Medical assistance in dying in Canada: A scoping review on the concept of suffering

Conduit or conductor? Physician providers' descriptions of their role as MAiD assessors in the first years after legalisation in Canada

PURPOSE

This qualitative study investigates how Canadian physician-providers of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) perceived their role in making judgements when assessing patients for MAiD.

METHODOLOGY

21 Canadian physician MAiD providers were interviewed about their experience as early-adopting providers. The data were analysed using a phenomenological approach to identify themes and thematic groupings regarding providers' perceptions of roles and reasoning while undertaking MAiD assessments.

FINDINGS

Participants universally endorsed a focus on providing patient-centred care. They varied in how they approached decision-making for patients applying for MAiD and how they viewed their role within the doctor-patient relationship. Group 1 participants placed moral decision-making with the patient, indicating a limited role for the provider. They focused on guiding the competent patient through the statutory MAiD requirements to actualise patient autonomy. Some described their role as 'conduits'. Group 2 had intermediate views. Group 3 participants described their professional judgement as important to the moral calculus of approval for MAiD. Their role was like that of a train conductor in that they positioned themselves as responsible for wider patient interests as part of maintaining their own professional and moral integrity during MAiD.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Participants' narratives indicate that decisions about MAiD assessments are strongly influenced by provider reasoning regarding the physician's role in MAiD assessment and provision. This divergence reflects unclear role expectations in the context of rapidly changing cultural expectations regarding MAiD.

Words matter: 'enduring intolerable suffering' and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada

Enduring intolerable suffering, an essential eligibility criterion in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada and elsewhere, is a contradiction in terms, in that suffering must be tolerable to be endured. Cases of people who were approved for MAiD but who elected to die naturally, thus tolerating their suffering, bear out the unreliability of this central safeguard. The clinical assessment of intolerable suffering may be strengthened by adopting a definition of intolerable suffering centred on clinically evidenced physical and psychological decompensation. This argument also raises important questions about the risks of MAiD clinicians subjectively defining, approving and providing MAiD in ways that deviate from accepted legal and clinical concepts and ethics. Examples show some prolific clinicians describe MAiD in terminology that differs from such norms, as a personal mission, as personally pleasurable, and as a rights-based service. These alternative views are explored for their risks in assessing and providing MAiD for intolerable suffering. This further demonstrates the need for conceptual clarity in legislation, improved vetting and monitoring of clinicians, and a different assessment process to protect patients and clinicians.

Human misconnection? A response to Beuthin and Bruce on medical assistance in dying providers' lived experience

Beuthin and Bruce's study 'MAiD as human connection: Stories and metaphors of physician providers existential lived experience' in this journal describes the affective experiences of Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) providers. A critical response to this work shows it is based on flawed premises and interpretations of its data, which centers on praising its participants in lethal injection for their very positive emotions. Their study also seems to unproblematically construct people dying by MAiD as "the other," a term that usually describes members of groups subject to individual and systemic oppression. Contextualized, their paper can be read to show how some MAiD providers may affectively and financially benefit from providing death to, and at the expense of, their suffering patients and grieving and possibly traumatized family members and witnesses. Beuthin and Bruce's study sheds new light on the provider side of MAiD and assists the case for vetting and setting suitability criteria for MAID clinicians.

The contribution of nonmedical opioid use to healthcare encounters for opioid overdose and use disorders among long-term users with metastatic cancer

PURPOSE

Opioid misuse is increasingly recognized as a relevant problem among patients with cancer. However, the applicability of these concerns for patients with metastatic disease is complicated by shorter prognoses and greater symptom burden. This study aimed to investigate whether nonmedical opioid use (NMOU) was identified as contributing to opioid-related healthcare encounters among patients with metastatic cancer receiving long-term prescribing.

METHODS

The study included patients with stage IV cancer diagnosed from 2004-2017 in Alberta, Canada who 1) received long-term opioid prescribing and 2) experienced ≥ 1 hospitalization or emergency department visit relating to opioid overdose or use disorder. Records from visits to cancer centres and opioid-related hospital encounters were reviewed to identify any documentation of NMOU. Patient characteristics were compared between those with and without documented NMOU.

RESULTS

Charts of 46 patients were reviewed. Although NMOU contributed to opioid-related encounters, these events were often related to poorly controlled pain, declining functional status, and disease progression. NMOU behaviors were documented for 16 (35%) patients. The most common NMOU behaviour was overuse of prescribed medications, which was documented for 12 patients. For 7 patients, there were indications of use of opioids for psychological coping, including 3 encounters caused by intentional overdoses with suicidal intent. Patients with NMOU were significantly more likely to have a history of substance use and limited social support.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1-in-3 patients experiencing opioid-related hospitalizations/emergency department visits had indications of NMOU. Further psychosocial care and interdisciplinary pain management are warranted to improve safe prescribing for these patients.

Ethics in disaster, mass casualty care, and critical care

The primary ethical principle guiding general medical practice is autonomy. However, in mass casualty (MASCAL) or disaster scenarios, the principles of beneficence and justice become of foremost concern. Despite multiple reviews, publications, and training courses available to prepare for a MASCAL incident, a minority of physicians and healthcare providers are abreast of these. In this review, we describe several MASCAL scenarios and their associated ethical, moral, and medicolegal quandaries in attempts to curb potential future misadventures.