Influence of respiratory physiotherapy on gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants: A systematic review

Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines on treatment of cystic fibrosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the existence of numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cystic fibrosis (CF), there is limited understanding of their credibility and consistency. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the quality of CPGs for CF and its pulmonary complications, focusing on treatment recommendations for pulmonary care.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across four databases and relevant websites to identify eligible guidelines providing treatment recommendations. The quality of these guidelines was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. Pulmonary treatment recommendations were analyzed and synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 35 guidelines were identified. Most guidelines were of moderate quality according to the AGREE II instrument, with overall scores ranging from 21·05 to 76·13. Only six guidelines were recommended for use. These guidelines provide 359 pulmonary treatment recommendations for seven primary therapies and others. There was inconsistency in the use of airway clearance therapy, anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, inhaled drugs, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy. Four guidelines conditionally advocated for oral corticosteroids, while six opposed routine inhaled corticosteroids. One guideline discouraged lumacaftor-ivacaftor in the general CF population, two recommended only for children under 12 years old, and another strongly advocated for children between 2 and 5 years of age. However, one guideline noted a lack of evidence to recommend it for children under 6.

CONCLUSION

The quality of CPGs for CF and its pulmonary complications has improved over time, reaching a moderate level generally, but there is still room for further improvement. Future efforts should focus on standardizing methodological frameworks and generating robust clinical evidence to enhance the overall quality and applicability of CF guidelines.

The effects of assisted autogenic drainage, combined or not with bouncing on gastroesophageal reflux in infants

AIM

This study aimed to determine the effect of assisted autogenic drainage (AAD) with or without bouncing (BAAD) on both acid and non-acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in infants <1 year.

METHODS

During a 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH), infants were treated with a 20-min intervention of AAD (in supine position) or BAAD (in upright position), 2 h postprandial. In this controlled trial with intra-subject design, the number of reflux episodes (REs) was the primary outcome measure. The results during AAD and BAAD were compared to a baseline period before intervention and 20 min after intervention.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 infants were included in both groups. During AAD a significant decrease of RE's was found compared to baseline (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in the BAAD group compared to baseline (p = 0.125).

CONCLUSION

AAD and BAAD do not cause or increase GER in infants under the age of 1 year.

Manual Cervical Traction and Trunk Stabilization Cause Significant Changes in Upper and Lower Esophageal Sphincter: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

Dysfunctions in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) levels can occur owing to poor muscle coordination, contraction, or relaxation. Such condition can possibly be addressed by functional rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to measure pressure changes in the UES and LES at rest and during routine rehabilitation techniques, that is, cervical manual traction and trunk stabilization maneuver.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a University Hospital Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center. Cervical manual traction and a trunk stabilization maneuver were performed in a convenient group of 54 adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. High-resolution manometry was used to measure pressure changes in the LES and UES at rest and during manual cervical traction and trunk stabilization maneuver.

RESULTS

Average initial resting UES pressure was 90.91 mmHg. A significant decrease was identified during both cervical traction (average UES pressure = 42.13 mmHg, P < .001) and trunk stabilization maneuver (average UES pressure = 62.74 mmHg, P = .002). The average initial resting LES pressure was 14.31 mmHg. A significant increase in LES pressure was identified both during cervical traction (average LES pressure = 21.39 mmHg, P < .001) and during the trunk stabilization maneuver, (average pressure = 24.09 mmHg, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Cervical traction and trunk stabilization maneuvers can be used to decrease pressure in the UES and increase LES pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Prolonged Slow Expiration Technique and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Infants Under the Age of 1 Year

Background: The Prolonged Slow Expiration Technique (PSE) is an airway clearance technique (ACT) carried out in newborn children with bronchial obstruction and hypersecretion to clear away the mucus from the respiratory tract. Evidence about the effect of PSE on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is currently lacking in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of PSE on GER in infants under the age of 1 year. Methods: Infants were observed using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) over 24 h. During monitoring, the participants were treated with one 20 min intervention of PSE in supine position, 2 h after feeding. In this controlled trial with intra-subject design, the number of reflux episodes (REs) during PSE were compared to 20 min before and after PSE. Results: Fifty infants younger than 1 year were screened of whom 22 had a pathological GER. For the entire group, no significant difference was seen in the total number of REs between before, during, or after the PSE treatment (P = 0.76). No significant difference in total REs was found between the three measuring points (P = 0.59) in the group of infants with an abnormal MII-pH (n = 22). Conclusion: PSE does not cause a significant difference in REs in infants younger than 1 year. Registration number: NCT03341585.

