The effects of physical symptoms, self-efficacy and social constraints on fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors: Examining the mediating role of illness representations

Fear of cancer recurrence among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a mixed-methods systematic review

PURPOSE

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common and burdensome in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. This systematic review examines FCR assessment, prevalence, severity, progression, related factors, consequences, and interventions in AYA cancer survivors.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Embase were searched from their inception to October 2024. Two reviewers identified eligible peer-reviewed empirical studies, including both qualitative and quantitative ones on FCR in AYA survivors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Quantitative studies were synthesized narratively, while qualitative studies underwent thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Among the 5340 studies identified, 34 studies were included finally. 21.4 to 93.3% of AYA cancer survivors experienced FCR. About one-third of survivors with moderate or high FCR improved over time. Female survivors, those with advanced cancer stages, and individuals with negative illness perceptions or higher anxiety reported higher FCR. Persistent FCR was associated with increased psychological problems and lower quality of life. Two studies on behavioral interventions, particularly internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), were acceptable but had limited evidence of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

FCR is prevalent among AYA cancer survivors, particularly in female survivors, those with advanced cancer stages, and those with negative perceptions or higher anxiety. A significant proportion experience persistent, but variability in current evidence limits a comprehensive understanding of its severity, progression, and intervention efficacy. To enhance FCR management, the use of validated assessment tools is essential in both research and clinical contexts. Addressing the physical and psychological aspects of survivorship through comprehensive care is crucial for alleviating FCR and improving overall well-being.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Identifying the key factors of FCR will stimulate the research and the development of targeted interventions for AYA cancer survivors.

Breast Cancer Surgery: A Qualitative Exploration of Concerns Over Time

INTRODUCTION

As outcomes for breast cancer patients improve, addressing the side effects and distress of treatment can optimize survivorship. Although distress in breast cancer is well known in literature, there is a lack of information on how these concerns change through the phases of the cancer care continuum. Therefore, this study investigates the longitudinal trajectory of worry in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Female patients with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer comprised a mixed-methods, longitudinal study at a cancer center from June 2019 to June 2023. Patients completed an open-ended survey regarding their top three concerns. Responses were obtained before surgery and two weeks, three, six, nine months, and one year postoperatively. Responses were qualitatively coded and analyzed to determine themes of cancer-related distress.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 262) were aged an average 57.53 y (±12.54), 65.8% had stage I disease at diagnosis, and 91.1% were White. Responses revealed that patients' top three sources of concerns varied by treatment phase. Overall, patients were worried about their cancer diagnosis and the risk of recurrence. Preoperatively, patients were worried about treatment timeline, while postoperative concerns transitioned to physical appearance and surgical side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients consistently reported worries about cancer diagnosis, recurrence, and metastasis as well as the side effects and fear of treatments. However, patient worry appeared to be intrinsically linked with their treatment phase. Therefore, support and interventions should be catered to reflect the changing patterns of patients' sources of distress to optimize breast cancer patients' quality of life.

Effectiveness of a phone-based support program on self-care self-efficacy, psychological distress, and quality of life among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a Phone-Based Support Program (PBSP) for newly diagnosed women with breast cancer.

METHODS

A two-group repeated measures randomized controlled trial was designed. Participants included 94 patients aged 18-60 years who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary hospital in China. They were randomly assigned to the intervention and the control groups. Participants in the intervention group were enrolled in a four-session PBSP, consisting of four interactive sections: learning, discussion, ask-the-expert, and personal stories, plus the routine care. Outcomes included patients' self-care self-efficacy, psychological distress (including symptom distress, anxiety, and depression), and quality of life. These were assessed at three time points: pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and follow-up (T3) by using the self-care self-efficacy scale, the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, the hospital anxiety and depression scale, and the global health status scale.

