The accuracy of predicting functional recovery in patients following a stroke, by physiotherapists and patients

Psychometric properties of measures of upper limb activity performance in adults with and without spasticity undergoing neurorehabilitation-A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review appraises the measurement quality of tools which assess activity and/or participation in adults with upper limb spasticity arising from neurological impairment, including methodological quality of the psychometric studies. Differences in the measurement quality of the tools for adults with a neurological impairment, but without upper limb spasticity, is also presented.

METHODS

29 measurement tools identified in a published review were appraised in this systematic review. For each identified tool, we searched 3 databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) to identify psychometric studies completed with neurorehabilitation samples. Methodological quality of instrument evaluations was assessed with use of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Synthesis of ratings allowed an overall rating of the psychometric evidence for each measurement tool to be calculated.

RESULTS

149 articles describing the development or evaluation of psychometric properties of 22 activity and/or participation measurement tools were included. Evidence specific to tool use for adults with spasticity was identified within only 15 of the 149 articles and provided evidence for 9 measurement tools only. Overall, COSMIN appraisal highlighted a lack of evidence of measurement quality. Synthesis of ratings demonstrated all measures had psychometric weaknesses or gaps in evidence (particularly for use of tools with adults with spasticity).

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic search, appraisal and synthesis revealed that currently there is insufficient measurement quality evidence to recommend one tool over another. Notwithstanding this conclusion, newer tools specifically designed for use with people with neurological conditions who have upper limb spasticity, have emergent measurement properties that warrant further research.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014013190.

Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Polymorphism Influences Outcome After Ischemic Stroke

Background. To explore whether a polymorphism in dopamine metabolism influences the effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation and the outcome after ischemic stroke. Methods. The Barthel Index (BI) and the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) were assessed in 78 moderately affected stroke patients (1) after they had entered a neurological inpatient rehabilitation, (2) after 4 weeks of rehabilitation therapy, and (3) 6 months later. Polymorphisms of the gene encoding catechol- O-methyltransferase (COMT) were determined. BI and RMA results were analyzed with respect to the genetic profiles of COMT. Results. Carriers of COMT Val/Val alleles showed better results in BI and RMA than COMT Met/Met carriers at all 3 time points. Val/Met carriers exhibited results in between the homozygotes, suggesting a gene–dose relationship. Altogether, BI and RMA results were highly correlated. Conclusion. Stroke patients with COMT Val/Val alleles had higher motor functions and abilities of activities of daily living even at the beginning of the rehabilitation period. All patient groups improved during the rehabilitation period to a similar degree, suggesting that physical therapy is comparably effective in all polymorphism subtypes.

Accuracy of prediction of walking for young stroke patients by use of the FIM

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Clinical prediction of walking outcome after a stroke is essential for effective discharge planning. However, its accuracy has hardly been explored. This study took place in a regional unit admitting patients with complex neurological disabilities for specialist inpatient rehabilitation. The aim was to compare predicted outcome (goal score) with achieved outcome (discharge score) on the seven-point locomotion subscale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), to evaluate its precision and identify factors influencing accuracy.

METHOD

Admission, goal and discharge scores were analysed retrospectively for 141 subjects (90 M; 51 F) admitted consecutively to the Unit with median age 54 years (range 15-68 years) with median length of stay 13.6 weeks (range 3-35 weeks).

RESULTS

Ninety subjects (64%) gained from two to six points; 50 subjects (35%) gained one point or showed no change. One patient deteriorated by two points. Excluding patients admitted with the highest score (FIM level 7), the overall level of agreement between predicted and discharge scores was moderate (weighted kappa 0.47). Prediction was accurate to +/- 1 point in 113 subjects (80%). Overprediction by > or = 2 points occurred in 16 subjects (11%) and underprediction by > or = 2 points in 12 subjects (9%). Analysis of the most-disabled cohort, admitted with FIM levels 1 or 2 scores, revealed a higher sensitivity for predicting 'independence' (FIM levels 5-7) (78%) than 'dependence' (FIM levels 1-4) (65%). Accuracy was not affected by age, gender or side of stroke. Inaccurate predictions were associated with lower admission FIM level scores (p = -0.26; p = 0.002) and a greater length of stay (p = 0.36; p < 0.001). Subjects with quadriplegia were more likely to have inaccurate outcome predictions made than those with hemiplegia (p = 0.025) and those with neglect were more likely to have inaccurate outcome predictions made than those without neglect (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Further investigation into clinical prediction and the variables which confound accuracy is needed for effective planning.