Prostatic basal cells in the peripheral and transitional zones: zonal variation in morphology and in immunophenotype

Single-cell RNA sequencing of human prostate basal epithelial cells reveals zone-specific cellular populations and gene expression signatures

Despite evidence of genetic signatures in normal tissue correlating with disease risk, prospectively identifying genetic drivers and cell types that underlie subsequent pathologies has historically been challenging. The human prostate is an ideal model to investigate this phenomenon because it is anatomically segregated into three glandular zones (central, peripheral, and transition) that develop differential pathologies: prostate cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the transition zone (TZ), with the central zone (CZ) rarely developing disease. More specifically, prostatic basal cells have been implicated in differentiation and proliferation during prostate development and regeneration; however, the contribution of zonal variation and the critical role of basal cells in prostatic disease etiology are not well understood. Using single-cell RNA sequencing of primary prostate epithelial cultures, we elucidated organ-specific, zone-specific, and cluster-specific gene expression differences in basal cells isolated from human prostate and seminal vesicle (SV). Aggregated analysis identified ten distinct basal clusters by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. Organ specificity compared gene expression in SV with the prostate. As expected, SV cells were distinct from prostate cells by clustering, gene expression, and pathway analysis. For prostate zone specificity, we identified two CZ-specific clusters, while the TZ and PZ populations clustered together. Despite these similarities, differential gene expression was identified between PZ and TZ samples that correlated with gene expression profiles in prostate cancer and BPH, respectively. Zone-specific profiles and cell type-specific markers were validated using immunostaining and bioinformatic analyses of publicly available RNA-seq datasets. Understanding the baseline differences at the organ, zonal, and cellular level provides important insight into the potential drivers of prostatic disease and guides the investigation of novel preventive or curative treatments. Importantly, this study identifies multiple prostate basal cell populations and cell type-specific gene signatures within prostate basal epithelial cells that have potential critical roles in driving prostatic diseases. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

[High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: state-of-the-art]

According to current views, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is the most likely precursor of prostate adenocarcinoma. This review gives the latest data of genetic, proteomic, and morphological analyses of this neoplasia and touches upon the probems that might arise when searching for new markers for differential diagnosis and prognosis estimation.

Single foci prostate cancer: current diagnosis and management

Diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci is a real challenge for pathologists and urologists as it carries the risk of false positive or negative diagnosis with clinical consequences. Diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci requires a strict methodological approach which includes a search for major and minor features under low and high magnification. Ambiguous cases can be further clarified with the use of basal cell immunomarkers complemented by a positive indicator of malignancy. Despite the new diagnostic armamentarium, a few cases will continue to remain doubtful and might require an appropriate rebiopsy.

[Non-neoplastic alterations of the prostate. Why should pathologists know them?]

Non-neoplastic changes in the prostatic gland include inflammatory, atrophic, hyperplastic and metaplastic reaction patterns of the glandular epithelium and the fibromuscular stroma. Furthermore, histoanatomical structures from outside the prostatic gland are sometimes included in biopsy material. Knowledge of the morphological appearance of benign, reactive lesions is important in order to differentiate them from malignancies. To this aim knowing the precise location of tissue sampling as well as ancillary immunohistochemical investigations are often useful or necessary.

Nonneoplastic lesions of the prostate and bladder

CONTEXT

Specimens from the prostate and bladder are commonly encountered by the general surgical pathologist. Emphasis is usually placed on neoplasms of the bladder and prostate, particularly if malignant, owing to their therapeutic consequences. A good command of benign lesions occurring in the bladder and prostate, and knowledge of their preneoplastic potential will help pathologists confidently diagnose malignancy versus its benign mimickers and guide the urologists in choosing the appropriate therapy and follow-up for the patient.

OBJECTIVE

To present a mixture of benign entities, and discuss their histologic and clinical characteristics, hoping to provide a practical review for the general surgical pathologist.

DATA SOURCES

An extensive review of the literature on the entities discussed was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide variety of benign entities are present in the prostate and bladder. Benign lesions in the prostate can be age related, such as prostatic atrophy and benign prostatic hyperplasia; transition zone associated, such as basal cell hyperplasia, adenosis, and sclerosing adenosis; or prostatic urethra associated. Benign lesions of the bladder encompass a wide variety of reactive changes that can occur in the urothelium, as well as hyperplastic lesions or reactive proliferations that could be misdiagnosed as malignant. The bladder responds to chronic irritation through several reactive/metaplastic lesions such as cystitis cystica/glandularis, keratinizing squamous metaplasia, or nephrogenic metaplasia. The urothelium can also give rise to hyperplastic/proliferative lesions, in particular von Brunn nest hyperplasia, papillary polypoid cystitis, and pseudocarcinomatous proliferation, which should be distinguished from malignant processes. Ectopic tissue, such as prostatic or mullerian, can also be seen.

CK5, CK5/6, and double-stains CK7/CK5 and p53/CK5 discriminate in situ vs invasive urothelial cancer in the prostate

For primary bladder tumors, distinguishing urothelial carcinoma (UC) invading the fibromuscular stroma of the prostate (pT4a) from in situ UC involving prostatic ducts can be difficult. Immunohistochemical markers (cytokeratin [CK]5/6, CK5, CK7, CK20, p53, p63, high-molecular-weight keratin [HMWK], androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate specific acid phosphatase [PSAP], laminin, CD44s, CD141) were assessed for their usefulness in determining depth of UC invasion in the prostate. In cystoprostatectomy specimens containing in situ UC in prostatic ducts, both CK5/6 and CK5 clearly differentiated prostatic basal cells from in situ UC. The remaining markers were not effective in determining depth of tumor invasion. Double-stain combinations CK7/CK5 and p53/CK5 were performed and robustly color contrasted in situ tumor from surrounding basal cells. The use of CK5/6, CK5, CK7/CK5, or p53/CK5 is recommended to assist in determining the depth of UC invasion in the prostate when histologic findings are equivocal.

Can conception of prostate cancer stem cells influence treatment dedicated to patients with disseminated disease?

No survival profit has been achieved for patients with disseminated prostate cancer since hormonal therapy was introduced. It is proposed that dissemination of rare prostatic cancer stem cells may lead to metastatic disease and that resistance of these cells to androgen ablation makes them responsible for failure of current treatments. In this paper, we will discuss the significance of the stem cell model for understanding prostate cancer pathogenesis. The concept of prostate cancer as a stem cell disease has the potential to change our view of its treatment in the particular case of disseminated disease. The major cellular target of prostate cancer therapy has to be directed against neoplastic stem cells. The combination of molecular-targeted therapy with the concept of the cancer stem cells should be introduced for the treatment of disseminated prostate cancer. Disseminated prostate cancer must be treated with agents directed toward stem cells, while hormone-therapy must be only an additional treatment leading to the decrease of tumor burden.