SPOP and FOXA1 mutations are associated with PSA recurrence in ERG wt tumors, and SPOP downregulation with ERG-rearranged prostate cancer

Prevalence of SPOP and IDH Gene Mutations in Prostate Cancer in a Jordanian Population

Speckle-type POZ (SPOP) is described as an essential tumor suppressor factor in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer (PCa). SPOP gene mutations were reported in primary human PCa. Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) oncogene mutations were detected in gliomas, acute myeloid leukemia, some benign and malignant cartilaginous tumors, and only 1% of PCa. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of mutations of SPOP and IDH1 genes in PCa in the Jordanian population. One hundred formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected from patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma. The obtained specimens were subjected to genomic DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and direct sequencing of exons 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the SPOP gene and exon 6 of the IDH1 gene. SPOP gene mutations were found in 17% of PCa cases, while no mutation was detected in the screened exon 6 of the IDH1 gene. Clinicopathological data demonstrated a strong correlation between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and both Gleason score (GS) and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG). There was no significant correlation between PSA levels and age (p = 0.816) nor there were significant associations for SPOP mutational status with age (p = 0.659), PSA levels (p = 0.395), GS (p = 0.259), and ISUP GG (p = 0.424) in the tested population. The study found a strong correlation between PSA levels and both GS and ISUP GG. It also identified a high frequency (17%) of SPOP gene mutations in Jordanian Arab PCa patients, mainly in exon 7. No IDH1 mutations were detected in exon 6.

Diverse landscape of genetically engineered mouse models: Genomic and molecular insights into prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a significant health concern for men worldwide and is particularly prevalent in the United States. It is a complex disease presenting different molecular subtypes and varying degrees of aggressiveness. Transgenic/genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) greatly enhanced our understanding of the intricate molecular processes that underlie PCa progression and have offered valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets for this disease. The integration of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, along with expression profiling, has played a pivotal role in advancing GEMMs by facilitating the identification of genetic alterations driving PCa development. This review focuses on genetically modified mice classified into the first and second generations of PCa models. We summarize whether models created by manipulating the function of specific genes replicate the consequences of genomic alterations observed in human PCa, including early and later disease stages. We discuss cases where GEMMs did not fully exhibit the expected human PCa phenotypes and possible causes of the failure. Here, we summarize the comprehensive understanding, recent advances, strengths and limitations of the GEMMs in advancing our insights into PCa, offering genetic and molecular perspectives for developing novel GEMM models.

Comparison of molecular analysis results determined by next-generation sequencing to immunohistochemical indicators and clinicopathological parameters in prostate adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is a common cancer in males, frequently leading to mortality. Multiple genetic factors play roles in prostate cancer pathogenesis. Demonstration of pathological pathways and customised treatment options have been possible with next-generation sequencing.

AIM

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationships of the changes in the prostate cancer pathways genes with the pathological, immunohistochemical and the clinical parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the prostate needle biopsy materials investigated in Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, thirty-one cases, who had been analysed using the next-generation sequencing system, were included in this study.

RESULTS

As a result of statistical analysis, a significant relationship was found between the pathogenic mutation detected in androgen receptor and Breast Cancer Gene 2 genes and tumour volume. In all cases with a pathogenic mutation in the androgen receptor gene, a pathogenic mutation in the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog gene was also observed and a significant relationship was found between them. Castration resistance was observed in cases with high tumour volume, and a statistically significant difference was found. A statistically significant relationship was found between tumour volume and Ki-67 expression. In addition, a significant relationship was observed between the castration resistance and Ki-67, c-erbB2 expressions. A statistically significant relationship was found between Ki-67 and c-erbB2.

CONCLUSION

Regarding prognosis prediction and treatment, identifying the molecular changes in genes playing roles in prostate cancer with next-generation sequencing is very important.

The Mutational and Transcriptional Landscapes of Speckle-Type POZ Protein (SPOP) and Androgen Receptor (AR) in a Single-Center pT3 Prostatectomy Cohort

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease both clinically and genetically. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the speckle‑type POZ protein (SPOP) mutant form is one of the significant core subtypes of PCa. However, the prognostic value of SPOP variations remains unknown. As a critical PCa driver and an SPOP-targeted protein, androgen receptor (AR) also plays a role in PCa initiation and progression. Thus, we aimed to analyze the mutational status of SPOP and AR with their transcriptional levels in a pathological stage 3 (pT3) prostatectomy cohort consisting of 89 Turkish PCa patients. Targeted sequence analysis and RT-qPCR were performed for SPOP and AR in the benign and malign prostate tissue samples. Our results introduced the two novel pathogenic SPOP variations, C203Y and S236R, in the BTB/POZ domain and a novel pathogenic variant in the ligand-binding domain of AR, R789W. Their predicted pathogenicities and effects on protein features were evaluated by web-based in silico analysis. The overall frequency of SPOP and AR variations for pT3 patients in our population was 3.4% (3/89) and 4.5% (4/89), respectively. The mutational results represented a possible subgroup characterized by carrying the novel variants in SPOP and AR in pT3 PCa patients. In addition to the significant clinicopathological parameters, the mutational results provide a better understanding of the molecular structure of pathologically advanced PCa in the SPOP and AR aspects.