RESULTS

After completion of the intervention, participants in the intervention group had significantly (p < .001) higher self-care self-efficacy (T2: Mdiff = 11.49, T3: Mdiff = 22.33), better quality of life (T2: Mdiff = 8.18, T3: Mdiff = 17.19), lower symptom distress (T2: Mdiff = -26.68, T3: Mdiff = -54.76), less anxiety (T2: Mdiff = -2.52, T3: Mdiff = -5.11), and less depression (T2: Mdiff = -3.61, T3: Mdiff = -6.71) than those in the control group.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that the PBSP is effective. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, could utilize it to enhance self-care self-efficacy and quality of life, as well as decrease psychological distress among women newly diagnosed breast cancer.

REGISTRATION

The Thai Clinical Trial Registry #TCTR20230321010.

Fear of disease progression, self-management efficacy, and family functioning in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional relationship study

Introduction

Fear of disease progression (FoP) has been identified as one of the most prevalent unmet needs among breast cancer patients in recent years. The aim of this study was to examine FoP in patients with breast cancer and explore its associations with demographic and clinical characteristics, self-management efficacy, and family functioning. We also aimed to create a clinically-relevant prediction model based off of these factors (i.e., a "nomogram") to help identify patients' probability of experiencing high FoP.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of breast cancer in patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University was conducted from June 2023 to February 2024. The study included the Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Questionnaire, the Fear of Disease Progression Scale (FoP-Q-SF), the Chinese Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients (C-SUPPH), and the Family Care Index Questionnaire (APGAR). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed based on multiple regression results and the model performance was evaluated.

Results

A total of 151 breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study. The mean (standard deviation) FoP score of the patients was 35.87 ± 9.24. The average score of C-SUPPH was 96.97 ± 17.29, and the average score of APGAR was 6.74 ± 2.98. Pearson correlation analysis showed that FoP was negatively correlated with self-management efficacy (r = -0.544, p < 0.01) and family functioning (r = -0.730, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (B = -4.038), self-management efficacy (B = -0.085) and family functioning (B = -1.972) were significantly related to FoP, and together explained 36% of FoP variation (R 2 = 0.360, F = 20.50, p < 0.001). The nomogram of these variables showed satisfactory prediction performance [the Bootstrap Correction Consistency Index (C-index) = 0.872]. According to previous studies, a C-index of >0.70 indicates that the model is acceptable.

Conclusion

We found that greater fear of cancer progression (FoP) was associated with younger age, lower self-management efficacy and poorer family functioning in breast cancer patients. Based on these variables, our exploratory prediction model should be further investigated in order to help identify breast cancer patients who may be at highest risk of experiencing high FoP.

Learned Helplessness and Associated Factors Among Patients with Lung Cancer

Purpose

Learned helplessness (LH) is the psychological state in which an individual experiences multiple failures and setbacks and experiences a sense of loss when facing the current situation. It is a significant burden for lung cancer patients that can impair quality of life and lead to physical, social, and psychological difficulties. Thus, this study aimed to determine the level of LH among patients with lung cancer and identify factors associated with LH.

Patients and Methods

From August 2022 to March 2023, 237 patients with lung cancer from Chongqing University Cancer Hospital were selected for this study. A general information questionnaire, the LH scale, the Brief Illness Perception questionnaire, the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health questionnaire, the Medical Coping Modes questionnaire, and the Self-esteem scale were used for the investigation. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify influencing factors for LH in patients with lung cancer.

Results

The total LH score of patients with lung cancer was 52.19±11.20. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that illness perception (β=0.249, P=0.001), self-efficacy (β=-0.194, P=0.017), and resignation coping mode (β=0.267, P<0.001) were the main influencing factors of LH (P<0.05), which explained 42.0% of the total variance.

Conclusion

The score of LH in patients with lung cancer was at a moderate level in this study. Illness perception, self-efficacy, and resignation coping mode have been found to impact LH among patients with lung cancer. Healthcare professionals should implement effective interventions, such as promoting self-efficacy, encouraging positive coping, and reducing illness perception, to alleviate LH.