The impact of hegemonic masculine ideals on self-esteem in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to ADT-naïve patients

Relationship between social support, self-esteem and sense of masculinity among geriatric Patients with Prostatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Most geriatric patients with prostate cancer experience not only external discomfort but also negative psychological consequences such as reduced feelings of masculinity and diminished self-esteem. Social support is a protective factor for dealing with and adapting to these stressors, which enhances quality of life.

AIM

To identify the relationship between social support, self-esteem, and sense of masculinity among geriatric patients with PC.

METHOD

The study is a cross-sectional survey adopting a descriptive correlational design. A convenience sample of one hundred ten (110) geriatric patients diagnosed with PC attending the oncology and urology outpatient clinics of Damanhur Oncology Center in El-Beharia Governorate, Egypt. Four tools were used: subjects' basic information, The Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ-2000), the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSE), and The Masculine Self-esteem scale (MSES).

RESULTS

74.6 % of the studied geriatric patients had high levels of social support, 86.4 % had moderate levels of self-esteem, and 55.4 % had low masculine self-esteem. Also, the relationship was a statistically significant between social support and self-esteem (p = .002), between social support and sense of masculinity (p = .038), and between self-esteem and sense of masculinity (p = .029).

CONCLUSION

social Support and self-esteem were significant predictors of high sense of masculinity with social support positively influencing and self-esteem negatively influencing the sense of masculinity.

Body image in patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment with hormone therapy: Observational study using both a cross-sectional and longitudinal design

This study aims to examine changes in body image (BI) over time and factors related to BI among patients with prostate cancer who receive hormone therapy (HT). A cross-sectional design and longitudinal design were utilized. Patients with prostate cancer who received HT were recruited from the urology outpatient departments in two hospitals in Taiwan between August 2017 and December 2020. Cross-sectional data were collected from 177 patients who had started HT for prostate cancer. Longitudinal data were collected from 34 newly diagnosed patients before receiving HT and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after HT. The variables measured included hormonal symptoms and distress, self-efficacy, and BI. The results showed that BI dissatisfaction ranged from 6.1% to 17.2%. Hormonal symptoms and distress (e.g. lack of vitality) were correlated with BI dissatisfaction. Education on the side effects of HT and coping strategies can be provided to patients to prevent BI dissatisfaction.

The mediating effect of self-efficacy on family functioning and psychological resilience in prostate cancer patients

Aims

Prostate cancer patients face impaired body image and psychological distress during the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, which leads to changes in mood, cognition and behavior. Psychological resilience has been shown to buffer shocks and stresses from the disease. Therefore, this study investigates the relationship between family functioning and psychological resilience in prostate cancer patients and the mediating role of self-efficacy between family functioning and psychological resilience to provide a relevant theoretical basis for improving patients' psychological status by providing relevant theoretical basis.

Method

Using a cross-sectional design, participants were 215 patients with prostate cancer admitted to and treated in a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu province, China. Questionnaires were administered using the general information questionnaire, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolution Index (APGAR), and the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES). Data were analyzed using descriptive and correlational analyses and the bootstrap mediation test was used to test the effect relationship between the variables.

Results

Family functioning, self-efficacy and psychological resilience were significantly and positively correlated (r = 0.526, P < 0.01; r = 0.378, P < 0.01; r = 0.358, P < 0.01). The mediating effect of psychological resilience between family functioning and psychological resilience was significant, accounting for 42.56%.

Conclusion

Family function and self-efficacy have been shown to increase the level of psychological resilience in prostate cancer patients. Attention should be paid to the mental health problems of prostate cancer patients, early screening and intervention, and the use of patients' family resources to improve their confidence in recovering from the disease, thus increasing their psychological resilience and improving their mental health.

Examining the impact of androgen deprivation therapy, masculine self-esteem, and psychological flexibility on distress and quality of life in men with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

Studies suggest that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) exacerbates psychological and quality of life (QoL) issues associated with prostate cancer (PCa). However, quantitative research examining underlying psychosocial mechanisms for this is limited. We examined the association of PCa symptoms with distress and QoL in ADT-treated and ADT-naïve patients, and the influence of masculine self-esteem and psychological flexibility (PF) on these relationships.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey of 286 PCa patients. Independent samples t-tests, moderation, and conditional process analysis were used to assess relationships between predictor, mediator, moderator, and outcome variables.

RESULTS

ADT was associated with greater PCa symptomology, lower masculine self-esteem, and lower QoL. Moderation analysis showed that ADT potentiated adverse impacts of PCa symptomology on distress and QoL. High PF attenuated these relationships, though less so for ADT-treated participants. Conditional process analysis showed that masculine self-esteem mediated the predictive effect of symptoms on distress across treatments. However, ADT did not moderate this indirect effect, nor was moderation conditional on PF.

CONCLUSION

PF appears to: (1) attenuate psychological distress in ADT patients; and (2) improve distress, QoL, and masculine self-esteem in ADT-naïve patients. Interventions targeting PF may thus be a viable adjunct to established approaches. However, their effects may be comparatively limited in ADT patients, who may benefit from more intensive and tailored treatment.