Focus on gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with cystic fibrosis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder in cystic fibrosis (CF), and based on various studies, its prevalence is elevated since childhood. There are several pathogenetic mechanisms on the basis of association between CF and GERD. However, there are no specific guidelines for GERD in CF patients, so diagnosis is based on guidelines performed on patients not affected by CF. The aim of this review is to provide the pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic options, complications, and future directions in the management of GERD patients with CF.

The influence of Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation on gastroesophageal reflux in infants under the age of 1 year

BACKGROUND

Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is an airway clearance technique used at any age to facilitate the removal of secretions from the respiratory tract. The effect of IPV on gastroesophageal reflux(GER) is not well documented. This study aimed to determine the influence of IPV on GER in infants.

METHODS

During a 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH), infants in the intervention group received a20 minutes session of IPV in upright position, 2 hours postprandial. The control group received no intervention and was placed in the same position for 20 minutes, 2 hours postprandial. The number of reflux episodes (REs) during IPV as compared to the number of REs in the control group during the 20 minutes period.

RESULTS

Fifty infants were included in each group;21 infants in the IPV group and 14 infants in the control group were diagnosed with abnormal MII-pH (P = .142). During IPV, the number of REs was significantly lower than in the control group (P < .001). Also in the subgroups with abnormal or normal MII-pH, a significantly lower number of REs during IPV was found (P = .011, P = .011 respectively).

CONCLUSION

IPV decreases the number of REs in infants independent of the results of MII-pH.

The effect of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is frequently used in clinical practice to enhance sputum evacuation and lung recruitment. However, the evidence in different respiratory pathologies, especially in children, is still lacking. This systematic review aims to enlist the effectiveness of IPV as an airway clearance technique in pediatric patients.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if the subjects suffered from a respiratory disease requiring airway clearance and the mean age of the sample was <18 years. After screening, nine articles remained for further analysis.

RESULTS

Three of the nine articles examined patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). No significant differences in lung function or expectorated mucus were found compared to conventional chest physiotherapy. On the other hand, significant beneficial results were found for the treatment or prevention of atelectasis in non-CF patients using IPV. Similar results were seen when comparing therapies for neuromuscular/neurological patients. One study found that IPV reduced hospital stay and improved the clinical status of children with acute bronchiolitis compared to no physiotherapy. Severe adverse events did not occur in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

A limited number of studies investigated IPV in the pediatric population. Despite the heterogeneity across the studies and the small sample sizes, the results seem promising. IPV is suggested to be a safe and effective alternative for airway clearance. Future research is required to confirm these results and to further analyze the possible benefits in different respiratory pathologies.

Cystic Fibrosis and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is common in children and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Pathological gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is also frequent in patients of all ages with CF. This article reviews the pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, management options, complications, and future directions in the evaluation and management of GERD - unique to and pertinent for - patients with CF in particular.

Standard (head-down tilt) versus modified (without head-down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Postural drainage is used primarily in infants with cystic fibrosis from diagnosis up to the moment when they are mature enough to actively participate in self-administered treatments. However, there is a risk of gastroesophageal reflux associated with this technique.This is an update of a review published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of standard postural drainage (15º to 45º head-down tilt) with modified postural drainage (15º to 30º head-up tilt) with regard to gastroesophageal reflux in infants and young children up to six years old with cystic fibrosis in terms of safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Additional searches were conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov and on the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for any planned, ongoing and unpublished studies.The date of the most recent literature searches: 19 June 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled studies that compared two postural drainage regimens (standard and modified postural drainage) with regard to gastroesophageal reflux in infants and young children (up to and including six years old) with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently identified studies for inclusion, extracted outcome data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by consensus or by involving a third review author. We contacted study authors to obtain missing or additional information. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies, involving a total of 40 participants, were eligible for inclusion in the review. We included no new studies in the 2018 update. The included studies were different in terms of the age of participants, the angle of tilt, the reported outcomes, the number of sessions and the study duration. The following outcomes were measured: appearance or exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux episodes; percentage of peripheral oxygen saturation; number of exacerbations of upper respiratory tract symptoms; number of days on antibiotics for acute exacerbations; chest X-ray scores; and pulmonary function tests. One study reported that postural drainage with a 20° head-down position did not appear to exacerbate gastroesophageal reflux. However, the majority of the reflux episodes in this study reached the upper oesophagus (moderate-quality evidence). The second included study reported that modified postural drainage (30° head-up tilt) was associated with fewer number of gastroesophageal reflux episodes and fewer respiratory complications than standard postural drainage (30° head-down tilt) (moderate-quality evidence). The included studies had an overall low risk of bias. One included study was funded by the Sydney Children's Hospital Foundation and the other by the Royal Children's Hospital Research Foundation and Physiotherapy Research Foundation of Australia. Data were not able to be pooled by meta-analysis due to differences in the statistical presentation of the data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence regarding the comparison between the two regimens of postural drainage is still weak due to the small number of included studies, the small number of participants assessed, the inability to perform any meta-analyses and some methodological issues with the studies. However, it may be inferred that the use of a postural regimen with a 30° head-up tilt is associated with a lower number of gastroesophageal reflux episodes and fewer respiratory complications in the long term. The 20° head-down postural drainage position was not found to be significantly different from the 20° head-up tilt modified position. Nevertheless, the fact that the majority of reflux episodes reached the upper oesophagus should make physiotherapists carefully consider their treatment strategy. We do not envisage that there will be any new trials undertaken that will affect the conclusions of this review; therefore, we do not plan to update this review.