Determination of TMPRSS2-ERG, SPOP, FOXA1, and IDH1 prostate cancer molecular subtypes in Colombian patients and their possible implications for prognosis

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of cancer with of the highest incidence and mortality worldwide. Current disease prognostic markers do not differentiate aggressive from indolent PCa with sufficient certainty, and characterization by molecular subtypes has been sought to allow a better classification. TMPRSS2-ERG, SPOP, FOXA1, and IDH1 molecular subtypes have been described, but the association of these subtypes with prognosis in PCa is unclear; their frequency in Colombian patients is also unknown. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of radical prostatectomy from 112 patients with PCa were used. The TMPRSS2-ERG subtype was assessed with fluorescent in situ hybridization. The mutations in SPOP, FOXA1, and IDH1 in hot-spot regions were evaluated using Sanger sequencing. Fusion was detected in 71 patients (63.4%). No statistically significant differences were found between the state of fusion and the variables analyzed. In the 41 fusion-negative cases (36.6%), two patients (4.9%) had missense mutations in SPOP (p.F102C and p.F133L), representing a 1.8% of the overall cohort. The low frequency of this subtype in Colombians could be explained by the reported variability in the frequency of these mutations according to the population (5%-20%). No mutations were found in FOXA1 in the cases analyzed. The synonym SNP rs11554137 IDH1^105GGT was found in tumor tissue but not in the normal tissue in one case. A larger cohort of Colombian PCa patients is needed for future studies to validate these findings and gain a better understanding of the molecular profile of this cancer in our population and if there are any differences by Colombian regions.

FOXA1 in prostate cancer

Most prostate cancers initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). With the long-term application of ADT, localized prostate cancer will progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), and the transcriptional network shifted. Forkhead box protein A1 (FOXA1) may play a key role in this process through multiple mechanisms. To better understand the role of FOXA1 in prostate cancer, we review the interplay among FOXA1-targeted genes, modulators of FOXA1, and FOXA1 with a particular emphasis on androgen receptor (AR) function. Furthermore, we discuss the distinct role of FOXA1 mutations in prostate cancer and clinical significance of FOXA1. We summarize possible regulation pathways of FOXA1 in different stages of prostate cancer. We focus on links between FOXA1 and AR, which may play different roles in various types of prostate cancer. Finally, we discuss FOXA1 mutation and its clinical significance in prostate cancer. FOXA1 regulates the development of prostate cancer through various pathways, and it could be a biomarker for mCRPC and NEPC. Future efforts need to focus on mechanisms underlying mutation of FOXA1 in advanced prostate cancer. We believe that FOXA1 would be a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer.

SPOP and CHD1 alterations in prostate cancer: Relationship with PTEN loss, tumor grade, perineural infiltration, and PSA recurrence

BACKGROUND

In the non-ETS fusion of prostate cancer (PCa) pathway, SPOP mutations emerge as a distinct oncogenic driver subclass. Both SPOP downregulation and mutation can lead to SPOP target stabilization promoting dysregulation of key regulatory pathways. CHD1 gene is commonly deleted in PCa. CHD1 loss significantly co-occurs with SPOP mutations, resulting in a PCa subclass with increased AR transcriptional activity and with a specific epigenetic pattern.

METHODS

In this study, SPOP alterations at mutational and protein levels and CHD1 copy number alterations have been analyzed and correlated with ERG and PTEN protein expression and with the clinical pathological features of the patients.

RESULTS

SPOP protein loss has been detected in 42.9% of the cases, and it has been strongly associated with PTEN protein loss (p < .001). CHD1 gene loss has been detected in 24.5% and SPOP mutations in 5.9% of the cases. Loss of CHD1 has been strongly associated with SPOP mutations (p = .003) and has shown a trend to be associated with ERG wt cancers (p = .08). The loss of SPOP protein (p = .01) and the combination of PTEN and SPOP protein loss (p = .002) were both statistically more common in grade group 5 cancers, with a prevalence of 60% and 37.5%, respectively. Furthermore, SPOP loss/PTEN loss and SPOP wt/PTEN loss phenotypes were strongly associated with extraprostatic perineural infiltration (p = .007). Strong CHD1 loss was associated with a shorter time to PSA recurrence in the univariate (p = .04), and showed a trend to be associated with the PSA recurrence risk in the multivariate analysis (p = .058).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that the loss of SPOP protein expression, either alone or in combination with loss of PTEN and, on the other hand, a marked loss of the CHD1 gene are very promising prognostic biomarkers in PCa.

Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of SPOP by LIMK2 promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

SPOP, an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor, can act either as a tumour suppressor or a tumour promoter. In prostate cancer (PCa), it inhibits tumorigenesis by degrading several oncogenic substrates. SPOP is the most altered gene in PCa (~15%), which renders it ineffective, promoting cancer. The remaining PCa tumours, which retain WT-SPOP, still progress to castration-resistant (CRPC) stage, indicating that other critical mechanisms exist for downregulating SPOP. SPOP is reduced in ~94% of WT-SPOP-bearing prostate tumours; however, no molecular mechanism is known for its downregulation.

METHODS

SPOP was identified as a direct target of LIMK2 using an innovative technique. The reciprocal relationship between SPOP and LIMK2 and its consequences on oncogenicity were analysed using a variety of biochemical assays. To probe this relationship in vivo, xenograft studies were conducted.

RESULTS

LIMK2 degrades SPOP by direct phosphorylation at three sites. SPOP promotes LIMK2's ubiquitylation, creating a feedback loop. SPOP's degradation stabilises AR, ARv7 and c-Myc promoting oncogenicity. Phospho-resistant SPOP completely suppresses tumorigenesis in vivo, indicating that LIMK2-mediated SPOP degradation is a key event in PCa progression.

CONCLUSIONS

While genomically altered SPOP-bearing tumours require gene therapy, uncovering LIMK2-SPOP relationship provides a powerful opportunity to retain WT-SPOP by inhibiting LIMK2, thereby halting disease progression.

The Genetic Complexity of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major concern in public health, with many genetically distinct subsets. Genomic alterations in PCa are extraordinarily complex, and both germline and somatic mutations are of great importance in the development of this tumor. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of genetic changes that can occur in the development of PCa and their role in potential therapeutic approaches. Various pathways and mechanisms proposed to play major roles in PCa are described in detail to provide an overview of current knowledge.

Molecular Interplay between AURKA and SPOP Dictates CRPC Pathogenesis via Androgen Receptor

SPOP, an adaptor protein for E3 ubiquitin ligase can function as a tumor-suppressor or a tumor-enhancer. In castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), it inhibits tumorigenesis by degrading many oncogenic targets, including androgen receptor (AR). Expectedly, SPOP is the most commonly mutated gene in CRPC (15%), which closely correlates with poor prognosis. Importantly, 85% of tumors that retain wild-type SPOP show reduced protein levels, indicating that SPOP downregulation is an essential step in CRPC progression. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains unknown. This study uncovered the first mechanism of SPOP regulation in any type of cancer. We identified SPOP as a direct substrate of Aurora A (AURKA) using an innovative technique. AURKA directly phosphorylates SPOP at three sites, causing its ubiquitylation. SPOP degradation drives highly aggressive oncogenic phenotypes in cells and in vivo including stabilizing AR, ARv7 and c-Myc. Further, SPOP degrades AURKA via a feedback loop. SPOP upregulation is one of the mechanisms by which enzalutamide exerts its efficacy. Consequently, phospho-resistant SPOP fully abrogates tumorigenesis and EMT in vivo, and renders CRPC cells sensitive to enzalutamide. While genomic mutations of SPOP can be treated with gene therapy, identification of AURKA as an upstream regulator of SPOP provides a powerful opportunity for retaining WT-SPOP in a vast majority of CRPC patients using AURKA inhibitors ± enzalutamide, thereby treating the disease and inhibiting its progression.

S119N Mutation of the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase SPOP Suppresses SLC7A1 Degradation to Regulate Hepatoblastoma Progression

A previous study on hepatoblastoma revealed novel mutations and cancer genes in the Wnt pathway and ubiquitin ligase complex, including the tumor suppressor speckle-type BTB/POZ (SPOP). Moreover, the SPOP gene affected cell growth, and its S119N mutation was identified as a loss-of-function mutation in hepatoblastoma. This study aimed to explore more functions and the potential mechanism of SPOP and its S119N mutation. The in vitro effects of SPOP on cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and in vivo tumor growth were investigated by western blot analysis, Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, and xenograft animal experiments. The substrate of SPOP was discovered by a protein quantification assay and quantitative ubiquitination modification assay. The present study further proved that SPOP functioned as an anti-oncogene through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway to affect various malignant biological behaviors of hepatoblastoma both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, experimental results also suggested that solute carrier family 7 member 1 (SLC7A1) might be a substrate of SPOP and influence cell phenotype by regulating arginine metabolism. In conclusion, these findings demonstrated the function of SPOP and revealed a potential substrate related to hepatoblastoma tumorigenesis, which might thus provide a novel therapeutic target for hepatoblastoma.