
- Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, Missouri University Health Care, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edward JS, McLouth LE, Rayens MK, Eisele LP, Davis TS, Hildebrandt G. Coverage and Cost-of-Care Links: Addressing Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Hematologic Cancer and Their Caregivers. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e696-e705. [PMID: 36888937 PMCID: PMC10414719 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of an oncology financial navigation (OFN) intervention, Coverage and Cost-of-Care Links (CC Links), among patients with hematologic cancer and their caregivers who are at increased risk of experiencing financial toxicity (FT). METHODS All patients who presented to the Division of Hematology and Bone and Marrow Transplant (BMT) at an National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between April 2021 and January 2022 were screened for FT during inpatient and outpatient visits. Patients who screened positive for FT and met the inclusion criteria were recruited to participate in CC Links that provided financial navigation and assistance via a financial navigator. Caregivers of patients undergoing BMTs were also recruited to participate. Primary outcomes were defined as improvements in FT, distress, and physical and mental quality of life. RESULTS Fifty-four patients and 32 caregivers completed the intervention and pre-/postintervention surveys. CC Links resulted in statistically significant decreases in the Comprehensive Score for FT for both patients (|t| = 2.42, P = .019) and caregivers (|t| = 2.43, P = .021) and total FT (|t| = 2.13, P = .041) and material conditions scores (|t| = 2.25, P = .031) for caregivers only. Only 27% of eligible patients participated in the study, whereas 100% of eligible caregivers participated. The majority of participants rated the intervention highly for acceptability (89%) and appropriateness (88%). An average of $2,500 (USD) in financial benefits was secured per participant via CC Links. CONCLUSION CC Links was effective in decreasing FT among patients with hematologic cancer and their caregivers while demonstrating high acceptability and appropriateness ratings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean S. Edward
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Laurie E. McLouth
- Department of Behavioral Health, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Lori P. Eisele
- Patient Financial Experience, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY
| | - Tani S. Davis
- Markey Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Blood and Marrow Transplants, Lexington, KY
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wheeler SB, Spencer JC, Manning ML, Samuel CA, Reeder‐Hayes KE, Greenup RA, Spees LP, Rosenstein DL. Multidimensional financial hardship among uninsured and insured young adult patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:11930-11940. [PMID: 37148550 PMCID: PMC10242847 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the heterogeneous nature of financial hardship in younger patients with metastatic disease and the extent to which insurance protects against it. We examine the association between insurance status and multidimensional indicators of financial hardship in a national sample of women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a national, retrospective online survey in partnership with the Metastatic Breast Cancer Network. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, and able to respond in English. We estimated multivariate generalized linear models predicting two distinct dimensions of financial hardship-financial insecurity (the ability to afford care and living costs) and financial distress (the extent of emotional/psychological distress experienced due to costs)-as a function of insurance status. RESULTS Participants responded from 41 states (N = 1054; median age: 44 years). Overall, 30% were uninsured. Financial insecurity was more frequently reported by uninsured respondents. In adjusted analyses, uninsured participants were more likely than insured participants to report contact by debt collectors (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.38 [2.06, 2.76]) and being unable to meet monthly expenses (aRR: 2.11 [1.68, 2.66]). Financial distress was reported more frequently by insured participants. For example, insured participants were more likely to worry about future financial problems due to cancer and distress about lack of cost transparency. After adjustment, uninsured participants remained about half as likely as insured participants to report financial distress. CONCLUSIONS Young adult women with metastatic cancer reported a high burden of financial toxicity. Importantly, insurance does not protect against financial distress; however, the uninsured are the most materially vulnerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jennifer C. Spencer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Michelle L. Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Cleo A. Samuel
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Katherine E. Reeder‐Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rachel A. Greenup
- Duke University School of MedicineDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Present address:
Department of Surgery (Oncology)Yale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wheeler SB, Birken SA, Wagi CR, Manning ML, Gellin M, Padilla N, Rogers C, Rodriguez J, Biddell CB, Strom C, Bell RA, Rosenstein DL. Core functions of a financial navigation intervention: An in-depth assessment of the Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention to inform adaptation and scale-up in diverse oncology care settings. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:958831. [PMID: 36925862 PMCID: PMC10012722 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) is an intervention designed to address financial toxicity (FT) and improve cancer care access and outcomes through financial navigation (FN). FN identifies patients at risk for FT, assesses eligibility for financial support, and develops strategies to cope with those costs. LIFT successfully reduced FT and improved care access in a preliminary study among patients with high levels of FT in a single large academic cancer center. Adapting LIFT requires distinguishing between core functions (components that are key to its implementation and effectiveness) and forms (specific activities that carry out core functions). Our objective was to complete the first stage of adaptation, identifying LIFT core functions. Methods We reviewed LIFT's protocol and internal standard-operating procedures. We then conducted 45-90 min in-depth interviews, using Kirk's method of identifying core functions, with key LIFT staff (N = 8), including the principal investigators. Interviews focused on participant roles and intervention implementation. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti and a codebook based on the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact, we coded interview transcripts. Through thematic analysis, we then identified themes related to LIFT's intervention and implementation core functions. Two report back sessions with interview participants were incorporated to further refine themes. Results Six intervention core functions (i.e., what makes LIFT effective) and five implementation core functions (i.e., what facilitated LIFT's implementation) were identified to be sufficient to reduce FT. Intervention core functions included systematically cataloging knowledge and tracking patient-specific information related to eligibility criteria for FT relief. Repeat contacts between the financial navigator and participant created an ongoing relationship, removing common barriers to accessing resources. Implementation core functions included having engaged sites with the resources and willingness necessary to implement FN. Developing navigators' capabilities to implement LIFT-through training, an established case management system, and connections to peer navigators-were also identified as implementation core functions. Conclusion This study adds to the growing evidence on FN by characterizing intervention and implementation core functions, a critical step toward promoting LIFT's implementation and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah A. Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Cheyenne R. Wagi
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Michelle L. Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Neda Padilla
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Cindy Rogers
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Julia Rodriguez
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin B. Biddell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Carla Strom
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Ronny Antonio Bell
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fu W, Shi J, Zhang X, Liu C, Sun C, Du Y, Wang H, Liu C, Lan L, Zhao M, Yang L, Bao B, Cao S, Zhang Y, Wang D, Li N, Chen W, Dai M, Liu G, He J. Effects of cancer treatment on household impoverishment: a multicentre cross-sectional study in China. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044322. [PMID: 34193481 PMCID: PMC8246348 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the incidence and intensity of household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China. DESIGN Average income and daily consumption per capita of the households and out-of-pocket payments for cancer care were estimated. Household impoverishment was determined by comparing per capita daily consumption against the Chinese poverty line (CPL, US$1.2) and the World Bank poverty line (WBPL, US$1.9) for 2015. Both pre-treatment and post-treatment consumptions were calculated assuming that the households would divert daily consumption money to pay for cancer treatment. PARTICIPANTS Cancer patients diagnosed initially from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016 who had received cancer treatment subsequently. Those with multiple cancer diagnoses were excluded. DATA SOURCES A household questionnaire survey was conducted on 2534 cancer patients selected from nine hospitals in seven provinces through two-stage cluster/convenience sampling. FINDINGS 5.89% (CPL) to 12.94% (WBPL) households were impoverished after paying for cancer treatment. The adjusted OR (AOR) of post-treatment impoverishment was higher for older patients (AOR=2.666-4.187 for ≥50 years vs <50 years, p<0.001), those resided in central region (AOR=2.619 vs eastern, p<0.01) and those with lower income (AOR=0.024-0.187 in higher income households vs the lowest 20%, p<0.001). The patients without coverage from social health insurance had higher OR (AOR=1.880, p=0.040) of experiencing post-treatment household impoverishment than those enrolled with the insurance for urban employees. Cancer treatment is associated with an increase of 5.79% (CPL) and 12.45% (WBPL) in incidence of household impoverishment. The median annual consumption gap per capita underneath the poverty line accumulated by the impoverished households reached US$128 (CPL) or US$212 (WBPL). US$31 170 395 (CPL) or US$115 238 459 (WBPL) were needed to avoid household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China. CONCLUSIONS The financial burden of cancer treatment imposes a significant risk of household impoverishment despite wide coverage of social health insurance in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenqi Fu