The impact of co-morbidity in childhood cystic fibrosis

A number of risk factors have been identified for deterioration of lung disease in children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF), and current management strategies are based on the prevention and treatment of such elements. Further challenge ensues when a patient has co-morbid disease in addition to CF, particularly when faced with rapidly deteriorating pulmonary status. It is difficult to measure the contribution of other pathologies to this decline and optimisation of both CF care and co-morbidity is paramount. This review explores the challenges faced when treating children with CF and co-morbid conditions, focussing on gastroesophageal reflux disease pre- and post-lung transplantation.

Influence of bouncing and assisted autogenic drainage on acid gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of modern airway clearance techniques using assisted autogenic drainage (AAD), whether or not combined with bouncing, on acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in infants <1 year.

METHODS

In this controlled trial with intra-subject design infants were studied using oesophageal pH monitoring over 24 h, during which they received one 15 min session of bouncing, AAD or bouncing combined with AAD (BAAD). The number of reflux episodes (RE) and the refluxindex (RI) were the outcome measures. The results obtained during (T15) and 15 min after the intervention (T30) were compared to a period of 15 min before treatment (T0).

RESULTS

The results of 150 infants, evenly distributed over the three treatment groups, were analyzed. No significant differences were found in number of RE at T15 and T30 compared to T0 in the bouncing group (P = 0.42), the AAD group (P = 0.14), and the BAAD group (P = 0.91). RI was significantly lower in the AAD group at T15 compared to T0 (P < 0.01). No differences in RI were found in the bouncing group (P = 0.28), nor in the BAAD group (P = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Bouncing, AAD and BAAD do not induce, nor aggravate acid GOR in infants under the age of 1 year.

Effectiveness of airway clearance techniques in children hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of two airway clearance techniques (ACT's) in children <24 months hospitalized with mild to moderate bronchiolitis.

DESIGN

One hundred and three children were randomly allocated to receive one 20-min session daily, either assisted autogenic drainage (AAD), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), or bouncing (B) (control group), ninety-three finished the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean time to recovery in days was our primary outcome measure. The impact of the treatment and the daily improvement was also assessed by a validated clinical and respiratory severity score (WANG score), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO₂ ).

RESULTS

Mean time to recovery was 4.5 ± 1.9 days for the control group, 3.6 ± 1.4 days, P < 0.05 for the AAD group and 3.5 ± 1.3 days, P = 0.03 for the IPV group. Wang scores improved significantly for both physiotherapy techniques compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Both ACT's reduced significantly the length of hospital stay compared to no physiotherapy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:225-231. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Influence of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in upright position on gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of physiotherapy using intrapulmonary percussive ventilation on gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in infants <1 year.

METHODS

In this controlled trial with intra-subject design, children were studied using multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (pH-MII) monitoring over 24 hr, during which they received one 20-min session of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in upright position (IPV_R ), 2 hr after their latest feeding. Two hours after each feeding, the number of reflux episodes (RE) over a 20-min period was registered for each infant and a mean per 20 min was calculated in order to obtain a baseline value. The number of RE during IPV_R intervention was compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Fifty infants with a median age of 133 days were recruited of whom 21 were diagnosed with pathological GOR. During IPV_R , the incidence of RE in the entire group was significantly lower compared to baseline; median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) 0 (0-1) versus 0.71 (0-1.33) RE, respectively, P = 0.003. The subgroup with abnormal GOR showed also a significant decrease of RE during IPV_R ; median (IQR) 0 (0-1) versus 1.17 (0.55-2.16) RE, respectively, P = 0.03. No difference was detected in the group with normal reflux; median (IQR) 0.6 (0-1) compared to 0 (0-1) RE, respectively, P = 0.34.

CONCLUSION

IPV_R does not induce, nor aggravate GOR in infants without and with pathological GOR, respectively, but on the contrary decreases the number of RE in patients with pathological reflux. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1065-1071. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.