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Chengcheng Liu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chengyao Sun
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yupeng Du
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Chaojie Liu
- Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Li Lan
- Department for Prevention and Control of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Harbin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin, China
| | - Min Zhao
- Department of Medical Administration, Yunnan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Burenbatu Bao
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, China
| | - Sumei Cao
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongzhen Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - DeBin Wang
- Health Management College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guoxiang Liu
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management/Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jie He
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oshima SM, Tait SD, Rushing C, Lane W, Hyslop T, Offodile AC, Wheeler SB, Zafar SY, Greenup R, Fish LJ. Patient Perspectives on the Financial Costs and Burdens of Breast Cancer Surgery. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e872-e881. [PMID: 33566677 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although financial toxicity is a well-documented aspect of cancer care, little is known about how patients narratively characterize financial experiences related to breast cancer treatment. We sought to examine these patient experiences through mixed methods analysis. METHODS Women (≥ 18 years old) with a history of breast cancer were recruited from the Love Research Army and Sisters Network to complete an 88-item electronic survey including an open-ended response. Quantitative data were used to sort and stratify responses to the open-ended question, which comprised the qualitative data evaluated here. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to evaluate the financial costs and other burdens resulting from breast cancer surgery. RESULTS In total, 511 respondents completed the survey in its entirety and wrote an open-ended response. Participants reported significant financial burden in different categories including direct payments for medical care and indirect costs such as lost wages and travel expenses. Treatment-related costs burdened participants for years after diagnosis, forming a financial arc for many participants. Discrepancies existed between the degree of financial burden reported on multiple-choice questions and participants' corresponding open-ended descriptions of financial burden. Participants described a lack of communication surrounding costs with their providers and difficulty negotiating payments with insurance. CONCLUSION Breast cancer care can result in ongoing financial burden years after diagnosis among all patients, even those with adequate insurance patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christel Rushing
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Whitney Lane
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global and Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Rachel Greenup
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Laura J Fish
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Behavioral Health and Survey Research Core, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Trogdon JG, Liu X, Reeder-Hayes KE, Rotter J, Ekwueme DU, Wheeler SB. Productivity costs associated with metastatic breast cancer in younger, midlife, and older women. Cancer 2020; 126:4118-4125. [PMID: 32648979 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the current study was to estimate productivity costs due to metastatic breast cancer (mBC) via productive time lost among survivors and potential life-years lost from premature mortality among 3 age groups: younger (aged 18-44 years), midlife (aged 45-64 years), and older (aged ≥65 years) women. METHODS The authors estimated the number of work and home productivity days missed due to mBC by age group using data from the 2000 to 2016 National Health Interview Survey. Years of potential life lost (YPLL) due to mBC were calculated for each age group using 2015 National Vital Statistics System data. The authors valued both sources of lost productivity time using the Current Population Survey and prior studies. RESULTS The per-woman value of lost productive days (work and home) due to mBC ranged from $680 for older women to $5169 for younger women. In 2015, the value of lost work and home productivity days associated with mBC nationally was $67 million for younger women, $246 million for midlife women, and $66 million for older women. YPLL were highest among midlife women (403,786 life-years), followed by older women (248,522 life-years) and younger women (95,943 life-years). Midlife women were found to have the highest market value of YPLL ($4.1 billion), followed by younger women ($1.6 billion) and older women ($527 million). CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrated that mBC generates a high economic burden through lost productivity, especially among midlife women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Xuejun Liu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jason Rotter
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Donatus U Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|